A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Atkins diet has long-term dangers, researchers warn



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #12  
Old September 3rd, 2004, 08:49 PM
Rune Børsjø
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:27:09 -0500, "Rick Ramey, Celestial Engineer"
wrote:

I have real problems with any diet that tells me that an apple and a
nice bowl of outmeal for breakfast is bad for me.


It's nice to see that sensible people have finally found their way
back to the group. The hordes of atkins zealots calling me ignorant
kept me away for a long time. As if reading a single book by a single
person with a very specific and unscientific approach to dieting has
suddenly made them nutritional physiologists.
  #13  
Old September 3rd, 2004, 09:24 PM
Patricia Heil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


This tracks with the experience of my ex-sister-in-law. She got diarrhea.

I didn't know about the headaches. I get migraines so that's one more
reason (besides the risk to my cholesterol) for me never to even consider
this.

"dawn" wrote in message
...
Associated Press
September 3, 2004

Atkins diet has long-term dangers, researchers warn

LONDON -- Dieters on the popular high-fat, low-carb Atkins approach
lose just as much body fat as those on low-fat diets, but the annoying
low-carb side effects could mean problems down the road, according to
a scientist who reviewed five dozen diet studies.

Danish obesity expert Dr. Arne Astrup, whose survey is published this
week in The Lancet medical journal, concludes that headaches, muscle
weakness and either diarrhea or constipation are reported more often
by Atkins dieters than people on conventional diets. Those side
effects may be signs that the eating plan isn't healthy in the long
run, he says.

However, other experts said the diet remains a viable option for some
because the side effects aren't bad enough to throw them off the
eating plan famous for its shunning of bread, pasta and many fruits.

"More people stayed in the low-carb group than in the low-fat group,
so you've got to wonder how severe those side effects were if more
people kept to the low-carb diet," said William Yancy, a Duke
University researcher who conducted one of the major studies that
Astrup reviewed.

The Atkins diet, which allows unlimited consumption of protein and fat
but drastically limits carbohydrates and does not restrict calories,
has had a following for decades but only recently has come under
serious scientific scrutiny. It has been embraced by an estimated 20
million people worldwide.

In his review, Astrup, director of research in the department of human
nutrition at the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University in
Frederiksberg, Denmark, examined the evidence from about 60 studies on
the Atkins and other low-carb diets.

Several small studies in the last year or two have surprised the
experts by showing that people lose more weight on the Atkins diet
than on the standard low-calorie, low-fat diet, at least in the short
term, with even better cholesterol improvements.

Longer studies have since shown that when dieters are followed for a
year, the total weight loss ends up almost the same with the two
approaches. The long-term effect on cholesterol has not been studied
yet.

Experts have suspected that the weight loss on a low-carb diet may be
largely due to water loss, because lots of fluid is bound up in the
body's carbohydrate stores that are depleted. However, Astrup said
body composition studies indicated the weight loss is a real fat loss,
not just water.

The most frequent complaints with low-carb diets are constipation and
headache, which are readily explained by the lack of fruit, vegetables
and whole grains, Astrup said.

Also, bad breath, muscle cramps, diarrhea, general weakness and rashes
are more often reported on low-carb diets than on low-fat diets,
Astrup found.

"The majority had some of these side effects in the Atkins group. In
the control group, almost nothing," he said.

These side effects are consistent with carbohydrate deficiency,
because the brain and muscle do not get enough sugar from
carbohydrates to maintain their normal function, Astrup said.

"We have known for many years that there is a minimum intake of
carbohydrate necessary to maintain the normal function of your body
and that is approximately 150 grams a day," he said. "But, if on the
Atkins diet you go down to 20 to 30 grams in the induction phase, then
maybe go up to 100 grams, still you are far below what your body
needs."

The body can coast along for a while with the carbohydrate stores in
the liver and the muscles, but eventually problems start to occur,
Astrup said.

"I think these symptoms are signs that something is wrong," Astrup
said.

But Yancy, the U.S. researcher, said side effects were seen not just
after six months but also at the beginning and could have been from
dehydration, which is easily overcome.

"We know that it works," Yancy said. "I think it's good that people
are acknowledging that this diet might be an option for people. ...At
this point, we need options for people and when we're looking for
options we need to consider even things that go against our judgment
sometimes."



  #14  
Old September 3rd, 2004, 09:24 PM
Patricia Heil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


This tracks with the experience of my ex-sister-in-law. She got diarrhea.

I didn't know about the headaches. I get migraines so that's one more
reason (besides the risk to my cholesterol) for me never to even consider
this.

"dawn" wrote in message
...
Associated Press
September 3, 2004

Atkins diet has long-term dangers, researchers warn

LONDON -- Dieters on the popular high-fat, low-carb Atkins approach
lose just as much body fat as those on low-fat diets, but the annoying
low-carb side effects could mean problems down the road, according to
a scientist who reviewed five dozen diet studies.

Danish obesity expert Dr. Arne Astrup, whose survey is published this
week in The Lancet medical journal, concludes that headaches, muscle
weakness and either diarrhea or constipation are reported more often
by Atkins dieters than people on conventional diets. Those side
effects may be signs that the eating plan isn't healthy in the long
run, he says.

However, other experts said the diet remains a viable option for some
because the side effects aren't bad enough to throw them off the
eating plan famous for its shunning of bread, pasta and many fruits.

"More people stayed in the low-carb group than in the low-fat group,
so you've got to wonder how severe those side effects were if more
people kept to the low-carb diet," said William Yancy, a Duke
University researcher who conducted one of the major studies that
Astrup reviewed.

The Atkins diet, which allows unlimited consumption of protein and fat
but drastically limits carbohydrates and does not restrict calories,
has had a following for decades but only recently has come under
serious scientific scrutiny. It has been embraced by an estimated 20
million people worldwide.

In his review, Astrup, director of research in the department of human
nutrition at the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University in
Frederiksberg, Denmark, examined the evidence from about 60 studies on
the Atkins and other low-carb diets.

Several small studies in the last year or two have surprised the
experts by showing that people lose more weight on the Atkins diet
than on the standard low-calorie, low-fat diet, at least in the short
term, with even better cholesterol improvements.

Longer studies have since shown that when dieters are followed for a
year, the total weight loss ends up almost the same with the two
approaches. The long-term effect on cholesterol has not been studied
yet.

Experts have suspected that the weight loss on a low-carb diet may be
largely due to water loss, because lots of fluid is bound up in the
body's carbohydrate stores that are depleted. However, Astrup said
body composition studies indicated the weight loss is a real fat loss,
not just water.

The most frequent complaints with low-carb diets are constipation and
headache, which are readily explained by the lack of fruit, vegetables
and whole grains, Astrup said.

Also, bad breath, muscle cramps, diarrhea, general weakness and rashes
are more often reported on low-carb diets than on low-fat diets,
Astrup found.

"The majority had some of these side effects in the Atkins group. In
the control group, almost nothing," he said.

These side effects are consistent with carbohydrate deficiency,
because the brain and muscle do not get enough sugar from
carbohydrates to maintain their normal function, Astrup said.

"We have known for many years that there is a minimum intake of
carbohydrate necessary to maintain the normal function of your body
and that is approximately 150 grams a day," he said. "But, if on the
Atkins diet you go down to 20 to 30 grams in the induction phase, then
maybe go up to 100 grams, still you are far below what your body
needs."

The body can coast along for a while with the carbohydrate stores in
the liver and the muscles, but eventually problems start to occur,
Astrup said.

"I think these symptoms are signs that something is wrong," Astrup
said.

But Yancy, the U.S. researcher, said side effects were seen not just
after six months but also at the beginning and could have been from
dehydration, which is easily overcome.

"We know that it works," Yancy said. "I think it's good that people
are acknowledging that this diet might be an option for people. ...At
this point, we need options for people and when we're looking for
options we need to consider even things that go against our judgment
sometimes."



  #15  
Old September 3rd, 2004, 09:33 PM
Bob in CT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I've never had a headache on low carb. Ever. What does that prove? Not a
damn thing, as I never got headaches on low fat, either. What's the deal
with crossposting? I wish my newsreader would mark these stupid post so I
don't read them.

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 16:24:11 -0400, Patricia Heil
wrote:


This tracks with the experience of my ex-sister-in-law. She got
diarrhea.

I didn't know about the headaches. I get migraines so that's one more
reason (besides the risk to my cholesterol) for me never to even consider
this.


Ah, my HDL went up, triglycerides down, blood glucose (fasting) down,
total cholesterol/HDL improved. In fact, every blood result improved when
going from low fat to low carb.

"dawn" wrote in message
...
Associated Press
September 3, 2004

Atkins diet has long-term dangers, researchers warn

LONDON -- Dieters on the popular high-fat, low-carb Atkins approach
lose just as much body fat as those on low-fat diets, but the annoying
low-carb side effects could mean problems down the road, according to
a scientist who reviewed five dozen diet studies.

Danish obesity expert Dr. Arne Astrup, whose survey is published this
week in The Lancet medical journal, concludes that headaches, muscle
weakness and either diarrhea or constipation are reported more often
by Atkins dieters than people on conventional diets. Those side
effects may be signs that the eating plan isn't healthy in the long
run, he says.

However, other experts said the diet remains a viable option for some
because the side effects aren't bad enough to throw them off the
eating plan famous for its shunning of bread, pasta and many fruits.

"More people stayed in the low-carb group than in the low-fat group,
so you've got to wonder how severe those side effects were if more
people kept to the low-carb diet," said William Yancy, a Duke
University researcher who conducted one of the major studies that
Astrup reviewed.

The Atkins diet, which allows unlimited consumption of protein and fat
but drastically limits carbohydrates and does not restrict calories,
has had a following for decades but only recently has come under
serious scientific scrutiny. It has been embraced by an estimated 20
million people worldwide.

In his review, Astrup, director of research in the department of human
nutrition at the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University in
Frederiksberg, Denmark, examined the evidence from about 60 studies on
the Atkins and other low-carb diets.

Several small studies in the last year or two have surprised the
experts by showing that people lose more weight on the Atkins diet
than on the standard low-calorie, low-fat diet, at least in the short
term, with even better cholesterol improvements.

Longer studies have since shown that when dieters are followed for a
year, the total weight loss ends up almost the same with the two
approaches. The long-term effect on cholesterol has not been studied
yet.

Experts have suspected that the weight loss on a low-carb diet may be
largely due to water loss, because lots of fluid is bound up in the
body's carbohydrate stores that are depleted. However, Astrup said
body composition studies indicated the weight loss is a real fat loss,
not just water.

The most frequent complaints with low-carb diets are constipation and
headache, which are readily explained by the lack of fruit, vegetables
and whole grains, Astrup said.

Also, bad breath, muscle cramps, diarrhea, general weakness and rashes
are more often reported on low-carb diets than on low-fat diets,
Astrup found.

"The majority had some of these side effects in the Atkins group. In
the control group, almost nothing," he said.

These side effects are consistent with carbohydrate deficiency,
because the brain and muscle do not get enough sugar from
carbohydrates to maintain their normal function, Astrup said.

"We have known for many years that there is a minimum intake of
carbohydrate necessary to maintain the normal function of your body
and that is approximately 150 grams a day," he said. "But, if on the
Atkins diet you go down to 20 to 30 grams in the induction phase, then
maybe go up to 100 grams, still you are far below what your body
needs."

The body can coast along for a while with the carbohydrate stores in
the liver and the muscles, but eventually problems start to occur,
Astrup said.

"I think these symptoms are signs that something is wrong," Astrup
said.

But Yancy, the U.S. researcher, said side effects were seen not just
after six months but also at the beginning and could have been from
dehydration, which is easily overcome.

"We know that it works," Yancy said. "I think it's good that people
are acknowledging that this diet might be an option for people. ...At
this point, we need options for people and when we're looking for
options we need to consider even things that go against our judgment
sometimes."






--
Bob in CT
Remove ".x" to reply
  #16  
Old September 3rd, 2004, 09:33 PM
Bob in CT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I've never had a headache on low carb. Ever. What does that prove? Not a
damn thing, as I never got headaches on low fat, either. What's the deal
with crossposting? I wish my newsreader would mark these stupid post so I
don't read them.

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 16:24:11 -0400, Patricia Heil
wrote:


This tracks with the experience of my ex-sister-in-law. She got
diarrhea.

I didn't know about the headaches. I get migraines so that's one more
reason (besides the risk to my cholesterol) for me never to even consider
this.


Ah, my HDL went up, triglycerides down, blood glucose (fasting) down,
total cholesterol/HDL improved. In fact, every blood result improved when
going from low fat to low carb.

"dawn" wrote in message
...
Associated Press
September 3, 2004

Atkins diet has long-term dangers, researchers warn

LONDON -- Dieters on the popular high-fat, low-carb Atkins approach
lose just as much body fat as those on low-fat diets, but the annoying
low-carb side effects could mean problems down the road, according to
a scientist who reviewed five dozen diet studies.

Danish obesity expert Dr. Arne Astrup, whose survey is published this
week in The Lancet medical journal, concludes that headaches, muscle
weakness and either diarrhea or constipation are reported more often
by Atkins dieters than people on conventional diets. Those side
effects may be signs that the eating plan isn't healthy in the long
run, he says.

However, other experts said the diet remains a viable option for some
because the side effects aren't bad enough to throw them off the
eating plan famous for its shunning of bread, pasta and many fruits.

"More people stayed in the low-carb group than in the low-fat group,
so you've got to wonder how severe those side effects were if more
people kept to the low-carb diet," said William Yancy, a Duke
University researcher who conducted one of the major studies that
Astrup reviewed.

The Atkins diet, which allows unlimited consumption of protein and fat
but drastically limits carbohydrates and does not restrict calories,
has had a following for decades but only recently has come under
serious scientific scrutiny. It has been embraced by an estimated 20
million people worldwide.

In his review, Astrup, director of research in the department of human
nutrition at the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University in
Frederiksberg, Denmark, examined the evidence from about 60 studies on
the Atkins and other low-carb diets.

Several small studies in the last year or two have surprised the
experts by showing that people lose more weight on the Atkins diet
than on the standard low-calorie, low-fat diet, at least in the short
term, with even better cholesterol improvements.

Longer studies have since shown that when dieters are followed for a
year, the total weight loss ends up almost the same with the two
approaches. The long-term effect on cholesterol has not been studied
yet.

Experts have suspected that the weight loss on a low-carb diet may be
largely due to water loss, because lots of fluid is bound up in the
body's carbohydrate stores that are depleted. However, Astrup said
body composition studies indicated the weight loss is a real fat loss,
not just water.

The most frequent complaints with low-carb diets are constipation and
headache, which are readily explained by the lack of fruit, vegetables
and whole grains, Astrup said.

Also, bad breath, muscle cramps, diarrhea, general weakness and rashes
are more often reported on low-carb diets than on low-fat diets,
Astrup found.

"The majority had some of these side effects in the Atkins group. In
the control group, almost nothing," he said.

These side effects are consistent with carbohydrate deficiency,
because the brain and muscle do not get enough sugar from
carbohydrates to maintain their normal function, Astrup said.

"We have known for many years that there is a minimum intake of
carbohydrate necessary to maintain the normal function of your body
and that is approximately 150 grams a day," he said. "But, if on the
Atkins diet you go down to 20 to 30 grams in the induction phase, then
maybe go up to 100 grams, still you are far below what your body
needs."

The body can coast along for a while with the carbohydrate stores in
the liver and the muscles, but eventually problems start to occur,
Astrup said.

"I think these symptoms are signs that something is wrong," Astrup
said.

But Yancy, the U.S. researcher, said side effects were seen not just
after six months but also at the beginning and could have been from
dehydration, which is easily overcome.

"We know that it works," Yancy said. "I think it's good that people
are acknowledging that this diet might be an option for people. ...At
this point, we need options for people and when we're looking for
options we need to consider even things that go against our judgment
sometimes."






--
Bob in CT
Remove ".x" to reply
  #17  
Old September 4th, 2004, 02:36 AM
Daniel Hoffmeister
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In alt.support.diet.low-carb dawn wrote:
....
Experts have suspected that the weight loss on a low-carb diet may be
largely due to water loss, because lots of fluid is bound up in the
body's carbohydrate stores that are depleted.


Yup, water loss, that must be it. Silly me.

Dan (celebrating 126 lbs. of water loss today)
325/199/180
Atkins since 1/1/02 (yeah, it was a New Year's Resolution)
Besetting sins: good beer, German bread, and Krispy Kremes

  #18  
Old September 4th, 2004, 02:42 AM
Daniel Hoffmeister
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In alt.support.diet.low-carb phoenix wrote:
dawn wrote:


Atkins diet has long-term dangers, researchers warn


As if the Atkins fans would care. Diet is religion and claiming their
religion has long term risks is not acceptable for them.


Actually, the side effects they cite are pretty well-recognized among
longer-term LCers. They generally indicate 1) insufficient potassium
intake, 2) insufficient water intake, and 3) too much fat, and can be
easily corrected by 1) getting your carbs from high-potassium veggies
instead of foods that pretend to be things you shouldn't be eating
anymore, 2) drinking enough water, getting more fiber (see 1.), and laying
off the caffeine, and 3) eating less fat.

Dan
325/199/180
Atkins since 1/1/02 (yeah, it was a New Year's Resolution)
Besetting sins: good beer, German bread, and Krispy Kremes

  #19  
Old September 4th, 2004, 02:42 AM
Daniel Hoffmeister
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In alt.support.diet.low-carb phoenix wrote:
dawn wrote:


Atkins diet has long-term dangers, researchers warn


As if the Atkins fans would care. Diet is religion and claiming their
religion has long term risks is not acceptable for them.


Actually, the side effects they cite are pretty well-recognized among
longer-term LCers. They generally indicate 1) insufficient potassium
intake, 2) insufficient water intake, and 3) too much fat, and can be
easily corrected by 1) getting your carbs from high-potassium veggies
instead of foods that pretend to be things you shouldn't be eating
anymore, 2) drinking enough water, getting more fiber (see 1.), and laying
off the caffeine, and 3) eating less fat.

Dan
325/199/180
Atkins since 1/1/02 (yeah, it was a New Year's Resolution)
Besetting sins: good beer, German bread, and Krispy Kremes

  #20  
Old September 4th, 2004, 02:42 AM
Daniel Hoffmeister
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In alt.support.diet.low-carb phoenix wrote:
dawn wrote:


Atkins diet has long-term dangers, researchers warn


As if the Atkins fans would care. Diet is religion and claiming their
religion has long term risks is not acceptable for them.


Actually, the side effects they cite are pretty well-recognized among
longer-term LCers. They generally indicate 1) insufficient potassium
intake, 2) insufficient water intake, and 3) too much fat, and can be
easily corrected by 1) getting your carbs from high-potassium veggies
instead of foods that pretend to be things you shouldn't be eating
anymore, 2) drinking enough water, getting more fiber (see 1.), and laying
off the caffeine, and 3) eating less fat.

Dan
325/199/180
Atkins since 1/1/02 (yeah, it was a New Year's Resolution)
Besetting sins: good beer, German bread, and Krispy Kremes

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Uncovering the Atkins diet secret Robin Smith Low Calorie 9 October 15th, 2010 02:51 PM
Atkins Diet cc0104007 General Discussion 19 April 11th, 2004 02:55 AM
Dr. ATKINS IS A QUACK Irv Finkleman Low Carbohydrate Diets 5 March 31st, 2004 12:37 PM
ATKINS DIET MAY REDUCE SEIZURES IN CHILDREN WITH EPILEPSY Ken Kubos Low Carbohydrate Diets 0 January 28th, 2004 05:53 PM
Was Atkins Right After All? Ken Kubos Low Carbohydrate Diets 5 November 23rd, 2003 12:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.