If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:20:10 GMT, nimue wrote:
Bob in CT wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:35:14 -0400, Roger Zoul wrote: Bob in CT wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:17:36 -0400, Roger Zoul wrote: Bob in CT wrote: is the headline in Newsweek. It provides a good description of research into fat cells. Supposedly, fat cells release inflammatory compounds, which is why an apple shape is worse than a pear shape ("visceral" fat releases more inflammatory compounds). Dang genetics! I can't seem to figure out what is meant by an apple shape. They have a picture. If you gain weight in your legs, you're a pear; if you gain weight around your waist (me), you're an apple. I don't see too many pears. For me, I have almost no weight around my legs (I can see individual quad muscles), but I'm still at least 30 pounds overweight, all on my stomach. What if you gain weight everywhere, like me? Am I a hybrid apple/pear? Interesting. Maybe. I wonder if there is a "hybrid" body type? I know that my first girlfriend was definitely an apple -- when she gained weight, it was all in her legs. That's a pear. Think how a pear looks -- think of the female figure -- got it? I know, I know. It was a slip, by Freud. -- Bob in CT Remove ".x" to reply |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:20:10 GMT, nimue wrote:
Bob in CT wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:35:14 -0400, Roger Zoul wrote: Bob in CT wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:17:36 -0400, Roger Zoul wrote: Bob in CT wrote: is the headline in Newsweek. It provides a good description of research into fat cells. Supposedly, fat cells release inflammatory compounds, which is why an apple shape is worse than a pear shape ("visceral" fat releases more inflammatory compounds). Dang genetics! I can't seem to figure out what is meant by an apple shape. They have a picture. If you gain weight in your legs, you're a pear; if you gain weight around your waist (me), you're an apple. I don't see too many pears. For me, I have almost no weight around my legs (I can see individual quad muscles), but I'm still at least 30 pounds overweight, all on my stomach. What if you gain weight everywhere, like me? Am I a hybrid apple/pear? Interesting. Maybe. I wonder if there is a "hybrid" body type? I know that my first girlfriend was definitely an apple -- when she gained weight, it was all in her legs. That's a pear. Think how a pear looks -- think of the female figure -- got it? I know, I know. It was a slip, by Freud. -- Bob in CT Remove ".x" to reply |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
In article , says...
I'm a classic pear. Yep -- me and J. Lo. THAT is a sexy pear shape. J. Lo is pear-a-rific! Me, well, I am about two pears right now -- I need to pare down! (I must stop! Must stop!). I am UNQUESTIONABLY a pear shape. With my weight dropping, it becomes even more apparent as my breasts get smaller and smaller (a breast easily fits in one hand (my own) now ;-) Proportionally, from the waist up I've always been about 2 sizes smaller than from the waist down. -- Saffire 205/149/125 - 5'1.5" Atkins since 6/14/03 Progress photo: http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333 |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
In article , says...
I'm a classic pear. Yep -- me and J. Lo. THAT is a sexy pear shape. J. Lo is pear-a-rific! Me, well, I am about two pears right now -- I need to pare down! (I must stop! Must stop!). I am UNQUESTIONABLY a pear shape. With my weight dropping, it becomes even more apparent as my breasts get smaller and smaller (a breast easily fits in one hand (my own) now ;-) Proportionally, from the waist up I've always been about 2 sizes smaller than from the waist down. -- Saffire 205/149/125 - 5'1.5" Atkins since 6/14/03 Progress photo: http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333 |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Bob in CT wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:17:36 -0400, Roger Zoul wrote: Bob in CT wrote: :: is the headline in Newsweek. It provides a good description of :: research into fat cells. Supposedly, fat cells release inflammatory :: compounds, which is why an apple shape is worse than a pear shape :: ("visceral" fat releases more inflammatory compounds). Dang :: genetics! :: I can't seem to figure out what is meant by an apple shape. They have a picture. If you gain weight in your legs, you're a pear; if you gain weight around your waist (me), you're an apple. I don't see too many pears. For me, I have almost no weight around my legs (I can see Women are more likely to be pear shaped. At least pre-menopausal women, are. Women who gain weight later in life seem to be more likely to go for the apple shape (and, of course, IR and diabetic women). individual quad muscles), but I'm still at least 30 pounds overweight, all on my stomach. I can get absolutely bony on my top half, but, short of surgical intervention, my thighs are always going to have some jiggle to 'em. Martha -- "ALPO is 99 cents a can. That's over SEVEN dog dollars!!" Revek - ASDLC |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Bob in CT wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:17:36 -0400, Roger Zoul wrote: Bob in CT wrote: :: is the headline in Newsweek. It provides a good description of :: research into fat cells. Supposedly, fat cells release inflammatory :: compounds, which is why an apple shape is worse than a pear shape :: ("visceral" fat releases more inflammatory compounds). Dang :: genetics! :: I can't seem to figure out what is meant by an apple shape. They have a picture. If you gain weight in your legs, you're a pear; if you gain weight around your waist (me), you're an apple. I don't see too many pears. For me, I have almost no weight around my legs (I can see Women are more likely to be pear shaped. At least pre-menopausal women, are. Women who gain weight later in life seem to be more likely to go for the apple shape (and, of course, IR and diabetic women). individual quad muscles), but I'm still at least 30 pounds overweight, all on my stomach. I can get absolutely bony on my top half, but, short of surgical intervention, my thighs are always going to have some jiggle to 'em. Martha -- "ALPO is 99 cents a can. That's over SEVEN dog dollars!!" Revek - ASDLC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I Need A Break | Damsel in dis Dress | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 47 | April 24th, 2004 02:21 AM |
disappointment | toni | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 53 | April 11th, 2004 08:46 PM |
On the lighter side | Warp100 | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 1 | March 4th, 2004 09:43 PM |
New low-carber; worsening hypoglycemia attacks? | wilson | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 3 | March 3rd, 2004 06:01 PM |
FDA Attacks Term "Low-Carb" as a Description! | Edward Gmys | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 57 | January 7th, 2004 06:31 AM |