A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CNN: Man counted calories, watched the pounds go



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 25th, 2008, 08:49 PM posted to alt.support.diet,alt.support.diet.low-carb
Doug Freyburger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,866
Default CNN: Man counted calories, watched the pounds go

quoted an article by Lyle M about
limited fat release rates and how to adjust caloric intake
to not lose lean.

That's a long winded article that ends up going with a
simple guideline I've suggested over the years -

How many calories should I target?

I've read guidelines that range from 10 calories per pound
of goal weight through 12 calories per pound of current
weight for dieters. The guideline of 10 per pound of goal
weight treats body fat as needing no calories (sorta). The
guideline of 12 per pound of current weight treats body fat
as needing the same calories as muscle (sorta). A
simple compromise is to take those two calorie numbers
and average them. As you lose, redo the average based
on your new current weight every month or two. The
result will be a gradual taper down in calories.

If you note the calorie levels Lyle M discussed if you change
my 10's above to 12's and my 12's above to 14's it gives the
same pattern of tapering down as Lyle's long winded version.
He's a lot more focused on exercise than I am and that
abotu covers the difference in calories. Huh, as long winded
as I normally am, I ended up more sucsinct than Lyle M.

There's an even less exact guideline that I've suggested over
the years that works the same without calculation -

How should I handle portion sizes and hunger levels?

With over 20 to lose, if you've seen a new low in the last
two weeks you're doing fine so don't change your portion
sizes. With under 20 to lose, if you've seen a new low in
the last four weeks you're doing fine so don't change your
portion sizes.

If you haven't been hungry in the last two weeks, tweak
your portion sizes down a bit. If you have been hungry
more than once in the last two weeks, consider tweaking
your portion sizes up a bit. But in the last ten pounds you
likely won't be able to avoid hunger so chose which you
want more those last 10 pounds or lack of hunger.

Combine these two sets of decisions and you end up
drifting down, treating food as a way of preventing hunger,
and drifting portion sizes down to keep loss happening.
All with the only math being counting calories and watching
for a new low.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calories Explained.(alphabetical list of calories in food) [email protected] Low Carbohydrate Diets 0 March 23rd, 2008 08:33 AM
We Watched Blazing Saddles Damsel in dis Dress Low Carbohydrate Diets 38 June 4th, 2004 09:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.