A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dieting is hard!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old August 19th, 2004, 02:14 PM
jmk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 8/19/2004 6:48 AM, Ignoramus29728 wrote:
In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:

JMA wrote in alt.support.diet on Wed, 18 Aug 2004:


Plus, women have hormone issues - the body wants to maintain fat more in
order to bear children. Plus some women gain weight every month due to their
cycle and even though it's water it doesn't necessarily come off as fast or
easy as it comes on. Then there's menopause as you know Chris that adds its
own difficulties to the mix.


*Tell* me about it..... sigh..... all the same, oh, the bliss of being
done with "all that"!



Hm, if one's weight goes up due to water retention, and then down,
every month, does it make it harder to lose weight over the period of
several months?


That's not what she said. She said, "the body wants to maintain fat."
In addition, there are water weight issues which put different
psychological stresses on women than men.



--
jmk in NC
  #42  
Old August 19th, 2004, 02:14 PM
jmk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 8/19/2004 6:48 AM, Ignoramus29728 wrote:
In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:

JMA wrote in alt.support.diet on Wed, 18 Aug 2004:


Plus, women have hormone issues - the body wants to maintain fat more in
order to bear children. Plus some women gain weight every month due to their
cycle and even though it's water it doesn't necessarily come off as fast or
easy as it comes on. Then there's menopause as you know Chris that adds its
own difficulties to the mix.


*Tell* me about it..... sigh..... all the same, oh, the bliss of being
done with "all that"!



Hm, if one's weight goes up due to water retention, and then down,
every month, does it make it harder to lose weight over the period of
several months?


That's not what she said. She said, "the body wants to maintain fat."
In addition, there are water weight issues which put different
psychological stresses on women than men.



--
jmk in NC
  #43  
Old August 19th, 2004, 02:17 PM
jmk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 8/19/2004 8:45 AM, Ignoramus29728 wrote:
In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:

Ignoramus29728 wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:


In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:

JMA wrote in alt.support.diet on Wed, 18 Aug 2004:


Plus, women have hormone issues - the body wants to maintain fat more in
order to bear children. Plus some women gain weight every month due to their
cycle and even though it's water it doesn't necessarily come off as fast or
easy as it comes on. Then there's menopause as you know Chris that adds its
own difficulties to the mix.


*Tell* me about it..... sigh..... all the same, oh, the bliss of being
done with "all that"!

Hm, if one's weight goes up due to water retention, and then down,
every month, does it make it harder to lose weight over the period of
several months?


It's not just water retention; it's to do with hormone fluctuation, etc.
You may choose to disbelieve us, but that is your privilege.

http://www.detnews.com/2003/health/0...d01-197825.htm



I do not "disbelieve", as such, I want to see some evidence. So many
things are said without evidence, that it only makes sense to ask for
it.

Thanks for the article, I will read it. It seems to say that men have
higher BMR (``In a preliminary study recently conducted on 76 Beaumont
patients who were morbidly obese (a 5-foot-8 person who weighs 310
pounds, for example), the men burned 13.6 calories per minute at their
peak exercise level, while the women burned 10.5 calories per
minute.'').

Besides that, would a man with a 500 calorie per day deficit lose
faster than a woman with a 500 calorie per day deficit?

i

They would not. A man can more easily achieve a defict and eat a
quantity of calories that would require women to go on VLCD. I see math
is not your strong suit.

--
jmk in NC
  #44  
Old August 19th, 2004, 02:17 PM
jmk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 8/19/2004 8:45 AM, Ignoramus29728 wrote:
In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:

Ignoramus29728 wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:


In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:

JMA wrote in alt.support.diet on Wed, 18 Aug 2004:


Plus, women have hormone issues - the body wants to maintain fat more in
order to bear children. Plus some women gain weight every month due to their
cycle and even though it's water it doesn't necessarily come off as fast or
easy as it comes on. Then there's menopause as you know Chris that adds its
own difficulties to the mix.


*Tell* me about it..... sigh..... all the same, oh, the bliss of being
done with "all that"!

Hm, if one's weight goes up due to water retention, and then down,
every month, does it make it harder to lose weight over the period of
several months?


It's not just water retention; it's to do with hormone fluctuation, etc.
You may choose to disbelieve us, but that is your privilege.

http://www.detnews.com/2003/health/0...d01-197825.htm



I do not "disbelieve", as such, I want to see some evidence. So many
things are said without evidence, that it only makes sense to ask for
it.

Thanks for the article, I will read it. It seems to say that men have
higher BMR (``In a preliminary study recently conducted on 76 Beaumont
patients who were morbidly obese (a 5-foot-8 person who weighs 310
pounds, for example), the men burned 13.6 calories per minute at their
peak exercise level, while the women burned 10.5 calories per
minute.'').

Besides that, would a man with a 500 calorie per day deficit lose
faster than a woman with a 500 calorie per day deficit?

i

They would not. A man can more easily achieve a defict and eat a
quantity of calories that would require women to go on VLCD. I see math
is not your strong suit.

--
jmk in NC
  #45  
Old August 19th, 2004, 04:10 PM
Annabel Smyth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ignoramus29728 wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:

In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:
Ignoramus29728 wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:

Besides that, would a man with a 500 calorie per day deficit lose
faster than a woman with a 500 calorie per day deficit?

Given a man and a woman of equal height and build, probably yes, since
the man is liable to have more muscle tissue and less fat for his weight
than the woman is.


Even so, remember, they still have the same calorie deficit, 500
calories in my example.

In which case, the man is probably eating more than the woman; if they
were both eating the same, he would have a larger calorie deficit than
her.
--
Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88/80kg

  #46  
Old August 19th, 2004, 04:10 PM
Annabel Smyth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ignoramus29728 wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:

In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:
Ignoramus29728 wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:

Besides that, would a man with a 500 calorie per day deficit lose
faster than a woman with a 500 calorie per day deficit?

Given a man and a woman of equal height and build, probably yes, since
the man is liable to have more muscle tissue and less fat for his weight
than the woman is.


Even so, remember, they still have the same calorie deficit, 500
calories in my example.

In which case, the man is probably eating more than the woman; if they
were both eating the same, he would have a larger calorie deficit than
her.
--
Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88/80kg

  #47  
Old August 19th, 2004, 04:46 PM
JMA
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ignoramus29728" wrote in message
...
In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:
Ignoramus29728 wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:

In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:
JMA wrote in alt.support.diet on Wed, 18 Aug 2004:

Plus, women have hormone issues - the body wants to maintain fat more
in
order to bear children. Plus some women gain weight every month due to
their
cycle and even though it's water it doesn't necessarily come off as
fast or
easy as it comes on. Then there's menopause as you know Chris that
adds its
own difficulties to the mix.

*Tell* me about it..... sigh..... all the same, oh, the bliss of being
done with "all that"!

Hm, if one's weight goes up due to water retention, and then down,
every month, does it make it harder to lose weight over the period of
several months?

It's not just water retention; it's to do with hormone fluctuation, etc.
You may choose to disbelieve us, but that is your privilege.

http://www.detnews.com/2003/health/0...d01-197825.htm


I do not "disbelieve", as such, I want to see some evidence. So many
things are said without evidence, that it only makes sense to ask for
it.

Thanks for the article, I will read it. It seems to say that men have
higher BMR (``In a preliminary study recently conducted on 76 Beaumont
patients who were morbidly obese (a 5-foot-8 person who weighs 310
pounds, for example), the men burned 13.6 calories per minute at their
peak exercise level, while the women burned 10.5 calories per
minute.'').

Besides that, would a man with a 500 calorie per day deficit lose
faster than a woman with a 500 calorie per day deficit?

i


Possibly not, but it would be much easier for a man to obtain a 500 calorie
deficit - thus the "painless" weight loss that some men have been able to
report.

Jenn


  #48  
Old August 19th, 2004, 04:46 PM
JMA
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ignoramus29728" wrote in message
...
In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:
Ignoramus29728 wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:

In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:
JMA wrote in alt.support.diet on Wed, 18 Aug 2004:

Plus, women have hormone issues - the body wants to maintain fat more
in
order to bear children. Plus some women gain weight every month due to
their
cycle and even though it's water it doesn't necessarily come off as
fast or
easy as it comes on. Then there's menopause as you know Chris that
adds its
own difficulties to the mix.

*Tell* me about it..... sigh..... all the same, oh, the bliss of being
done with "all that"!

Hm, if one's weight goes up due to water retention, and then down,
every month, does it make it harder to lose weight over the period of
several months?

It's not just water retention; it's to do with hormone fluctuation, etc.
You may choose to disbelieve us, but that is your privilege.

http://www.detnews.com/2003/health/0...d01-197825.htm


I do not "disbelieve", as such, I want to see some evidence. So many
things are said without evidence, that it only makes sense to ask for
it.

Thanks for the article, I will read it. It seems to say that men have
higher BMR (``In a preliminary study recently conducted on 76 Beaumont
patients who were morbidly obese (a 5-foot-8 person who weighs 310
pounds, for example), the men burned 13.6 calories per minute at their
peak exercise level, while the women burned 10.5 calories per
minute.'').

Besides that, would a man with a 500 calorie per day deficit lose
faster than a woman with a 500 calorie per day deficit?

i


Possibly not, but it would be much easier for a man to obtain a 500 calorie
deficit - thus the "painless" weight loss that some men have been able to
report.

Jenn


  #49  
Old August 19th, 2004, 04:47 PM
JMA
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rob" wrote in message
...
JMA wrote:

snip


Plus, women have hormone issues - Jenn


... and men have more stress since we're forced to prepare and correctly
react to womens hormone issues -

duck & sprint


Umm, dude, you know what PMS *really* stands for right? Putting up with
Men's S***




  #50  
Old August 19th, 2004, 04:47 PM
JMA
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rob" wrote in message
...
JMA wrote:

snip


Plus, women have hormone issues - Jenn


... and men have more stress since we're forced to prepare and correctly
react to womens hormone issues -

duck & sprint


Umm, dude, you know what PMS *really* stands for right? Putting up with
Men's S***




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The myth of the yo-yo: consistent rate of weight loss with successive dieting by VLCD. NR General Discussion 0 June 17th, 2004 02:19 AM
The myth of the yo-yo: consistent rate of weight loss with successive dieting by VLCD. NR Low Carbohydrate Diets 0 June 17th, 2004 02:19 AM
The myth of the yo-yo: consistent rate of weight loss with successive dieting by VLCD. NR Weightwatchers 0 June 17th, 2004 02:19 AM
The myth of the yo-yo: consistent rate of weight loss with successive dieting by VLCD. NR General Discussion 0 May 22nd, 2004 05:23 PM
The myth of the yo-yo: consistent rate of weight loss with successive dieting by VLCD. NR Weightwatchers 0 May 22nd, 2004 05:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.