Maximizing life expectancy/enjoyment

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 02:36:24 +1000, "DRS"
wrote:

There's no reliable evidence as to the location of either grave.

Don't agree.

The show us the evidence so we can all see for ourselves.

Grow up. What an idiotic thing to post.

Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

Chupacabra wrote in message

On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 12:05:22 -0400, Full Mu_n
wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 22:27:24 -0400, Chupacabra
wrote:

Do you have anything interesting to say? Nope?

Okay, then I'm gonna call you a fag, you fag.

bye

Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

So long, fag.

The homophobia is so unnecessary.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

Full Mu_n wrote in message

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 02:36:24 +1000, "DRS"
wrote:

There's no reliable evidence as to the location of either grave.

Don't agree.

The show us the evidence so we can all see for ourselves.

Grow up. What an idiotic thing to post.

IOW, you're full of ****. Run away then.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 02:39:18 +1000, "DRS"
wrote:

IOW, you're full of ****. Run away then.

plonk

Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 02:38:40 +1000, "DRS"
wrote:

Chupacabra wrote in message

On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 12:05:22 -0400, Full Mu_n
wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 22:27:24 -0400, Chupacabra
wrote:

Do you have anything interesting to say? Nope?

Okay, then I'm gonna call you a fag, you fag.

bye

Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

So long, fag.

The homophobia is so unnecessary.

'Cept it's not homophobia. Would you rather I called him a pussy? The
two words are essentially interchangable in my vocabulary.

In this context, anyway.

"DRS" wrote in message
...
OmegaZero2003 wrote in message


[...]

It is a state of consciousness that has been reached by these people;
one that has been called: God Consciousness, Christ Consciosness,
enlightenment, Nirvana/Paranirvana, Consciousness Without and
Object/Subject etc. etc.

It is emminently reachable although most always ineffable to normal
waking consciousness.

Another word for it is psychosis: the state in which the mind loses
contact
with reality.

You cannot define mind, psychosis or reality so for you to use all three
words in a sentence is evidence your reality is not in your mind but in a
psychotic state (like New York).

In sci.med.nutrition DRS wrote or quoted:

Since larger animals tend to live longer than tiny animals anyway I want to
see the research done on elephants.

Unfortunately, the longer the lifespan of the animal you are interested
in, the longer you have to be prepared to wait for the results - and the
more the research costs to perform.
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ Remove lock to reply.

OmegaZero2003 wrote in message

"DRS" wrote in message
...
OmegaZero2003 wrote in message


[...]

It is a state of consciousness that has been reached by these
people; one that has been called: God Consciousness, Christ
Consciosness, enlightenment, Nirvana/Paranirvana, Consciousness
Without and Object/Subject etc. etc.

It is emminently reachable although most always ineffable to normal
waking consciousness.

Another word for it is psychosis: the state in which the mind loses
contact with reality.

You cannot define mind, psychosis or reality so for you to use all
three words in a sentence is evidence your reality is not in your
mind but in a psychotic state (like New York).

Stop right there. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
We can define those things, we have defined those things, we continue to
refine our understanding of them and simple-minded New Age twaddle like
yours benefits nobody. We do know there is an external reality because
solipsism has been disproved (it's logically incoherent, see
http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/s/solipsis.htm for a synopsis). That our
understanding isn't absolute in no way invalidates what we do know, and we
know enough that its fundamental coherence is established, so you're on a
hiding to nothing when you post nonsense like that.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

Chupacabra wrote in message

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 02:38:40 +1000, "DRS"
wrote:
Chupacabra wrote in message


[...]

So long, fag.

The homophobia is so unnecessary.

'Cept it's not homophobia. Would you rather I called him a pussy? The
two words are essentially interchangable in my vocabulary.

In this context, anyway.

It is homophobic, just as using "pussy" as an abusive synonym for "weak" is
misogynistic. There a lots of other ways to put down idiots.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

Tim Tyler wrote in message
In sci.med.nutrition DRS wrote or quoted:

Since larger animals tend to live longer than tiny animals anyway I
want to see the research done on elephants.

Unfortunately, the longer the lifespan of the animal you are
interested in, the longer you have to be prepared to wait for the
results - and the more the research costs to perform.

Details, details. If it works for elephants it'll work better for us. :-)

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?