If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
stunned at link between income and obesity
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=3854505
This was a very interesting program. I hadn't really thought about the link between money and diet before, but it makes sense. If you earn less than 42K/year, which 50% of the US does, you have $4/day for food. How can you possibly eat health for that little? You can't. A head of lettuce is about $2. Fruit and veggies, even if available, are not purchasable at that income. So what are you left with? Fast food, where you can get enough calories for the money. Eating fast food on limitted income is actually the most rational thing to do. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Matthew wrote:
Not where I shop. I can buy a weeks worth of fruits and vegetables for less than $15. Lucky me. If you don't eat any i could buy a years worth for $0/year :-) More informative would be where do you live and what are your prices per pound? Eating fast food on limited income is actually the most rational thing to do. Perhaps for certain variations on the word rational. Maximize calories/dollar seems rational when on a budget. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Stacey Bender wrote in message ... http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=3854505 This was a very interesting program. I hadn't really thought about the link between money and diet before, but it makes sense. If you earn less than 42K/year, which 50% of the US does, you have $4/day for food. Why would you need to limit your food budget to 3.5% of income? How can you possibly eat health for that little? You can't. A head of lettuce is about $2. Fruit and veggies, even if available, are not purchasable at that income. Not where I shop. I can buy a weeks worth of fruits and vegetables for less than $15. Lucky me. So what are you left with? Fast food, where you can get enough calories for the money. Eating fast food on limited income is actually the most rational thing to do. Perhaps for certain variations on the word rational. Matthew |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Stacey Bender" wrote in message ... Matthew wrote: Not where I shop. I can buy a weeks worth of fruits and vegetables for less than $15. Lucky me. If you don't eat any i could buy a years worth for $0/year :-) More informative would be where do you live and what are your prices per pound? Eating fast food on limited income is actually the most rational thing to do. Perhaps for certain variations on the word rational. Maximize calories/dollar seems rational when on a budget. Do you think that is the conscious thought process though? I haven't listened to the segment in the link but maybe income is related to education, and educated people make better choices? Just a thought. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
There is no cheaper and easier to prepare food than bread and/or pasta.
And soda is pretty cheap too, often cheaper than milk. TC Stacey Bender wrote: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=3854505 This was a very interesting program. I hadn't really thought about the link between money and diet before, but it makes sense. If you earn less than 42K/year, which 50% of the US does, you have $4/day for food. How can you possibly eat health for that little? You can't. A head of lettuce is about $2. Fruit and veggies, even if available, are not purchasable at that income. So what are you left with? Fast food, where you can get enough calories for the money. Eating fast food on limitted income is actually the most rational thing to do. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I'm in northern California where everything costs more, and our lettuce
is usually $.99. I don't think it's "rationale" for anyone to eat a lot of fast food. Dave Stacey Bender wrote: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=3854505 This was a very interesting program. I hadn't really thought about the link between money and diet before, but it makes sense. If you earn less than 42K/year, which 50% of the US does, you have $4/day for food. How can you possibly eat health for that little? You can't. A head of lettuce is about $2. Fruit and veggies, even if available, are not purchasable at that income. So what are you left with? Fast food, where you can get enough calories for the money. Eating fast food on limitted income is actually the most rational thing to do. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
oops! I think I meant "rational".
D I don't think it's "rationale" for anyone to eat a lot |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I just went to the market last night (after yelling at me for a week, lol
i'm bad) anyhow.. a head of Lettuce was $1.17 in Central Ohio. Now tomatoes were $2.96 for 3 midsized ones. I agree.. about the fast food.. I know I certainly need to lay off it. But when the kid isn't home.. and hubbys just worked 18hrs and I can't stand more then 10mins.. it's much easier for him to pick up something on the way home. Why all my labs are good but my trigs and hdl because I can't exercise and eat too much fast food, lol and yet I'm not overweight. go figure. RK, t1 "David" wrote in message ... I'm in northern California where everything costs more, and our lettuce is usually $.99. I don't think it's "rationale" for anyone to eat a lot of fast food. Dave Stacey Bender wrote: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=3854505 This was a very interesting program. I hadn't really thought about the link between money and diet before, but it makes sense. If you earn less than 42K/year, which 50% of the US does, you have $4/day for food. How can you possibly eat health for that little? You can't. A head of lettuce is about $2. Fruit and veggies, even if available, are not purchasable at that income. So what are you left with? Fast food, where you can get enough calories for the money. Eating fast food on limitted income is actually the most rational thing to do. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I would have agreed with you before but not anymore. Some of the fast food
places have gotten a lot more healthy lately. I now eat at Wendy's 3-5 times a week. I usually get a grilled chicken sandwich combo with a side salad vice French fries, and a diet coke. Sometimes, as a treat, I get a cheeseburger with a side salad. With the addition of salads rather than French fries it is not that unhealthy. I am amazed at the quality of the salad at my local Wendy's. They are crisper and fresher than I could get a Vons across the parking lot. It is the high quality salad that keeps me coming back. As a plus, Wendy's gives a 10% senior citizen discount. That makes it a real bargain for an old widow living on a fixed income who is too lazy to cook. Anon "David" wrote in message ... snip I don't think it's "rationale" for anyone to eat a lot of fast food. Dave Stacey Bender wrote: |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Ignoramus14555 wrote:
Great question! But is fast food the only choice for poor people? For example, cabbage is a very cheap vegetables, and it has a lot of vitamins etc. Cabbage tastes horrible. Sorry. It looks especially shabby against a hamburger, fries, and drink. Convenience and palatability are part of the equation as well. With a little bit of shopping, meat is also not that expensive (think chicken, etc, can be had for 39-60 cents per lb). Less convenient so less likely to happen. Bread and potatoes are not that expensive. Fast food is much more expensive than many alternatives. Potatoes are almost 50% of the veggies consumed. For about $1, you can eat a pound of potatoes and a pound of chicken. Rice and bread cost next to nothing. Notice no fruits and veggies in your list? I don't really count potatoes as a veggie, specially since i can't have them. A comparable amount of fast food would be much more expensive. $2.99 for a good hamburger, fries, and drink. It tastes a lot better than your suggestion. It is far more convenient. And it is far more effective on a dollar/calorie basis. Poor third worlders do not live on fast food. When they get the option they will. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Arkansas School Children at Obesity Risk | Roman Bystrianyk | General Discussion | 4 | September 10th, 2004 02:02 AM |
Tobacco Use and Obesity Hit Least Educated, Lowest Income Americans Hardest | Neutron | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 6 | June 1st, 2004 09:31 PM |
Tobacco Use and Obesity Hit Least Educated, Lowest Income Americans Hardest | Neutron | Weightwatchers | 3 | June 1st, 2004 07:43 PM |
IRS declares obesity a disease | That T Woman | General Discussion | 13 | December 6th, 2003 03:53 AM |
Political Causes of Obesity | FOB | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 2 | October 20th, 2003 10:36 PM |