A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Article: The Way We Eat Now



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 21st, 2004, 09:33 PM
The Queen of Cans and Jars
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Article: The Way We Eat Now

interesting stuff.

http://www.harvard-magazine.com/on-line/050465.html
  #2  
Old May 23rd, 2004, 12:03 AM
Shawn & Michelle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Article: The Way We Eat Now

Wow - that really puts things into perspective! Sad for our
society, too.

Michelle

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" wrote in
message .. .
interesting stuff.

http://www.harvard-magazine.com/on-line/050465.html



  #3  
Old May 24th, 2004, 04:12 PM
jmk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Article: The Way We Eat Now

On 5/21/2004 4:33 PM, The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
interesting stuff.

http://www.harvard-magazine.com/on-line/050465.html


Nice article! Thanks for posting this link!

--
jmk in NC
  #4  
Old May 24th, 2004, 04:38 PM
Bob in CT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Article: The Way We Eat Now

On Mon, 24 May 2004 11:12:06 -0400, jmk wrote:

On 5/21/2004 4:33 PM, The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
interesting stuff.

http://www.harvard-magazine.com/on-line/050465.html


Nice article! Thanks for posting this link!


It is a good article, except for this:

"People tend to eat the same amount of bulk, no matter what the calories,"
says research fellow in cell biology Jennifer Sacheck of Harvard Medical
School. "They'll fill their plate with the same amount of food. So if the
foods are energy-dense, they take in more calories, but things that have a
lot of water, air, and fiber in them, like fruits and fresh vegetables,
fill you up more without the caloric load." Because fat, at nine calories
per gram, is the densest form of food energy we consume, it's much easier
to overeat on fat. Doing so tends to add body weight more readily, Sacheck
says, "because fat is more efficiently stored." (Storing 100 calories of
protein, for example, takes nearly twice as much energy as storing 100
calories of fat.)

I think this is bunk. Try it yourself -- eat 500 calories of pasta.
Gauge your appetite an hour later. The next day, at the same time after
having eatin the same thing as the previous day, eat 500 calories of fat.
Gauge your appetite an hour later. Try the same with protein. Report
back.

--
Bob in CT
Remove ".x" to reply
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NY Times Article issue continued This is cute Chris Taylor Jr Low Carbohydrate Diets 150 March 5th, 2004 06:08 AM
PCRM (anti-Atkins) Article in ATL Paper trebor4258 Low Carbohydrate Diets 4 March 4th, 2004 01:55 PM
The Business of Low Carb (recent articles) EmmaPeel Low Carbohydrate Diets 1 November 16th, 2003 01:30 AM
Link to and mini-review of semi-stupid Salon article on Atkins Adam Cole Low Carbohydrate Diets 0 October 30th, 2003 10:33 PM
Harvard study/CNN article bob Low Carbohydrate Diets 4 October 15th, 2003 03:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.