A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

40% Fat?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 17th, 2005, 12:31 AM
Andrew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 40% Fat?

I just read that the standard American diet is about 40% fat, but how
do they consume so much fat!?!? Even if you ate a lot of red meat and
dairy products which can be about 50% fat, there's just no way. And
certainly nobody uses a s***load of cooking oils. I'm very confused
about that.

  #2  
Old May 17th, 2005, 05:10 AM
Andrew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ok. Nobody makes meat their staple food, certainly not anyone sensable.
There's just no way you would eat a pound of meat and still enjoy it.
And besides very few meat has more than 60% calories in fat. 40% is
very high in fat ... you could still eat a lot of meat and achieve
lower than that ... It seems Americans are drinking oil!

  #3  
Old May 17th, 2005, 06:36 AM
Jim Bard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew" wrote in message
ups.com...
Ok. Nobody makes meat their staple food, certainly not anyone sensable.
There's just no way you would eat a pound of meat and still enjoy it.
And besides very few meat has more than 60% calories in fat. 40% is
very high in fat ... you could still eat a lot of meat and achieve
lower than that ... It seems Americans are drinking oil!


Listed percentages of fat content on meat is by weight, not calories. But a
gram of fat is 9 calories, while a gram of protein is 4 calories. Hence the
difference.


  #4  
Old May 17th, 2005, 07:17 AM
joanne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Andrew wrote:
I just read that the standard American diet is about 40% fat, but how
do they consume so much fat!?!? Even if you ate a lot of red meat and
dairy products which can be about 50% fat, there's just no way. And
certainly nobody uses a s***load of cooking oils. I'm very confused
about that.


There are a couple of ways Americans over consume fat. One big one is
in eating fastfoods. At this website you can do a search of say
sandwiches/fat content per grams/from higher to lower and get a Hardees
Bacon Double Cheeseburger with 96grams of fat! When you consider that
most people eat maybe 20-30grams of fat for a whole DAY, its way too
much in one sitting. http://www.foodfacts.info/index.shtml
Then another place fats are overeaten is of course in
desserts(icecream, cakes cookies, etc) and of course chocolate candies.
Hellooooo butter is a fat, its not just red meat or cooking oils!
Then there is snack foods like chips, nachos, etc and mayo and CHEESE!
OMG! no wonder we overeat fats! Its everywhere in everything -
processed that is. Now if only we ate more vegetables and fruits ...


joanne

  #5  
Old May 17th, 2005, 01:14 PM
Beverly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Ignoramus21310 wrote:
On 16 May 2005 21:10:08 -0700, Andrew wrote:
Ok. Nobody makes meat their staple food, certainly not anyone

sensable.
There's just no way you would eat a pound of meat and still enjoy

it.

I suppose that 154 bananas are easier to eat.

And besides very few meat has more than 60% calories in fat. 40% is
very high in fat ... you could still eat a lot of meat and achieve
lower than that ... It seems Americans are drinking oil!


you may want to actually check out calorie content of, say, short

ribs
trimmed to 1/4" fat. 100 grams contains 383 calories, 288 of them
coming from fat. Most of the fat in short ribs is not "saturated",
contrary to popular beliefs. Very tasty stuff and easy to cook. A
store near us sells them for $1.99 per lb.

--
223/174.8/180


According to www.nutritiondata.com short ribs is one of the beef
varieites highest in saturated fat. There are much better selections
of beef that contain less saturated fats. Most diets recommend
limiting saturated fats. It's probably better all around if someone
chooses to consume healthier fats and avoid saturated fats.

http://www.nutritiondata.com/foods-0...000000000.html

  #6  
Old May 17th, 2005, 01:43 PM
Nunya B.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Beverly" wrote in message
ups.com...

Ignoramus21310 wrote:
On 16 May 2005 21:10:08 -0700, Andrew wrote:
Ok. Nobody makes meat their staple food, certainly not anyone

sensable.
There's just no way you would eat a pound of meat and still enjoy

it.

I suppose that 154 bananas are easier to eat.

And besides very few meat has more than 60% calories in fat. 40% is
very high in fat ... you could still eat a lot of meat and achieve
lower than that ... It seems Americans are drinking oil!


you may want to actually check out calorie content of, say, short

ribs
trimmed to 1/4" fat. 100 grams contains 383 calories, 288 of them
coming from fat. Most of the fat in short ribs is not "saturated",
contrary to popular beliefs. Very tasty stuff and easy to cook. A
store near us sells them for $1.99 per lb.

--
223/174.8/180


According to www.nutritiondata.com short ribs is one of the beef
varieites highest in saturated fat. There are much better selections
of beef that contain less saturated fats. Most diets recommend
limiting saturated fats. It's probably better all around if someone
chooses to consume healthier fats and avoid saturated fats.

http://www.nutritiondata.com/foods-0...000000000.html


Not only that, but most red meats like that are the primary source of
saturated fat in a typical diet. Just because there are other kinds of fat
in it, even if it is a higher amount, doesn't make it good for you. It's
just another way of distorting the facts to mask the truth - typical of
this poster.

Very recent studies are showing that it's not always the saturated fat but
where it's coming from and what you eat with it that makes it less healthy.
Yesterday a new study came out that showed low fat diets help prevent
recurrence of breast cancer. But hey, if people want to load up on their
fat they should feel free - just don't whine when the pounds start coming on
or when worse things happen down the road.
--
the volleyballchick


  #7  
Old May 17th, 2005, 02:25 PM
Beverly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Nunya B. wrote:
"Beverly" wrote in message
ups.com...

Ignoramus21310 wrote:
On 16 May 2005 21:10:08 -0700, Andrew

wrote:
Ok. Nobody makes meat their staple food, certainly not anyone

sensable.
There's just no way you would eat a pound of meat and still

enjoy
it.

I suppose that 154 bananas are easier to eat.

And besides very few meat has more than 60% calories in fat. 40%

is
very high in fat ... you could still eat a lot of meat and

achieve
lower than that ... It seems Americans are drinking oil!


you may want to actually check out calorie content of, say, short

ribs
trimmed to 1/4" fat. 100 grams contains 383 calories, 288 of them
coming from fat. Most of the fat in short ribs is not "saturated",
contrary to popular beliefs. Very tasty stuff and easy to cook. A
store near us sells them for $1.99 per lb.

--
223/174.8/180


According to www.nutritiondata.com short ribs is one of the beef
varieites highest in saturated fat. There are much better

selections
of beef that contain less saturated fats. Most diets recommend
limiting saturated fats. It's probably better all around if

someone
chooses to consume healthier fats and avoid saturated fats.

http://www.nutritiondata.com/foods-0...000000000.html


Not only that, but most red meats like that are the primary source of


saturated fat in a typical diet. Just because there are other kinds

of fat
in it, even if it is a higher amount, doesn't make it good for you.

It's
just another way of distorting the facts to mask the truth - typical

of
this poster.

Very recent studies are showing that it's not always the saturated

fat but
where it's coming from and what you eat with it that makes it less

healthy.
Yesterday a new study came out that showed low fat diets help prevent


recurrence of breast cancer. But hey, if people want to load up on

their
fat they should feel free - just don't whine when the pounds start

coming on
or when worse things happen down the road.
--
the volleyballchick


I saw the article on low-fat diets helping to prevent the recurrence of
breast cancer. I wondered if avoiding fat would also help to reduce
the risk of developing breast cancer and not just in preventing it's
recurrence? Breast cancer has hit several women on my father's side of
the family. My aunt has been a breast cancer survivor for several
years and I know she drastically changed her diet afterward. She also
added exercise. She's now in her early 70's and looks and feels great.


I also heard a report recently that indicated the fatty area of meat is
where they find the highest concentration of additives such as
antibiotics, etc from the animal's diet.

Beverly

  #8  
Old May 17th, 2005, 02:42 PM
Matthew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Ignoramus21310 wrote in message
...

you may want to actually check out calorie content of, say, short

ribs
trimmed to 1/4" fat. 100 grams contains 383 calories, 288 of them
coming from fat. Most of the fat in short ribs is not "saturated",
contrary to popular beliefs. Very tasty stuff and easy to cook. A
store near us sells them for $1.99 per lb.

The ratio of unsaturated:saturated fat in short ribs is roughly close
to 1:1. The AHA--among other organizations--recommends a ratio closer
to 2:1. But even then, ratios are not the whole story. If I choose 100
grams of eye of round trimmed of all fat I would get only 5 grams of
fat compared to the 30+ grams in short ribs.

Matthew

  #9  
Old May 17th, 2005, 02:52 PM
Matthew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Beverly wrote in message
oups.com...


I saw the article on low-fat diets helping to prevent the recurrence

of
breast cancer. I wondered if avoiding fat would also help to reduce
the risk of developing breast cancer and not just in preventing it's
recurrence?


http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...June/ai_863875
65

Matthew

  #10  
Old May 17th, 2005, 03:05 PM
Beverly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Matthew wrote:
Ignoramus21310 wrote in message
...

you may want to actually check out calorie content of, say, short

ribs
trimmed to 1/4" fat. 100 grams contains 383 calories, 288 of them
coming from fat. Most of the fat in short ribs is not "saturated",
contrary to popular beliefs. Very tasty stuff and easy to cook. A
store near us sells them for $1.99 per lb.

The ratio of unsaturated:saturated fat in short ribs is roughly close
to 1:1. The AHA--among other organizations--recommends a ratio closer
to 2:1. But even then, ratios are not the whole story. If I choose

100
grams of eye of round trimmed of all fat I would get only 5 grams of
fat compared to the 30+ grams in short ribs.

Matthew


Eye of round is a much better choice. I don't eat a lot of beef but I
do buy eye of round when I want to fix a steak of the grill. I prefer
fish more than beef. Of course we have to consider the risk of mercury
in fish I'm beginning to wonder about our food sources. We hear
almost daily about health hazards from our food sources. Guess I'll
just pick the lowest risk items.

I couldn't find the recent article on additives in beef but here's an
older one. It indicates many of the harmful additives are concentrated
in the fat area.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...ct/ai_78900860


Beverly

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.