A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Researcher Links Obesity, Food Portions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 06:01 AM
Wm Harmon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Researcher Links Obesity, Food Portions

Researcher Links Obesity, Food Portions

January 2, 2004 02:05 PM EST

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. - With self-refilling bowls of soup and jumbo
buckets of stale popcorn, professor Brian Wansink has
identified one culprit for U.S. obesity: excessive food portions.

The University of Illinois researcher has set up several
food experiments that show the more people are given, the
more they will eat - regardless of whether they are full
or think the food tastes good.

"In the obesity war, portion size is the first casualty,"
said Wansink, who founded the University of Illinois'
Food & Brand Lab. "It's easy to point at, and we don't have
to take responsibility because we can blame the restaurant
or the packaged food manufacturer."

Wansink and other researchers hope the results can help the
federal government devise more user-friendly nutrition labels
for packaged foods. For example, instead of stating that a
handful of granola has 200 calories, the label instead could
say the consumer would have to walk 2 miles to burn it off.

His experiments - which have included tomato soup, popcorn
and potato visual clues people use to tell them it's time
to stop eating.

In the soup experiment, participants come to the lab
expecting a taste test. Some bowls are rigged with hidden
tubes that keep them full, while others are not.

Over two years of the experiment, students with bottomless
bowls tended to eat 40 percent more than test subjects with
regular bowls.

"I wasn't aware of it," said Nina Huesgen, one of the students
who got a trick bowl in a recent experiment. "That's why I
feel so filled up, I guess."

James Painter, chairman of Eastern Illinois University's
Family and Consumer Sciences Department, who collaborated
with Wansink on the experiment, said one student drank almost
a quart of soup.

"I said, 'What were you doing?' And he said, 'I was trying
to reach the bottom of the bowl,'" Painter said.

Another telling experiment came outside Philadelphia, where
Wansink offered free popcorn to moviegoers at a $1 movie
theater. Half the audience was given fresh popcorn, either
in small containers or in jumbo buckets; half received
14-day-old popcorn in small and jumbo containers.

Even though 82 percent of the people with the old popcorn
reported it tasted terrible, those with the jumbo buckets
ate 33 percent more than those with the smaller container.

Wansink has come up with ways the food industry could help,
such as offering visual clues to what an adequate portion
should be.

An experiment with Lay's Stax potato chips gave one group
regular chips, a second group chips in which every seventh
chip was red, and a third group chips in which every 14th
chip was red.

The groups weren't told the reason for the red chips but
still used them to determine how much to eat, Wansink said.
The participants who ate the least had the potato chips in
which every seventh chip was red, followed by the group in
which every 14th chip was red.

Such research has produced commonsense tips for the
weight-conscious.

For example, people who drank out of short, fat glasses
consumed considerably more than those who used tall, skinny
glasses, even though the glasses held the same amount.

"The tendency we have is to focus on heights instead of widths,"
Wansink wrote in a report on the study. "That's why, for instance,
people say, 'Boy, is the St. Louis Arch high.' But they never say,
'Boy, is it wide,' even though the dimensions are identical."
  #2  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 01:05 PM
Carol Frilegh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Researcher Links Obesity, Food Portions

In article , Wm Harmon
wrote:

Researcher Links Obesity, Food Portions

January 2, 2004 02:05 PM EST

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. - With self-refilling bowls of soup and jumbo
buckets of stale popcorn, professor Brian Wansink has
identified one culprit for U.S. obesity: excessive food portions.

The University of Illinois researcher has set up several
food experiments that show the more people are given, the
more they will eat - regardless of whether they are full
or think the food tastes good.

"In the obesity war, portion size is the first casualty,"
said Wansink, who founded the University of Illinois'
Food & Brand Lab. "It's easy to point at, and we don't have
to take responsibility because we can blame the restaurant
or the packaged food manufacturer."

Wansink and other researchers hope the results can help the
federal government devise more user-friendly nutrition labels
for packaged foods. For example, instead of stating that a
handful of granola has 200 calories, the label instead could
say the consumer would have to walk 2 miles to burn it off.

His experiments - which have included tomato soup, popcorn
and potato visual clues people use to tell them it's time
to stop eating.

In the soup experiment, participants come to the lab
expecting a taste test. Some bowls are rigged with hidden
tubes that keep them full, while others are not.

Over two years of the experiment, students with bottomless
bowls tended to eat 40 percent more than test subjects with
regular bowls.

"I wasn't aware of it," said Nina Huesgen, one of the students
who got a trick bowl in a recent experiment. "That's why I
feel so filled up, I guess."

James Painter, chairman of Eastern Illinois University's
Family and Consumer Sciences Department, who collaborated
with Wansink on the experiment, said one student drank almost
a quart of soup.

"I said, 'What were you doing?' And he said, 'I was trying
to reach the bottom of the bowl,'" Painter said.

Another telling experiment came outside Philadelphia, where
Wansink offered free popcorn to moviegoers at a $1 movie
theater. Half the audience was given fresh popcorn, either
in small containers or in jumbo buckets; half received
14-day-old popcorn in small and jumbo containers.

Even though 82 percent of the people with the old popcorn
reported it tasted terrible, those with the jumbo buckets
ate 33 percent more than those with the smaller container.

Wansink has come up with ways the food industry could help,
such as offering visual clues to what an adequate portion
should be.

An experiment with Lay's Stax potato chips gave one group
regular chips, a second group chips in which every seventh
chip was red, and a third group chips in which every 14th
chip was red.

The groups weren't told the reason for the red chips but
still used them to determine how much to eat, Wansink said.
The participants who ate the least had the potato chips in
which every seventh chip was red, followed by the group in
which every 14th chip was red.

Such research has produced commonsense tips for the
weight-conscious.

For example, people who drank out of short, fat glasses
consumed considerably more than those who used tall, skinny
glasses, even though the glasses held the same amount.

"The tendency we have is to focus on heights instead of widths,"
Wansink wrote in a report on the study. "That's why, for instance,
people say, 'Boy, is the St. Louis Arch high.' But they never say,
'Boy, is it wide,' even though the dimensions are identical."


Agreed. Tell Elaine benes she should not keep asking george to treat
her to "The Big Salad".

--
Diva
********
Completing 4 years of maintenance
  #3  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 03:20 PM
Real PanoraM_un
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Researcher Links Obesity, Food Portions


Three words: Two Pound Diet

==================================================

On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 01:01:21 -0500, Wm Harmon
wrote:

Researcher Links Obesity, Food Portions

January 2, 2004 02:05 PM EST

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. - With self-refilling bowls of soup and jumbo
buckets of stale popcorn, professor Brian Wansink has
identified one culprit for U.S. obesity: excessive food portions.

The University of Illinois researcher has set up several
food experiments that show the more people are given, the
more they will eat - regardless of whether they are full
or think the food tastes good.

"In the obesity war, portion size is the first casualty,"
said Wansink, who founded the University of Illinois'
Food & Brand Lab. "It's easy to point at, and we don't have
to take responsibility because we can blame the restaurant
or the packaged food manufacturer."

Wansink and other researchers hope the results can help the
federal government devise more user-friendly nutrition labels
for packaged foods. For example, instead of stating that a
handful of granola has 200 calories, the label instead could
say the consumer would have to walk 2 miles to burn it off.

His experiments - which have included tomato soup, popcorn
and potato visual clues people use to tell them it's time
to stop eating.

In the soup experiment, participants come to the lab
expecting a taste test. Some bowls are rigged with hidden
tubes that keep them full, while others are not.

Over two years of the experiment, students with bottomless
bowls tended to eat 40 percent more than test subjects with
regular bowls.

"I wasn't aware of it," said Nina Huesgen, one of the students
who got a trick bowl in a recent experiment. "That's why I
feel so filled up, I guess."

James Painter, chairman of Eastern Illinois University's
Family and Consumer Sciences Department, who collaborated
with Wansink on the experiment, said one student drank almost
a quart of soup.

"I said, 'What were you doing?' And he said, 'I was trying
to reach the bottom of the bowl,'" Painter said.

Another telling experiment came outside Philadelphia, where
Wansink offered free popcorn to moviegoers at a $1 movie
theater. Half the audience was given fresh popcorn, either
in small containers or in jumbo buckets; half received
14-day-old popcorn in small and jumbo containers.

Even though 82 percent of the people with the old popcorn
reported it tasted terrible, those with the jumbo buckets
ate 33 percent more than those with the smaller container.

Wansink has come up with ways the food industry could help,
such as offering visual clues to what an adequate portion
should be.

An experiment with Lay's Stax potato chips gave one group
regular chips, a second group chips in which every seventh
chip was red, and a third group chips in which every 14th
chip was red.

The groups weren't told the reason for the red chips but
still used them to determine how much to eat, Wansink said.
The participants who ate the least had the potato chips in
which every seventh chip was red, followed by the group in
which every 14th chip was red.

Such research has produced commonsense tips for the
weight-conscious.

For example, people who drank out of short, fat glasses
consumed considerably more than those who used tall, skinny
glasses, even though the glasses held the same amount.

"The tendency we have is to focus on heights instead of widths,"
Wansink wrote in a report on the study. "That's why, for instance,
people say, 'Boy, is the St. Louis Arch high.' But they never say,
'Boy, is it wide,' even though the dimensions are identical."



http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040102.html
Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.
  #4  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 03:27 PM
That T Woman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Researcher Links Obesity, Food Portions


"Carol Frilegh" wrote in message
...
In article , Wm Harmon
wrote:

Researcher Links Obesity, Food Portions

January 2, 2004 02:05 PM EST

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. - With self-refilling bowls of soup and jumbo
buckets of stale popcorn, professor Brian Wansink has
identified one culprit for U.S. obesity: excessive food portions.

The University of Illinois researcher has set up several
food experiments that show the more people are given, the
more they will eat - regardless of whether they are full
or think the food tastes good.

"In the obesity war, portion size is the first casualty,"
said Wansink, who founded the University of Illinois'
Food & Brand Lab. "It's easy to point at, and we don't have
to take responsibility because we can blame the restaurant
or the packaged food manufacturer."

Wansink and other researchers hope the results can help the
federal government devise more user-friendly nutrition labels
for packaged foods. For example, instead of stating that a
handful of granola has 200 calories, the label instead could
say the consumer would have to walk 2 miles to burn it off.

His experiments - which have included tomato soup, popcorn
and potato visual clues people use to tell them it's time
to stop eating.

In the soup experiment, participants come to the lab
expecting a taste test. Some bowls are rigged with hidden
tubes that keep them full, while others are not.

Over two years of the experiment, students with bottomless
bowls tended to eat 40 percent more than test subjects with
regular bowls.

"I wasn't aware of it," said Nina Huesgen, one of the students
who got a trick bowl in a recent experiment. "That's why I
feel so filled up, I guess."

James Painter, chairman of Eastern Illinois University's
Family and Consumer Sciences Department, who collaborated
with Wansink on the experiment, said one student drank almost
a quart of soup.

"I said, 'What were you doing?' And he said, 'I was trying
to reach the bottom of the bowl,'" Painter said.

Another telling experiment came outside Philadelphia, where
Wansink offered free popcorn to moviegoers at a $1 movie
theater. Half the audience was given fresh popcorn, either
in small containers or in jumbo buckets; half received
14-day-old popcorn in small and jumbo containers.

Even though 82 percent of the people with the old popcorn
reported it tasted terrible, those with the jumbo buckets
ate 33 percent more than those with the smaller container.

Wansink has come up with ways the food industry could help,
such as offering visual clues to what an adequate portion
should be.

An experiment with Lay's Stax potato chips gave one group
regular chips, a second group chips in which every seventh
chip was red, and a third group chips in which every 14th
chip was red.

The groups weren't told the reason for the red chips but
still used them to determine how much to eat, Wansink said.
The participants who ate the least had the potato chips in
which every seventh chip was red, followed by the group in
which every 14th chip was red.

Such research has produced commonsense tips for the
weight-conscious.

For example, people who drank out of short, fat glasses
consumed considerably more than those who used tall, skinny
glasses, even though the glasses held the same amount.

"The tendency we have is to focus on heights instead of widths,"
Wansink wrote in a report on the study. "That's why, for instance,
people say, 'Boy, is the St. Louis Arch high.' But they never say,
'Boy, is it wide,' even though the dimensions are identical."


Agreed. Tell Elaine benes she should not keep asking george to treat
her to "The Big Salad".

--
Diva
********
Completing 4 years of maintenance


I'd rather tell Jared to come out from behind that desk and show us how well
he's been maintaining on Subway.

Tonia


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Target of the Food Police (CSPI) jmk General Discussion 74 December 24th, 2003 01:40 AM
To lose weight dont cook your food habshi General Discussion 6 December 18th, 2003 01:32 PM
WSJ: How to Give Your Child A Longer Life Jean B. General Discussion 0 December 9th, 2003 06:10 PM
I love Chinese food. But is it a healthy choice? Nicholas Zhou General Discussion 2 November 18th, 2003 01:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.