Speaking of Quackery, there is no science standing behind the Glycemic

"Correct. All bull**** and smoke and mirrors, paid for by grain
companies."

Na, it was the dairy and meat industry that paid for it, its all reverse
psychology don't ya know?

"The whole point of my THREAD is that real world experiences and
observations have real world value even if NOT supported by stupid medical
scientism.

Ergo, the Glycemic Index is NOT Quackery. But, the scientific method is
Quacked."

Ergo, you don't understand that which you fear, why, because you want to.
Astrology and esp are popular also as "real world experiences" and fare no
better then homopathology in lacking any independent evidence of support.
That independent means no one cares what you think unless and untill you
produce the meat of evidence in place of self invented irrelevant
babbling. The science for gi is sound, to show the contrary requires
equally sound evidence that finds no salvation in babbling.

My observations were not claimed to be science with regard to your babble,
only common sense and observation serves. I had many years of graduate
level training in the scientific method thank you. If we were doing
science it would be about you and your behavior and the possible character
flaws by which to make a diagnosis. But we need not bother with such a
formal approach for you have provided all the evidence such that science
is not required to identify same. Bigotry and hissy fits and bouts of
emotional hand waving and appeals to marterdom are obvious to anyone as
all the evidence we need.

You do not understand science, you have no grounds to be critical of
others who do based on your lack of same, you are jealous and envious of
it's power in the face of your pathetic notions and how it contradicts
what you hold dear and meaningful. You are bitter and resent the hand
life has delt you and lash out in that bitterness while at the same time
desperatly seeking recognition and validation.

"Sorry to inform you, but YOU are NOT:

1. Practicing the scientific method, now. 2. Furthering the noble cause of
the scientific method, now.

Anybody can claim to believe in science, but that is not what counts. Nor,
has it ever counted.

Only the scientific method counts, and you dear fool are NOT presently
engaging in the scientific method in any shape, way, or form."

wrote:
"The whole point of my THREAD is that real world experiences and
observations have real world value even if NOT supported by stupid medical
scientism.

Ergo, the Glycemic Index is NOT Quackery. But, the scientific method is
Quacked."

Ergo, you don't understand that which you fear, why, because you want to.
Astrology and esp are popular also as "real world experiences" and fare no
better then homopathology in lacking any independent evidence of support.
That independent means no one cares what you think unless and untill you
produce the meat of evidence in place of self invented irrelevant
babbling. The science for gi is sound, to show the contrary requires
equally sound evidence that finds no salvation in babbling.

See my commentary on babbling on these ngs at:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...d9c9c853239923

Sorry to inform you, but YOU are NOT:

1. Practicing the scientific method, now.
2. Furthering the noble cause of the scientific method, now.

Anybody can claim to believe in science, but that is not what counts.
Nor, has it ever counted.

Only the scientific method counts, and you dear fool are NOT presently
engaging in the scientific method in any shape, way, or form.

You have my condolences, for being just a deluded fool.

wrote:

only common sense and observation serves. I had many years of graduate
level training in the scientific method thank you.

You are dumber than a door nob, thank you.

You are a Benjamin Rush of the new millennium.

While the Glycemic Index has been a real help for diabetics and for
those suffering from borderline diabetes, all you see is your blind
pursuit of science. But, NEVER do you actually follow the Scientific
Method.

The patient be damn. The public be damn. Just as long as you can
blindly pursue your beloved science, but NEVER the scientific method.

You have my condolences. And, the public has been warned: You wont
find any use of the scientific method on these ngs. No self-respecting
scientist would ever post on these ngs. They publish research. They
NEVER babble here.

Just thought that you might want to know.

wrote:

only common sense and observation serves. I had many years of graduate
level training in the scientific method thank you.

You are dumber than a door nob, thank you.

You are a Benjamin Rush of the new millennium.

While the Glycemic Index has been a real help for diabetics and for
those suffering from borderline diabetes, all you see is your blind
pursuit of science. But, NEVER do you actually follow the Scientific
Method.

The patient be damn. The public be damn. Just as long as you can
blindly pursue your beloved science, but NEVER the scientific method.

You have my condolences. And, the public has been warned: You wont
find any use of the scientific method on these ngs. No self-respecting
scientist would ever post on these ngs. They publish research. They
NEVER babble here.

Just thought that you might want to know.

As mentioned before, all the evidence is here before us to make common
sense decisions of the quality of your babble and the character on which
it is formed, hissy fits and other now familiar behavior continues in
place of informative content.

"You are dumber than a door nob, thank you.
You are a Benjamin Rush of the new millennium.

While the Glycemic Index has been a real help for diabetics and for
those suffering from borderline diabetes, all you see is your blind
pursuit of science. But, NEVER do you actually follow the Scientific
Method.

The patient be damn. The public be damn. Just as long as you can
blindly pursue your beloved science, but NEVER the scientific method.

You have my condolences. And, the public has been warned: You wont
find any use of the scientific method on these ngs. No self-respecting
scientist would ever post on these ngs. They publish research. They
NEVER babble here."