I'm baaaaacccckkkkk

oh fooey.

i regained all my lost weight because i spent the last 1-2 years binging.

i am hoping i can stay on track or at least get to a place where the road
way swerve but I don't go over the cliff, ya know?

I've seen people lose more weight than I weighted at my biggest but for me
its 50lbs of, 50 lbs on. At 5'3" that ain't pretty!!

so - i am a big old blob again, back to my post pregnancy blobtacularness. A
few familiar names here.

nanner
176/172/126
(is a goal weight in the 120's still flame-bait around here??)

nanner wrote:
:
:: nanner
:: 176/172/126
:: (is a goal weight in the 120's still flame-bait around here??)

haha. Welcome back....even though...I thought you were back!?!

"Roger Zoul" wrote in message
...
nanner wrote:
:
:: nanner
:: 176/172/126
:: (is a goal weight in the 120's still flame-bait around here??)

haha. Welcome back....even though...I thought you were back!?!

LOL i was back for a minute when i tried to get it together last time and
then there was thing week long pudding binge and ... must I go on????

On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:07:51 -0400, "nanner"
wrote:

oh fooey.

i regained all my lost weight because i spent the last 1-2 years binging.

i am hoping i can stay on track or at least get to a place where the road
way swerve but I don't go over the cliff, ya know?

I've seen people lose more weight than I weighted at my biggest but for me
its 50lbs of, 50 lbs on. At 5'3" that ain't pretty!!

so - i am a big old blob again, back to my post pregnancy blobtacularness. A
few familiar names here.

nanner
176/172/126
(is a goal weight in the 120's still flame-bait around here??)

Why would a goal in the 120s be flame-bait?

--
BlueBrooke
254/239/135

"Pat" wrote in message
...

:: (is a goal weight in the 120's still flame-bait around here??)

haha. Welcome back....even though...I thought you were back!?!

LOL i was back for a minute when i tried to get it together last time and
then there was thing week long pudding binge and ... must I go on????

Have you been doing any exercise?

Pat in TX


i was *before* the crash and burn entirely kicked in so I'd say 10 months of
no excercise at all.

why do you ask?

"BlueBrooke" .@. wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:07:51 -0400, "nanner"
wrote:

oh fooey.

i regained all my lost weight because i spent the last 1-2 years binging.


i am hoping i can stay on track or at least get to a place where the road
way swerve but I don't go over the cliff, ya know?

I've seen people lose more weight than I weighted at my biggest but for me
its 50lbs of, 50 lbs on. At 5'3" that ain't pretty!!

so - i am a big old blob again, back to my post pregnancy blobtacularness.
A
few familiar names here.

nanner
176/172/126
(is a goal weight in the 120's still flame-bait around here??)

Why would a goal in the 120s be flame-bait?

--
BlueBrooke
254/239/135

it just was. people would jump on you because they said "why does it have to
be this magical #" blah blah - it was a certain group of people at a certain
time on this group and it really got them going. For me that's the number
because I was always at my most compfortable weight at 126 and I am short.

I've been in and out of this group for at least 5 years and living on and
off LC since 1998

nanner wrote:
:: "Roger Zoul" wrote in message
:: ...
::: nanner wrote:
::::
::::: nanner
::::: 176/172/126
::::: (is a goal weight in the 120's still flame-bait around here??)
:::
::: haha. Welcome back....even though...I thought you were back!?!
::
:: LOL i was back for a minute when i tried to get it together last
:: time and then there was thing week long pudding binge and ... must I
:: go on????

next time...just keep posting through the binges...no need to quit...most of
us have been there....keep posting and spilling your binging guts.

nanner wrote:
:: it just was. people would jump on you because they said "why does it
:: have to be this magical #" blah blah - it was a certain group of
:: people at a certain time on this group and it really got them going.
:: For me that's the number because I was always at my most
:: compfortable weight at 126 and I am short.
::
:: I've been in and out of this group for at least 5 years and living
:: on and off LC since 1998

Sometimes it's just the way the wind blows....people somehow get a
"collective attitude," where everyone falls in sync and flames you out over
anything....it keeps things exciting...

Frankly, I think a good flamefest keeps things alive around here...just jump
in and give as good as you get!

:: (is a goal weight in the 120's still flame-bait around here??)

haha. Welcome back....even though...I thought you were back!?!

LOL i was back for a minute when i tried to get it together last time and
then there was thing week long pudding binge and ... must I go on????

Have you been doing any exercise?

Pat in TX

"nanner" wrote in message
...
oh fooey.

i regained all my lost weight because i spent the last 1-2 years binging.




Not to pick on you alone, but in general.... why do folks wait until
they get back to the starting point before they do it all over again I
wonder? Can you imagine if you started up again when you were only 10-20 lbs
gone? Gotta be some sort of emotional trigger here?


--
JK Sinrod
www.SinrodStudios.com
www.MyConeyIslandMemories.com