If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
How a real scientist can make a difference. Eventually.
On Wed, 23 May 2012 06:03:41 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: [...] If I ever do get seriously ill, I'll make sure the doctor I see knows what he or she is talking about, is someone who never stops learning, and is someone who fully understands what The Scientific Method and the Hippocratic Oath actually are. In other words, you have no doctor, which isn't surprising given your bizarre mindset. You do realize how stupid that sounds, right? Nah, probably not. What do you propose to do? Actually, asshole, I propose that I not get seriously ill. If I do get seriously ill, and say, need a specialist, I intend to remain in control of my treatment, the drugs prescribed, etc., not the doctor. But feel free to let *your* doctors run your life! -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
How a real scientist can make a difference. Eventually.
On May 24, 11:55*am, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 06:21:46 -0700 (PDT), " wrote: Did you not read that article I posted today? That's typical, it's not an anomaly. It's sure typical of your methods. Yes, it is. To give examples, which I was asked for. *The FDA withdrew their recommendation.* I wonder why they did that? Simple. They changed their opinion based on new data. You take one doctor's opinion that is negative and instantly it becomes the gold standard of truth. Since you are unable to reason deductively, let's see if you can prove him wrong. Again, I can see why you so easily go wrong. YOU are the one choosing to believe this one editorial writer. YOU are then using that to slam and indict the entire medical establishment without ever considering any other views or possibilities. It's up to YOU to prove he's right. You should be thanking this doctor, and here you are impugning his efforts to save lives. You're a real piece of work, asshole. More vulgarity which is to be expected from someone who's getting demolished here right and left an can't argue the facts. One doctor said it in an editorial and it's negative about a drug company on a very complex subject. Yet instantly, that one doctor must be right and what the drug company did is criminal..... Yes, it is criminal, unless you think "improvement in quality of life" is just another way to say "deaths" and "heart attacks." Another example of faulty logic. How can a person of even normal intelligence come away with any other conclusion, that they did it deliberately, and with deception! Very easy. *It's just the opinion of one doctor on a complex subject. *And we have not even heard the other side. * Capiche? We heard the other side when the FDA withdrew it's recommendations. Sure, based on new data. Now if the FDA is really evil as you claim, why would they change their opinion at all? |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
How a real scientist can make a difference. Eventually.
On Fri, 25 May 2012 07:30:50 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: [...] *The FDA withdrew their recommendation.* I wonder why they did that? Simple. They changed their opinion based on new data. No, they didn't. They changed it only when forced to by the FDA. "The results I found in the Amgen report, filed with the FDA in 1996, showed that bigger epoetin doses to target higher hematocrit did not improve the physical function quality of life component at all, and had significantly increased the risk of death, heart attack, other thrombotic events, and hospitalizations." Which is why you can't go by PR releases, you have to actually read the studies themselves. AMGEN knew this all along. You should be thanking this doctor, and here you are impugning his efforts to save lives. You're a real piece of work, asshole. More vulgarity which is to be expected from someone who's getting demolished here right and left an can't argue the facts. My language is appropriate for the assholes who call others "loons" and "morons." Yes, it is criminal, unless you think "improvement in quality of life" is just another way to say "deaths" and "heart attacks." Another example of faulty logic. It's exactly what they tried to get away with. Sure, based on new data. Now if the FDA is really evil as you claim, why would they change their opinion at all? The FDA was as much duped as evil here. -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Make 1000 dollars for every 20 people you get to your website! A Real Business! | NCMom26 | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 2 | June 8th, 2007 10:04 PM |
The Science of Getting It Wrong (and how to make it right - eventually) | Jbuch | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 0 | February 28th, 2007 02:43 PM |
Does it really make a difference... | Uncle Bonzi | Weightwatchers | 15 | October 28th, 2006 12:02 AM |
***Make 50-K In 2 Weeks - This Is Real!!!*** | [email protected] | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 0 | September 8th, 2006 09:03 PM |
Does Food Quality Make a Difference? | Carol Frilegh | General Discussion | 20 | October 25th, 2004 04:41 AM |