dr_ernie the yahoo and his magical hot air balloon

The good "doctor" is an accomplished psychiatrist, logician,
diagnostician, analyst and several other, um, personalities.

Unfortunately, he has the psychiatrist part doing the punctuation, the
logician looking into the thesaurus, the diagnostician in charge of
question marks, the analyst doing the writing and nobody in charge of
intelligent content.

It all goes back to his blowhole "analysis" of what and who JC is and
how far, far off the mark he was. That part seems to get lost in his
desire to try to divert attention to me instead of his hilarious
projection and blundering attempts to smear. Analysis by innuendo, by
imagination, by conclusion, by nasty effort. Great show, from Zippy the
Wonder Shrink.

Witless, contentless, formless, pointless, useless.


dr_ernie the yahoo wrote these following non sequiturs today in four
different posts:

The amount of ferocity you've put into this thread certainly has
little to do with my responses - as I've posted less, you've posted
more, and more furiously as well.

I merely took that observation a step further and interpreted your
constant and almost compulsively bilious reaction at my very few words
as a reflection of your own insecurities. Something about mental health
language gets you so ****ed you can hardly see straight.

So what happened to you?
-------------------------

Would it hurt your pride if people did read your responses and find
you angry, Bob (hence your explanation of your post)?

You still sound angry.... your explanation didn't do it for me.
--------------------------
Bob has a thing about picking fights. Anger problem.
---------------------------
Bob wrote "Remember that I wrote this to you a couple notes
ago...?"

I do remember you said that. It sort of keeps with the theme of this
thread - the things you write seem curiously more applicable to the
author than the subject.

BTW, on that note, do you really thing that people believe you're
laughing when you write "LOL" in your posts? It doesn't seem to fit
with how angry you seem to be.

You shouldn't take this thread seriously Bob. I'm not.
-------------------------

Remember this, ernie. I said it to you early on and you're ignoring very
good advice. And, curiously, you seem to be trying to appropriate it as
though it were yours:

Have a perfectly splendid day. And do laugh a bit instead of
taking yourself *sooooo* seriously...

Right. I can see you're not taking it seriously, ernie. I bet that's why
you answer *every* post of mine. I mean I can see your point of view. It
makes me laugh, but I can see it.

No, seriously...

Pastorio

Yay! A thread about me!

Bob (this one) wrote:
The good "doctor" is an accomplished psychiatrist, logician,
diagnostician, analyst and several other, um, personalities.

Unfortunately, he has the psychiatrist part doing the punctuation, the
logician looking into the thesaurus, the diagnostician in charge of
question marks, the analyst doing the writing and nobody in charge of
intelligent content.

It all goes back to his blowhole "analysis" of what and who JC is and
how far, far off the mark he was. That part seems to get lost in his
desire to try to divert attention to me instead of his hilarious
projection and blundering attempts to smear. Analysis by innuendo, by
imagination, by conclusion, by nasty effort. Great show, from Zippy the
Wonder Shrink.

Witless, contentless, formless, pointless, useless.


dr_ernie the yahoo wrote these following non sequiturs today in four
different posts:

The amount of ferocity you've put into this thread certainly has
little to do with my responses - as I've posted less, you've posted
more, and more furiously as well.

I merely took that observation a step further and interpreted your
constant and almost compulsively bilious reaction at my very few words
as a reflection of your own insecurities. Something about mental health
language gets you so ****ed you can hardly see straight.

So what happened to you?
-------------------------

Would it hurt your pride if people did read your responses and find
you angry, Bob (hence your explanation of your post)?

You still sound angry.... your explanation didn't do it for me.
--------------------------
Bob has a thing about picking fights. Anger problem.
---------------------------
Bob wrote "Remember that I wrote this to you a couple notes
ago...?"

I do remember you said that. It sort of keeps with the theme of this
thread - the things you write seem curiously more applicable to the
author than the subject.

BTW, on that note, do you really thing that people believe you're
laughing when you write "LOL" in your posts? It doesn't seem to fit
with how angry you seem to be.

You shouldn't take this thread seriously Bob. I'm not.
-------------------------

Remember this, ernie. I said it to you early on and you're ignoring very
good advice. And, curiously, you seem to be trying to appropriate it as
though it were yours:

Have a perfectly splendid day. And do laugh a bit instead of
taking yourself *sooooo* seriously...

Right. I can see you're not taking it seriously, ernie. I bet that's why
you answer *every* post of mine. I mean I can see your point of view. It
makes me laugh, but I can see it.

No, seriously...

Pastorio