If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
NYNY - Fred - Dec 3rd
I can't keep track anymore who's under and who's on top. No matter.
You're still well below goal, you celebrated Thanksgiving and your BBS friendships, and you (along with your cohorts in comedy) are keeping the entire NG in stitches. Keep up the great work. Prairie Roots On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:02:06 -0800, Fred wrote: Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G) What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G) So (drumroll) the numbers this week are ..... The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4 The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0 Fred 219.2/158.4/164.0 (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
NYNY - Fred - Dec 3rd
Sorry about the little gain Fred, but you're still under goal and that's
great! Gee if the place was empty, why didn't you weigh naked? -- Brenda 209/173/150 NYNY goal 160 "Fred" wrote in message ... Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G) What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G) So (drumroll) the numbers this week are ..... The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4 The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0 Fred 219.2/158.4/164.0 (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
NYNY - Fred - Dec 3rd
Thanks - well, it really does help to be a bit below goal which is
probably why some of us set our goal at the TOP of the WW range. A group of us here have realized that there is not such thing a ONE STEADY WEIGHT. There are normal variations based on how much "bulk" you have left over from the day before's foods, water retention due to exercise or salt or women's period, etc. So up and down from week to week is something that just will happen. Anyone who can stay exactly the same week to week is not normal. So below goal is really the only way to actually be AT GOAL and Maintain LIFETIME. On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 01:21:19 GMT, "Janice Kennish" wrote: Fred, Sorry about the gain but it wasn't much considering Thanksgiving was in there!!! I have to say I can't wait until the day a 1.4 pound gain still keeps me under goal!! Way to stay below your goal--you're doing a great job!!! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
NYNY - Fred - Dec 3rd
Thanks and thanks for the chuckles you just provided, too. (G)
And this week I finally got a handle on clothing weights, too. I'm set as long as I keep to the program. And since I am enjoying the current me, I am hoping that staying with the program will just be fine since the outcome is so damn acceptable. On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 19:58:19 -0600, Prairie Roots wrote: I can't keep track anymore who's under and who's on top. No matter. You're still well below goal, you celebrated Thanksgiving and your BBS friendships, and you (along with your cohorts in comedy) are keeping the entire NG in stitches. Keep up the great work. Prairie Roots On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:02:06 -0800, Fred wrote: Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G) What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G) So (drumroll) the numbers this week are ..... The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4 The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0 Fred 219.2/158.4/164.0 (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
NYNY - Fred - Dec 3rd
That's enough from the northerly contingent! (G)
It was not quite empty and my leader probably would have me arrested. On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:31:50 -0800, "Brenda Hammond" wrote: Sorry about the little gain Fred, but you're still under goal and that's great! Gee if the place was empty, why didn't you weigh naked? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
NYNY - Fred - Dec 3rd
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 20:56:54 -0800, Fred
wrote: I'm set as long as I keep to the program. Huh! And here I was thinking you'd figured this out already. G Prairie Roots 232/175/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
NYNY - Fred - Dec 3rd
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 13:46:18 -0800, Fred wrote:
Thanks. Boy, you and Lesanne were in here fast! (G) Yup, I have fallen behind with the newsgroup - managed to pop in here for a few minutes while I caught my breath from the afternoon running. Maybe I will just become more of a hermit and not accept any invitations to any parties. (g) Yeah, sure - like THAT'S gonna happen. G Joyce On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:23:34 -0600, Joyce wrote: No matter what clothing option you choose, you still are well below your goal weight. Congratulations on keeping everything under control through the first step of the holiday season. Joyce On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:02:06 -0800, Fred wrote: Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G) What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G) So (drumroll) the numbers this week are ..... The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4 The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0 Fred 219.2/158.4/164.0 (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
NYNY - Fred - Dec 3rd
Well you can figure that I am in it for the long haul, as long as I can go
to meetings FREE like we can (GIANT G) I figure I can spend the Next 20 years if I want getting that last 5 off. ! "Fred" wrote in message ... I think you will make it, too. But that's what I'm now heading toward if it seems possible so I ain't letting you get ahead of me just yet (G). But with my up/down fluctuations it might not be either possible or comfortable. On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:36:16 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: Oh, I will eventually get to the 155. Consider that it took me from 1981 to this past August to get from my highest weight to my WW goal.... "Fred" wrote in message .. . YES!!!!!!!!! (g) We shall see. (g) On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 21:41:22 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: I don't think I am going to beat 158.4, so you get this week too. However, one of these days I am going to get to my Actual goal weight of 155, so .... Good going, only 1.4 after a major meal. Very very good. "Fred" wrote in message .. . Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G) What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G) So (drumroll) the numbers this week are ..... The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4 The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0 Fred 219.2/158.4/164.0 (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
NYNY - Fred - Dec 3rd
This is so true. My leader set her goal at the top, and did not go under
it. She is always on probation or something because she is a pound or two over when any holiday hits, or other stuff, like when the cinnabon opened their first place here and her husband found it. "Fred" wrote in message ... Thanks - well, it really does help to be a bit below goal which is probably why some of us set our goal at the TOP of the WW range. A group of us here have realized that there is not such thing a ONE STEADY WEIGHT. There are normal variations based on how much "bulk" you have left over from the day before's foods, water retention due to exercise or salt or women's period, etc. So up and down from week to week is something that just will happen. Anyone who can stay exactly the same week to week is not normal. So below goal is really the only way to actually be AT GOAL and Maintain LIFETIME. On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 01:21:19 GMT, "Janice Kennish" wrote: Fred, Sorry about the gain but it wasn't much considering Thanksgiving was in there!!! I have to say I can't wait until the day a 1.4 pound gain still keeps me under goal!! Way to stay below your goal--you're doing a great job!!! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
NYNY - Fred - Dec 3rd
Huh. Now that you mention it..... On top.....
"Prairie Roots" wrote in message ... I can't keep track anymore who's under and who's on top. No matter. You're still well below goal, you celebrated Thanksgiving and your BBS friendships, and you (along with your cohorts in comedy) are keeping the entire NG in stitches. Keep up the great work. Prairie Roots On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:02:06 -0800, Fred wrote: Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G) What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G) So (drumroll) the numbers this week are ..... The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4 The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0 Fred 219.2/158.4/164.0 (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NYNY - Fred - Nov 19 | Fred | Weightwatchers | 28 | December 6th, 2003 05:16 PM |
NYNY - Fred - Nov 19 | Fred | Weightwatchers | 110 | December 1st, 2003 05:12 PM |
NYNY - Fred - Oct 29th | Fred | Weightwatchers | 79 | November 16th, 2003 12:36 AM |
NYNY - Fred - Oct 22 - Another trampoline week | Fred | Weightwatchers | 17 | October 25th, 2003 10:26 PM |
NYNY - Fred, Oct 8th | Fred | Weightwatchers | 49 | October 12th, 2003 01:31 AM |