A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fish with Insensative Dioxin Receptor Survive in PCB Polluted Hudson River



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 10th, 2011, 05:06 AM posted to sci.med.nutrition,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diet.low-carb
outsider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Fish with Insensative Dioxin Receptor Survive in PCB PollutedHudson River

On 8/9/2011 7:27 PM, Billy wrote:

You know that you must look really lame to the others in
sci.med.nutrition, alt.support.diabetes, alt.support.diet.low-carb by
now.


I don't have a need to impress anyone. Those folks worth their
salt will have checked out the reference I gave and be getting
miles in front of your head in the sand political approach. Why
would I care about laggards like you?
  #22  
Old August 10th, 2011, 05:35 AM posted to sci.med.nutrition,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diet.low-carb
Billy[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default Fish with Insensative Dioxin Receptor Survive in PCB Polluted Hudson River

In article ,
outsider wrote:

On 8/9/2011 7:27 PM, Billy wrote:

You know that you must look really lame to the others in
sci.med.nutrition, alt.support.diabetes, alt.support.diet.low-carb by
now.


I don't have a need to impress anyone. Those folks worth their
salt will have checked out the reference I gave and be getting
miles in front of your head in the sand political approach. Why
would I care about laggards like you?


You're a dullard trying to pass for bright.
--
- Billy
Both the House and Senate budget plan would cut Social Security and Medicare, while cutting taxes on the wealthy.

Kucinich noted that none of the government programs targeted for
elimination or severe cutback in House Republican spending plans
"appeared on the GAO's list of government programs at high risk of
waste, fraud and abuse."
http://www.politifact.com/ohio/state...is-kucinich/re
p-dennis-kucinich-says-gop-budget-cuts-dont-targ/

[W]e have the situation with the deficit and the debt and spending and jobs. And itıs not that difficult to get out of it. The first thing you do is you get rid of corporate welfare. Thatıs hundreds of billions of dollars a year. The second is you tax corporations so that they donıt get away with no taxation.
- Ralph Nader
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/7/19/ralph_naders_solution_to_debt_crisis
  #23  
Old August 10th, 2011, 03:33 PM posted to sci.med.nutrition,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diet.low-carb
Psycho-Deli™
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Fish with Insensative Dioxin Receptor Survive in PCB PollutedHudson River

On 10/08/11 2:35 PM, Billy wrote:
In ,
wrote:

On 8/9/2011 7:27 PM, Billy wrote:

You know that you must look really lame to the others in
sci.med.nutrition, alt.support.diabetes, alt.support.diet.low-carb by
now.


I don't have a need to impress anyone. Those folks worth their
salt will have checked out the reference I gave and be getting
miles in front of your head in the sand political approach. Why
would I care about laggards like you?


You're a dullard trying to pass for bright.


You're a boor too dull to realise by trying to win a fight that you have
already lost you make yourself an object of derision.

  #24  
Old August 10th, 2011, 03:38 PM posted to sci.med.nutrition,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diet.low-carb
outsider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Fish with Insensative Dioxin Receptor Survive in PCB PollutedHudson River

On 8/10/2011 9:33 AM, Psycho-Deli™ wrote:
On 10/08/11 2:35 PM, Billy wrote:
In ,
wrote:

On 8/9/2011 7:27 PM, Billy wrote:

You know that you must look really lame to the others in
sci.med.nutrition, alt.support.diabetes, alt.support.diet.low-carb by
now.

I don't have a need to impress anyone. Those folks worth their
salt will have checked out the reference I gave and be getting
miles in front of your head in the sand political approach. Why
would I care about laggards like you?


You're a dullard trying to pass for bright.


You're a boor too dull to realise by trying to win a fight that you have
already lost you make yourself an object of derision.


He is doing such a fine job of it too!
  #25  
Old August 10th, 2011, 03:50 PM posted to sci.med.nutrition,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diet.low-carb
Billy[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default Fish with Insensative Dioxin Receptor Survive in PCB Polluted Hudson River

In article ,
Psycho-Deli wrote:

On 10/08/11 2:35 PM, Billy wrote:
In ,
wrote:

On 8/9/2011 7:27 PM, Billy wrote:

You know that you must look really lame to the others in
sci.med.nutrition, alt.support.diabetes, alt.support.diet.low-carb by
now.

I don't have a need to impress anyone. Those folks worth their
salt will have checked out the reference I gave and be getting
miles in front of your head in the sand political approach. Why
would I care about laggards like you?


You're a dullard trying to pass for bright.


You're a boor too dull to realise by trying to win a fight that you have
already lost you make yourself an object of derision.


"Psycho" like "out" you make statements that you can't support. I can
see why you two have an affinity for each other. Sayin' it don't make it
so. If you don't believe me, you can look it up in
http://www.amazon.com/Chaos-Making-S.../0143113453/re
f=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1312810518&sr=8-1

Far from having chosen humans to be victims by banning DDT. DDT is being
used in a more intelligent way via "Integrated Pest Management" (IPM),
instead of just being dumped into the environment.


http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...o-combat-malar
ia
The scientists reported that DDT may have a variety of human health
effects, including reduced fertility, genital birth defects, breast
cancer, diabetes and damage to developing brains. Its metabolite, DDE,
can block male hormones.

In 2007, at least 3,950 tons of DDT were sprayed for mosquito control in
Africa and Asia, according to a report by the United Nations Environment
Programme.

In South Africa, about 60 to 80 grams is sprayed in each household per
year, Bouwman said.

A 2007 study on male fertility is the only published research so far.
Conducted in Limpopo, South Africa by de Jager and his colleagues, the
study found men in the sprayed homes had extremely high levels of DDT in
their blood and that their semen volume and sperm counts were low.

"Clearly, more research is neededŠbut in the meantime, DDT should really
be the last resort against malaria, rather than the first line of
defense," Eskenazi said.

The pesticide accumulates in body tissues, particularly breast milk, and
lingers in the environment for decades.

Since then [2001, Stockholm Convention], nine nations‹Ethiopia, South
Africa, India, Mauritius, Myanmar, Yemen, Uganda, Mozambique and
Swaziland‹notified the treaty's secretariat that they are using DDT.
Five others‹Zimbabwe, North Korea, Eritrea, Gambia, Namibia and
Zambia--also reportedly are using it, and six others, including China,
have reserved the right to begin using it, according to a January
Stockholm Convention report.

Mexico, the rest of Central America and parts of Africa have combated
malaria without DDT by using alternative methods, such as controlling
stagnant ponds where mosquitoes breed and using bed nets treated with
pyrethroid insecticides. But such efforts have been less successful in
other places, particularly South Africa.

"We have a whole host of mosquito species and more than one parasite.
The biology of the vectors is different and there is therefore no
one-method-fits-all strategy, as is the case in Central America,"
Bouwman said.
---

So much for having chosen human beings for our victims.

If you want to prove me wrong, refute the above statement, otherwise
please spare us your constant braying.
--
- Billy
Both the House and Senate budget plan would cut Social Security and Medicare, while cutting taxes on the wealthy.

Kucinich noted that none of the government programs targeted for
elimination or severe cutback in House Republican spending plans
"appeared on the GAO's list of government programs at high risk of
waste, fraud and abuse."
http://www.politifact.com/ohio/state...is-kucinich/re
p-dennis-kucinich-says-gop-budget-cuts-dont-targ/

[W]e have the situation with the deficit and the debt and spending and jobs. And itıs not that difficult to get out of it. The first thing you do is you get rid of corporate welfare. Thatıs hundreds of billions of dollars a year. The second is you tax corporations so that they donıt get away with no taxation.
- Ralph Nader
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/7/19/ralph_naders_solution_to_debt_crisis
  #26  
Old August 10th, 2011, 07:16 PM posted to sci.med.nutrition,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diet.low-carb
outsider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Fish with Insensative Dioxin Receptor Survive in PCB PollutedHudson River

On 8/10/2011 9:50 AM, Billy wrote:

So much for having chosen human beings for our victims.


Still trying to bamboozle readers with multitudes of bull****?

From the article you cited:

(unbroken link here, you really should learn how that's done!)

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=ddt-use-to-combat-malaria

"Malaria is one of the world's most deadly diseases, each year
killing about 880,000 people, mostly children in sub-Saharan
Africa, according to the World Health Organization."

What's the point in spraying the inside of a house that has no
screening?

They're the victims of the failure to eradicate by any means
possible. Nothing more is needed to refute your incessant
boorish blather.

If you want to prove me wrong, refute the above statement, otherwise
please spare us your constant braying.


If you read your own cite you'd get the picture. If you read
_Chaos, the Making of a new Science_ you'd perhaps actually
understand the problem. But it is likely you're too brain
damaged to understand the mathematical logic.

Bray on!
  #27  
Old August 10th, 2011, 08:53 PM posted to sci.med.nutrition,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diet.low-carb
Billy[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default Fish with Insensative Dioxin Receptor Survive in PCB Polluted Hudson River

In article ,
outsider wrote:

On 8/10/2011 9:50 AM, Billy wrote:

So much for having chosen human beings for our victims.


Still trying to bamboozle readers with multitudes of bull****?

From the article you cited:

(unbroken link here, you really should learn how that's done!)

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=ddt-use-to-combat-malaria

"Malaria is one of the world's most deadly diseases, each year
killing about 880,000 people, mostly children in sub-Saharan
Africa, according to the World Health Organization."

What's the point in spraying the inside of a house that has no
screening?

They're the victims of the failure to eradicate by any means
possible.


Citation, please, to show that every means possible isn't being used.
You are a wonder. You can't even read an article, yet you claimed to
have read a whole book. It seems unlikely.

In any event, some proof, please, to support your deranged opinion.
It would be nice if we could have stayed with the original subject,
which according to you, was the deaths that arose from the non-use of
DDT. I guess you've dropped that contention to now argue that they
don't spray enough.

Are you the product of the dysfunctional American school system?

Bray on!

Nothing more is needed to refute your incessant
boorish blather.

If you want to prove me wrong, refute the above statement, otherwise
please spare us your constant braying.


If you read your own cite you'd get the picture. If you read
_Chaos, the Making of a new Science_ you'd perhaps actually
understand the problem. But it is likely you're too brain
damaged to understand the mathematical logic.

Bray on!

--
- Billy
Both the House and Senate budget plan would cut Social Security and Medicare, while cutting taxes on the wealthy.

Kucinich noted that none of the government programs targeted for
elimination or severe cutback in House Republican spending plans
"appeared on the GAO's list of government programs at high risk of
waste, fraud and abuse."
http://www.politifact.com/ohio/state...is-kucinich/re
p-dennis-kucinich-says-gop-budget-cuts-dont-targ/

[W]e have the situation with the deficit and the debt and spending and jobs. And itıs not that difficult to get out of it. The first thing you do is you get rid of corporate welfare. Thatıs hundreds of billions of dollars a year. The second is you tax corporations so that they donıt get away with no taxation.
- Ralph Nader
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/7/19/ralph_naders_solution_to_debt_crisis
  #28  
Old August 10th, 2011, 08:55 PM posted to sci.med.nutrition,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diet.low-carb
Billy[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default Fish with Insensative Dioxin Receptor Survive in PCB Polluted Hudson River

In article ,
outsider wrote:

On 8/10/2011 9:33 AM, Psycho-Deli wrote:
On 10/08/11 2:35 PM, Billy wrote:
In ,
wrote:

On 8/9/2011 7:27 PM, Billy wrote:

You know that you must look really lame to the others in
sci.med.nutrition, alt.support.diabetes, alt.support.diet.low-carb by
now.

I don't have a need to impress anyone. Those folks worth their
salt will have checked out the reference I gave and be getting
miles in front of your head in the sand political approach. Why
would I care about laggards like you?

You're a dullard trying to pass for bright.


You're a boor too dull to realise by trying to win a fight that you have
already lost you make yourself an object of derision.


He is doing such a fine job of it too!


So what newsgroup are you boneheads from?
--
- Billy
Both the House and Senate budget plan would cut Social Security and Medicare, while cutting taxes on the wealthy.

Kucinich noted that none of the government programs targeted for
elimination or severe cutback in House Republican spending plans
"appeared on the GAO's list of government programs at high risk of
waste, fraud and abuse."
http://www.politifact.com/ohio/state...is-kucinich/re
p-dennis-kucinich-says-gop-budget-cuts-dont-targ/

[W]e have the situation with the deficit and the debt and spending and jobs. And itıs not that difficult to get out of it. The first thing you do is you get rid of corporate welfare. Thatıs hundreds of billions of dollars a year. The second is you tax corporations so that they donıt get away with no taxation.
- Ralph Nader
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/7/19/ralph_naders_solution_to_debt_crisis
  #29  
Old August 10th, 2011, 09:05 PM posted to sci.med.nutrition,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diet.low-carb
%
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default Fish with Insensative Dioxin Receptor Survive in PCB Polluted Hudson River

are you guys having a happy day



Billy wrote:
In article ,
outsider wrote:

On 8/10/2011 9:50 AM, Billy wrote:

So much for having chosen human beings for our victims.


Still trying to bamboozle readers with multitudes of bull****?

From the article you cited:

(unbroken link here, you really should learn how that's done!)

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=ddt-use-to-combat-malaria

"Malaria is one of the world's most deadly diseases, each year
killing about 880,000 people, mostly children in sub-Saharan
Africa, according to the World Health Organization."

What's the point in spraying the inside of a house that has no
screening?

They're the victims of the failure to eradicate by any means
possible.


Citation, please, to show that every means possible isn't being used.
You are a wonder. You can't even read an article, yet you claimed to
have read a whole book. It seems unlikely.

In any event, some proof, please, to support your deranged opinion.
It would be nice if we could have stayed with the original subject,
which according to you, was the deaths that arose from the non-use of
DDT. I guess you've dropped that contention to now argue that they
don't spray enough.

Are you the product of the dysfunctional American school system?

Bray on!

Nothing more is needed to refute your incessant
boorish blather.

If you want to prove me wrong, refute the above statement, otherwise
please spare us your constant braying.


If you read your own cite you'd get the picture. If you read
_Chaos, the Making of a new Science_ you'd perhaps actually
understand the problem. But it is likely you're too brain
damaged to understand the mathematical logic.

Bray on!


  #30  
Old August 10th, 2011, 10:53 PM posted to sci.med.nutrition,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diet.low-carb
Billy[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default Fish with Insensative Dioxin Receptor Survive in PCB Polluted Hudson River

In article ,
"%" wrote:

are you guys having a happy day


A day without whacking a bonehead, is like a day without sunshine ;O)



Billy wrote:
In article ,
outsider wrote:

On 8/10/2011 9:50 AM, Billy wrote:

So much for having chosen human beings for our victims.

Still trying to bamboozle readers with multitudes of bull****?

From the article you cited:

(unbroken link here, you really should learn how that's done!)

http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...combat-malaria


"Malaria is one of the world's most deadly diseases, each year
killing about 880,000 people, mostly children in sub-Saharan
Africa, according to the World Health Organization."

What's the point in spraying the inside of a house that has no
screening?

They're the victims of the failure to eradicate by any means
possible.


Citation, please, to show that every means possible isn't being used.
You are a wonder. You can't even read an article, yet you claimed to
have read a whole book. It seems unlikely.

In any event, some proof, please, to support your deranged opinion.
It would be nice if we could have stayed with the original subject,
which according to you, was the deaths that arose from the non-use of
DDT. I guess you've dropped that contention to now argue that they
don't spray enough.

Are you the product of the dysfunctional American school system?

Bray on!

Nothing more is needed to refute your incessant
boorish blather.

If you want to prove me wrong, refute the above statement, otherwise
please spare us your constant braying.

If you read your own cite you'd get the picture. If you read
_Chaos, the Making of a new Science_ you'd perhaps actually
understand the problem. But it is likely you're too brain
damaged to understand the mathematical logic.

Bray on!


--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_vN0--mHug
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High Animal Fat Diet, Dioxin, Chloracne jay[_2_] Low Carbohydrate Diets 0 July 15th, 2008 09:07 PM
Is it just a river? Lump Chicken Weightwatchers 17 March 9th, 2006 09:57 PM
Grains a Good Thing: Bound antioxidant phytochemicals in grains survive intact long enough to reach the colon to prevent cancer Alan S Low Carbohydrate Diets 0 February 28th, 2006 02:44 AM
Grains a Good Thing: Bound antioxidant phytochemicals in grains survive intact long enough to reach the colon to prevent cancer Carmen Low Carbohydrate Diets 1 February 27th, 2006 11:04 PM
Caloric restriction and increased dopamine receptor signaling. Tim General Discussion 0 March 15th, 2004 09:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright İ2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.