A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 27th, 2004, 10:32 PM
Steve Randy Shilts Bayt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II

Preface: I am no longer reading one-line brain dead responses from
people trying to keep me from saving the lives of millions of people
being brainwashed into believing Atkins. For 35 years of public
warnings against Atkins-like diets can't be ignored by one-line brain
dead comments. Any comments or desperate arguments should be e-mailed
to me and if not completely stupid will be considered for future
Atkins bashing.




STEVE BAYT
(Parma/Brook Park, Ohio)


So, last time I gave some highlights of 30 books with
publishers not financially connected to Atkins describing the lethal
nature of what I am calling THE ATKINS DEATH SENTENCE, as opposed to
the Atkins Diet. The word Diet implies something that is good.


Yet, for 35 years every health, fitness and medical
organization has unquestionably called Atkins high fat/high
protein/low-to no- carb approach the worst idea ever marketed. In 35
years there has yet to be any non-paid mass communication encouraging
people to do The Atkins Death Sentence. Not one doctor or entity not
being financially connected to Atkins has ever done anything but
condem and warn against Atkins.

While The Homeland Security Department is guarding against
political terrorism. Atkins has engaging in health terrorism protected
by The First Amendment-using Free Speech to cascade what many, have
called for decades, a potential health crisis if ever mass marketed.

The list of fatal problems associated with Atkins can be
summarized on page 65 of THE DIET ADVISOR published by Health Magazine
(parent company: TIme Inc. )As can other low carb diets be analyzed
throughout the rest of the book.

Due to the extensive undeniable scientific evidence that my
so-called title ATKINS DEATH SENTENCE is appropriate, the question
becomes what should individuals do who have been brainwashed by Atkins
marketing.

Similar to how from 1981-1986 most People With AIDS
(PWA's) couldn't get, or continue with Health Coverage or get or
maintain Life Insurance. So to will Atkins followers have trouble
getting coverage. For Health Insurance companies don't legally have to
pay for medical conditions self-induced by stupidity. A majority of
health insurance companies won't cover smoking related causes as they
didn't cover such treatments for PWA's AZT and HIV cocktails.

It will be very unlikely someone with a 130 Cholesterol
level when they start with a Health Insurance, goes on Atkins at time
of coverage commencement, raises their Cholesterol to the 300 range,
suffers kidney damage, brain damage due to the Atkins protein level
along with all the other hundreds of possible health problems, will
not have their coverage cancelled.

For Insurance companies will notice what treatments are
being pursued and come up with common demonators that the insured is
probably on Atkins.

Health Insurance companies before AIDS related Laws, would
use computers in what was called THE INTRANET to track medical
treatments of particular patients. Because homosexual sex is
considered such a high-risk activity- those who did not disclose their
lifestyle when applying for coverage had their policies cancelled for
fraud.
Some who found out they were HIV positive then got insurance were
convicted.

An Atkins person who despite all medical certainty of health
consequences is lured by the advertising-as were homosexuals lured by
bathhouses-and doesn't disclose they are on the Atkins Death Sentence
could face civil litigation and criminal prosecution for failure to
disclose either a pre-existing condition or high risk activity.

And of course, no one who has Health Coverage should
contact their insurance agent and ask them point blank if being on
Atkins would effect their premiums or if the drugs and operations in
the future will be covered. For there is caller-ID and other ways
Insurance companies can sick blood-sucking lawyers to find any way to
not pay benefits.

As for Life Insurance implications on benefactors of
those on Atkins, the law presently would require your carrier to pay
off the policy. For as of now it would be unlikely that Atkins could
be legally declared suicide.

Here's the scenario for what could happen, either on
CSI, Cold Case, Crossing Jordan or in the real world.

Someone after years of feeling life isn't worth living
but would like to do something for a loved one takes out a Life
Insurance policy. They don't want to put anyone in harm of being
charged with murder-or have the policyholder's murderer tell
investigators of being paid to kill the holder.

The depressed policyholder decides to go on Atkins after
reading the hundreds of books describing its programs eventual fatal
end. If they follow Atkins they won't live very much longer, lose some
weight during the Induction phase- and appear normal to friens they
don't want to worry.

The Atkins policyholder figures it will take about 2-4
years until they suffer a heart attack, kidney breakdown, coma or
death. So, there is time for their life to get better. For at any time
within 3 or so years on Atkins they can stop and live a healthy life.

After about 4 years nothing is any better, it's even
worse. They have been fired many times, can't get a job, have been
divorced many times, is living off welfare. So, the 4-year Atkins
policyholder finds a nice running course where no one will be around
to call 911. They wait until some Wagnerian weather to attempt a run.
After about a mile of trying to run with 4 years of toxic levels of
fat, cholesterol and protein they suffer a heart attack.

The official cause of death is Heart Attack albeit it
was more suicide which would prevent the benefactor from Insurance
proceeds. The Insurance company might conduct an investigation. For if
they are faced with paying off a $2 million policy even $20,000 or so
to find out why a person who eats an Atkins diet would try running
would be of minimal cost.

Maybe while the insurance company is investigating why
someone with a plus 300 cholesterol level would be out running, they
find out the deceased was on Atkins. The insurance company gets
suspicious. They do a background and discover divorces, firings,
bankruptcy etc. They find upon subpoena thousands of articles about
Atkins health consequences in the deceased apartment along with a
computer's cookies filled with health sites on My Favorite Places.

((((((((((((If anyone is thinking about doing this, then get immediate
psychological, and financial help. If anyone is thinking about
submitting this as a story for CSI, Crossing Jordan, Cold Case or any
other dramatic production. I WILL SUE for theft of intellectual
property and donate the proceeds to some AIDS, Homeless, Pet Shelter
organization and PCRM)))))))))

The insurance company then finds a deceased journal
along with Cholesterol test strips from years ago. The journal has
research about how un-healthy Atkins can make someone. And the
inevitable heart attack after years on Atkins.

The Insurance Company, after a few months, concludes
the deceased intentionally knew Atkins was indeed a death sentence. It
is also suspicious that the deceased never sought the extensive
medical treatments that could have prevented the heart attack.

They then disagree with the coroner and call the
deceased having died due to suicide. The benefactor gets nothing and
the deceased becomes one of about a million Americans who die every
year due to the lifestyle promoted by Atkins.

The insurance company agent who has read this posting on
google then seeks to reward me for saving them $2 million. At which
point I tell them to write a check to an organization of any of the
above causes.

IN THE NEXT ARTICLE. Which will be published probably
some time by 7:30 p.m.EDT June 30th but no sooner then 7:30 p.m EDT
June 29th I. will discuss the effects on the First Amendment, THE FTC,
FCC And FDA which are caused by the Atkins Death Sentence.



Love Means Never Having To Say. You're Sorry.


STEVE BAYT
  #2  
Old June 27th, 2004, 11:04 PM
marengo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II

Steve Randy Shilts Bayt wrote:
| Preface: I am no longer reading one-line brain dead responses from
| people trying to keep me from saving the lives of millions of people
| being brainwashed into believing Atkins.

And I am no longer reading volumes of drivel from a moronic hypocritical
pea-brain ignorant idiot vegan with his own agenda.
--
Peter
270/215/180
Before/Current Pix:
http://users.thelink.net/marengo/wei...htlosspix.html


  #3  
Old June 27th, 2004, 11:28 PM
TaliesinSoft
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II

What is so sad and so unfortunate is that so often newsgroup disagreements,
instead of being healthy debates, turn into name calling, often laced with
profanity, shouting matches. Many of us come to learn, and stepping into a
mire of mudslinging does nothing to help us achieve that end.

-- James L. Ryan -- TaliesinSoft

"My dog never came across a bush he didn't like!"

  #4  
Old June 27th, 2004, 11:49 PM
marengo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II

TaliesinSoft wrote:
| What is so sad and so unfortunate is that so often newsgroup
| disagreements, instead of being healthy debates, turn into name
| calling, often laced with profanity, shouting matches. Many of us
| come to learn, and stepping into a mire of mudslinging does nothing
| to help us achieve that end.
|
| -- James L. Ryan -- TaliesinSoft
|
| "My dog never came across a bush he didn't like!"


That's why I've killfiled him. You cannot have an intellectual discourse
with an intellectually dishonest individual. He gave himself away when he
inadvertently mentioned the PCRM, the front organization for PETA. Instead
of stating that he represents an anti-meat eating animal rights
organization, he slings lies, half-truths, innuendo and completely
foundless, unproven (unprovable) accusations as if they were "fact."

If he were a real man with real intellect he would have stated up front that
he represents PETA, and would have gone on to say why he believes that
humans should not eat meat. Instead he mistakenly assumes that by taking
the negative approach and bashing Atkins he can sway people into not eating
meat. He must really think that no one would be able to see through his
oh-so-obvious agenda.

It's sad, really. It must suck being him.
--
Peter
270/215/180
Before/Current Pix:
http://users.thelink.net/marengo/wei...htlosspix.html


  #5  
Old June 28th, 2004, 12:03 AM
Cubit
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II

Do you also advocate blood letting, the use of leeches, circumcision, and
mustard plaster?

40 years ago studies that showed high carbs cause CHD were ambiguos. The
doctors picked fat as the culprit without discerning evidence.


  #6  
Old June 28th, 2004, 04:19 AM
David Johnston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:28:12 GMT, TaliesinSoft
wrote:

What is so sad and so unfortunate is that so often newsgroup disagreements,
instead of being healthy debates, turn into name calling, often laced with
profanity, shouting matches. Many of us come to learn,


Did you not notice that the rants are being crossposted to
rec.arts.tv? Nobody on rec.arts.tv comes there to learn about the
atkins diet or vegetarianism. He's being an asshole.


  #7  
Old June 28th, 2004, 04:46 AM
TaliesinSoft
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:19:03 -0500, David Johnston wrote
(in article ):

Did you not notice that the rants are being crossposted to rec.arts.tv?
Nobody on rec.arts.tv comes there to learn about the atkins diet or
vegetarianism. He's being an asshole.


Actually I didn't notice the "rec.arts.tv" crossposting. That aside, I feel
the most effective strategy to discourage someone from posting what one
thinks of as gibberish is to just ignore it.


-- James L. Ryan -- TaliesinSoft

"My dog never came across a bush he didn't like!"

  #8  
Old June 28th, 2004, 08:28 PM
Doug Freyburger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II

Steve Randy Shilts Bayt wrote:

Preface: I am no longer reading one-line brain dead responses from
people trying to keep me from saving the lives of millions of people
being brainwashed into believing Atkins.


Then few will read your multi-page drivel because it's clear that
all you are interested in is spreading propaganda not debating
actual results.

For 35 years of public warnings against Atkins-like diets can't be
ignored ...


Nor could a century of blood-letting but eventually the medical
establishment figured out it was wrong. The low fat phase only
lasted under half that long. It's called progress.

The problem with the low fat idea is that it has been viewed as
one-size-fits-all. Nothing is a panacea. Folks should try low
fat and see if it works for them personally. If it does stick
with it. If it doesn't try something else. Personal customization
to figure out what does work.
  #9  
Old June 29th, 2004, 12:56 PM
Chet Hayes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II

I especially like the nonsense about people being criminally
prosecuted or sued for failing to disclose "high risk behavior" when
getting health insurance. I've filled out many health insurance forms
in my day, and while they do ask about pre-existing conditions,
treatments, etc. I've never seen one ask about high risk behavior, or
what one eats.

What a complete fool.
  #10  
Old June 29th, 2004, 08:17 PM
Bob (this one)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II

Chet Hayes wrote:

I've filled out many health insurance forms in my day, and while
they do ask about pre-existing conditions, treatments, etc. I've
never seen one ask about high risk behavior, or what one eats.


Then you're not a pilot, skydiver or race driver.

Pastorio

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Atkins & new Lo-Carb frenzy jk Low Carbohydrate Diets 21 April 16th, 2004 04:26 AM
Uncovering the Atkins diet secret Diarmid Logan Low Carbohydrate Diets 142 February 14th, 2004 03:26 PM
Fat people, get real ADP Low Carbohydrate Diets 48 December 16th, 2003 12:25 AM
ARTICLE: Yet another study has shown that the Atkins diet works Jim Marnott Low Carbohydrate Diets 108 December 12th, 2003 04:12 AM
The Atkins Spousal Syndrome: Partners of Low-Carb Dieters Suffer Mars at the Mu_n's Edge General Discussion 0 October 28th, 2003 05:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.