If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Allowed calorie intake...?
Turn your data into smooth curves automatically with TableCurve 2D by
Systat Software, Inc. http://www.systat.com/products/TableCurve2D/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TableCurve/ "GaryG" wrote in message ... "Heywood Mogroot" wrote in message om... "GaryG" wrote in message ... "Bob" wrote in message While researching this, I realized that my digital scale could provide some answers. So, I started weighing myself every day. But, after doing this for a while, I noticed a problem...weight changes quite a bit from day to day. Variations of 2-4 pounds are not uncommon (due to many natural causes, in addition to that container of Haagen-Dasz!). Fortunately, the problem of "variability" in data has been addressed in other fields. And diet books! I found this free diet book: http://www.fourmilab.ch/hackdiet/www/hackdiet.html (the infamous "Hacker's Diet") to be an excellent educational source (and the basis for my diet philosophy). Scientists and stock market analysts use a technique called "linear regression" to filter out the daily ups and downs in their data. So, I decided to write a program to do this for weight management. Funny, I've been thinking of marketing a diet program too, and checking over your site for the first time I see a lot of common ideas! (I like your calendar layout idea -- very smart). It's a weight and health diary called "WeightWare" (http://www.WeightWare.com). I also must say the overall quality of design of your work is very apparent. Bravo! (and this is coming from a full-time programmer / UI designer!). BTW - if you do decide to download and try WeightWare, I would welcome your feedback on it. You can contact me via email at garyg -at- shastasoftware -dot- com. I hesitate to torpedo your work here, since it is so good, so I'll refer anyone who is interested in this important aspect of dieting (maintaining statistics daily) to my other post in this thread that I'll write now. ... You can download a free, fully functional 45-day trial version from the website to see if it meets your needs. Sorry for the somewhat lengthy plug, but I've been working really hard on this program, and just officially released it this morning (yeah!). Hah, like I said, clearly an excellent job. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Allowed calorie intake...?
Just a quick note...I've released version 1.3 of WeightWare. Along with a
couple of bug fixes for metric units of measure, it includes two new graphs that you might find useful. The "Weight and Moving Average" graph shows your daily weight, along with an exponentially smoothed moving average (using a .75 smoothing factor), for any time frame that you choose. The "30 Day Calorie Trend" graph shows each day's calorie deficit/surplus averaged over the preceding 30 days (using linear regression). This 2nd order graph allows you to quickly determine if your rate of weight loss is increasing or decreasing, allowing you to make changes in eating/exercise patterns before getting off track. As far as I know, no other program offers this feature. GG http://www.WeightWare.com Your Weight and Health Diary "Heywood Mogroot" wrote in message om... "GaryG" wrote in message ... + if you plot the expected rate loss, you will have to support variable loss rates, since it is common to switch gears on a diet (partway in I went from 875 kcal/day deficit to 1000 kcal/day, but perhaps later I might want to start backing off a bit in a month or two). +Your trend plotting is very linear; I think too much information is being lost with your function. I prefer John Walker's formula (with a 0.75 smoothing factor), since it is more usable on a day-to-day basis. It's linear by design. The weight trend shown (for whatever time period you select) is based on "least squares linear regression". The same technique is mentioned on page 294 of the Hacker's Diet. All the "hacker's diet" followers on the web use the moving average method of graphing, AFAIK. During development, I experimented with also displaying an exponentially smoothed moving average, but it didn't seem to add much value. The least squares just seems like it is drawing a single line to fit the data. As I tried to imply, this is fine for looking back at a period of time, but doesn't seem to provide any useful information going forward, since important recent trends are apparently getting chopped off with the single best fit curve fitting. The eye can determine the linear trend easily enough, but when I look at my chart, it's the bumps and dips in the moving average that tell me how things were going at that period of the diet. By fitting all the datapoints to a single line, you've basically reduced all information for that period down to a single datum: the average rate of loss over the entire period. Now that I think about it, I think it depends on the time frame you're looking at. For shorter time frames (say, 1-3 months) I think the linear "weight trend" provides more useful information. Disagree. See above. The most important thing is what's happening this week, and what the weight will likely be tomorrow if present trends continue. For longer time frames, I think the moving average would give a better view of changes in weight. I'll probably add a "Moving Average" view to the graphs in the next version. recommended I'm also thinking of adding a "30-day Weight Trend" view...this would show the 30-day linear regression value for each date (i.e., the 30-day least squares daily caloric deficit). Changes in this graph would allow you to quickly see if your rate of weight loss is increasing or decreasing. yeah 2nd order trends are useful. In my spreadsheet I color-code the daily gain/loss red if it is less than planned (0.286 lbs/day in my case). My other (sooper sekrit proprietary LOL) numbers are also 2nd-order related, and similarly color-coded. Too many reds in a row and I know something's not working. + minor UI thing on the calendar, the weekly summary cells should not be so similar to the out-of-month cells. I'd also color-code 'up' days in red, to better signal them. I'm hesitant to color-code like that, for several reasons. Firstly, the monthly min/max weights are already color coded (green and red, respectively). yeah I saw that and first assumed you we're color-coding like me :0 I also don't want to overemphasize the "up" days like that because they occur naturally, even during a successful weight loss program...coloring them red could add unnecessary stress to the weigh-ins (the status panel at the bottom of the month shows how many days were Up vs. Down, however). Here's where I think you're missing the crux of the Hacker's Diet... the exponential smoothing function filters this up & down business already, so if & when you're in an "up" situation it means the trending is pretty out of control. Of the 75 days (rows) in my diet worksheet, the daily gain/loss column's got 7 "red" figures (days where I the daily scale weight exceeded the previous calculated average) located in 3 groups. In fact, none of my calculations (other than the averaging function) even refer to the scale weights, everything is using the weighted averages. And when I post here I always refer to the weighted average as my current weight. The purpose of the weighted average is to buffer noise, and at least for my weight loss pattern seems to be working well. Heywood 232/208/182 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
calorie intake | tala | General Discussion | 10 | March 19th, 2004 01:52 AM |
a good site to find calorie intake | Anglea Woollcombe | General Discussion | 3 | February 8th, 2004 09:04 PM |
Too Much Exercise for Calorie Intake | Gary Jones | General Discussion | 5 | November 14th, 2003 03:42 PM |
shape of glass affects fluid calorie intake | Doug Skrecky | General Discussion | 4 | November 3rd, 2003 03:25 PM |
Safe minimum calorie intake | Chupacabra | General Discussion | 11 | October 5th, 2003 02:46 PM |