Atkins Died Obese, Confirmed By Mayor Bloomberg; Raises Rightful Suspicions About His "Accidental" Death

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

hiss

You poor guy. Reduced to only this.

Anything to help poor little overworked and overwrought Chung with his
snips and hisses. Big job for such a little guy. It's why I gave
him some easy hisses to delete. Looks like he took most of them out.
Good job. Spare him the trouble of actually thinking. Don't want to go
to his weaknesses.

A mere hissing shadow:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

LOL Chung grows more frantic by the hour. Slashing and deleting with
the frenzied abandon of a demented saber dancer. Cutting away the
offensive parts (read: the parts that show his deep failure personally
and professionally) of the sea of posts washing up on the shores of so
many NG's. Poor Chung. Hope that big orange wig and floppy shoes don't
slow him down. And how he can see around that big red, rubber nose is
nothing short of amazing.

One last one for the Chungster to trim. HISS

Bob

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

hiss

You poor guy. Reduced to only this.

hiss

A mere hissing shadow:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

hiss

You poor guy.

You remain in my prayers, neighbor.

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message.
Because the author of the message to which I am responding did not request
that the header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it. If you are upset about
reading this message, a few suggestions:

(1) Yell at Bob
(2) Report Bob to his ISP
(3) Killfile this thread.
(4) Killfile me.
(5) Read about free speech.

This discussion(s) is related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD) which is
described completely at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate the Usenet
discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary
and has been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation
has been entirely altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as
a Christian. Jesus freely gave of Himself to better the health of folks
He touched:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp

From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently
opposed to the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on
every perceived weakness of the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the
argument soundly at every point:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp

These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this
discussion thread(s).

However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the
argument(s), certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound
diet approach toward its author. The rationale appears to be "if you can
not discredit the message then try to discredit the messenger."

Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is
someone who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming
discussion value and with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars.

These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the
following observations were made:

(1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously.
(2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the
discussion(s).
(a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to
achieve near-ideal weight.
(b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their
weight becomes near-ideal.
(c) For (b) see: http://makeashorterlink.com/?V5D042C47
(3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s).
(4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).
(5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line
(including jpegs of the actual diplomas).

Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have
tried to attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were
attempting to libel him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the
hateful folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in
support of their fallen hero.

Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either
actively or as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are,
using the on-line third-party resources at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp

where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous
claims that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked.

Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the
anon posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack):

(1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or
accountability).
(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory
characters.
(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver
one-sided insults.
(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by
cross-posting.
(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD
or its author.

and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.

It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to
speed.

It will remain my pleasure to continue the discussion(s) about the 2PD
above the din of hissing from the peanut gallery.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

--
Who is the humblest person in the universe?

http://makeashorterlink.com/?L21532147

wrote:

The more you attack HIM the greater HIS strength will become.
It is the will.

I guess you went to the same schools as Chung. You can't read, either.=20
And you write like the script from Star Wars. It is the FORCE. Um, Luke.

I wasn't talking about HIM. I was talking about Chung. Trust me;=20
there's no HIM there. And I was actually attacking you and the other=20
socks. Good reading skills.

So in your words below, you were talking to Jesus? Or do you often=20
refer to frauds and quacks in all caps? Or is it as simple as=20
illiteracy? Could it include a soup=E7on of fanaticism? Maybe a little=20
spiritual generosity a la the Taliban like Chung?

Inquiring minds don't really want to know, in this case.

Bob

Bob wrote:
=20
wrote:

Thank you for you many kind responses to the number of ill informed=20
people who attack you. They walk in ignorance and have no future as =

they can not see the truth before their very eyes.

Ok. So Chung has admirers. I don't know which damages him more, you,=20
"John," Earboy, or Mu_dpie.

Bob

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

hiss

You poor guy. Reduced to only this.

hiss

A mere hissing shadow:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

hiss

LOL Poor exhausted Chung. The relentless hisses must be the reason
he's going round the bend and so frantically posting. Poor obsessed
Chung has top reply to *everything* with his macro (typing in a lot of
hisses individually). The true sign of a balanced mind. hiss

Hard to tell which are my hisses and which are Chung's hisses.
And, don't kid yourself, it's important to differentiate hisses.
Only Chung's hisses are going to heaven, you know. He has a clear
path to the top.

Wait till he actually gets there and finds out he screwed up and he's
got a very short visit in his future. He'll hiss his pants.

Bob hiss

I am not concerned about your inability to get the point.
I was referring to Dr. Chung.
He has the FORCE+1
If you don't understand that please refer to the books by Dr. L. Ron
Hubbard.

Bob wrote:

wrote:

The more you attack HIM the greater HIS strength will become.
It is the will.


I guess you went to the same schools as Chung. You can't read, either.
And you write like the script from Star Wars. It is the FORCE. Um, Luke.

I wasn't talking about HIM. I was talking about Chung. Trust me; there's
no HIM there. And I was actually attacking you and the other socks. Good
reading skills.

So in your words below, you were talking to Jesus? Or do you often refer
to frauds and quacks in all caps? Or is it as simple as illiteracy?
Could it include a soupçon of fanaticism? Maybe a little spiritual
generosity a la the Taliban like Chung?

Inquiring minds don't really want to know, in this case.

Bob

Bob wrote:

wrote:

Thank you for you many kind responses to the number of ill informed
people who attack you. They walk in ignorance and have no future as
they can not see the truth before their very eyes.


Ok. So Chung has admirers. I don't know which damages him more, you,
"John," Earboy, or Mu_dpie.

Bob

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

hiss

You poor guy. Reduced to only this.

hiss

A mere hissing shadow:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

hiss


LOL Poor exhausted Chung. The relentless hisses must be the reason
he's going round the bend and so frantically posting. Poor obsessed
Chung has top reply to *everything* with his macro (typing in a lot of
hisses individually). The true sign of a balanced mind. hiss

Hard to tell which are my hisses and which are Chung's hisses. And,
don't kid yourself, it's important to differentiate hisses. Only
Chung's hisses are going to heaven, you know. He has a clear path to
the top.

Wait till he actually gets there and finds out he screwed up and he's
got a very short visit in his future. He'll hiss his pants.

Bob ****

Bob wrote:

wrote:

The more you attack HIM the greater HIS strength will become.
It is the will.

hiss...sputter... hiss hiss

You poor guy.

You remain in my prayers, neighbor.

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message.
Because the author of the message to which I am responding did not request
that the header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it. If you are upset about
reading this message, a few suggestions:

(1) Yell at Bob
(2) Report Bob to his ISP
(3) Killfile this thread.
(4) Killfile me.
(5) Read about free speech.

This discussion(s) is related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD) which is
described completely at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate the Usenet
discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary
and has been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation
has been entirely altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as a
Christian. Jesus freely gave of Himself to better the health of folks He
touched:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp

From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently
opposed to the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on every
perceived weakness of the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the argument
soundly at every point:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp

These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this
discussion thread(s).

However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the argument(s),
certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound diet approach
toward its author. The rationale appears to be "if you can not discredit
the message then try to discredit the messenger."

Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is
someone who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming
discussion value and with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars.

These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the following
observations were made:

(1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously.
(2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the
discussion(s).
(a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to
achieve near-ideal weight.
(b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their
weight becomes near-ideal.
(c) For (b) see: http://makeashorterlink.com/?V5D042C47
(3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s).
(4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).
(5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line (including
jpegs of the actual diplomas).

Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have tried
to attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were
attempting to libel him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the
hateful folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in
support of their fallen hero.

Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either
actively or as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are,
using the on-line third-party resources at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp

where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous
claims that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked.

Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the
anon posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack):

(1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or
accountability).
(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory
characters.
(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver
one-sided insults.
(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by cross-posting.

(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD or
its author.

and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.

It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to speed.

It will remain my pleasure to continue the discussion(s) about the 2PD above
the din of hissing from the peanut gallery.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

--
Who is the humblest person in the universe?

http://makeashorterlink.com/?L21532147

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

hiss

You poor guy. Reduced to only this.

hiss

A mere hissing shadow:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

hiss

hiss

You poor guy.

You remain in my prayers, neighbor.

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message.
Because the author of the message to which I am responding did not request
that the header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it. If you are upset about
reading this message, a few suggestions:

(1) Yell at Bob
(2) Report Bob to his ISP
(3) Killfile this thread.
(4) Killfile me.
(5) Read about free speech.

This discussion(s) is related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD) which is
described completely at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate the Usenet
discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary
and has been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation
has been entirely altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as
a Christian. Jesus freely gave of Himself to better the health of folks
He touched:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp

From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently
opposed to the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on
every perceived weakness of the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the
argument soundly at every point:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp

These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this
discussion thread(s).

However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the
argument(s), certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound
diet approach toward its author. The rationale appears to be "if you can
not discredit the message then try to discredit the messenger."

Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is
someone who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming
discussion value and with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars.

These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the
following observations were made:

(1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously.
(2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the
discussion(s).
(a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to
achieve near-ideal weight.
(b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their
weight becomes near-ideal.
(c) For (b) see: http://makeashorterlink.com/?V5D042C47
(3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s).
(4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).
(5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line
(including jpegs of the actual diplomas).

Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have
tried to attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were
attempting to libel him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the
hateful folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in
support of their fallen hero.

Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either
actively or as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are,
using the on-line third-party resources at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp

where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous
claims that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked.

Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the
anon posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack):

(1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or
accountability).
(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory
characters.
(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver
one-sided insults.
(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by
cross-posting.
(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD
or its author.

and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.

It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to
speed.

It will remain my pleasure to continue the discussion(s) about the 2PD
above the din of hissing from the peanut gallery.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

--
Who is the humblest person in the universe?

http://makeashorterlink.com/?L21532147

wrote:

I am not concerned about your inability to get the point.

Yet, here you are.

I was referring to Dr. Chung.

With ALL CAPS. WHAT AN IMPORTANT GUY.

He has the FORCE+1

So does Yoda only he handles it better. And his sentences were more=20
coherent than Chung's.

If you don't understand that please refer to the books by Dr. L. Ron=20
Hubbard.

LOL

Right. The "religious scientific philosophy" propounded by a hack=20
science fiction writer. Oh, FYI, he's not a Dr. He's just a Mr.

Ask Chung if he wants to be lumped in with a different sort of wacko=20
than he already is.

You're a prize, Zippy. I really mean it.

Bob


Bob wrote:
=20
wrote:

The more you attack HIM the greater HIS strength will become.
It is the will.

I guess you went to the same schools as Chung. You can't read, either.=
=20
And you write like the script from Star Wars. It is the FORCE. Um, Luk=
e.

I wasn't talking about HIM. I was talking about Chung. Trust me;=20
there's no HIM there. And I was actually attacking you and the other=20
socks. Good reading skills.

So in your words below, you were talking to Jesus? Or do you often=20
refer to frauds and quacks in all caps? Or is it as simple as=20
illiteracy? Could it include a soup=E7on of fanaticism? Maybe a little=
=20
spiritual generosity a la the Taliban like Chung?

Inquiring minds don't really want to know, in this case.

Bob

Bob wrote:

wrote:

Thank you for you many kind responses to the number of ill informed=
=20
people who attack you. They walk in ignorance and have no future=20
as they can not see the truth before their very eyes.

Ok. So Chung has admirers. I don't know which damages him more, you,=
=20
"John," Earboy, or Mu_dpie.

Bob

wrote:

With your change of a single letter, you've defined yourself as no one
else could.

All the way down to the last line. How classy. We're done now.

Bob

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

hiss

You poor guy. Reduced to only this.

hiss

A mere hissing shadow:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

hiss

LOL Poor exhausted Chung. The relentless hisses must be the reason
he's going round the bend and so frantically posting. Poor obsessed
Chung has top reply to *everything* with his macro (typing in a lot of
hisses individually). The true sign of a balanced mind. hiss

Hard to tell which are my hisses and which are Chung's hisses.
And, don't kid yourself, it's important to differentiate hisses.
Only Chung's hisses are going to heaven, you know. He has a clear
path to the top.

Wait till he actually gets there and finds out he screwed up and he's
got a very short visit in his future. He'll hiss his pants.

Bob ****