A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Weightwatchers
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RAFL Oh whatever



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old February 9th, 2004, 05:42 AM
Fred
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RAFL Oh whatever

You know if they ever call you for jury duty you could serve all alone
(sort of!) (G)

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 09:37:38 -0600, Prairie Roots
wrote:

Modifying my size is proving to be MUCH easier than modifying my mood
swings. When you get that one figured out, let us know.

In the meantime, I'm carrying on with strength training and aerobic
exercise. Activity seems to fatigue Sybil/Eve/Jasmine/Tawanda/et al.
It hasn't been this quiet in a long time. LOL

Prairie Roots

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 14:41:33 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

I am a happy camper this morning. I think that history does make some
difference. I used to be quite happy at 200 and thought I would stay there.
Compared to 365, it was truly much better. Compared to now, no contest. I
really think I need to accept this as the spot and learn to modify the mood
swings instead of my size
"Lynne" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

If you feel good stay where you are. Unrealistic goals that are
impossible to attain just wreck self-esteem. You've come a very long
way, and you need to be proud of your accomplishments. A BF of 19 is
AMAZING!!! You're my hero!

Lynne

My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week

will
be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it

is
probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my
measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with
"athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to

quit
trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one

fifties,
y Ya as they say here




  #22  
Old February 9th, 2004, 05:44 AM
Fred
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RAFL Oh whatever

It is getwiththeprogram.ORG

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 23:42:05 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

http://www.getwiththeprogram.com
I hope ;0

"Connie" wrote in message
...
Lesanne:

What is the Bob Greene site?

Connie

Lesanne wrote:
Loosely translated y Ya, means "and whatever" "and so on" "and thats

it",
that kind of thing. I am a happy camper my own scale is back to 157

this
morning. The leader thinks 155 is not realistic because of my muscle

mass,
and the size I am right now, as in measurements. She thinks I am done.
Also, I do still have enough skin to cover 365 pounds although it has

done a
fabulous job of shrinking up, It doesn't flake off or anything. And the

way
I tend to get Ferociously hungry and feel weak when I try to get below

where
I am right now. My bone structure is fairly average, but I began
weightlifting while I was still in the mid 250's and I was not dieting

at
the time. I have lost some of the muscle mass, but you can still

clearly
see quite a bit of it here and there, particularly in my quads and my
shoulders. Bob Greene uses height, age, weight, waist measurement and

sex
(there was no place for "no" in the sex choices so I went with F for
failing). My waist measurement is 29 inches. Also, the top of me (lets

not
get too specific) still has two rather large weights that I don't care

to
totally lose, they give the body some shape. Y Ya. Gonna stick as

close to
157 as I can. She does not think that is realistic either, but

whatever.
She thinks the 164 goal is good. But I am not going there.

Lesanne
365/160/157
"Fred" wrote in message
...

A MAINTAIN below GOAL is a GOOD THING (as Martha would say).

Mind if I ask why the leader thought 155 was not realistic? Bone size
or bone density or?????

What does that Bob Greene site use to make that determination?

And is that "y Ya?" And if so, what does it mean when they say it
down "thar?"

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:


My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week

will

be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it

is

probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my
measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with
"athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to

quit

trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one

fifties,

y Ya as they say here







--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/205/155
RAFL 210.5/205/198.5



  #23  
Old February 9th, 2004, 05:49 AM
Fred
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RAFL Oh whatever

(sigh) - I only came out as "fit!" (sniff)

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 23:42:05 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

http://www.getwiththeprogram.com
I hope ;0

"Connie" wrote in message
...
Lesanne:

What is the Bob Greene site?

Connie

Lesanne wrote:
Loosely translated y Ya, means "and whatever" "and so on" "and thats

it",
that kind of thing. I am a happy camper my own scale is back to 157

this
morning. The leader thinks 155 is not realistic because of my muscle

mass,
and the size I am right now, as in measurements. She thinks I am done.
Also, I do still have enough skin to cover 365 pounds although it has

done a
fabulous job of shrinking up, It doesn't flake off or anything. And the

way
I tend to get Ferociously hungry and feel weak when I try to get below

where
I am right now. My bone structure is fairly average, but I began
weightlifting while I was still in the mid 250's and I was not dieting

at
the time. I have lost some of the muscle mass, but you can still

clearly
see quite a bit of it here and there, particularly in my quads and my
shoulders. Bob Greene uses height, age, weight, waist measurement and

sex
(there was no place for "no" in the sex choices so I went with F for
failing). My waist measurement is 29 inches. Also, the top of me (lets

not
get too specific) still has two rather large weights that I don't care

to
totally lose, they give the body some shape. Y Ya. Gonna stick as

close to
157 as I can. She does not think that is realistic either, but

whatever.
She thinks the 164 goal is good. But I am not going there.

Lesanne
365/160/157
"Fred" wrote in message
...

A MAINTAIN below GOAL is a GOOD THING (as Martha would say).

Mind if I ask why the leader thought 155 was not realistic? Bone size
or bone density or?????

What does that Bob Greene site use to make that determination?

And is that "y Ya?" And if so, what does it mean when they say it
down "thar?"

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:


My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week

will

be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it

is

probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my
measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with
"athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to

quit

trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one

fifties,

y Ya as they say here







--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/205/155
RAFL 210.5/205/198.5



  #24  
Old February 9th, 2004, 07:32 AM
Miss Violette
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RAFL Oh whatever

a whole post filled with nsvs that is wonderful to read, Lee
Fred wrote in message
...
No, I meant that Bob required you to pick a sex!! (g)

Sardines with onions are fine but too much efforts early in the a.m.
before a ski trip, a GREAT SKI TRIP, as it turns out.

I get that famished feeling after a lot of exercise and it cannot
easily be quenched. Tomorrow is probably going to be one of those
days, which is why I don't believe that Flex's requirement that I eat
all of my activity points on the day of activity is right - not for
_ME_.

I also don't think I can go down much more - Most of my lower body is
muscle but like you, I could work the upper body quite a bit more.
Very little, other than ski poling, works that but my lower body gets
all kinds of exercise. (sipping port now that the skinny cow is
finished) I'm hoping to counter the green tea from sushi dinner as it
appears to keep me awake so the port is intended to redeaden things
(G)

I think you have done great and there is no reason to push down the
range. I think WW has worked wonders and I think that their weight
ranges are pretty realistic and there is a RANGE for a reason - not
everyone should be top or bottom.

Funny, just now at sushi the folks sitting next to me ordered sashimi
(no rice) and I made an Atkins comment. They both said they did WW
(G). He made lifetime and she was also there, I believe. They also
mentioned that they bought the stock when it first went public and did
well. He lost 20 pounds and asked me how much. I said 60 and they
were both dumbfounded - asking about twice more! We had a great time
discussing foods and diets while eating dinner (G)


On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 16:36:24 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

oh man, what a great breakfast, oatmeal and sardines. I love sardines,

but
with onion (iced) and ak mak crackers. Bob did not force me, but it did
give me another opinion. And it kind of agrees with all the people who

see
me. Nobody is encouraging me to lose any more, even my thin women

friends
have all said Stop. The ones that used to look at me like I was nuts

when I
wanted to stop at 200 and 180 etc. I get hungry when I overeat, but it

is a
different hungry than the hungry that shows up when I hit 156. THAT is

an
eat the paint off the walls, dizzy spells kind of hungry. And I do want

to
try and build up my upper body strength to where it was when I started

this,
which may call for more food. I know I am most likely to get

dizzy/hungry
days when I do a real lively weights workout, and have the lower end of

my
weight range.
"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
Interesting info. All of it including Bob Greene forcing you to make
a choice (G)

Now, how do you pronounce Y Ya?

I think the famished is probably a good indication that the body needs
more food. But then again, I would have said that at a HIGHER weight
since I still somewhat believe those damn little fat cells are
secreting hormones demanding to be fed again!!!?????? That would
cause the resultant demand for food????

I'm in hover mode now - up a fraction, down a fraction. I like it
here, too just around 158 or so. At least, the way I feel biking and
skiing....

Sardines (second course) are calling....

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 14:01:50 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

Loosely translated y Ya, means "and whatever" "and so on" "and thats

it",
that kind of thing. I am a happy camper my own scale is back to 157

this
morning. The leader thinks 155 is not realistic because of my muscle

mass,
and the size I am right now, as in measurements. She thinks I am

done.
Also, I do still have enough skin to cover 365 pounds although it has

done a
fabulous job of shrinking up, It doesn't flake off or anything. And

the
way
I tend to get Ferociously hungry and feel weak when I try to get below

where
I am right now. My bone structure is fairly average, but I began
weightlifting while I was still in the mid 250's and I was not dieting

at
the time. I have lost some of the muscle mass, but you can still

clearly
see quite a bit of it here and there, particularly in my quads and my
shoulders. Bob Greene uses height, age, weight, waist measurement and

sex
(there was no place for "no" in the sex choices so I went with F for
failing). My waist measurement is 29 inches. Also, the top of me

(lets
not
get too specific) still has two rather large weights that I don't care

to
totally lose, they give the body some shape. Y Ya. Gonna stick as

close
to
157 as I can. She does not think that is realistic either, but

whatever.
She thinks the 164 goal is good. But I am not going there.

Lesanne
365/160/157
"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
A MAINTAIN below GOAL is a GOOD THING (as Martha would say).

Mind if I ask why the leader thought 155 was not realistic? Bone

size
or bone density or?????

What does that Bob Greene site use to make that determination?

And is that "y Ya?" And if so, what does it mean when they say it
down "thar?"

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next

week
will
be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said

that
it
is
probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put

my
measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with
"athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going

to
quit
trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one
fifties,
y Ya as they say here








  #25  
Old February 9th, 2004, 07:39 AM
Connie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RAFL Oh whatever

Thanks Fred and Lesanne!!

Connie

Fred wrote:
It is getwiththeprogram.ORG

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 23:42:05 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:


http://www.getwiththeprogram.com
I hope ;0

"Connie" wrote in message
...

Lesanne:

What is the Bob Greene site?

Connie

Lesanne wrote:

Loosely translated y Ya, means "and whatever" "and so on" "and thats

it",

that kind of thing. I am a happy camper my own scale is back to 157

this

morning. The leader thinks 155 is not realistic because of my muscle

mass,

and the size I am right now, as in measurements. She thinks I am done.
Also, I do still have enough skin to cover 365 pounds although it has

done a

fabulous job of shrinking up, It doesn't flake off or anything. And the

way

I tend to get Ferociously hungry and feel weak when I try to get below

where

I am right now. My bone structure is fairly average, but I began
weightlifting while I was still in the mid 250's and I was not dieting

at

the time. I have lost some of the muscle mass, but you can still

clearly

see quite a bit of it here and there, particularly in my quads and my
shoulders. Bob Greene uses height, age, weight, waist measurement and

sex

(there was no place for "no" in the sex choices so I went with F for
failing). My waist measurement is 29 inches. Also, the top of me (lets

not

get too specific) still has two rather large weights that I don't care

to

totally lose, they give the body some shape. Y Ya. Gonna stick as

close to

157 as I can. She does not think that is realistic either, but

whatever.

She thinks the 164 goal is good. But I am not going there.

Lesanne
365/160/157
"Fred" wrote in message
m...


A MAINTAIN below GOAL is a GOOD THING (as Martha would say).

Mind if I ask why the leader thought 155 was not realistic? Bone size
or bone density or?????

What does that Bob Greene site use to make that determination?

And is that "y Ya?" And if so, what does it mean when they say it
down "thar?"

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:



My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week

will


be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it

is


probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my
measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with
"athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to

quit


trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one

fifties,


y Ya as they say here





--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/205/155
RAFL 210.5/205/198.5






--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/205/155
RAFL 210.5/205/198.5

  #26  
Old February 9th, 2004, 09:46 AM
Joyce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RAFL Oh whatever

I never looked at the official url - I typed in bobgreene.com and my browser took
me to the site you listed. LOL!

Joyce

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 23:42:05 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote:

http://www.getwiththeprogram.com
I hope ;0

"Connie" wrote in message
...
Lesanne:

What is the Bob Greene site?

Connie

Lesanne wrote:
Loosely translated y Ya, means "and whatever" "and so on" "and thats

it",
that kind of thing. I am a happy camper my own scale is back to 157

this
morning. The leader thinks 155 is not realistic because of my muscle

mass,
and the size I am right now, as in measurements. She thinks I am done.
Also, I do still have enough skin to cover 365 pounds although it has

done a
fabulous job of shrinking up, It doesn't flake off or anything. And the

way
I tend to get Ferociously hungry and feel weak when I try to get below

where
I am right now. My bone structure is fairly average, but I began
weightlifting while I was still in the mid 250's and I was not dieting

at
the time. I have lost some of the muscle mass, but you can still

clearly
see quite a bit of it here and there, particularly in my quads and my
shoulders. Bob Greene uses height, age, weight, waist measurement and

sex
(there was no place for "no" in the sex choices so I went with F for
failing). My waist measurement is 29 inches. Also, the top of me (lets

not
get too specific) still has two rather large weights that I don't care

to
totally lose, they give the body some shape. Y Ya. Gonna stick as

close to
157 as I can. She does not think that is realistic either, but

whatever.
She thinks the 164 goal is good. But I am not going there.

Lesanne
365/160/157
"Fred" wrote in message
...

A MAINTAIN below GOAL is a GOOD THING (as Martha would say).

Mind if I ask why the leader thought 155 was not realistic? Bone size
or bone density or?????

What does that Bob Greene site use to make that determination?

And is that "y Ya?" And if so, what does it mean when they say it
down "thar?"

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:


My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week

will

be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it

is

probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my
measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with
"athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to

quit

trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one

fifties,

y Ya as they say here







--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/205/155
RAFL 210.5/205/198.5



  #27  
Old February 9th, 2004, 09:49 AM
Joyce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RAFL Oh whatever

at least you can say you are *fit*. I am *normal* or whatever. .1 away from
being fit. sigh

Joyce

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:49:36 -0800, Fred wrote:

(sigh) - I only came out as "fit!" (sniff)

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 23:42:05 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

http://www.getwiththeprogram.com
I hope ;0

"Connie" wrote in message
...
Lesanne:

What is the Bob Greene site?

Connie

Lesanne wrote:
Loosely translated y Ya, means "and whatever" "and so on" "and thats

it",
that kind of thing. I am a happy camper my own scale is back to 157

this
morning. The leader thinks 155 is not realistic because of my muscle

mass,
and the size I am right now, as in measurements. She thinks I am done.
Also, I do still have enough skin to cover 365 pounds although it has

done a
fabulous job of shrinking up, It doesn't flake off or anything. And the

way
I tend to get Ferociously hungry and feel weak when I try to get below

where
I am right now. My bone structure is fairly average, but I began
weightlifting while I was still in the mid 250's and I was not dieting

at
the time. I have lost some of the muscle mass, but you can still

clearly
see quite a bit of it here and there, particularly in my quads and my
shoulders. Bob Greene uses height, age, weight, waist measurement and

sex
(there was no place for "no" in the sex choices so I went with F for
failing). My waist measurement is 29 inches. Also, the top of me (lets

not
get too specific) still has two rather large weights that I don't care

to
totally lose, they give the body some shape. Y Ya. Gonna stick as

close to
157 as I can. She does not think that is realistic either, but

whatever.
She thinks the 164 goal is good. But I am not going there.

Lesanne
365/160/157
"Fred" wrote in message
...

A MAINTAIN below GOAL is a GOOD THING (as Martha would say).

Mind if I ask why the leader thought 155 was not realistic? Bone size
or bone density or?????

What does that Bob Greene site use to make that determination?

And is that "y Ya?" And if so, what does it mean when they say it
down "thar?"

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:


My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week

will

be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it

is

probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my
measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with
"athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to

quit

trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one

fifties,

y Ya as they say here







--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/205/155
RAFL 210.5/205/198.5



  #28  
Old February 9th, 2004, 03:22 PM
Lesanne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RAFL Oh whatever

OH, the sex issue. . A wrong number . I think once there is not a lot
of fat to draw from, when the body is trying to repair tissue it will Insist
on energy sources of some kind. It is truly a different quality of hunger
from that one that I would feel for a couple of weeks when I had to drop my
points? That one was intense too, but perversely almost enjoyable compared
to the exercise and lower weigh induced one. It felt "healthy" or
something, whereas the other feels "CRITICAL". I can't describe it, do you
feel the difference?
good deal on the nice ski trip. I wonder if I could ski.?
Upper body development almost requires resistance training i.e. inside
boring stuff. I am on here putting off starting, but gonna do it this
morning.
I am reminded of green tea by your post, gonna make a pot.

"Fred" wrote in message
...
No, I meant that Bob required you to pick a sex!! (g)

Sardines with onions are fine but too much efforts early in the a.m.
before a ski trip, a GREAT SKI TRIP, as it turns out.

I get that famished feeling after a lot of exercise and it cannot
easily be quenched. Tomorrow is probably going to be one of those
days, which is why I don't believe that Flex's requirement that I eat
all of my activity points on the day of activity is right - not for
_ME_.

I also don't think I can go down much more - Most of my lower body is
muscle but like you, I could work the upper body quite a bit more.
Very little, other than ski poling, works that but my lower body gets
all kinds of exercise. (sipping port now that the skinny cow is
finished) I'm hoping to counter the green tea from sushi dinner as it
appears to keep me awake so the port is intended to redeaden things
(G)

I think you have done great and there is no reason to push down the
range. I think WW has worked wonders and I think that their weight
ranges are pretty realistic and there is a RANGE for a reason - not
everyone should be top or bottom.

Funny, just now at sushi the folks sitting next to me ordered sashimi
(no rice) and I made an Atkins comment. They both said they did WW
(G). He made lifetime and she was also there, I believe. They also
mentioned that they bought the stock when it first went public and did
well. He lost 20 pounds and asked me how much. I said 60 and they
were both dumbfounded - asking about twice more! We had a great time
discussing foods and diets while eating dinner (G)


On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 16:36:24 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

oh man, what a great breakfast, oatmeal and sardines. I love sardines,

but
with onion (iced) and ak mak crackers. Bob did not force me, but it did
give me another opinion. And it kind of agrees with all the people who

see
me. Nobody is encouraging me to lose any more, even my thin women

friends
have all said Stop. The ones that used to look at me like I was nuts

when I
wanted to stop at 200 and 180 etc. I get hungry when I overeat, but it

is a
different hungry than the hungry that shows up when I hit 156. THAT is

an
eat the paint off the walls, dizzy spells kind of hungry. And I do want

to
try and build up my upper body strength to where it was when I started

this,
which may call for more food. I know I am most likely to get

dizzy/hungry
days when I do a real lively weights workout, and have the lower end of

my
weight range.
"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
Interesting info. All of it including Bob Greene forcing you to make
a choice (G)

Now, how do you pronounce Y Ya?

I think the famished is probably a good indication that the body needs
more food. But then again, I would have said that at a HIGHER weight
since I still somewhat believe those damn little fat cells are
secreting hormones demanding to be fed again!!!?????? That would
cause the resultant demand for food????

I'm in hover mode now - up a fraction, down a fraction. I like it
here, too just around 158 or so. At least, the way I feel biking and
skiing....

Sardines (second course) are calling....

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 14:01:50 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

Loosely translated y Ya, means "and whatever" "and so on" "and thats

it",
that kind of thing. I am a happy camper my own scale is back to 157

this
morning. The leader thinks 155 is not realistic because of my muscle

mass,
and the size I am right now, as in measurements. She thinks I am

done.
Also, I do still have enough skin to cover 365 pounds although it has

done a
fabulous job of shrinking up, It doesn't flake off or anything. And

the
way
I tend to get Ferociously hungry and feel weak when I try to get below

where
I am right now. My bone structure is fairly average, but I began
weightlifting while I was still in the mid 250's and I was not dieting

at
the time. I have lost some of the muscle mass, but you can still

clearly
see quite a bit of it here and there, particularly in my quads and my
shoulders. Bob Greene uses height, age, weight, waist measurement and

sex
(there was no place for "no" in the sex choices so I went with F for
failing). My waist measurement is 29 inches. Also, the top of me

(lets
not
get too specific) still has two rather large weights that I don't care

to
totally lose, they give the body some shape. Y Ya. Gonna stick as

close
to
157 as I can. She does not think that is realistic either, but

whatever.
She thinks the 164 goal is good. But I am not going there.

Lesanne
365/160/157
"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
A MAINTAIN below GOAL is a GOOD THING (as Martha would say).

Mind if I ask why the leader thought 155 was not realistic? Bone

size
or bone density or?????

What does that Bob Greene site use to make that determination?

And is that "y Ya?" And if so, what does it mean when they say it
down "thar?"

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next

week
will
be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said

that
it
is
probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put

my
measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with
"athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going

to
quit
trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one
fifties,
y Ya as they say here








  #29  
Old February 9th, 2004, 03:24 PM
Lesanne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RAFL Oh whatever

PR and I together could make up a jury pool. You know, it is funny, one of
the things that one of my exes said drove him crazy was the way I could
argue both sides of things in the same discussion. That would be the ex
with the brain. As opposed to the ex with the body...

"Fred" wrote in message
...
You know if they ever call you for jury duty you could serve all alone
(sort of!) (G)

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 09:37:38 -0600, Prairie Roots
wrote:

Modifying my size is proving to be MUCH easier than modifying my mood
swings. When you get that one figured out, let us know.

In the meantime, I'm carrying on with strength training and aerobic
exercise. Activity seems to fatigue Sybil/Eve/Jasmine/Tawanda/et al.
It hasn't been this quiet in a long time. LOL

Prairie Roots

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 14:41:33 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

I am a happy camper this morning. I think that history does make some
difference. I used to be quite happy at 200 and thought I would stay

there.
Compared to 365, it was truly much better. Compared to now, no contest.

I
really think I need to accept this as the spot and learn to modify the

mood
swings instead of my size
"Lynne" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

If you feel good stay where you are. Unrealistic goals that are
impossible to attain just wreck self-esteem. You've come a very long
way, and you need to be proud of your accomplishments. A BF of 19 is
AMAZING!!! You're my hero!

Lynne

My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week
will
be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that

it
is
probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my
measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with
"athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to
quit
trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one
fifties,
y Ya as they say here






  #30  
Old February 9th, 2004, 03:24 PM
Lesanne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RAFL Oh whatever

oh Thank you Fred, my memory serks...

"Fred" wrote in message
...
It is getwiththeprogram.ORG

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 23:42:05 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

http://www.getwiththeprogram.com
I hope ;0

"Connie" wrote in message
...
Lesanne:

What is the Bob Greene site?

Connie

Lesanne wrote:
Loosely translated y Ya, means "and whatever" "and so on" "and thats

it",
that kind of thing. I am a happy camper my own scale is back to 157

this
morning. The leader thinks 155 is not realistic because of my muscle

mass,
and the size I am right now, as in measurements. She thinks I am

done.
Also, I do still have enough skin to cover 365 pounds although it has

done a
fabulous job of shrinking up, It doesn't flake off or anything. And

the
way
I tend to get Ferociously hungry and feel weak when I try to get

below
where
I am right now. My bone structure is fairly average, but I began
weightlifting while I was still in the mid 250's and I was not

dieting
at
the time. I have lost some of the muscle mass, but you can still

clearly
see quite a bit of it here and there, particularly in my quads and my
shoulders. Bob Greene uses height, age, weight, waist measurement

and
sex
(there was no place for "no" in the sex choices so I went with F for
failing). My waist measurement is 29 inches. Also, the top of me

(lets
not
get too specific) still has two rather large weights that I don't

care
to
totally lose, they give the body some shape. Y Ya. Gonna stick as

close to
157 as I can. She does not think that is realistic either, but

whatever.
She thinks the 164 goal is good. But I am not going there.

Lesanne
365/160/157
"Fred" wrote in message
...

A MAINTAIN below GOAL is a GOOD THING (as Martha would say).

Mind if I ask why the leader thought 155 was not realistic? Bone

size
or bone density or?????

What does that Bob Greene site use to make that determination?

And is that "y Ya?" And if so, what does it mean when they say it
down "thar?"

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:


My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next

week

will

be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that

it

is

probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my
measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with
"athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going

to

quit

trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one

fifties,

y Ya as they say here







--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/205/155
RAFL 210.5/205/198.5





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAFL wk 3/THTP wk 7 - Laura (LJ) Laura Weightwatchers 47 February 3rd, 2004 08:34 AM
Post your results here! RafL wk 2 & THTP wk 5 Amberle3 Weightwatchers 35 January 19th, 2004 03:19 PM
RAFL & THTP Laura(LJ) Laura Weightwatchers 9 January 19th, 2004 07:10 AM
RAFL Week 1 I LOST! Billie Severy Weightwatchers 8 January 19th, 2004 07:08 AM
Time to 'fess up - RAFL Nathalie W Weightwatchers 17 January 15th, 2004 09:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.