If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The 2PD-OMER Approach for permanent weight loss
Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp
It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the 2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones. Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the "omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing this is "the two pedomer approach." At His service, Andrew -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist ** Suggested Reading: (1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 (2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A (3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A (4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A (5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A (6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A (7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the 2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones. LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support." And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot. Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the "omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing this is "the two pedomer approach." Hahahahahahahahahaha... Now it's also an acronym. Too, too funny. This house built on intellectual sand has just had a second storey added. Oh, sure. That'll make it stronger. Probably the negative testimonials will help hold it up for the 90,000 people doing it with not one dropout. Maybe Mel Gibson will make a movie about it. Guy with a lab coat crucifies himself by nailing his hyper-inflated ego to the wall of absurdity. Maybe get Jim Carrey to play Chung. Or Ronald McDonald. LOL Bob |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob (this one)" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the 2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones. LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support." And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot. Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the "omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing this is "the two pedomer approach." hiss sputter hiss hiss Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you. You will remain in my prayers, dear Bob, whom I love, in Lord Christ's holy name. May you accept Him as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that you too will have eternal life and the unimaginable riches of His infinite kingdom. Here's how: http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129 Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the 2 arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of the Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and the 2PD Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make His presence known here on Usenet :-) Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16 oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is what "omer" literally means in Hebrew. Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach: http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp At His service, Andrew -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist ** Suggested Reading: (1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 (2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A (3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A (4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A (5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A (6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A (7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Bob (this one)" wrote: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the 2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones. LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support." And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot. Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the "omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing this is "the two pedomer approach." hiss sputter hiss hiss Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you. Actually, it looks like the bother is all Chung's. Poor guy's running around hissing and sputtering in the sheer frustration of having his insistent wackiness spotlighted. Changing what people have actually posted. Deleting the parts that crush his fraudulent assertions. Says he writes honestly. Bwah... LOL The two pedometer approach, I'd say. One for the feet walking and one for the feet in the mouth. Poor, poor Chung... Bob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob (this one)" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: "Bob (this one)" wrote: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the 2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones. LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support." And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot. Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the "omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing this is "the two pedomer approach." hiss sputter hiss hiss Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you. Actually, it looks like the bother is all Chung's. Poor guy's running around hissing and sputtering in the sheer frustration of having his insistent wackiness spotlighted. Changing what people have actually posted. Deleting the parts that crush his fraudulent assertions. Says he writes honestly. Bwah... LOL The two pedometer approach, I'd say. One for the feet walking and one for the feet in the mouth. Poor, poor Chung... Bob Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5: 11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you. You will remain in my prayers, dear Bob, whom I love, in Lord Christ's holy name. May you accept Him as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that you too will have eternal life and the unimaginable riches of His everlasting kingdom. Here's how: http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129 Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the 2 arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of the Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and the 2PD Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make His presence known here on Usenet :-) Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16 oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is what "omer" literally means in Hebrew. Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach: http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp At His service, Andrew -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist ** Suggested Reading: (1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 (2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A (3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A (4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A (5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A (6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A (7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Bob (this one)" wrote: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: "Bob (this one)" wrote: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the 2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones. LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support." And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot. Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the "omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing this is "the two pedomer approach." hiss sputter hiss hiss Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you. Actually, it looks like the bother is all Chung's. Poor guy's running around hissing and sputtering in the sheer frustration of having his insistent wackiness spotlighted. Changing what people have actually posted. Deleting the parts that crush his fraudulent assertions. Says he writes honestly. Bwah... LOL The two pedometer approach, I'd say. One for the feet walking and one for the feet in the mouth. Poor, poor Chung... Bob Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5: 11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you. Chung has already seen the dissection of this passage to his deadly detriment. He's like Goebbels. Repeat the lie often enough, repeat the slanted propaganda often enough, repeat the self-excusing rationale often enough and it becomes Chung's "truth." He fabricates his own image and sadly, it's pure fabrication. NOw it looks like he's edging toward considering himself a prophet. Bwah... Chung has re-re-re-reposted this quotation in reply to several rational people, to contrast with him. Shame he doesn't seem to understand it. Notice the word "falsely" in there? When the bad news is the truth, that part falls away. And when the part about "because of me" is scrutinized, then Chung is simply a big loser. Bob |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob (this one)" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: snip Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5: 11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you. Chung has already seen the dissection of this passage to his deadly detriment. He's like Goebbels. Repeat the lie often enough, repeat the slanted propaganda often enough, repeat the self-excusing rationale often enough and it becomes Chung's "truth." He fabricates his own image and sadly, it's pure fabrication. NOw it looks like he's edging toward considering himself a prophet. Bwah... Chung has re-re-re-reposted this quotation in reply to several rational people, to contrast with him. Shame he doesn't seem to understand it. Notice the word "falsely" in there? When the bad news is the truth, that part falls away. And when the part about "because of me" is scrutinized, then Chung is simply a big loser. Bob You seem to have forgotten about Whom I have chosen to serve. At His service, Andrew -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist ** Suggested Reading: (1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 (2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A (3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A (4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A (5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A (6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A (7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Bob (this one)" wrote: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: snip Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5: 11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you. Chung has already seen the dissection of this passage to his deadly detriment. He's like Goebbels. Repeat the lie often enough, repeat the slanted propaganda often enough, repeat the self-excusing rationale often enough and it becomes Chung's "truth." He fabricates his own image and sadly, it's pure fabrication. NOw it looks like he's edging toward considering himself a prophet. Bwah... Chung has re-re-re-reposted this quotation in reply to several rational people, to contrast with him. Shame he doesn't seem to understand it. Notice the word "falsely" in there? When the bad news is the truth, that part falls away. And when the part about "because of me" is scrutinized, then Chung is simply a big loser. Bob You seem to have forgotten about Whom I have chosen to serve. Nah. Your ego gallops all over your posts. Your limitless capacity for self-aggrandizement defines your crippled vision and your obsessive impulsions. You serve yourself. You seem to not grasp the essence of what "serve" means. I'll help out here and tell you what it isn't: * It isn't deliberately trying to harm people in real life. * It isn't refusing to admit error after having it shown to you. * It isn't telling people that they're blessed or not. * It isn't claiming "truth discernment" when it's obvious you can't. * It isn't acting the malicious fool and claiming that people condemn you for your Christianity when it's your actions that shape your image. Your belligerent insistence of absolute and infallible correctness is the surest sign of the blind fool. Your efforts to impugn anyone who is critical of your charade show you to be ego-bound. If you truly served, you would invite people to partake of the wisdom of Jesus. Instead you justify your viciousness by citing the example of Jesus showing anger on the temple steps - and thereby forgiving your self for rather serious transgressions - rather than the loving ones. You pervert the meanings of biblical passages - say nasty things and claim it's being "salty" as in the "salt of the earth" - to justify your mean-spiritedness, after the fact. The best recent example is your whole business of the omer and what fantasy you've imbued it with. You've asserted it's about 2 pounds because that's enough food for anyone to live on. Apparently God disagrees with you because an omer is actually a measure of volume, not weight, and it's 3.7 liters according to reliable sources. Whom do you serve...? No one with a generous spirit. No one with a kind vision. No one with a sense of justice. No one with a need for truth. Sad, sad, sad... Bob |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
It seems that you have relapsed into your old obsessions about the
2PD-OMER Approach. You will remain in my prayers, dear Bob, whom I love, in Christ's name. May you accept Him as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that you too will have eternal life and the limitlessly interesting riches of His everlasting kingdom. Here's how: http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129 Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the 2 arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of the Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and the 2PD Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make His presence known here on Usenet :-) Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16 oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is what "omer" literally means in Hebrew. Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach: http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp At His service, Andrew -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist ** Suggested Reading: (1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 (2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A (3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A (4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A (5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A (6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A (7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129 "Bob (this one)" wrote: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: "Bob (this one)" wrote: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: snip Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5: 11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you. Chung has already seen the dissection of this passage to his deadly detriment. He's like Goebbels. Repeat the lie often enough, repeat the slanted propaganda often enough, repeat the self-excusing rationale often enough and it becomes Chung's "truth." He fabricates his own image and sadly, it's pure fabrication. NOw it looks like he's edging toward considering himself a prophet. Bwah... Chung has re-re-re-reposted this quotation in reply to several rational people, to contrast with him. Shame he doesn't seem to understand it. Notice the word "falsely" in there? When the bad news is the truth, that part falls away. And when the part about "because of me" is scrutinized, then Chung is simply a big loser. Bob You seem to have forgotten about Whom I have chosen to serve. Nah. Your ego gallops all over your posts. Your limitless capacity for self-aggrandizement defines your crippled vision and your obsessive impulsions. You serve yourself. You seem to not grasp the essence of what "serve" means. I'll help out here and tell you what it isn't: * It isn't deliberately trying to harm people in real life. * It isn't refusing to admit error after having it shown to you. * It isn't telling people that they're blessed or not. * It isn't claiming "truth discernment" when it's obvious you can't. * It isn't acting the malicious fool and claiming that people condemn you for your Christianity when it's your actions that shape your image. Your belligerent insistence of absolute and infallible correctness is the surest sign of the blind fool. Your efforts to impugn anyone who is critical of your charade show you to be ego-bound. If you truly served, you would invite people to partake of the wisdom of Jesus. Instead you justify your viciousness by citing the example of Jesus showing anger on the temple steps - and thereby forgiving your self for rather serious transgressions - rather than the loving ones. You pervert the meanings of biblical passages - say nasty things and claim it's being "salty" as in the "salt of the earth" - to justify your mean-spiritedness, after the fact. The best recent example is your whole business of the omer and what fantasy you've imbued it with. You've asserted it's about 2 pounds because that's enough food for anyone to live on. Apparently God disagrees with you because an omer is actually a measure of volume, not weight, and it's 3.7 liters according to reliable sources. Whom do you serve...? No one with a generous spirit. No one with a kind vision. No one with a sense of justice. No one with a need for truth. Sad, sad, sad... Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adherene to, not type of diet important for fat loss ( 4 popular diets compared ) | [email protected] | General Discussion | 5 | January 5th, 2005 06:57 PM |
FA: Elizabeth Taylor on -- Weight Gain, Weight Loss, Self-Image, and Self-Esteem | Lee Sun | Low Calorie | 2 | September 11th, 2004 11:29 PM |
Massive challenge summary - weight challenges | Amberle3 | Weightwatchers | 3 | July 24th, 2004 03:01 PM |
Atkins Refresher - From Atkins Online Support | Ropingirl | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 1 | December 18th, 2003 08:10 PM |
Intentional weight loss: patterns in the general population and its association with morbidity and mortality. | NR | General Discussion | 2 | November 12th, 2003 11:51 AM |