A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

When FAT Attacks



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old August 18th, 2004, 09:58 PM
Bob in CT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:20:10 GMT, nimue wrote:

Bob in CT wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:35:14 -0400, Roger Zoul
wrote:

Bob in CT wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:17:36 -0400, Roger Zoul
wrote:

Bob in CT wrote:
is the headline in Newsweek. It provides a good description of
research into fat cells. Supposedly, fat cells release
inflammatory compounds, which is why an apple shape is worse
than a pear shape ("visceral" fat releases more inflammatory
compounds). Dang genetics!


I can't seem to figure out what is meant by an apple shape.



They have a picture. If you gain weight in your legs, you're a
pear; if you gain weight around your waist (me), you're an apple.
I don't see too many pears. For me, I have almost no weight
around my legs (I can see individual quad muscles), but I'm still
at least 30 pounds overweight, all on my stomach.

What if you gain weight everywhere, like me? Am I a hybrid
apple/pear?



Interesting. Maybe. I wonder if there is a "hybrid" body type? I
know that my first girlfriend was definitely an apple -- when she
gained weight, it was all in her legs.


That's a pear. Think how a pear looks -- think of the female figure --
got
it?


I know, I know. It was a slip, by Freud.

--
Bob in CT
Remove ".x" to reply
  #32  
Old August 18th, 2004, 09:58 PM
Bob in CT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:20:10 GMT, nimue wrote:

Bob in CT wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:35:14 -0400, Roger Zoul
wrote:

Bob in CT wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:17:36 -0400, Roger Zoul
wrote:

Bob in CT wrote:
is the headline in Newsweek. It provides a good description of
research into fat cells. Supposedly, fat cells release
inflammatory compounds, which is why an apple shape is worse
than a pear shape ("visceral" fat releases more inflammatory
compounds). Dang genetics!


I can't seem to figure out what is meant by an apple shape.



They have a picture. If you gain weight in your legs, you're a
pear; if you gain weight around your waist (me), you're an apple.
I don't see too many pears. For me, I have almost no weight
around my legs (I can see individual quad muscles), but I'm still
at least 30 pounds overweight, all on my stomach.

What if you gain weight everywhere, like me? Am I a hybrid
apple/pear?



Interesting. Maybe. I wonder if there is a "hybrid" body type? I
know that my first girlfriend was definitely an apple -- when she
gained weight, it was all in her legs.


That's a pear. Think how a pear looks -- think of the female figure --
got
it?


I know, I know. It was a slip, by Freud.

--
Bob in CT
Remove ".x" to reply
  #36  
Old August 20th, 2004, 05:59 PM
Martha Gallagher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Bob in CT wrote:

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:17:36 -0400, Roger Zoul
wrote:

Bob in CT wrote:
:: is the headline in Newsweek. It provides a good description of
:: research into fat cells. Supposedly, fat cells release inflammatory
:: compounds, which is why an apple shape is worse than a pear shape
:: ("visceral" fat releases more inflammatory compounds). Dang
:: genetics!
::

I can't seem to figure out what is meant by an apple shape.



They have a picture. If you gain weight in your legs, you're a pear; if
you gain weight around your waist (me), you're an apple. I don't see too
many pears. For me, I have almost no weight around my legs (I can see


Women are more likely to be pear shaped. At least pre-menopausal women,
are. Women who gain weight later in life seem to be more likely to go for
the apple shape (and, of course, IR and diabetic women).

individual quad muscles), but I'm still at least 30 pounds overweight, all
on my stomach.


I can get absolutely bony on my top half, but, short of surgical
intervention, my thighs are always going to have some jiggle to 'em.

Martha


--
"ALPO is 99 cents a can. That's over SEVEN dog dollars!!"
Revek - ASDLC

  #37  
Old August 20th, 2004, 05:59 PM
Martha Gallagher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Bob in CT wrote:

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:17:36 -0400, Roger Zoul
wrote:

Bob in CT wrote:
:: is the headline in Newsweek. It provides a good description of
:: research into fat cells. Supposedly, fat cells release inflammatory
:: compounds, which is why an apple shape is worse than a pear shape
:: ("visceral" fat releases more inflammatory compounds). Dang
:: genetics!
::

I can't seem to figure out what is meant by an apple shape.



They have a picture. If you gain weight in your legs, you're a pear; if
you gain weight around your waist (me), you're an apple. I don't see too
many pears. For me, I have almost no weight around my legs (I can see


Women are more likely to be pear shaped. At least pre-menopausal women,
are. Women who gain weight later in life seem to be more likely to go for
the apple shape (and, of course, IR and diabetic women).

individual quad muscles), but I'm still at least 30 pounds overweight, all
on my stomach.


I can get absolutely bony on my top half, but, short of surgical
intervention, my thighs are always going to have some jiggle to 'em.

Martha


--
"ALPO is 99 cents a can. That's over SEVEN dog dollars!!"
Revek - ASDLC

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I Need A Break Damsel in dis Dress Low Carbohydrate Diets 47 April 24th, 2004 02:21 AM
disappointment toni Low Carbohydrate Diets 53 April 11th, 2004 08:46 PM
On the lighter side Warp100 Low Carbohydrate Diets 1 March 4th, 2004 09:43 PM
New low-carber; worsening hypoglycemia attacks? wilson Low Carbohydrate Diets 3 March 3rd, 2004 06:01 PM
FDA Attacks Term "Low-Carb" as a Description! Edward Gmys Low Carbohydrate Diets 57 January 7th, 2004 06:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.