A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old April 11th, 2004, 01:19 AM
Carmen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof.

Hi,
On 10-Apr-2004, "marengo" wrote:

| Translation services brought to you free of charge by Carmen. G

LMAO!


Thank you. :-)

By the way I manage a business where cutomer service is everything
(a hotel); we do all we can to please our guests. The hotel I
manage
is a rather upscale brand, and we maintain certain brand standards.
Occassionally someone will come in who is obviously not in the right
hotel for their needs. If they cannot be satisfied with the product
that
pleases 99.9999% of our customers, sometimes we suggest that they
might be
happier at the Best Value Inn across the street.


Translated:
We do not allow guests to throw keg parties in the elevators nor do we
encourage streaking, filling the hot tubs with Jell-O, burping
contests in the lobby, asking room service for ramen noodles and Cheez
Whiz, putting flip-flops out for shoe shine service or swimming in the
pool in cut-offs. G

I bet that they threw a party at that grocery store after Normie was
out the door, and sang a nice loud chorus of "Thank God And
Greyhound You're
Gone!" Why would they worry about his $20 when for every dollar bill
he
didn't spend, ten more were spent by those attracted by the Atkins
product
sign?


A single bachelor male's purchases of beer, beans and weenies and
Sports Illustrated is hardly going to break them, is it? ;-)
The problem with this sort of petulant display is one must be a
customer of longstanding AND sufficient value to offset any losses
that the establishment would incur if that business were to cater to
the irate customer. Without the support of a large number of
customers, someone like Normie is just going to be an amusing story
for the manager to tell his or her family at the end of the day.

The store can get new customers, but Normie will always be an
asshole. Who's the winner, and who's the loser?


One wonders how many stores Normie can find that do not have low carb
products in them. Methinks he'd best get used to shopping in small
ethnic groceries. G That's the only place I haven't seen the
stuff.

take care,
Carmen
  #113  
Old April 11th, 2004, 06:54 AM
Sleepyman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof.

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:51:23 GMT, "Carmen"
wrote:

Hi Sleepy,
On 10-Apr-2004, Sleepyman wrote:

We polluted his beloved diabetes group with crossposts.


You polluted my diabetes group with OT troll crossposts. You seem to
have learned your lesson though!


Actually, that was the result of the Mu/Chung/Pastorio wars. ASDLC
itself was but another one of their battlegrounds, just like ASD and
the cardiology group. There was no concerted effort on ASDLCers parts
to go annoy the diabetes group. There are a number of members in
common, but that's all.

but less overtly obnoxious than our new resident loon. Loony boy
(aka
Normal) almost makes me miss the Mu/Chung vs. Bob wars.

Bite your tongue!


If you've been reading the diabetes group today you'll see Mu is back.
The Mu/Chung/Pastorio wars have already resumed. Just a heads-up.
ASDLC doesn't start this stuff. We just attract the folks who do.
:-)

Take care,
Carmen


Hey Carm, Hope you enjoy Easter,

I have Mu/Chung Bob, Doe, Martini, and their minion sockpuppet trolls
all killfiled, and re-killfiled after morphing. The problem is that
the people in this group continued X Posting after being asked not to.
I realize that some peoples newsreaders don't warn them when they
crosspost, but I check headers. A lot of posters were using Agent,
which asks you if you want to post to all newsgroups the message has
been posted to, and tells you how many groups that is. There have been
many of those threads. The cave man diet thread was especially
useless.

What I was referring to specifically was the Gay Marriage debacle that
generated countless posts. Many a day the only posts in ASD on that
topic were the X Posted ones from people here! And all that did was
drag more and more posters into the endless spiral into the toilet.
And then being told that it was my fault that I hadn't killfiled the
guilty parties from here! Justifiable anger I do believe.

Yea I saw the X Posts from Mu today, so I assume the rest have
followed him in. Oh well, at least Mu does post some good humor on
occasion.

Talk to you later,

Sleepy

____________________________________
The True Axis of Evil
Bush - Cheney - Ashcroft - Rumsfeld
____________________________________

  #114  
Old April 11th, 2004, 06:54 AM
Sleepyman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof.

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 15:29:49 -0500,
wrote:

On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 20:58:08 GMT, The King of Pots and Pans
wrote:

You aren't using the group for what it was intended. It was intended
to support each other; giving support to those who follow the low carb
way of eating. So you are not on topic; hence the troll word.


Support means helping those who need help. People doing the Atkins
diet need lots of help. But the help they need is getting OFF the
diet. That's my opinion, based on personal exeprience with my former
spouse, and with that being given by many doctors and other
professionals. When are you people going to wake up. Unfortunately,
most of you will only see the light as you lay on your death bed. You
are all part of a multi million dollar scam, and you're buying into
it, because you are brainwashed into it. And if you dont like the use
of that word, you're being controlled by it, same difference.

And as far as the word TROLL, well, the real trolls are those that
repeatedly use that word and dont add anything useful to the topic.


I don't generally agree with the writhing masses, but your continual
use of the PETA scum, as refernces and cites for your posts have
forced me to agree with them in this case. I have come to the
conclusion that you are indeed a troll. I think you, not your wife, is
the one that went off their nut. Your obsession is not helping the
state of your mental health. Those replying to you, in kind, are as
guilty as you are in the trolling department. Stop beating a dead
horse.

Sleepy

____________________________________
The True Axis of Evil
Bush - Cheney - Ashcroft - Rumsfeld
____________________________________

  #115  
Old April 11th, 2004, 06:55 AM
Sleepyman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof.

On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 00:00:38 GMT, "Carmen"
wrote:

Hi Sleepy,
On 10-Apr-2004, Sleepyman wrote:

I do believe in low or I suppose around here it would be lower carb
diet, as I am forced to be due to my disease. My only argument here
is with the extremist element.


Most newsgroups have an extremist element, and I think diet groups
have to have one. It's the law or something. G Your lower carb
diet isn't Atkins or Protein Power low, but it's still a low carb
diet. For we diabetics it makes sense to lower carb intake.

Your best bet is to nod politely or ignore the Martha
Morelowcarbthanyou folks the same as you would that rabid cousin who
keeps telling you that your purchase of Nike shoes is morally
equivalent to keeping a slave. They aren't going to go away, their
position stems from a belief system. No amount of logic can dislodge
a belief - just look at religious disputes.

Take care,
Carmen


I have pretty much ignored the more obvious ones. Some come flying out
of their little holes with the fangs out and the venom loaded when you
least expect it though. You are right in that most NGs have an
extremist element, however it seems that most of the more rational
people must have been driven out by the atkins kooks. I don't see
atkins in the name of this group, but atkins does seem to be the
company line around here. But what can you do. Take what you need and
leave the rest seems to be the most obvious solution.

Sleepy

____________________________________
The True Axis of Evil
Bush - Cheney - Ashcroft - Rumsfeld
____________________________________

  #117  
Old April 11th, 2004, 07:44 AM
Jackie Patti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof.

Karen Rodgers wrote:

Oh, you posted enough to make a normal person run like hell, all
right, as far away from you as possible. I had a small spark of
sympathy when you posted about your wife. But its evaporated like
water on a hot summer sidewalk.


I must disagree; my sympathy for his wife increases with each post.

--
Newbie tip: Read the FAQ. It's posted here daily, contains tons of
great info on low-carbing and lots of links to more great info and tons
of recipes too!

  #118  
Old April 11th, 2004, 08:01 AM
Supergoof
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof.

"Carmen" wrote ...

Most newsgroups have an extremist element, and I think diet groups
have to have one. It's the law or something. G Your lower carb
diet isn't Atkins or Protein Power low, but it's still a low carb
diet. For we diabetics it makes sense to lower carb intake.


I think Atkins is like the embodiment of all low carb diets - because it's
the best known it's getting all the coverage, which just reinforces people's
misconception that all low carb = Atkins.

Atkins is probably the most extreme, especially when most of the reporting
only covers the induction phase, not the other phases.

I haven't personally seen much evidence of people espousing one low carb
method over another. Like everywhere else, Atkins probably gets a little
more bandwidth around here because it's got the highest profile. Many people
seem to start off with the basics a la Atkins and then modify it to suit
themselves, which seems to me the most sensible way to do it.

Some may feel that Atkins started it and others are copying, putting their
own spin on it and making money, but if it's getting the message out there
that low carb is a valid and healthy way of life, it's good for all of us in
the long run.

IMO the more variations of low carb there are, the greater the chances of it
becoming mainstream instead of being dismissed as one man's quackery. If
it's worth copying, that seems to give it more validity.

Rachel
(New Zealand)


  #119  
Old April 11th, 2004, 08:07 AM
Supergoof
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof.

"Sleepyman" wrote ...

While I think there are many who believe atkins is a god, and his
words should be followed as a fundie thinks the bible is the literal
translation of god's word,


For some folks low carb probably seems like a miracle/life-saver when all
else had failed - when other weight loss plans didn't work or when following
the standard diabetic diet made matters worse.

As atkins seems to be the personification of low carb I'm sure there are
some parallels with [insert favourite deity here] for some people.


Rachel
(New Zealand)


  #120  
Old April 11th, 2004, 08:47 AM
revek
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof.

Supergoof burbled across the ether:
"Sleepyman" wrote ...

While I think there are many who believe atkins is a god, and his
words should be followed as a fundie thinks the bible is the literal
translation of god's word,


For some folks low carb probably seems like a miracle/life-saver when
all else had failed - when other weight loss plans didn't work or
when following the standard diabetic diet made matters worse.

As atkins seems to be the personification of low carb I'm sure there
are some parallels with [insert favourite deity here] for some people.


And then it fades. And life goes on. It's a standard part of any
epiphany.

--
revek www.geocities.com/tanirevek/LowCarb.html lowcarbing since June
2002 5'2" 41 F 165+/too much/size seven petite please
A good pun is its own punishment.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Irrefuteable proof obesity is caused by a genetic disease exzuberance General Discussion 3 June 20th, 2004 07:44 AM
"How Quackery Sells" Sleepyman Low Carbohydrate Diets 6 March 27th, 2004 11:12 PM
If you need any further proof of America's obesity problem... Sunflower Colonel Low Carbohydrate Diets 38 February 19th, 2004 11:29 PM
Proof that obesity kills [email protected] Low Carbohydrate Diets 6 December 31st, 2003 05:51 AM
Irrefutable proof that obesity is glandular. Lady Veteran Low Carbohydrate Diets 1 October 29th, 2003 12:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.