If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
40% Fat?
I just read that the standard American diet is about 40% fat, but how
do they consume so much fat!?!? Even if you ate a lot of red meat and dairy products which can be about 50% fat, there's just no way. And certainly nobody uses a s***load of cooking oils. I'm very confused about that. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ok. Nobody makes meat their staple food, certainly not anyone sensable.
There's just no way you would eat a pound of meat and still enjoy it. And besides very few meat has more than 60% calories in fat. 40% is very high in fat ... you could still eat a lot of meat and achieve lower than that ... It seems Americans are drinking oil! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Andrew" wrote in message ups.com... Ok. Nobody makes meat their staple food, certainly not anyone sensable. There's just no way you would eat a pound of meat and still enjoy it. And besides very few meat has more than 60% calories in fat. 40% is very high in fat ... you could still eat a lot of meat and achieve lower than that ... It seems Americans are drinking oil! Listed percentages of fat content on meat is by weight, not calories. But a gram of fat is 9 calories, while a gram of protein is 4 calories. Hence the difference. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew wrote: I just read that the standard American diet is about 40% fat, but how do they consume so much fat!?!? Even if you ate a lot of red meat and dairy products which can be about 50% fat, there's just no way. And certainly nobody uses a s***load of cooking oils. I'm very confused about that. There are a couple of ways Americans over consume fat. One big one is in eating fastfoods. At this website you can do a search of say sandwiches/fat content per grams/from higher to lower and get a Hardees Bacon Double Cheeseburger with 96grams of fat! When you consider that most people eat maybe 20-30grams of fat for a whole DAY, its way too much in one sitting. http://www.foodfacts.info/index.shtml Then another place fats are overeaten is of course in desserts(icecream, cakes cookies, etc) and of course chocolate candies. Hellooooo butter is a fat, its not just red meat or cooking oils! Then there is snack foods like chips, nachos, etc and mayo and CHEESE! OMG! no wonder we overeat fats! Its everywhere in everything - processed that is. Now if only we ate more vegetables and fruits ... joanne |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ignoramus21310 wrote: On 16 May 2005 21:10:08 -0700, Andrew wrote: Ok. Nobody makes meat their staple food, certainly not anyone sensable. There's just no way you would eat a pound of meat and still enjoy it. I suppose that 154 bananas are easier to eat. And besides very few meat has more than 60% calories in fat. 40% is very high in fat ... you could still eat a lot of meat and achieve lower than that ... It seems Americans are drinking oil! you may want to actually check out calorie content of, say, short ribs trimmed to 1/4" fat. 100 grams contains 383 calories, 288 of them coming from fat. Most of the fat in short ribs is not "saturated", contrary to popular beliefs. Very tasty stuff and easy to cook. A store near us sells them for $1.99 per lb. -- 223/174.8/180 According to www.nutritiondata.com short ribs is one of the beef varieites highest in saturated fat. There are much better selections of beef that contain less saturated fats. Most diets recommend limiting saturated fats. It's probably better all around if someone chooses to consume healthier fats and avoid saturated fats. http://www.nutritiondata.com/foods-0...000000000.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Beverly" wrote in message ups.com... Ignoramus21310 wrote: On 16 May 2005 21:10:08 -0700, Andrew wrote: Ok. Nobody makes meat their staple food, certainly not anyone sensable. There's just no way you would eat a pound of meat and still enjoy it. I suppose that 154 bananas are easier to eat. And besides very few meat has more than 60% calories in fat. 40% is very high in fat ... you could still eat a lot of meat and achieve lower than that ... It seems Americans are drinking oil! you may want to actually check out calorie content of, say, short ribs trimmed to 1/4" fat. 100 grams contains 383 calories, 288 of them coming from fat. Most of the fat in short ribs is not "saturated", contrary to popular beliefs. Very tasty stuff and easy to cook. A store near us sells them for $1.99 per lb. -- 223/174.8/180 According to www.nutritiondata.com short ribs is one of the beef varieites highest in saturated fat. There are much better selections of beef that contain less saturated fats. Most diets recommend limiting saturated fats. It's probably better all around if someone chooses to consume healthier fats and avoid saturated fats. http://www.nutritiondata.com/foods-0...000000000.html Not only that, but most red meats like that are the primary source of saturated fat in a typical diet. Just because there are other kinds of fat in it, even if it is a higher amount, doesn't make it good for you. It's just another way of distorting the facts to mask the truth - typical of this poster. Very recent studies are showing that it's not always the saturated fat but where it's coming from and what you eat with it that makes it less healthy. Yesterday a new study came out that showed low fat diets help prevent recurrence of breast cancer. But hey, if people want to load up on their fat they should feel free - just don't whine when the pounds start coming on or when worse things happen down the road. -- the volleyballchick |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Nunya B. wrote: "Beverly" wrote in message ups.com... Ignoramus21310 wrote: On 16 May 2005 21:10:08 -0700, Andrew wrote: Ok. Nobody makes meat their staple food, certainly not anyone sensable. There's just no way you would eat a pound of meat and still enjoy it. I suppose that 154 bananas are easier to eat. And besides very few meat has more than 60% calories in fat. 40% is very high in fat ... you could still eat a lot of meat and achieve lower than that ... It seems Americans are drinking oil! you may want to actually check out calorie content of, say, short ribs trimmed to 1/4" fat. 100 grams contains 383 calories, 288 of them coming from fat. Most of the fat in short ribs is not "saturated", contrary to popular beliefs. Very tasty stuff and easy to cook. A store near us sells them for $1.99 per lb. -- 223/174.8/180 According to www.nutritiondata.com short ribs is one of the beef varieites highest in saturated fat. There are much better selections of beef that contain less saturated fats. Most diets recommend limiting saturated fats. It's probably better all around if someone chooses to consume healthier fats and avoid saturated fats. http://www.nutritiondata.com/foods-0...000000000.html Not only that, but most red meats like that are the primary source of saturated fat in a typical diet. Just because there are other kinds of fat in it, even if it is a higher amount, doesn't make it good for you. It's just another way of distorting the facts to mask the truth - typical of this poster. Very recent studies are showing that it's not always the saturated fat but where it's coming from and what you eat with it that makes it less healthy. Yesterday a new study came out that showed low fat diets help prevent recurrence of breast cancer. But hey, if people want to load up on their fat they should feel free - just don't whine when the pounds start coming on or when worse things happen down the road. -- the volleyballchick I saw the article on low-fat diets helping to prevent the recurrence of breast cancer. I wondered if avoiding fat would also help to reduce the risk of developing breast cancer and not just in preventing it's recurrence? Breast cancer has hit several women on my father's side of the family. My aunt has been a breast cancer survivor for several years and I know she drastically changed her diet afterward. She also added exercise. She's now in her early 70's and looks and feels great. I also heard a report recently that indicated the fatty area of meat is where they find the highest concentration of additives such as antibiotics, etc from the animal's diet. Beverly |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Ignoramus21310 wrote in message ... you may want to actually check out calorie content of, say, short ribs trimmed to 1/4" fat. 100 grams contains 383 calories, 288 of them coming from fat. Most of the fat in short ribs is not "saturated", contrary to popular beliefs. Very tasty stuff and easy to cook. A store near us sells them for $1.99 per lb. The ratio of unsaturated:saturated fat in short ribs is roughly close to 1:1. The AHA--among other organizations--recommends a ratio closer to 2:1. But even then, ratios are not the whole story. If I choose 100 grams of eye of round trimmed of all fat I would get only 5 grams of fat compared to the 30+ grams in short ribs. Matthew |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Beverly wrote in message oups.com... I saw the article on low-fat diets helping to prevent the recurrence of breast cancer. I wondered if avoiding fat would also help to reduce the risk of developing breast cancer and not just in preventing it's recurrence? http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...June/ai_863875 65 Matthew |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Matthew wrote: Ignoramus21310 wrote in message ... you may want to actually check out calorie content of, say, short ribs trimmed to 1/4" fat. 100 grams contains 383 calories, 288 of them coming from fat. Most of the fat in short ribs is not "saturated", contrary to popular beliefs. Very tasty stuff and easy to cook. A store near us sells them for $1.99 per lb. The ratio of unsaturated:saturated fat in short ribs is roughly close to 1:1. The AHA--among other organizations--recommends a ratio closer to 2:1. But even then, ratios are not the whole story. If I choose 100 grams of eye of round trimmed of all fat I would get only 5 grams of fat compared to the 30+ grams in short ribs. Matthew Eye of round is a much better choice. I don't eat a lot of beef but I do buy eye of round when I want to fix a steak of the grill. I prefer fish more than beef. Of course we have to consider the risk of mercury in fish I'm beginning to wonder about our food sources. We hear almost daily about health hazards from our food sources. Guess I'll just pick the lowest risk items. I couldn't find the recent article on additives in beef but here's an older one. It indicates many of the harmful additives are concentrated in the fat area. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...ct/ai_78900860 Beverly |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|