A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Good fats bad fats



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 2nd, 2007, 01:16 AM posted to alt.support.diet
em
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 519
Default Good fats bad fats

I see a lot about fat this and fat that. These fats are "good fats", these
fats are "bad fats". I'm having difficulty sorting this out in my head. Are
there any decent (and hopefully not too long) primers on fats available on
the Internet? I eat a lot of beef, for example, and I do like the fattier
cuts. Is that good fat or bad fat? Also, I usually use butter instead of oil
when I fry. Is that good fat or bad fat? Fish: tuna, salmon, halibut, that's
good fat, right? Corn oil = bad? Arghhhh.

  #2  
Old October 2nd, 2007, 01:45 AM posted to alt.support.diet
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 482
Default Good fats bad fats

On Oct 1, 8:16 pm, "em" wrote:
I see a lot about fat this and fat that. These fats are "good fats", these
fats are "bad fats". I'm having difficulty sorting this out in my head. Are
there any decent (and hopefully not too long) primers on fats available on
the Internet? I eat a lot of beef, for example, and I do like the fattier
cuts. Is that good fat or bad fat? Also, I usually use butter instead of oil
when I fry. Is that good fat or bad fat? Fish: tuna, salmon, halibut, that's
good fat, right? Corn oil = bad? Arghhhh.


Here are a couple of good, fairly simple web sites about this:

http://www.healthcastle.com/goodfats-badfats.shtml
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/fats.html

Basically, your beef & butter would be considered "bad fats" --
they're saturated fats. Corn oil is a polyunsaturated fat; that's in
the "good fat" category. Fish is also a "good fat". I should point
out that many folks in the low-carb community will tell you that
there's no such thing as a bad fat (well, they might agree that trans
fats are bad). I don't know that I'd agree with this, though I do eat
saturated fats in moderation. (I have always preferred lean cuts of
meat, but I do like cheese, eggs, & butter.)

Chris
262/130s/130s

  #3  
Old October 2nd, 2007, 03:32 PM
Night Owl Night Owl is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by WeightlossBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by em View Post
I see a lot about fat this and fat that. These fats are "good fats", these
fats are "bad fats". I'm having difficulty sorting this out in my head. Are
there any decent (and hopefully not too long) primers on fats available on
the Internet? I eat a lot of beef, for example, and I do like the fattier
cuts. Is that good fat or bad fat? Also, I usually use butter instead of oil
when I fry. Is that good fat or bad fat? Fish: tuna, salmon, halibut, that's
good fat, right? Corn oil = bad? Arghhhh.
The American Heart Association has a campaign called "Face the Fats" that's all about this. It's quick and concise -- AmericanHeart.org/facethefats. They've also created two animated characters called the Bad Fats Brothers to help people learn what foods have the bad fats. It's all on the site. Hope this helps
  #4  
Old October 3rd, 2007, 03:02 AM posted to alt.support.diet
em
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 519
Default Good fats bad fats

OK, I've read all three links (your two + Night Owl's). Let me see if I have
this straight so far:

Good Fats (mono/poly) come from plants and fish.

Bad Fats (saturated) come from meats, eggs and milk products.

Terrible Fats (trans) come from labs and food processors.

I don't know where fowl fits in.

I don't know what this Omega stuff is all about, Omega 3 or whatever. Could
somebody please clue me in?

Being as I'm on low carb & am a real meat eater, one thing I can do is to
use a vegetable oil when I cook rather than butter, and I can replace some
of the meat in my diet with fish. I think I'm getting it :-)

Thanks!

Mike



"Chris" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 1, 8:16 pm, "em" wrote:
I see a lot about fat this and fat that. These fats are "good fats",
these
fats are "bad fats". I'm having difficulty sorting this out in my head.
Are
there any decent (and hopefully not too long) primers on fats available
on
the Internet? I eat a lot of beef, for example, and I do like the fattier
cuts. Is that good fat or bad fat? Also, I usually use butter instead of
oil
when I fry. Is that good fat or bad fat? Fish: tuna, salmon, halibut,
that's
good fat, right? Corn oil = bad? Arghhhh.


Here are a couple of good, fairly simple web sites about this:

http://www.healthcastle.com/goodfats-badfats.shtml
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/fats.html

Basically, your beef & butter would be considered "bad fats" --
they're saturated fats. Corn oil is a polyunsaturated fat; that's in
the "good fat" category. Fish is also a "good fat". I should point
out that many folks in the low-carb community will tell you that
there's no such thing as a bad fat (well, they might agree that trans
fats are bad). I don't know that I'd agree with this, though I do eat
saturated fats in moderation. (I have always preferred lean cuts of
meat, but I do like cheese, eggs, & butter.)

Chris
262/130s/130s


  #5  
Old October 3rd, 2007, 05:45 PM posted to alt.support.diet
Doug Freyburger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,866
Default Good fats bad fats

"em" wrote:

I don't know where fowl fits in.


All fats have mixtures of types of fatty acids. You can estimate
the portion of saturated fat by how liquid the fat is at room
temperature. Venison fat is like wax, very high percentage.
Chicken smaltz is soft, medium low percentage.

I don't know what this Omega stuff is all about, Omega 3 or whatever. Could
somebody please clue me in?


What matters is the fatty acid types. Fat is made by bonding
a glycerol to 3 fatty acids, so it ends up that nearly all fat is
a mixture of types.

The omega number is how far down the chain the first double
bond is found. Since fatty acids have variable lengths, enzymes
start working on them from one end and keep working until the
process is finished. So how long the first chain is determines
if one specific enzyme will work on one specific fatty acid.

The types go something like this -

Saturated fats - The body can manufacture some types so
saturated fats are not essential. The body and burn and store
all of the common types.

Mono-unsaturated fats - The body can only use them for fuel
so they are not essential. The body can burn them for fuel so
they are beneficial. The body can't store them so they are
helpful for weight loss. What happens if you eat enough to
have excess? I don't know if the body can convert them to
other types or if they get somehow wasted.

Poly-unsaturated fats - The body needs certain types to build
cell membranes, nerve sheaths and so on so they are essential.
The body can store a limited amount (very large amount
compared to stored glycogen carbs, small amount compared
to stored saturated fats).

Trans-fats - Fool the body into using them.

Being as I'm on low carb & am a real meat eater, one thing I can do is to
use a vegetable oil when I cook rather than butter, and I can replace some
of the meat in my diet with fish. I think I'm getting it :-)


Being a low carber the types aren't the same. The issue is
carbs *plus* saturated fat is a problem. For low fatters, since
they have high carb they need to avoid saturated fat to avoid the
problem. For low carbers, since they have low carb there is no
need nor motivation to avoid saturated fat - It just doesn't matter
for low carbers. So for a low carber the types are like this:

Bad fats - trans-fats.

Fats that only matter by calorie count - saturated fats,
mono-unsaturated fats.

Good fats - polyunsaturated fats depending on the omega
number.

There is no down-side to draining off the more solid animal fat
that has a higher percentage of saturated fat and replacing it
with the more liquid nut oil that has a lower percentage of
saturated fat. But as a low carber there's no down side to
keeping the animal fat in the first place.

Caveats - Look long enough and you can find studies that say
loss rate is better by replacing animal oil with vegitable oil, but
the studies don' specify low carbing. It doesn't take much
searching to decide that the oil in seafood is benficial enough
that you will even want your tuna in its own oil but no one has
canned it that way in decades. On a low carb plan if you work
the numbers you end up being on a high fat plan so avoiding
any type of fat is going to drive your calories down much lower
than planned.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fats mattbma Low Carbohydrate Diets 1 July 19th, 2005 04:56 PM
Good fats, bad fats Mike Turco General Discussion 20 February 24th, 2005 04:06 AM
Fats are Good Dave General Discussion 0 June 26th, 2004 08:03 PM
Fats are Good Dave Low Carbohydrate Diets 0 June 26th, 2004 08:01 PM
Atkins - Comparing good fats and better fats Doug Freyburger Low Carbohydrate Diets 26 April 15th, 2004 08:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.