If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
About diabetic friendly supplemental drinks
On May 16, 6:49*pm, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger wrote: Dogman wrote: Yes, it virtually does. He implies that doing drugs intraveneously, abusing other rec. drugs, taking antibiotics prohylatically, getting STD after STD, inhaling amyl nitrates, exchanging bodily fluids with hundreds of men per month, getting no sleep, eating poorly, drinking dirty water, etc. will destroy your immune ststem. HIV isn't needed. To disprove this theory what it takes is for a person who is otherwise healthy but has suffered an injury to receive a transfusion of HIV infected blood, then recover from their injuries and be healthy again and then later become symptomatic and die of AIDS. Unless I'm misunderstanding you, why does he need to have suffered an injury? Gee, I could understand his point. What's your problem? Doug is giving you the classic example of people who have contracted AIDS through blood transfusions following being seriously injured. There were plenty of them. They showed up in the 80s exactly as you would expect with a virus that is transmitted via blood. Someone was in a car crash, got a blood transfusion, recovered fine, later wound up with AIDS. I gave you Arthur Ashe as one famous example, though it wasn't an injury, it was a heart bypass. He was otherwise healthy. And we know that heart bypass patients normally don't wind up with no T cells, no immunity and die from AIDS. Only those that receive blood contaminated with HIV. And as quickly as these cases appeared, they disappeared here in the west once blood was screened for HIV. Now that would be one hell of a coincidence if HIV was not the cause. Isaac Asimov is another example contracted through a blood transfusion. The hemophiliacs are another classic example. They receive clotting factor that's generated from the blood on many people. So many of them suddenly started developing AIDS in the 80s when AIDS first appeared. Exactly as a reasonable person would expect from a virus transmitted via blood. Even Montagnier brought up this proof in the lecture I provided you with a link to. A lecture where he clearly says Duesburg is wrong in denying that HIV causes AIDS. But Duesburg and the denialist ignore these elephants in the room and come up with all kinds of bizarre explanations instead. You'd have to believe 10 year old hemophiliacs were drug abusing homosexuals who didn't get enough sleep or some other nonsense. That's why Duesburg hasn't been taken seriously by real scientists for decades. Experiments on both monkeys and chimps (our closest cousins) have done pretty much what you describe above, and they didn't get AIDS. Which once again shows that you don't know what your talking about. Monkeys have a very similar disease caused by a retrovirus. Much research has been done with monkeys to learn how to combat the human form http://jvi.asm.org/content/78/4/2121.full "Newborn rhesus macaques were infected with two chimeric simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) strains which contain unique human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) env genes and exhibit distinct phenotypes. Infection with either the CCR5-specific SHIVSF162P3 or the CXCR4-utilizing SHIVSF33A resulted in clinical manifestations consistent with simian AIDS. Most prominent in this study was the detection of severe thymic involution in all SHIVSF33A-infected infants, which is very similar to HIV-1-induced thymic dysfunction in children who exhibit a rapid pattern of disease progression." It's well known that monkeys have a similar retrovirus and a similar disease that can be transmitted among them. In fact it's thought that HIV likely came to humans by jumping from species to species. But all that is real science. And a doctor in Florida injected himself with HIV and didn't get AIDS. He did die within a year, I think, from a heart attack. Sure, we're to believe his self-reported claim that he actually did that. And even if it was true, it proves nothing. He died of a heart attack in a year and AIDS can take many years to manifest itself following infection. I'm surprised the AIDS industry didn't start to blame heart attacks on HIV too. They probably would have gotten away with it. There have been a few famous examples like this. They are extremely convincing examples. Convincing enough that Deusenberg's work on the topic is discreditted by most scientists. Like James and Trader, most scientists haven't read Duesberg's book. That's because among the rational, Duesburg has so thoroughly discredited himself that he's a joke. But thousands of them have, and thousands of them agree with Duesberg, Rasnick, Mullis, et al. I doubt it's thousands of scientists that have specific knowledge and are involved with AIDS research and treatment. There will always be some fools that will believe anything, no matter how silly. I can show you scientists and engineers who believe that what the rest of us know were 767's hitting the world trade center were actually just laser holograms. Let's see now. We have: HIV doesn't cause AIDS HPV isn't a cause of ovarian cancer No virus can cause cancer. Monkeys don't get AIDS. #2 is my favorite. There is a whole branch of biology devoted to oncoviruses. What do you want to add to the list next? |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
About diabetic friendly supplemental drinks
On May 16, 2:14*pm, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 10:52:58 -0700 (PDT), " wrote: On May 16, 1:13 pm, Dogman wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2012 09:54:52 -0700 (PDT), " wrote: Montagnier's own words, *2009*:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQoNW7lOnT4&NR=1 Of course the obvious problem for you is that the video doesn't show Montagnier denying that HIV causes AIDS. He said that it is not required, He never said any such thing. What part of "HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient to cause AIDS" do you not understand? [...] Look, you claimed "he never said any such thing." Well, he did, and I gave you the citation. Never means never, eh? No, you claimed he said it in the contemporary video that you linked to. In fact that quote is apparently two decades old. Rather odd that if Montagnier doesn't believe HIV causes AIDS that in the recent video he talks about vaccines, reducing transmission rates, etc. Why reduce transmission rates if there is nothing to transmit, eh? This is what I mean when I say you're too stupid to understand any of this stuff. Now please stop? *Okay? *You're boring me to death. -- Dogman Sure, you claim: HIV doesn't cause AIDS HPV isn't a cause of ovarian cancer No virus can cause cancer Monkey don't get AIDS. #3 is my favorite. There is a whole branch of biology devoted to oncoviruses. And you call others here stupid? |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
About diabetic friendly supplemental drinks
On 16/05/2012 9:21 PM, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 20:47:01 -0300, James Warren wrote: [...] Why are you evading a yes or no question? Why aren't you reading Duesberg's book? I have a whole stack of unread books that are way more important than that. I have a feeling that all the books in your home are unread. You would be wrong yet again. Why do you claim things for which you can't possibly have any evidence? Do you just insult gratuitously? -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
#214
|
|||
|
|||
About diabetic friendly supplemental drinks
On 16/05/2012 9:22 PM, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 20:55:16 -0300, James Warren wrote: [...] His viewpoint IS an opposing viewpoint, James. But whose viewpoint is opposing him? Who shall I read for that? Damn, and I thought a box of rocks was dumb. Sigh. Sigh and recommend just one book. You can do that, right? BTDT. It should be easy then, so why the dodge? -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
About diabetic friendly supplemental drinks
On 16/05/2012 11:06 PM, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 22:52:04 -0300, James Warren wrote: [...] I have a feeling that all the books in your home are unread. You would be wrong yet again. Why do you claim things for which you can't possibly have any evidence? Because I can. I can too, but I have intellectual integrity, so I don't. Do you just insult gratuitously? No. Sometimes I get paid to do it. Bu Duesberg? -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
About diabetic friendly supplemental drinks
On 16/05/2012 11:07 PM, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 22:52:40 -0300, James Warren wrote: Sigh and recommend just one book. You can do that, right? BTDT. It should be easy then, so why the dodge? It's not a dodge, but, as usual, you can't figure out what it is. Yet another dodge. -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
About diabetic friendly supplemental drinks
On 16/05/2012 11:36 PM, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 23:16:37 -0300, James Warren wrote: You would be wrong yet again. Why do you claim things for which you can't possibly have any evidence? Because I can. I can too, but I have intellectual integrity, so I don't. You are to intellectual integrity what a fish is to a bicycle. Yet another claim without any supporting evidence. At least you're consistent. Do you just insult gratuitously? No. Sometimes I get paid to do it. Bu Duesberg? No, I do it gratis for Duesberg. So you're an ass kissing disciple then? -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
#218
|
|||
|
|||
About diabetic friendly supplemental drinks
On 16/05/2012 11:36 PM, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 23:17:07 -0300, James Warren wrote: It's not a dodge, but, as usual, you can't figure out what it is. Yet another dodge. Yet another innane comment. And another dodge. -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
#219
|
|||
|
|||
About diabetic friendly supplemental drinks
On 16/05/2012 11:39 PM, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 23:37:55 -0300, James Warren wrote: You are to intellectual integrity what a fish is to a bicycle. Yet another claim without any supporting evidence. At least you're consistent. The proof is all around you. That's what the theists all say. No, I do it gratis for Duesberg. So you're an ass kissing disciple then? No, I just respect real scientists. Defined as the ones you believe in, right? Why don't you read a book on the other side. Compare and contrast opposing arguments. Critically evaluate both arguments. That's what real scientists do. -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
#220
|
|||
|
|||
About diabetic friendly supplemental drinks
On 17/05/2012 12:01 AM, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 23:44:21 -0300, James Warren wrote: The proof is all around you. That's what the theists all say. That's what anyone who can read says. No, I just respect real scientists. Defined as the ones you believe in, right? No, defined as the ones who practice The Scientific Method. Why don't you read a book on the other side. BTDT. The literature is awash with them. Compare and contrast opposing arguments. Critically evaluate both arguments. That's what real scientists do. Don't tell me what to do. You're not smart enough to do that. I guess you have to do that when your mind is made up. Everybody else just must be beneath you. You're not lacking in self esteem, are you? -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Supplemental Natural Diet Support | Meeks | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 0 | May 28th, 2008 01:44 PM |
Looking for a few friendly faces | justme | General Discussion | 4 | August 12th, 2006 05:46 PM |
Chicken recipes that are WW friendly AND kid friendly | Julia | Weightwatchers | 32 | March 10th, 2006 02:08 PM |
Friendly Server who really tried.... | Pat | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 3 | October 5th, 2004 08:12 PM |
Induction-friendly gum? | Mo Geffer | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 6 | September 8th, 2004 09:39 PM |