If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Do you trust food labels?
Generally, they are fairly consistent. One brands green beans for the
same size serving might say 20 cal and another 30. I suppose this could just be a rounding-off phenomenon. Then there are lentils. One package of lentils is organic but I didn't get the brand name, another is a store brand of lentils (non-organic) for a quarter the price (Wal- mart GV brand) They look identical in size and shape...yet one quarter cup of one which is identified as 35g. on both packages is listed as 150 cal per serving on the organic and 80 cal. on the other. A third package I say with a Spanish or Italian sounding name...Goya, I think, listed the same quarter-cup size lentils as 70 cal, although these appeared slightly larger, and since larger varieties of anything increase the empty air space, the 70 seems to agree with the 80 fairly closely. Something is wrong. I buy the cheapo brand and have the label in front of me. Now here is the interesting thing. The package also lists the grams of fat, protein and carbs. It list 0 fat, which is probably right, although there is obviously a small amount of fat in every food under the sun, but it is probably half a gram or so and perhaps they rounded it off correctly. There are also 20g. of carbs total, and 10 grams of protein total in that 1/4 cup serving. The fiber, by the way is 11 grams. Now, one should be able to figure the calories for themselves provided the other info is right. For example, 35 gram serving minus the 11 grams of fiber with no calories gives 24 calories of carbs plus protein. In this case, since carbs and protein both have 4 cal. per gram (fat has 9 cal per gram by the way), we should be able to just multiply 24 X 4. We get 96 calories. Well, heck this is not 70 calories. Another way to figure calories, provided the info is correct once again is to just total the listed carbs plus the listed protein first. In this case it is 20 + 10 which is 30, but 30 X 4 = 120. Something is way off on the labels. dkw |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
McDonald's will put nutrtion labels on their food | [email protected] | General Discussion | 0 | October 26th, 2005 03:15 PM |
Net carbs and food labels | Jody Scott | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 5 | January 23rd, 2005 12:34 PM |
Total Carbs, Fiber and USA Food Labels | TAD | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 5 | April 16th, 2004 10:03 PM |
Good news for canadians and food labels. | Steven C \(Doktersteve\) | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 1 | December 23rd, 2003 03:04 PM |