Ping Ig

Dally wrote:
Is it better to x-no-archive or to see it in google and remove it with
google's removal tool? Assuming you want to say something you don't
wish your children to read in 10 years, say?

Dally

It's truly better to just not say it than to try and hide it.
1. There are other archives out there which may or may not honor the no
archive request.
2. People can still quote you and it will show up. In that case they'll
probably edit your post to only reflect what they're repying to so that your
comments may be taken completely out of context. Without your original post
there's no way for anyone to know what you really said.
3. An even worse scenario than 2 is that there are some sick souls out there
who might change what you wrote not just edit down to what they're replying
to. Again, without your original post there's no way for anyone to know what
you really said.
--
Jeri
"Change is inevitable, except from vending machines."

"Heywood Mogroot" wrote in message
m...
"JMA" wrote in message
...
"Heywood Mogroot" wrote in message
I (think) I solved that problem by choosing this ~outrageous~ netname.

Would have been more outrageous if you had the last name Jabuzov.

That's my ~middle~ name

I read via dejanews so I find x-no-archive somewhat disruptive.

Google's new version of the the groups will temporarily post x-no-archive
posts (6 days).

yeah but it sucks compared to the current and I can only hope they fix
it before turning off this one.

What don't you like about it? I'm curious because I normally don't use it,
but it's the only way I can post from work. I liked it, though it is a
little cumbersome at times.

Jenn

"Heywood Mogroot" wrote in message
m...
"JMA" wrote in message
...
"Heywood Mogroot" wrote in message
I (think) I solved that problem by choosing this ~outrageous~ netname.

Would have been more outrageous if you had the last name Jabuzov.

That's my ~middle~ name

I read via dejanews so I find x-no-archive somewhat disruptive.

Google's new version of the the groups will temporarily post x-no-archive
posts (6 days).

yeah but it sucks compared to the current and I can only hope they fix
it before turning off this one.

What don't you like about it? I'm curious because I normally don't use it,
but it's the only way I can post from work. I liked it, though it is a
little cumbersome at times.

Jenn

"JMA" wrote in message ...
"Heywood Mogroot" wrote in message
m...
"JMA" wrote in message
...
"Heywood Mogroot" wrote in message
I (think) I solved that problem by choosing this ~outrageous~ netname.

Would have been more outrageous if you had the last name Jabuzov.

That's my ~middle~ name

I read via dejanews so I find x-no-archive somewhat disruptive.

Google's new version of the the groups will temporarily post x-no-archive
posts (6 days).

yeah but it sucks compared to the current and I can only hope they fix
it before turning off this one.

What don't you like about it? I'm curious because I normally don't use it,
but it's the only way I can post from work. I liked it, though it is a
little cumbersome at times.

let's just say I like the current design and the departures from it
don't improve upon it.