Diabetes Epidemic Grows as Feds Reduce Commitment to Prevention

Year in Review: Congress to Adjourn by Making First-Ever Reduction to
Effective CDC Diabetes Prevention Program; Research at NIH Also Cut.


http://www.diabetesincontrol.com/mod...ticle&sid=3370

what does this mean ?

Rob wrote:
what does this mean ?


The President will preserve the tax cuts at all costs ....

Those who become diabetic, but could have had the disorder prevented,
are collateral damage from the expensive war (because some foreign guy
was alleged to have mass weapons of destruction), and the necessity of
maintaining almost equally expensive tax cuts.

Perhaps the tax cuts and the extra cases of diabetes will stimulate the
economy.... and some of the medical community will earn more money by
treating the extra diabetics and the drug companies will also have
increased cash flow..


--
1) Eat Till SATISFIED, Not STUFFED... Atkins repeated 9 times in the book
2) Exercise: It's Non-Negotiable..... Chapter 22 title, Atkins book
3) Don't Diet Without Supplimental Nutrients... Chapter 23 title, Atkins
book
4) A sensible eating plan, and follow it. (Atkins, Self Made or Other)

Those who become diabetic, but could have had the disorder prevented, are
collateral damage from the expensive war (because some foreign guy was
alleged to have mass weapons of destruction), and the necessity of
maintaining almost equally expensive tax cuts.

Perhaps the tax cuts and the extra cases of diabetes will stimulate the
economy.... and some of the medical community will earn more money by
treating the extra diabetics and the drug companies will also have
increased cash flow..

Liberal, democratic tripe from a person who doesn't understand PERSONAL
RESPONSIBILITY. How you can blame Bush on diabetes? Call Marengo. You two
could have a party.

"Moo" wrote in message
. ..

Those who become diabetic, but could have had the disorder prevented, are
collateral damage from the expensive war (because some foreign guy was
alleged to have mass weapons of destruction), and the necessity of
maintaining almost equally expensive tax cuts.

Perhaps the tax cuts and the extra cases of diabetes will stimulate the
economy.... and some of the medical community will earn more money by
treating the extra diabetics and the drug companies will also have
increased cash flow..

Liberal, democratic tripe from a person who doesn't understand PERSONAL
RESPONSIBILITY. How you can blame Bush on diabetes? Call Marengo. You two
could have a party.


what does needing more doctors and meds to treat the growing numbers of
diabetics have to do with anything political?