If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Portion control an important weight loss factor
Ignoramus32597 wrote in news:ckm1ng
: Exercise, increased fruit and veg consumption are factors in weight loss, but portion control is a more deciding factor. That does not imply that exercise or eating vegs is unnecessary, but it helps set our dieting priorities straight and not forget about portion control. There is the reason why "eat less, exercise more" has "eat less" first. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-ssf101304.php ``The study found that 38 percent of obese patients who consistently spent two years practicing food portion control lost five percent or more of their baseline weight. Conversely, they concluded that 33 percent of patients who did not consistently practice portion control gained five percent or more of their baseline weight. "The message in the study is that you have to eat fewer calories and/or burn more calories if you want to loss weight," Logue said. "There are no short cuts. However, there are multiple ways of eating fewer calories and/or burning more calories. The trick is to find a way of eating and exercising that works for you that you can maintain for a lifetime. Since we live in an obesogenic environment, you can not rely on the overeating and sedentary signals that the environment is constantly sending. You have to block these signals out (cognitive restructuring) and change your personal environment (change the way that you shop for food, where you eat, and how you spend your non-work time). You cannot follow the crowd, because the crowd is getting more overweight each year."'' I am maintaining just fine. And all I follow is portion control. I dont restict my diet of any food. I even eat the occasional candy bar. And I enjoy a wonderfull dessert nightly. Just one serving and then I stop. I must say though. Counting calories for as long as I did gave me great insight to how big serving portions are. In the back of my mind I will still look at my meal and guesstimate the amount of cals that are on my plate. Old habits die hard. I noticed when I obssessed about my calorie intake day in and day out, or restricted my diet from eating certain foods that I would binge more frequently. Sometimes 2 or more times a week. I still endulge now and again. Going back for a second serving of sugar free angel food cake with strawberries. But by no means the 8 - 10 thousand calorie binges I used to have. I am after all cursed with being a binger. I will strugle with this for the rest of my life. But portion control/no certain food restriction has been my holy grail.I do substitute sugar with splenda or stevia 90% of the time. But if my body craves that peanut butter cup at the end of a hard week. I let myself have it. (((one serving only!!))) 7 times out of 10 I wont finish the whole candy bar now. That evil binging demon doesnt get a kick out of it anymore when its no longer a ??bad thing??. You peeps know what I mean. You tell yourself you wont eat doughnuts anymore. Whats the first thing you find yourself binging on? Doughnuts of course, or some sort of pastry. Anyway Im rambling now. Just wanted to comment on your post. ..Portion control is working for me. **for now** -- start 365 goal 200 maintaining 189-194 range current 193 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 03:51:01 GMT, "
wrote: I am maintaining just fine. And all I follow is portion control. I dont restict my diet of any food. I even eat the occasional candy bar. And I enjoy a wonderfull dessert nightly. Just one serving and then I stop. I must say though. Counting calories for as long as I did gave me great insight to how big serving portions are. In the back of my mind I will still look at my meal and guesstimate the amount of cals that are on my plate. Old habits die hard. I noticed when I obssessed about my calorie intake day in and day out, or restricted my diet from eating certain foods that I would binge more frequently. Sometimes 2 or more times a week. I still endulge now and again. Going back for a second serving of sugar free angel food cake with strawberries. But by no means the 8 - 10 thousand calorie binges I used to have. I am after all cursed with being a binger. I will strugle with this for the rest of my life. But portion control/no certain food restriction has been my holy grail.I do substitute sugar with splenda or stevia 90% of the time. But if my body craves that peanut butter cup at the end of a hard week. I let myself have it. (((one serving only!!))) 7 times out of 10 I wont finish the whole candy bar now. That evil binging demon doesnt get a kick out of it anymore when its no longer a ??bad thing??. You peeps know what I mean. You tell yourself you wont eat doughnuts anymore. Whats the first thing you find yourself binging on? Doughnuts of course, or some sort of pastry. Anyway Im rambling now. Just wanted to comment on your post. .Portion control is working for me. **for now** So glad you're maintaining well, Alien. As a binge eater myself, I know what a victory this is for you. I was interested in your comment about bingeing more often when you obsess about calories or forbid yourself certain foods - this is me exactly, although I know it doesn't work this way for everyone. janice |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article . net,
" wrote: Ignoramus32597 wrote in news:ckm1ng : Exercise, increased fruit and veg consumption are factors in weight loss, but portion control is a more deciding factor. That does not imply that exercise or eating vegs is unnecessary, but it helps set our dieting priorities straight and not forget about portion control. There is the reason why "eat less, exercise more" has "eat less" first. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-ssf101304.php ``The study found that 38 percent of obese patients who consistently spent two years practicing food portion control lost five percent or more of their baseline weight. Conversely, they concluded that 33 percent of patients who did not consistently practice portion control gained five percent or more of their baseline weight. "The message in the study is that you have to eat fewer calories and/or burn more calories if you want to loss weight," Logue said. "There are no short cuts. However, there are multiple ways of eating fewer calories and/or burning more calories. The trick is to find a way of eating and exercising that works for you that you can maintain for a lifetime. Since we live in an obesogenic environment, you can not rely on the overeating and sedentary signals that the environment is constantly sending. You have to block these signals out (cognitive restructuring) and change your personal environment (change the way that you shop for food, where you eat, and how you spend your non-work time). You cannot follow the crowd, because the crowd is getting more overweight each year."'' I am maintaining just fine. And all I follow is portion control. I dont restict my diet of any food. I need to cut back for two weeks and will do so on the oldest WW plan of 1200 calories a day which is based on portion control. I will use Fitday to track the items without regard to calories. I used this diet back in 1968 quite successfully ( lost 70 pounds) and WW then began to change their plan periodically over the succeeding years. I in tuen became careless about maintenance. The diet is simple and mainly balanced but it does lean to low fat. Considering I use butter, dried fruit, nuts and bacon for maintenance, this old WW diet will be which excludes them will be strictly temporary. I will continue to use whole milk for making yogurt and have to use nut flour for baking bread because I cannot use grain. I will also be having fish five times a week for lunch or dinner and liver once a week. It is a simple plan and a bit restrictive, but I topped my upper weight limit allowance this past week and cannpt allow that to go unchecked. With my two exceptions it will likey actually be more like 1500 calories a day. I'll post the results in twp or three weeks, not that anyone cares :-( -- Diva ****** There is no substitute for the right food |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Carol Frilegh wrote in
: In article . net, " wrote: Ignoramus32597 wrote in news:ckm1ng : Exercise, increased fruit and veg consumption are factors in weight loss, but portion control is a more deciding factor. That does not imply that exercise or eating vegs is unnecessary, but it helps set our dieting priorities straight and not forget about portion control. There is the reason why "eat less, exercise more" has "eat less" first. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-ssf101304.php ``The study found that 38 percent of obese patients who consistently spent two years practicing food portion control lost five percent or more of their baseline weight. Conversely, they concluded that 33 percent of patients who did not consistently practice portion control gained five percent or more of their baseline weight. "The message in the study is that you have to eat fewer calories and/or burn more calories if you want to loss weight," Logue said. "There are no short cuts. However, there are multiple ways of eating fewer calories and/or burning more calories. The trick is to find a way of eating and exercising that works for you that you can maintain for a lifetime. Since we live in an obesogenic environment, you can not rely on the overeating and sedentary signals that the environment is constantly sending. You have to block these signals out (cognitive restructuring) and change your personal environment (change the way that you shop for food, where you eat, and how you spend your non-work time). You cannot follow the crowd, because the crowd is getting more overweight each year."'' I am maintaining just fine. And all I follow is portion control. I dont restict my diet of any food. I need to cut back for two weeks and will do so on the oldest WW plan of 1200 calories a day which is based on portion control. I will use Fitday to track the items without regard to calories. I used this diet back in 1968 quite successfully ( lost 70 pounds) and WW then began to change their plan periodically over the succeeding years. I in tuen became careless about maintenance. The diet is simple and mainly balanced but it does lean to low fat. Considering I use butter, dried fruit, nuts and bacon for maintenance, this old WW diet will be which excludes them will be strictly temporary. I will continue to use whole milk for making yogurt and have to use nut flour for baking bread because I cannot use grain. I will also be having fish five times a week for lunch or dinner and liver once a week. It is a simple plan and a bit restrictive, but I topped my upper weight limit allowance this past week and cannpt allow that to go unchecked. With my two exceptions it will likey actually be more like 1500 calories a day. I'll post the results in twp or three weeks, not that anyone cares :-( Please keep us posted! I am always curious of the different ways everyone goes about losing/maintaining. {{{{ I care }}}} -- start 365 goal 200 maintaining 189-194 range current 193 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
ink.net... do substitute sugar with splenda or stevia 90% of the time. But if my body craves that peanut butter cup at the end of a hard week. I let myself have it. (((one serving only!!))) 7 times out of 10 I wont finish the whole candy bar now. That evil binging demon doesnt get a kick out of it anymore when its no longer a ??bad thing??. You peeps know what I mean. You tell yourself you wont eat doughnuts anymore. Whats the first thing you find yourself binging on? Doughnuts of course, or some sort of pastry. Well, I sort of know what you mean. I told myself I wouldn't eat sugar as an experiment to see if I really had trouble with it (like a little book I was reading suggested) -- at the time I loved doughnuts and everything else sweet and fatty, and didn't think I *really* had a problem with sugar, but almost nobody was talking about it then and I found the idea intriguing and decided to give it a try. After finding out how much I changed (positively) after giving up sugar, I knew I could never go back. I know in my heart I can't eat sugar *and* weigh under 300 lbs -- and guess which one I want more. I haven't had a doughnut in 19 years -- so giving up a food doesn't mean you are going to binge on it at anytime in the future. For me, giving it up totally is central to staying away from it for good -- just like an alcoholic can't have just one shot of vodka and then stop. Different bodies, different solutions. Mary M 325-153-145 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Carol Frilegh wrote:
I need to cut back for two weeks and will do so on the oldest WW plan of 1200 calories a day which is based on portion control. I will use Fitday to track the items without regard to calories. I used this diet back in 1968 quite successfully ( lost 70 pounds) and WW then began to change their plan periodically over the succeeding years. I in tuen became careless about maintenance. The diet is simple and mainly balanced but it does lean to low fat. Considering I use butter, dried fruit, nuts and bacon for maintenance, this old WW diet will be which excludes them will be strictly temporary. I will continue to use whole milk for making yogurt and have to use nut flour for baking bread because I cannot use grain. I will also be having fish five times a week for lunch or dinner and liver once a week. It is a simple plan and a bit restrictive, but I topped my upper weight limit allowance this past week and cannpt allow that to go unchecked. With my two exceptions it will likey actually be more like 1500 calories a day. I'll post the results in twp or three weeks, not that anyone cares :-( Don't be ridiculous - of course we care. I came here because of you! I'm expecting reports and results s -- On the bike . . . Laurie in Maine 207/110 60 inches of attitude! Start: 2/02 Maintained since 2/03 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article , SnugBear
wrote: Carol Frilegh wrote: I need to cut back for two weeks and will do so on the oldest WW plan of 1200 calories a day which is based on portion control. I will use Fitday to track the items without regard to calories. I used this diet back in 1968 quite successfully ( lost 70 pounds) and WW then began to change their plan periodically over the succeeding years. I in tuen became careless about maintenance. The diet is simple and mainly balanced but it does lean to low fat. Considering I use butter, dried fruit, nuts and bacon for maintenance, this old WW diet will be which excludes them will be strictly temporary. I will continue to use whole milk for making yogurt and have to use nut flour for baking bread because I cannot use grain. I will also be having fish five times a week for lunch or dinner and liver once a week. It is a simple plan and a bit restrictive, but I topped my upper weight limit allowance this past week and cannpt allow that to go unchecked. With my two exceptions it will likey actually be more like 1500 calories a day. I'll post the results in twp or three weeks, not that anyone cares :-( Don't be ridiculous - of course we care. I came here because of you! I'm expecting reports and results s Thanks Bear It's like riding a bicycle, you don't forget. I already combined tomato juice, dijon mustard, oregano, saccharin amd tobasco to make a jar of tasty salad dressing. Breakfast was: poached egg on spinach 1 slice almond bread 1/2 grapefruit Lunch: Field greens with crumbled cottage cheese and Havarti, slice of pickled eggplant cubed, homemade dressing a slice of almond bread 1 small pear (in the salad) Really good coffee from Whole Foods with added cinnamon and vanilla Dinner: Broiled minced lamb 1/2 cup green peas with mint zucchini tomato juice 1/2 cantelope Going over my top weight limit made me crabby this week and I addressed everything I had issues about so it would all be dealt with. I declined invitations to places I really didn't want to go, quit a book review group with books I didn't like and reserved some i really want to read, insisted on a refund from a store that charged 25% more than another for an item available elsewhere at the suggested retail price and had a talk with a friend with whom I attended a group viewing of the presidential debate. He was popping up and down all evening, changing seats giving his web site to all the attendees and was very distracting. I also decided if JJ from Fla. has any subtle comments on anything I have to say, I will not respond. Tha-tha-that's all folks -- Diva ******** Intending to complete 4 years of maintenance |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Ignoramus32597 wrote:
Exercise, increased fruit and veg consumption are factors in weight loss, but portion control is a more deciding factor. That does not imply that exercise or eating vegs is unnecessary, but it helps set our dieting priorities straight and not forget about portion control. There is the reason why "eat less, exercise more" has "eat less" first. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-ssf101304.php “Eat less” that is a tough one Especially when the grazing and the munching are taking over your willpower I believe weight lost start when you’re shopping, “Read the label” first. Reading a label – 101 5gm or 5 ml = 1 tsp 15 gm or 15 ml = 1 tbsp If one serving contains 30 gm of fat or sugar; picture yourself eating 2 tablespoon full of lard or sugar. 1 gm of fat is 9 calories – I gm of sugar is 4 calories If you multiple the fat gm. by 10 for a quick count, make sure that less than 1/3 of the calories are coming from fat (1/4 is ideal) By spending a few extra minutes in the aisle you can cut your shopping cart’s calories by 20 to 25%, without changing any of your eating habit yet. “Shop smart, eat less calories, and exercise more” Fighting constant hunger? Try skim dairy product: yogurt, cottage cheese, skim milk, they are rich in proteins very low in fat and quite the complex carbs. -- Francois B. francois[at]NewBody4Free[dot]c o m http://www.NewBody4Free.com - an online tool that you can customize to help you achieve your weight and fitness goals! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Ignoramus21424" wrote in message ... On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:21:55 -0400, Mary M - Ohio wrote: wrote in message ink.net... do substitute sugar with splenda or stevia 90% of the time. But if my body craves that peanut butter cup at the end of a hard week. I let myself have it. (((one serving only!!))) 7 times out of 10 I wont finish the whole candy bar now. That evil binging demon doesnt get a kick out of it anymore when its no longer a ??bad thing??. You peeps know what I mean. You tell yourself you wont eat doughnuts anymore. Whats the first thing you find yourself binging on? Doughnuts of course, or some sort of pastry. Well, I sort of know what you mean. I told myself I wouldn't eat sugar as an experiment to see if I really had trouble with it (like a little book I was reading suggested) -- at the time I loved doughnuts and everything else sweet and fatty, and didn't think I *really* had a problem with sugar, but almost nobody was talking about it then and I found the idea intriguing and decided to give it a try. After finding out how much I changed (positively) after giving up sugar, I knew I could never go back. I know in my heart I can't eat sugar *and* weigh under 300 lbs -- and guess which one I want more. I haven't had a doughnut in 19 years -- so giving up a food doesn't mean you are going to binge on it at anytime in the future. For me, giving it up totally is central to staying away from it for good -- just like an alcoholic can't have just one shot of vodka and then stop. Different bodies, different solutions. I am the same way, more or less. It is much easier for me to accept that "X is bad for me" and not eat X, rather than decide that "X is bad for me, but I want to reward myself with it once a week". That does not make intuitive sense to me. Well expressed -- I can relate completely. (I know that Alien does not see eating his bars and stuff as a reward, so it is not a dig at him) What surprises me is how little I miss sugar and sweets. My wife thinks that I have this incredible willpower that allows be to not eat sweets, which I assuredly do not have. I simply forgot the lure of sugar by now. All I remember is that it is something to stay away from. And thank you for suggesting to me 15 months ago, that I could live a sugarfree life. I took it a bit farther and live a sweetener free life. You are more than welcome -- it pleases me to know that my experience influenced you to try it yourself with positive results! Mary |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two Keys to Weight Loss | [email protected] | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 0 | June 3rd, 2004 08:26 PM |
Study credits Weight Watchers with helping many to keep weight off | Neutron | Weightwatchers | 0 | May 29th, 2004 06:07 PM |
Shakes and a thank you to you all! | Mark | General Discussion | 12 | March 19th, 2004 06:11 AM |
Medscape on dieting | Tabi Kasanari | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 6 | March 3rd, 2004 12:53 PM |
Intentional weight loss: patterns in the general population and its association with morbidity and mortality. | NR | General Discussion | 2 | November 12th, 2003 11:51 AM |