Apples, Apples, Apples

A bench press of 110?

So you're weak, small and stupid then.

It's probably the apples that are causing your problems.

HTH

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Renegade5" wrote in message
...
Male, 5'10, 175lbs of muscle, BP 105-110, way-low cholesterol, RP of
about 60. I eat what I want (restrict bad carbs), including
sap-sucking-sons-of- motherless-goats such as yourself... for
breakfast. Beats Slim-Fast ;-)

BTW, I see from your postings that your PC is sending out a lot of ID
10 T errors g



On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 01:42:46 GMT, "JC Der Koenig"
wrote:

You're just one more example of fat and stupid being inextricably linked.

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Renegade5" wrote in message
...
I never said they were. And personally, I could care less how many
carbs an apple has... I eat one every day, and plan to continue until
I'm 110. So nah, nah, nah! I fart in your general direction.
(and don't give me any crap about this being a low carb news group!!)
Stupid IBMers...

To the original poster:
(large) Granny Smith: 101 calories, 0g fat, 25.9g carbs
Red Delicious 127 cal, 0 fat, 32.9g carb


On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:30:37 GMT, "JC Der Koenig"
wrote:

Apples aren't low carb.

--
You take stupid to a new level. -- MFW


"Renegade5" wrote in message
...
I think that's right - Granny Smith's are the lowest in sugar...
however, bright red apples (such as Mac's) have a higher content of
healthy, anti-cancer and disease-fighting, phytochemicals and
flavanoids. The darker red, the better (from that perspective).


On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:51:31 -0400, Jim Marnott
wrote:

I've always thought Granny Smiths, because they're very tart, had
less
sugar.

---
Jim Marnott
Originally: 245/193/180
Now: 221/216/180


jk wrote:
I haven't eaten any fruit in 5 years, but I just started adding
an
occasional apple, with fine results. Anyone know which varieties
are
lowest
in carbs, and highest in fiber, or are they basically the same?

A bench press of 110?

So you're weak, small and stupid then.

It's probably the apples that are causing your problems.

HTH

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Renegade5" wrote in message
...
Male, 5'10, 175lbs of muscle, BP 105-110, way-low cholesterol, RP of
about 60. I eat what I want (restrict bad carbs), including
sap-sucking-sons-of- motherless-goats such as yourself... for
breakfast. Beats Slim-Fast ;-)

BTW, I see from your postings that your PC is sending out a lot of ID
10 T errors g



On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 01:42:46 GMT, "JC Der Koenig"
wrote:

You're just one more example of fat and stupid being inextricably linked.

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Renegade5" wrote in message
...
I never said they were. And personally, I could care less how many
carbs an apple has... I eat one every day, and plan to continue until
I'm 110. So nah, nah, nah! I fart in your general direction.
(and don't give me any crap about this being a low carb news group!!)
Stupid IBMers...

To the original poster:
(large) Granny Smith: 101 calories, 0g fat, 25.9g carbs
Red Delicious 127 cal, 0 fat, 32.9g carb


On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:30:37 GMT, "JC Der Koenig"
wrote:

Apples aren't low carb.

--
You take stupid to a new level. -- MFW


"Renegade5" wrote in message
...
I think that's right - Granny Smith's are the lowest in sugar...
however, bright red apples (such as Mac's) have a higher content of
healthy, anti-cancer and disease-fighting, phytochemicals and
flavanoids. The darker red, the better (from that perspective).


On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:51:31 -0400, Jim Marnott
wrote:

I've always thought Granny Smiths, because they're very tart, had
less
sugar.

---
Jim Marnott
Originally: 245/193/180
Now: 221/216/180


jk wrote:
I haven't eaten any fruit in 5 years, but I just started adding
an
occasional apple, with fine results. Anyone know which varieties
are
lowest
in carbs, and highest in fiber, or are they basically the same?

Really?

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Ignoramus350" wrote in message
...
In article , JC Der
Koenig wrote:
A bench press of 110?

I think that he means blood pressure of 105-110.

i

So you're weak, small and stupid then.

It's probably the apples that are causing your problems.

HTH

Really?

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Ignoramus350" wrote in message
...
In article , JC Der
Koenig wrote:
A bench press of 110?

I think that he means blood pressure of 105-110.

i

So you're weak, small and stupid then.

It's probably the apples that are causing your problems.

HTH

Yes... 106/72, 110/69 and 109/66 are the most recent.

On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 01:52:02 GMT, "JC Der Koenig"
wrote:

Really?

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Ignoramus350" wrote in message
...
In article , JC Der
Koenig wrote:
A bench press of 110?

I think that he means blood pressure of 105-110.

i

So you're weak, small and stupid then.

It's probably the apples that are causing your problems.

HTH

Yes... 106/72, 110/69 and 109/66 are the most recent.

On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 01:52:02 GMT, "JC Der Koenig"
wrote:

Really?

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Ignoramus350" wrote in message
...
In article , JC Der
Koenig wrote:
A bench press of 110?

I think that he means blood pressure of 105-110.

i

So you're weak, small and stupid then.

It's probably the apples that are causing your problems.

HTH

Yes... 106/72, 110/69 and 109/66 are the most recent.

On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 01:52:02 GMT, "JC Der Koenig"
wrote:

Really?

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Ignoramus350" wrote in message
...
In article , JC Der
Koenig wrote:
A bench press of 110?

I think that he means blood pressure of 105-110.

i

So you're weak, small and stupid then.

It's probably the apples that are causing your problems.

HTH

So your bench press is even lower than that?

That's just sad.

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Renegade5" wrote in message
...
Yes... 106/72, 110/69 and 109/66 are the most recent.

On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 01:52:02 GMT, "JC Der Koenig"
wrote:

Really?

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Ignoramus350" wrote in message
...
In article , JC Der
Koenig wrote:
A bench press of 110?

I think that he means blood pressure of 105-110.

i

So you're weak, small and stupid then.

It's probably the apples that are causing your problems.

HTH

So your bench press is even lower than that?

That's just sad.

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Renegade5" wrote in message
...
Yes... 106/72, 110/69 and 109/66 are the most recent.

On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 01:52:02 GMT, "JC Der Koenig"
wrote:

Really?

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Ignoramus350" wrote in message
...
In article , JC Der
Koenig wrote:
A bench press of 110?

I think that he means blood pressure of 105-110.

i

So you're weak, small and stupid then.

It's probably the apples that are causing your problems.

HTH