If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Max Effective Calorie Limit
Is there a level of calorie intake where the body cannot digest anymore for
that particular day or whatever. For example, if someone was to eat 10,000 calories in one day, would you effectively put on 2 pounds in a day, or would the body just pass it out after a certain level ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Max Effective Calorie Limit
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:06:03 GMT, "paul.smith" wrote:
Is there a level of calorie intake where the body cannot digest anymore for that particular day or whatever. For example, if someone was to eat 10,000 calories in one day, would you effectively put on 2 pounds in a day, or would the body just pass it out after a certain level ? I don't have a scientific answer to this, but I would say that your body would take up the calories - unless you were bulimic and brought it all up again before it was digested. janice 233/177/133 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Max Effective Calorie Limit
"paul.smith" wrote in message
s.com... Is there a level of calorie intake where the body cannot digest anymore for that particular day or whatever. For example, if someone was to eat 10,000 calories in one day, would you effectively put on 2 pounds in a day, or would the body just pass it out after a certain level ? If there is a limit, it seems to be genetic - so, it's personnal. There was a study conducted in US jails [E.A. Sims,1973], where several volunteers (of normal weight) were fed a 10,000-15,000 calories diet during a six months period. All of them survived, so it seems the body does fine. Though many reported nausea after a couple of days, which seems to credit the idea that our body in its normal state is self regulating (the nausea being the signal that food intake should stop). The goal was to reach a weight gain of 20-25% of their initial weight. Many of the prisonners took the whole six months to manage to get that extra weight. Some actually didn't manage at all, and only gained 15lbs max. But the prisonners with obesity in their famillies had a slighly easier time gaining the weight. Also, merely *maintening* the gained weight needed a high calorie diet (5,000-10,000), and most of the prisonners had no problem at all losing all the extra weight.(except for 4 out the prisonners - 2 of which having obesity in their famillies). That also explains why people who are naturally underweight have a real nightmare with trying to *gain* weight - it's much much harder than losing weight. It's a lot of work to grow fat, for most of us, it took years, not months... So, either the equivalence between calories and pounds of fat is not as direct and constant as we think, or our ability to deal with a huge intake of calories is very variable from a person to another. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best Calorie Counter Book? | Cammie | General Discussion | 2 | January 27th, 2005 05:11 PM |
Calorie increase linked to carbs | Diarmid Logan | General Discussion | 35 | February 21st, 2004 03:40 PM |
CDC Calorie Recommendations | Last Shot At The Mu_n | General Discussion | 26 | February 9th, 2004 01:15 AM |
Now Harvard study backs up Atkins diet | Diarmid Logan | General Discussion | 84 | November 16th, 2003 11:31 PM |
EAT: low calorie seasoning | shinino | General Discussion | 0 | November 4th, 2003 08:40 AM |