If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ASD Book Club - Thin for Life (Key #1)
Well Ladies and Gentlemen, today is officially November and time to kick off
the first installment of the ASD Book Club. The book we're reading is "Thin for Life: 10 Keys to Success from People Who Have Lost Weight and Kept It Off" by Anne M. Fletcher. All are welcome to participate or kill the thread. By popular request, we're doing the book one section at a time. Having never participated in a book club let alone lead one I'm winging it here so please jump in! I'll just summarize the chapter in this post - breaking it into easily discussable sections. Key to Success #1 - Believe That You Can Become Thin for Life Summary: This chapter starts out with a discussion of the success stories interviewed for the book. The author started out with 160 people in the first edition. People who lost at least 20 lbs and kept it off for a minimum of 3 years. There are an additional 48 people included in this book. These 208 people are referred to as "masters" throughout the book. "They Break the Rules" addresses some commonly held notions about weight control and maintenance, most of which were challenged by the success of the masters. Myth #1: If you've been overweight since childhood, it's next to imporssible to lose weight and keep it off. Myth #2: If you've dieted and failed may times before, there's little hope of ever licking your weight problem. Myth #3: If you do succeed at losing weight and keeping ti off, you'll have to eat like a bird for the rest of your life. Myth #4: In order to lose weight and keep it off, you hav eto become an exercise fanatic. Myth #5: It's really hard to lose weight once you pass the age of 40. Myth #6: You can't lose weight on your own, let alone maintain weight loss. Myth #7: Diets don't work - if you lose weight be going on a diet, you're bound to gain it back. Myth #8: If you hit a plateau while losing weight, there's little hope of moving on. Myth #9: If you start regaining weight, you're bound to gain it all back. You should stay away from the scale. Myth #10: If you don't stay at your original weight goal, then you're a failure. Why the "Failure Talk"?/Finding Success - a discussion of the weight maintenance statistics and why they may be incorrectly skewed toward the failures. What Exactly is Maintenance? - a discussion on how to define maintenance If You're Fat, It May Not Be Your Fault - But That Doesn't Mean You Can't Do Something About It/What Have You Got to Lose? - a discussion on the causes/reasons for obesity and how to overcome some obstacles. The "Nondieting" Movement - a little about the nondieting perspective. It's Your Choice/If You Think You Can, You Will - making the choice to lose weight and believing in your ability to do it. Opinions, thoughts, or comments on these topics as discussed in the book? I'll add mine as we go, I just wanted to start off with a neutral jumping off point. Jenn |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:16:32 -0600, "JMA" wrote:
Opinions, thoughts, or comments on these topics as discussed in the book? I'll add mine as we go, I just wanted to start off with a neutral jumping off point. I read the whole book after I bought it a few weeks back, and I marked up the bits that made me want to comment, so here goes.... First, I found the book tremendously uplifting. It was refreshing to read a book that was so optimistic in tone, challenging so many of the things we're told so often - like that a string of previous failed attempts doesn't mean you can't succeed in the end (although I'm quite sure my lifetime overall loss is far higher than the 270 pounds average quoted for those who finally succeeded!), that it's not more or less a given conclusion that people who lose their weight will then regain it, that age is no barrier to success - I loved the woman who lost 97 pounds at the age of 69. I liked the idea that you can use the experience gained in previous attempts to achieve success in the end. I know I have a mass of experience on what works, what doesn't work, nutritional information, portion size, and probably most of all how I behave in certain situations. Surely all this can only come in useful if I can really harness it to my own advantage. Another point that struck me was to learn that many of the "masters" had settled for a maintenance weight higher than their original goal. I think this is something we need to be prepared to do if that's what's going to work for us, and to realise it doesn't mean we are "failures". In fact, very little of this book dwells on the idea of failure, which can be such an enemy of success, in my experience. I'm quite good at the negative self-talk I found the whole bit about maintenance very interesting as it tallied quite closely with how I've always felt it should be - to define maintenance as a range you've agreed with yourself that you'll keep within, rather than a precise weight, and this is what successful maintainers here on asd seem to do, too. The point is made that "contrary to what some people think, weight cycling has not been proven to increase the amount of fat tissue in people who lose and regain weight". There doesn't seem to be any scientific reference to back this up, so I wonder it it's true? Gosh, it's difficult to comment on a whole chapter - I'm glad we're not doing the whole book at once! To sum up my feelings on chapter 1, there was a lot that was encouraging and I didn't spot anything that I really disagreed with or that didn't match quite well with my own thoughts and experiences. I think it gets a bit more controversial later on. I love the use of real life case studies, which always interests me. janice |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:16:32 -0600, "JMA" wrote:
Opinions, thoughts, or comments on these topics as discussed in the book? I'll add mine as we go, I just wanted to start off with a neutral jumping off point. I read the whole book after I bought it a few weeks back, and I marked up the bits that made me want to comment, so here goes.... First, I found the book tremendously uplifting. It was refreshing to read a book that was so optimistic in tone, challenging so many of the things we're told so often - like that a string of previous failed attempts doesn't mean you can't succeed in the end (although I'm quite sure my lifetime overall loss is far higher than the 270 pounds average quoted for those who finally succeeded!), that it's not more or less a given conclusion that people who lose their weight will then regain it, that age is no barrier to success - I loved the woman who lost 97 pounds at the age of 69. I liked the idea that you can use the experience gained in previous attempts to achieve success in the end. I know I have a mass of experience on what works, what doesn't work, nutritional information, portion size, and probably most of all how I behave in certain situations. Surely all this can only come in useful if I can really harness it to my own advantage. Another point that struck me was to learn that many of the "masters" had settled for a maintenance weight higher than their original goal. I think this is something we need to be prepared to do if that's what's going to work for us, and to realise it doesn't mean we are "failures". In fact, very little of this book dwells on the idea of failure, which can be such an enemy of success, in my experience. I'm quite good at the negative self-talk I found the whole bit about maintenance very interesting as it tallied quite closely with how I've always felt it should be - to define maintenance as a range you've agreed with yourself that you'll keep within, rather than a precise weight, and this is what successful maintainers here on asd seem to do, too. The point is made that "contrary to what some people think, weight cycling has not been proven to increase the amount of fat tissue in people who lose and regain weight". There doesn't seem to be any scientific reference to back this up, so I wonder it it's true? Gosh, it's difficult to comment on a whole chapter - I'm glad we're not doing the whole book at once! To sum up my feelings on chapter 1, there was a lot that was encouraging and I didn't spot anything that I really disagreed with or that didn't match quite well with my own thoughts and experiences. I think it gets a bit more controversial later on. I love the use of real life case studies, which always interests me. janice |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"janice" wrote in message ... On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:16:32 -0600, "JMA" wrote: Opinions, thoughts, or comments on these topics as discussed in the book? I'll add mine as we go, I just wanted to start off with a neutral jumping off point. I read the whole book after I bought it a few weeks back, and I marked up the bits that made me want to comment, so here goes.... First, I found the book tremendously uplifting. It was refreshing to read a book that was so optimistic in tone, challenging so many of the things we're told so often - like that a string of previous failed attempts doesn't mean you can't succeed in the end (although I'm quite sure my lifetime overall loss is far higher than the 270 pounds average quoted for those who finally succeeded!), that it's not more or less a given conclusion that people who lose their weight will then regain it, that age is no barrier to success - I loved the woman who lost 97 pounds at the age of 69. I appreciated the optimistic tone also. I am so sick of hearing about how little chance I have of success because of either a. - the weight loss method I initially chose or b. - whatever "statistics" are being spouted by people (ok, mostly person) on this group who are mean, petty, little ****ants who derive pleasure at deeming others a failure. The people in this group who I look up to as role models are the more positive, overall happier people who are *always* encouraging others rather than pointing out all of the negatives. I think most of us who spent our lives overweight or obese have heard enough negative talk to last a lifetime. Some of what I marked in the book were statements like "Don't pay attention to the odds." "If you think you can't you won't." "ignore people who say you can't do it." Those are things I've copied down and have used as affirmations the last several weeks after reading them. I liked the idea that you can use the experience gained in previous attempts to achieve success in the end. I know I have a mass of experience on what works, what doesn't work, nutritional information, portion size, and probably most of all how I behave in certain situations. Surely all this can only come in useful if I can really harness it to my own advantage. Experience is the best teacher. Another point that struck me was to learn that many of the "masters" had settled for a maintenance weight higher than their original goal. I think this is something we need to be prepared to do if that's what's going to work for us, and to realise it doesn't mean we are "failures". In fact, very little of this book dwells on the idea of failure, which can be such an enemy of success, in my experience. I'm quite good at the negative self-talk Same here. I've been on the receiving end of negative crap most of my obese life. Regaining some weight when my medical problems were out of control was devistating to me. It was folks like you and others in this group (minus one ignorant) who were able to help me realize that I wasn't a failure and it helped me keep going and not give up. In my job, I deal with a lot of kids who have the deck stacked against them. If I promoted the "reality" of the failures that lie ahead of them, they'd stop coming to school altogether. It should be the same for weight loss. If I had dwelled on the "failure" part of my weight loss, I'd probably be back at 300 lbs already rather than controlling my weight and my bulimia. I found the whole bit about maintenance very interesting as it tallied quite closely with how I've always felt it should be - to define maintenance as a range you've agreed with yourself that you'll keep within, rather than a precise weight, and this is what successful maintainers here on asd seem to do, too. My favorite part of that section was "Maintenance means much more than *weight* maintenance. It includes the maintenance of other healthy lifestyle behaviors, such as healthy eating patterns, exercise, reducing stress, keeping healthy relationships and more." There are some people who are at a healthy weight, but definitely not healthy people. The point is made that "contrary to what some people think, weight cycling has not been proven to increase the amount of fat tissue in people who lose and regain weight". There doesn't seem to be any scientific reference to back this up, so I wonder it it's true? There are a ton of references in the back of the book, but they're not footnoted or noted in any way so that definitely makes it difficult. This isn't the first time I've heard it said though. Gosh, it's difficult to comment on a whole chapter - I'm glad we're not doing the whole book at once! I agree. To sum up my feelings on chapter 1, there was a lot that was encouraging and I didn't spot anything that I really disagreed with or that didn't match quite well with my own thoughts and experiences. I think it gets a bit more controversial later on. I love the use of real life case studies, which always interests me. I did appreciate the discussion on "failure talk" also. The experts interviewed felt that the negative statistics may not be a real picture of the truth because of things like: - the type of people who end up in research studies from which the statistics are derived - report averages that "blot out" the cases of success in a study - broad conclusions from research studies with weight loss methods selected by experimenters rather than by individuals using personal plans which tend to be more successful. Unlike people who rely on a study to tell them everything, I don't live in a lab. I live in a multifaceted world with too many variables to be reproduced in a lab or a study. So, a book like this is very much geared toward an open minded person like me. The main thrust of the end of this chapter was that it is all up to the individual - period. Jenn |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"janice" wrote in message ... On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:16:32 -0600, "JMA" wrote: Opinions, thoughts, or comments on these topics as discussed in the book? I'll add mine as we go, I just wanted to start off with a neutral jumping off point. I read the whole book after I bought it a few weeks back, and I marked up the bits that made me want to comment, so here goes.... First, I found the book tremendously uplifting. It was refreshing to read a book that was so optimistic in tone, challenging so many of the things we're told so often - like that a string of previous failed attempts doesn't mean you can't succeed in the end (although I'm quite sure my lifetime overall loss is far higher than the 270 pounds average quoted for those who finally succeeded!), that it's not more or less a given conclusion that people who lose their weight will then regain it, that age is no barrier to success - I loved the woman who lost 97 pounds at the age of 69. I appreciated the optimistic tone also. I am so sick of hearing about how little chance I have of success because of either a. - the weight loss method I initially chose or b. - whatever "statistics" are being spouted by people (ok, mostly person) on this group who are mean, petty, little ****ants who derive pleasure at deeming others a failure. The people in this group who I look up to as role models are the more positive, overall happier people who are *always* encouraging others rather than pointing out all of the negatives. I think most of us who spent our lives overweight or obese have heard enough negative talk to last a lifetime. Some of what I marked in the book were statements like "Don't pay attention to the odds." "If you think you can't you won't." "ignore people who say you can't do it." Those are things I've copied down and have used as affirmations the last several weeks after reading them. I liked the idea that you can use the experience gained in previous attempts to achieve success in the end. I know I have a mass of experience on what works, what doesn't work, nutritional information, portion size, and probably most of all how I behave in certain situations. Surely all this can only come in useful if I can really harness it to my own advantage. Experience is the best teacher. Another point that struck me was to learn that many of the "masters" had settled for a maintenance weight higher than their original goal. I think this is something we need to be prepared to do if that's what's going to work for us, and to realise it doesn't mean we are "failures". In fact, very little of this book dwells on the idea of failure, which can be such an enemy of success, in my experience. I'm quite good at the negative self-talk Same here. I've been on the receiving end of negative crap most of my obese life. Regaining some weight when my medical problems were out of control was devistating to me. It was folks like you and others in this group (minus one ignorant) who were able to help me realize that I wasn't a failure and it helped me keep going and not give up. In my job, I deal with a lot of kids who have the deck stacked against them. If I promoted the "reality" of the failures that lie ahead of them, they'd stop coming to school altogether. It should be the same for weight loss. If I had dwelled on the "failure" part of my weight loss, I'd probably be back at 300 lbs already rather than controlling my weight and my bulimia. I found the whole bit about maintenance very interesting as it tallied quite closely with how I've always felt it should be - to define maintenance as a range you've agreed with yourself that you'll keep within, rather than a precise weight, and this is what successful maintainers here on asd seem to do, too. My favorite part of that section was "Maintenance means much more than *weight* maintenance. It includes the maintenance of other healthy lifestyle behaviors, such as healthy eating patterns, exercise, reducing stress, keeping healthy relationships and more." There are some people who are at a healthy weight, but definitely not healthy people. The point is made that "contrary to what some people think, weight cycling has not been proven to increase the amount of fat tissue in people who lose and regain weight". There doesn't seem to be any scientific reference to back this up, so I wonder it it's true? There are a ton of references in the back of the book, but they're not footnoted or noted in any way so that definitely makes it difficult. This isn't the first time I've heard it said though. Gosh, it's difficult to comment on a whole chapter - I'm glad we're not doing the whole book at once! I agree. To sum up my feelings on chapter 1, there was a lot that was encouraging and I didn't spot anything that I really disagreed with or that didn't match quite well with my own thoughts and experiences. I think it gets a bit more controversial later on. I love the use of real life case studies, which always interests me. I did appreciate the discussion on "failure talk" also. The experts interviewed felt that the negative statistics may not be a real picture of the truth because of things like: - the type of people who end up in research studies from which the statistics are derived - report averages that "blot out" the cases of success in a study - broad conclusions from research studies with weight loss methods selected by experimenters rather than by individuals using personal plans which tend to be more successful. Unlike people who rely on a study to tell them everything, I don't live in a lab. I live in a multifaceted world with too many variables to be reproduced in a lab or a study. So, a book like this is very much geared toward an open minded person like me. The main thrust of the end of this chapter was that it is all up to the individual - period. Jenn |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Ignoramus1308" wrote in message ... On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:15:49 +0000, janice wrote: Another point that struck me was to learn that many of the "masters" had settled for a maintenance weight higher than their original goal. I think this is something we need to be prepared to do if that's what's going to work for us, and to realise it doesn't mean we are "failures". In fact, very little of this book dwells on the idea of failure, which can be such an enemy of success, in my experience. I'm quite good at the negative self-talk I also read the book some time ago and it is not a terrible book, although, unlike you, I found the positive self talk and fake optimism to be mildly irritating. I do not think that optimism, as opposed to realism, leads to better results in anything measurable, such as income, return on capital, weight loss and so on. You have no idea what realism is. Realism is understanding that life is multifaceted and not everything can be measured scientifically. Of course *you* found the optimism irritating because you are a negative petty and mean spirited individual who gets pleasure out of what you perceive as the failure of others. I agree with you -- and the book -- that it is a great idea to try to choose an easily defensible target weight, rather than strive to have the perfect figure, regardless of difficulty. If I am not mixing it up, this book also points out that most people do not look like models, at any weight. So losing weight to achieve great looks can be a big source of disappointment. If that were the case then why do you insult people who put on 2-3 or 8 lbs, or more? Don't answer, we all know. The first one is about Thin for Life. They refer to the National Weight Control Registry and their studies. Unfortunately, as a member of that registry, I must say that they have an agenda of promoting low fat dieting. That is evident from their questionnaire. It had numerous questions such as "do you try to keep high fat foods out of the house", and so on. But it would not ask a question such as "do you try to keep high CARB foods out of the house". So, a researcher looking at answers to the questionnaires, would conclude something like "many successful maintainers are low fatting", but it would be next to impossible to conclude that at least some successful maintainers are low carbing, because of the way the questionnaire is designed. I was rather disappointed at that obvious partiality. So, I view all conclusions based on that NWCR data as being somewhat suspect. Because it interferes with your religion, we understand. At the time the NWCR was established, low-carb was still fringe. Interesting how all of those people still are maintaining on low fat though. It works for some, just not for you. But in your world, that means it's wrong. Somewhat similarly, these books dwell a lot on various psychological attributes, which are no doubt important, and did not bother to explore very deeply if the successful maintainers in fact have some superior "metabolism", or some other bodily advantage. Yes, that's your dream come true. Face it, they ate less and exercised more. Interesting how doing real weightlifting (beyond calethenics) has given me a "super" metabolism compared to where I was a mere 6 months ago. Oh, I forgot, I'm just out of shape by your ASSumptions. It is, therefore, possible that successful maintainers have some sort of biological advantage, that allowed their superior attitude to actually bring results. That is upsetting and not uplifting, and demeans their accomplishment to some extent, but, quite possibly, is true. Not likely, but for you who has to find the cloud in every silver lining it's definitely not a surprise. You go out of your way to spread misery and negativity. That they talk so much about psychology and much less about biology is probably due to a "man with a hammer" syndrome. It is also easier and cheaper to talk about psychology and discuss answers to psychological questions, than it is to conduct metaboic studies, blood tests, deal with real statistics, etc. Yes, because dealing with the whole person, not just their numbers is baaaaad. Emotions just suck and are so irrelevant in our lives. Psychology is a real science - deal with it. I wonder if you're so negative on it because someone actually has identified the plethora of issues you seem to have. Being human, I liked mention of some of the traits of successful maintainers that I can identify with. Taking it one day at a time, watching weight, making self a priority etc. That said, I do not harbor great illusions that these simple traits alone would be enough to make me maintain my weight loss for an extended period of time, like a decade. I have to be on a diet that matches my biology and lifestyle. No one said any differently. You should see someone about that persecution complex. BTW, I have my doubts about the human thing since humans are generally not emotionally stunted robots. I also know that I should not rely on exercise excessively, or else the whole dieting thing will break as soon as I become unable to spend enough time exercising, due to various life events. Exercise is great, but it should not be the linchpin of the weight maintenance, it should be an aide. If you remembered the book correctly you'd know that it doesn't advocate excessive exercise. It says specifically "Myth #4: In order to lose weight and keep it off, you have to become an exercise fanatic." But as usual, you aren't going to let a silly little thing like fact get in the way of your overblown speculations. As I read this book I was able to see people in this group - good, bad, and otherwise. I knew *you* would have a problem with it since as I continued to read I kept thinking - aha exactly the opposite of the crap that ignoranus posts! That's when I realized what an excellent resource it was. Jenn |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"JMA" wrote in message ... "Ignoramus1308" wrote in message ... On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:15:49 +0000, janice wrote: Another point that struck me was to learn that many of the "masters" had settled for a maintenance weight higher than their original goal. I think this is something we need to be prepared to do if that's what's going to work for us, and to realise it doesn't mean we are "failures". In fact, very little of this book dwells on the idea of failure, which can be such an enemy of success, in my experience. I'm quite good at the negative self-talk I also read the book some time ago and it is not a terrible book, although, unlike you, I found the positive self talk and fake optimism to be mildly irritating. I do not think that optimism, as opposed to realism, leads to better results in anything measurable, such as income, return on capital, weight loss and so on. You have no idea what realism is. Realism is understanding that life is multifaceted and not everything can be measured scientifically. Of course *you* found the optimism irritating because you are a negative petty and mean spirited individual who gets pleasure out of what you perceive as the failure of others. I agree with you -- and the book -- that it is a great idea to try to choose an easily defensible target weight, rather than strive to have the perfect figure, regardless of difficulty. If I am not mixing it up, this book also points out that most people do not look like models, at any weight. So losing weight to achieve great looks can be a big source of disappointment. If that were the case then why do you insult people who put on 2-3 or 8 lbs, or more? Don't answer, we all know. The first one is about Thin for Life. They refer to the National Weight Control Registry and their studies. Unfortunately, as a member of that registry, I must say that they have an agenda of promoting low fat dieting. That is evident from their questionnaire. It had numerous questions such as "do you try to keep high fat foods out of the house", and so on. But it would not ask a question such as "do you try to keep high CARB foods out of the house". So, a researcher looking at answers to the questionnaires, would conclude something like "many successful maintainers are low fatting", but it would be next to impossible to conclude that at least some successful maintainers are low carbing, because of the way the questionnaire is designed. I was rather disappointed at that obvious partiality. So, I view all conclusions based on that NWCR data as being somewhat suspect. Because it interferes with your religion, we understand. At the time the NWCR was established, low-carb was still fringe. Interesting how all of those people still are maintaining on low fat though. It works for some, just not for you. But in your world, that means it's wrong. Somewhat similarly, these books dwell a lot on various psychological attributes, which are no doubt important, and did not bother to explore very deeply if the successful maintainers in fact have some superior "metabolism", or some other bodily advantage. Yes, that's your dream come true. Face it, they ate less and exercised more. Interesting how doing real weightlifting (beyond calethenics) has given me a "super" metabolism compared to where I was a mere 6 months ago. Oh, I forgot, I'm just out of shape by your ASSumptions. It is, therefore, possible that successful maintainers have some sort of biological advantage, that allowed their superior attitude to actually bring results. That is upsetting and not uplifting, and demeans their accomplishment to some extent, but, quite possibly, is true. Not likely, but for you who has to find the cloud in every silver lining it's definitely not a surprise. You go out of your way to spread misery and negativity. That they talk so much about psychology and much less about biology is probably due to a "man with a hammer" syndrome. It is also easier and cheaper to talk about psychology and discuss answers to psychological questions, than it is to conduct metaboic studies, blood tests, deal with real statistics, etc. Yes, because dealing with the whole person, not just their numbers is baaaaad. Emotions just suck and are so irrelevant in our lives. Psychology is a real science - deal with it. I wonder if you're so negative on it because someone actually has identified the plethora of issues you seem to have. Being human, I liked mention of some of the traits of successful maintainers that I can identify with. Taking it one day at a time, watching weight, making self a priority etc. That said, I do not harbor great illusions that these simple traits alone would be enough to make me maintain my weight loss for an extended period of time, like a decade. I have to be on a diet that matches my biology and lifestyle. No one said any differently. You should see someone about that persecution complex. BTW, I have my doubts about the human thing since humans are generally not emotionally stunted robots. I also know that I should not rely on exercise excessively, or else the whole dieting thing will break as soon as I become unable to spend enough time exercising, due to various life events. Exercise is great, but it should not be the linchpin of the weight maintenance, it should be an aide. If you remembered the book correctly you'd know that it doesn't advocate excessive exercise. It says specifically "Myth #4: In order to lose weight and keep it off, you have to become an exercise fanatic." But as usual, you aren't going to let a silly little thing like fact get in the way of your overblown speculations. As I read this book I was able to see people in this group - good, bad, and otherwise. I knew *you* would have a problem with it since as I continued to read I kept thinking - aha exactly the opposite of the crap that ignoranus posts! That's when I realized what an excellent resource it was. Jenn Gotta love the hostility. Can you imagine a world where folks are focused more on their own stuff than trying to figure out someone else's stuff? That would be cool.... Anyway...back to the discussion, of which I can not make a comment since I don't have the book and so must rely on you fine folks' responses to said book. Heidi |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"JMA" wrote in message ... "Ignoramus1308" wrote in message ... On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:15:49 +0000, janice wrote: Another point that struck me was to learn that many of the "masters" had settled for a maintenance weight higher than their original goal. I think this is something we need to be prepared to do if that's what's going to work for us, and to realise it doesn't mean we are "failures". In fact, very little of this book dwells on the idea of failure, which can be such an enemy of success, in my experience. I'm quite good at the negative self-talk I also read the book some time ago and it is not a terrible book, although, unlike you, I found the positive self talk and fake optimism to be mildly irritating. I do not think that optimism, as opposed to realism, leads to better results in anything measurable, such as income, return on capital, weight loss and so on. You have no idea what realism is. Realism is understanding that life is multifaceted and not everything can be measured scientifically. Of course *you* found the optimism irritating because you are a negative petty and mean spirited individual who gets pleasure out of what you perceive as the failure of others. I agree with you -- and the book -- that it is a great idea to try to choose an easily defensible target weight, rather than strive to have the perfect figure, regardless of difficulty. If I am not mixing it up, this book also points out that most people do not look like models, at any weight. So losing weight to achieve great looks can be a big source of disappointment. If that were the case then why do you insult people who put on 2-3 or 8 lbs, or more? Don't answer, we all know. The first one is about Thin for Life. They refer to the National Weight Control Registry and their studies. Unfortunately, as a member of that registry, I must say that they have an agenda of promoting low fat dieting. That is evident from their questionnaire. It had numerous questions such as "do you try to keep high fat foods out of the house", and so on. But it would not ask a question such as "do you try to keep high CARB foods out of the house". So, a researcher looking at answers to the questionnaires, would conclude something like "many successful maintainers are low fatting", but it would be next to impossible to conclude that at least some successful maintainers are low carbing, because of the way the questionnaire is designed. I was rather disappointed at that obvious partiality. So, I view all conclusions based on that NWCR data as being somewhat suspect. Because it interferes with your religion, we understand. At the time the NWCR was established, low-carb was still fringe. Interesting how all of those people still are maintaining on low fat though. It works for some, just not for you. But in your world, that means it's wrong. Somewhat similarly, these books dwell a lot on various psychological attributes, which are no doubt important, and did not bother to explore very deeply if the successful maintainers in fact have some superior "metabolism", or some other bodily advantage. Yes, that's your dream come true. Face it, they ate less and exercised more. Interesting how doing real weightlifting (beyond calethenics) has given me a "super" metabolism compared to where I was a mere 6 months ago. Oh, I forgot, I'm just out of shape by your ASSumptions. It is, therefore, possible that successful maintainers have some sort of biological advantage, that allowed their superior attitude to actually bring results. That is upsetting and not uplifting, and demeans their accomplishment to some extent, but, quite possibly, is true. Not likely, but for you who has to find the cloud in every silver lining it's definitely not a surprise. You go out of your way to spread misery and negativity. That they talk so much about psychology and much less about biology is probably due to a "man with a hammer" syndrome. It is also easier and cheaper to talk about psychology and discuss answers to psychological questions, than it is to conduct metaboic studies, blood tests, deal with real statistics, etc. Yes, because dealing with the whole person, not just their numbers is baaaaad. Emotions just suck and are so irrelevant in our lives. Psychology is a real science - deal with it. I wonder if you're so negative on it because someone actually has identified the plethora of issues you seem to have. Being human, I liked mention of some of the traits of successful maintainers that I can identify with. Taking it one day at a time, watching weight, making self a priority etc. That said, I do not harbor great illusions that these simple traits alone would be enough to make me maintain my weight loss for an extended period of time, like a decade. I have to be on a diet that matches my biology and lifestyle. No one said any differently. You should see someone about that persecution complex. BTW, I have my doubts about the human thing since humans are generally not emotionally stunted robots. I also know that I should not rely on exercise excessively, or else the whole dieting thing will break as soon as I become unable to spend enough time exercising, due to various life events. Exercise is great, but it should not be the linchpin of the weight maintenance, it should be an aide. If you remembered the book correctly you'd know that it doesn't advocate excessive exercise. It says specifically "Myth #4: In order to lose weight and keep it off, you have to become an exercise fanatic." But as usual, you aren't going to let a silly little thing like fact get in the way of your overblown speculations. As I read this book I was able to see people in this group - good, bad, and otherwise. I knew *you* would have a problem with it since as I continued to read I kept thinking - aha exactly the opposite of the crap that ignoranus posts! That's when I realized what an excellent resource it was. Jenn Gotta love the hostility. Can you imagine a world where folks are focused more on their own stuff than trying to figure out someone else's stuff? That would be cool.... Anyway...back to the discussion, of which I can not make a comment since I don't have the book and so must rely on you fine folks' responses to said book. Heidi |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Heidi" wrote in message ... Gotta love the hostility. Can you imagine a world where folks are focused more on their own stuff than trying to figure out someone else's stuff? That would be cool.... Anyway...back to the discussion, of which I can not make a comment since I don't have the book and so must rely on you fine folks' responses to said book. Heidi Yep, that's pretty much what happens when you jump into the middle of stuff. Since he hides his posting history it's tough to go back and see all of the friendly and supportive things he's done over time (/sarcasm off) Jenn |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Ignoramus1308" wrote in message ... You know, I post to some purely technical newsgroups, dealing with pleasant topics and hobbies, and even there, there are some bitter people and endless flamewars etc. It is not something that happens only here. But yet I am not alone in this group - you seem to bring it out in people with your endless charm. Hey, even in other groups they think you're an idiot. Anyway...back to the discussion, of which I can not make a comment since I don't have the book and so must rely on you fine folks' responses to said book. You know, that book is not introducing something new like the discovery of relativity. It discusses subjects that we already know a bit about. So if you have an opinion about anything that is said here, go ahead and say it! There was a post summarizing the first chapter of the book for those that didn't read it. Jenn |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASD Book Club | JMA | General Discussion | 0 | October 25th, 2004 01:06 AM |
ASD Book Club | JMA | General Discussion | 11 | October 7th, 2004 03:12 PM |
ASD Book Club | JMA | General Discussion | 7 | September 26th, 2004 12:44 PM |
ASD Book Club? | JMA | General Discussion | 24 | September 22nd, 2004 03:06 PM |
Where are all the thin poeple from Atkins first book? | Rob | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 244 | August 12th, 2004 07:34 PM |