A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Culture of Corpulence



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 15th, 2010, 08:47 PM posted to soc.support.fat-acceptance,alt.support.diet,alt.elvis.king
Luuk[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Culture of Corpulence

http://www.newsweek.com/id/234886

Look around anywhere in America and the reality assaults you: we are
simply too big. Nowhere is the evidence for this more striking than the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's color-coded obesity map.
Between 1990 and 2008 the country morphs from a sea of pleasant blue,
representing an obese population of less than 19 percent, to an alarming
patchwork of tan, orange, and maroon, where the stats range from 21
percent obese in Connecticut to 32.8 percent in Mississippi.

The epidemic is most alarming among American children: rates have tripled
among kids ages 12 to 19 since 1980, with one third of America's youth now
overweight or obese and almost 10 percent of infants and toddlers
dangerously heavy. Obese kids, defined by a body-mass index at or above
the 95th percentile for children of the same age and sex, are at risk for
developing conditions in childhood once monopolized by adults: high blood
pressure, high cholesterol, and type 2 diabetes. And many are stigmatized
and suffer from low self-esteem, which can lead to depression. If current
trends continue, nearly one in three kids born in 2000—and one in two
minorities—will develop type 2 diabetes in their lifetime, according to
the American Diabetes Association. The disease is linked to heart attack,
stroke, blindness, amputation, and kidney disease. Indeed, a study
published last month found that obese children are more than twice as
likely to die prematurely as adults than kids on the lower end of the
weight spectrum. In the U.S., new government data show an overall plateau
of high BMIs in kids over the last 10 years—a hopeful sign. But "even
without further increases in childhood obesity, the toll of the epidemic
will mount for decades to come," says Harvard's Dr. David Ludwig, director
of the Optimal Weight for Life program at Children's Hospital Boston.


This goes way beyond fitting into our jeans or airline seats: the
estimated annual cost of obesity in the United States is $147 billion. The
problem even threatens our national security—being overweight is the No. 1
reason recruits are turned away from the military. Not so long ago, a lack
of personal willpower was blamed. Today, obesity is considered a public-
health threat, the toll of a toxic environment that endangers the well-
being of our children and their future.

It's not just us, either. "Globesity" has consumed much of the planet,
with more than 1 billion adults overweight or obese. And while we're not
the fattest—Nauru, Micronesia, and a handful of other countries beat
us—we're very close to the top of the list. Urbanization, modernization,
technology, and the globalization of food markets, which includes the
exportation of Coke and burgers, has created a crisis of "epidemic
proportions," in the words of the World Health Organization.

But it's America that has become the world's preeminent fat-making
machine. To dismantle it we need a coordinated, comprehensive plan of
attack, one that pairs individual responsibility with a social construct
that fosters good nutrition and a healthy lifestyle. We need to be
surrounded by food that makes us well, not sick. We need schools and
workplaces that reward us for exercising our bodies, not just our brains.
"If you want people to make the right choices, they need to have the right
choices to make," says Dr. William Dietz, director of the CDC's Division
of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. We need forceful and well-
enforced policies, a government that invests dollars in improving the diet
of school kids and puts limitations on the advertising that targets them.
We need Americans to perceive obesity as a personal threat to themselves
and to their children, not as somebody else's problem. We have a long way
to go.

We got here through multiple innovations, many of them meant to improve,
not corrupt, our lifestyles. Fast food is a quick fix for hungry working
families. Cars and buses get kids to school faster than sidewalks. We have
grown used to a world order of speed and convenience.
But with our processed diets come fat, sugar, and calories. And a lot of
it. When McDonald's opened in the 1950s, a soda weighed seven ounces,
according to a study in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association;
today, 7-Eleven serves a behemoth 44-ounce Super Big Gulp, which has its
own fan club on Facebook. Burger King's signature Whopper packs almost 700
calories. And research shows that the more we're served, the more we eat.

High-calorie, low-nutrient foods are ubiquitous—at gas stations, at
airports, and at school, where it matters most for kids. The National
School Lunch Program, signed into law in 1946 by President Harry Truman,
was designed to feed hungry children who needed extra calories. Today it
serves 31 million kids, most of whom don't. School meals, which are
subsidized by the government, are subject to nutritional standards, but
that doesn't always translate to apples and cucumbers. Almost 42 percent
of schools do not offer any fresh fruits or raw vegetables on a daily
basis.

Kids supplement, and often substitute, their lunches with "competitive
foods." Vending machines, some stocked with cookies and sodas, exist in 17
percent of elementary schools, 82 percent of middle schools, and 97
percent of high schools. Most states have extremely weak standards or none
at all when it comes to competitive foods, says Margo Wootan, director of
nutrition policy at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Mary
Story, director of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Healthy Eating
Research, asks a simple question: if the average school day is only about
six hours, why do snack foods or beverages need to be sold at all? If they
are, she says, they should come from the food groups lacking in children's
diets today: fruits, vegetables, low-fat and nonfat dairy, and whole
grains.

Calories in are not the entire problem. Exercise used to be built into the
day; today it is an elite privilege for too many kids. With a focus on
standards of learning propelled by the reading- and math-focused No Child
Left Behind Act, many schools cannot afford, financially or academically,
to offer physical education—even though studies show exercise can improve
academic performance. The surgeon general recommends at least 60 minutes
of moderate physical activity a day most days of the week for kids; two
thirds of high schoolers fail to get it. Too many boys and girls end up
wired instead: 8- to 18-year-olds spend an average of seven and a half
hours a day multitasking in front of TVs, videogames, or computers.

Our suburban designs, influenced by age-old zoning laws, also work against
us. A century ago, residential neighborhoods were separated from workplace
factories to spare people from breathing in soot. Fast-forward to 2010: we
live in subdivisions and drive to shopping centers and office parks.
Biking and walking have been "systematically taken out of our lives," says
Jim Sallis, director of the RWJF's Active Living Research program.

We've battled public-health crises before by collecting data, raising
public awareness, and passing tough laws. Everybody must now wear seat
belts, kids must be buckled into car seats, and drunken driving is an
offense punishable by jail. Winning the war on obesity demands the same
kind of big-think solution and the determination to take on and also
collaborate with powerful interests. It will require time, money, and both
individual and political will to undo or rework what got us here.

Aware that it has a public-relations problem, the food industry is taking
steps to show it can be part of the solution without help from government
regulators. "We have changed the recipes for more than 10,000 of our
products to reduce fat, calories, sugar, and sodium," says Scott Faber of
the Grocery Manufacturers Association. Salads are now routinely offered at
fast-food chains; KFC introduced grilled chicken last year (one grilled
wing, 80 calories; one extra-crispy fried, 190). Coke debuted a mini 7.5-
ounce can in December. And the beverage industry has substituted high-
calorie soft drinks with lower-calorie, more nutritious options in
schools, resulting in an 88 percent reduction in calories since 2004.

But those efforts are still aimed more at healthy competition than healthy
nutrition. The 100-calorie snack packs of Doritos and Oreos are an attempt
to merge both agendas, and while some pediatricians give these products a
thumbs up—fewer calories is, after all, a good thing—purists like Dr.
Sarah Armstrong, a pediatrician at Duke University Medical Center, want
their patients to make better choices, not just eat smaller amounts of the
bad stuff. Diet sodas are also double-edged. They save on calories, but
they're far from nutritious.

Public-health advocates are taking on Big Food just as their predecessors
took on Big Tobacco. Dr. David Kessler, the former head of the FDA, argues
that the fattening of America has happened by design as food companies
intentionally manufactured irresistible cocktails of sugar, fat, and salt.
Manufacturers' efforts to do better don't assuage Kelly Brownell, head of
Yale's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity. "The country defaults to
giving industry the benefit of the doubt," he says. "Industry says you
don't need to regulate us; we'll police ourselves. The tobacco industry
abused that with God knows how many lives as a consequence. To expect the
food industry to be different may be wishful thinking."

Especially when laudatory efforts are entwined with deceptive information.
Earlier this month, FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg sent an open letter
to the food industry citing violations in food labeling that mislead
consumers. Example: particular brands of coconut custard pie, fish
fillets, and organic vegetable shortening are promoted as having no trans
fat, but fail to disclose the fact that they are high in saturated fat and
total fat.

And then there's rampant marketing. Food and drink advertising to children
is a $1.6 billion annual effort. The food industry has made an effort to
increase ads for healthy foods and reduce the not-so-healthy stuff. But
parents and kids are still besieged. The least nutritious cereals are the
ones most aggressively and frequently marketed to children, according to a
recent Yale study. "I think it's a stretch to say that the First Amendment
protects the right of a cereal manufacturer to advertise a sugary
breakfast product to a 5-year-old," says Harvard's Ludwig. "These kinds of
practices cry out for regulation."

Maybe it would help to adopt a more European approach, increasing our
comfort level with government meddling that encourages healthier behavior.
Sweden and Norway forbid advertising of any kind to children younger than
12 on commercial TV shows. The French removed more than 22,000 food and
drink vending machines from schools and replaced them with water
fountains. Denmark banned trans fatty acids in 2003 and plans a tax on
saturated fat this year. New York City launched its own local revolution
in the United States. As head of the city's Department of Health, Dr. Tom
Frieden banned trans fats and forced calorie counts onto restaurant-chain
menus. Whether or not this will change eating habits is unclear, but a new
study out of Seattle found that parents will choose meals with 100 fewer
calories for their kids when they see the numbers. Frieden's approach
caught Obama's attention: he appointed him to head the CDC.

Now Frieden and others support a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages.
Brownell's calculation: a penny per ounce on soda could reduce consumption
by 23 percent, which would ultimately save about $50 billion over 10 years
in health-care costs. A controversial federal soft-drink tax was
considered as a way to help pay for health-care reform. Last fall
President Obama said, "It's an idea that we should be exploring." But a
coalition led by the beverage industry spent millions lobbying against it,
arguing that it would burden working families. And, fearing the "food
police," many constituents don't like it either. The idea may be gaining
momentum at the local level, however; a handful of states have introduced
soda-tax legislation and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said it
"makes sense" as a way to build state revenue.

Ludwig believes a tax would also level the playing field against
government subsidies on abundant commodities like corn and soy. High-
fructose corn syrup, synthesized from corn, is a main ingredient in a
multitude of sweetened drinks and snacks. "We've got a cheap calorie
environment, where a lot of the calories are coming from added fats and
added sugars that are derived from these few crops," says Dr. David
Wallinga of the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy in Minnesota.
"What we don't have is a policy encouraging the production of fruits and
vegetables and other healthy foods." Price does have some sway over the
salivary glands: a new study out of the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, which followed participants over 20 years, finds that young
adults eat less pizza and soda as the cost for these items goes up. And
here's the really good news: their weight and risk for diabetes go down.

It took decades after the surgeon general's 1964 report on the hazards of
tobacco for anti-smoking laws to go into effect. And there is, of course,
one major and critical difference between tobacco and food: you can live
without smoking, but you will die without eating. Which makes tackling
childhood obesity such a complicated challenge.

An entire cultural shift is required, starting with nutrition education.
Showing children the government's food pyramid is fine, but it's not
enough. Kids need to learn which items to choose in the lunch line, says
CSPI's Wootan, and someone needs to show them what a plate of colorful,
nourishing food looks like. Schools must get the funding they need to fix
ovens and buy mixers and salad bars so their meal staff can do more than
reheat processed foods. Educators must figure out creative ways to
incorporate exercise into the day, even if it means blasting music over
the PA system for 10 minutes every morning and afternoon for all-school
dance time.

Nutritionists and community organizations must team up to reinvent the way
families cook, especially in poor and undernourished neighborhoods—the
"food deserts," where corner bodegas sell candy bars and white bread. In
her hometown Alabama shrimping village, Surgeon General Regina Benjamin
taught people to shift from frying to broiling. Gumbo can be less greasy
and "still taste very good," says Benjamin. Workplaces should offer an
area for pumping or breast-feeding, which has been shown to reduce the
risk of obesity, perhaps because breast-fed babies may be better at
regulating how much they eat. Parents should eat with their kids as often
as possible and set limits on TV, computer, and videogame use. Above all,
they should demand healthful foods and environments for their children.

First lady Michelle Obama is being careful not to alienate anyone—from the
food lobby to beleaguered parents trying their best. She's investing $400
million in the eradication of food deserts, but she isn't giving anybody a
pass on individual responsibility. She's growing fresh fruits and veggies
on the White House lawn, but isn't banning the occasional burger and
fries. Will her approach be aggressive enough? It's hard to know. But it
is ambitious.

With her initiative comes the president's executive order for a Task Force
on Childhood Obesity, which requires government departments that have
often been at cross-purposes to work together. The president's
appointments signal a seriousness about public health. And his higher-ups
are not afraid to concede their personal fat demons. Benjamin has
acknowledged her own weight struggle, which, she told NEWSWEEK, started in
her 40s. So has Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. He says he can't forget
the cartoon his mother put on the fridge to discourage him from snacking
when he was an overweight child: a heavyset kid wearing a beanie cap,
busting out of his britches. "Every time I opened the refrigerator door, I
had to look at that guy," he told a crowd at the National Press Club.

Now he's calling on Congress to increase meal-reimbursement rates so that
schools can buy higher-priced healthier foods, including whole grains,
fruits, and vegetables. He's asking for a stronger link between local
farmers and cafeterias, and the authority to set standards on competitive
foods. The American Academy of Pediatrics, partnering with the first lady,
is urging its doctors to write exercise and eating "prescriptions" for
their patients. "Just as we give immunizations," says AAP president Judith
Palfrey, "we're going to give healthy eating and exercise advice at every
visit." Benjamin says she is planning to travel the country to educate
schools and communities about nutrition and physical activity "anywhere we
can get the message out." Americans are trying—the multibillion-dollar
diet industry attests to that—but they need help, she says. Her personal
goal: a hike to the top of Mount Kilimanjaro by 2011.

Talk about a steep climb. Childhood obesity is so vast, so complex, so
entrenched. We must all join the journey. "When we come together as a
nation and really commit ourselves, we can do it," says Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation CEO Risa Lavizzo-Mourey. "If we can get that kind of
resolve, we'll be able to create a legacy of healthy children and a
healthier nation." Our future depends on it.

  #2  
Old March 15th, 2010, 08:55 PM posted to soc.support.fat-acceptance,alt.support.diet,alt.elvis.king
Luuk[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Culture of Corpulence


"Luuk" schreef in bericht
...
http://www.newsweek.com/id/234886


Meantime in Africa......


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yogurt culture questions jmk General Discussion 3 January 19th, 2006 03:03 PM
Letter on Corpulence Doug Lerner Low Carbohydrate Diets 6 December 28th, 2004 06:03 PM
Letter On Corpulence Svenco Low Carbohydrate Diets 0 July 8th, 2004 07:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.