If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Did you see the diet comparisons?
On Mar 14, 8:19 pm, Chris Braun wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:03:58 -0500, "LFM" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... To me, the choice was clear. I want FOOD. Someone could try and make a point that fat (or protein) might be more filling, or stay with you longer, or curb appetite. All I know is there is a difference of opinion on that. Although Atkins might have better results at 10 months, I would go for the high carb Ornish diet and MORE FOOD. Not even close. dkw Forgive me here, but I've never looked into the Ornish diet. What would a typical dinner consist of? Butting in here, as I'm not the one who posted about this originally: Ornish is a virtually fat-free diet. Hence it's vegetarian. Only fat-free dairy is permitted. I think pretty much the only fats considered acceptable are those occurring naturally in fruits and veggies. I'm not sure about the low levels of fats that are generally found in bread and such. As I understand it, Ornish initially published this more as a strategy for heart health; weight loss is a side effect, in general. A close friend of mine did it for about a year due to a desire to try to lower his cholesterol without drugs, but ultimately couldn't stick with it because it's so restrictive. He did lose a fair bit of weight, though that wasn't his reason for doing it. It also lowered his cholesterol some, but not really enough. This was several years ago -- now he has gained back the weight and gone on Lipitor :-(. Chris 262/130s/130s started dieting July 2002, maintaining since June 2004 "Restrictive" must be in the eye and mouth of the beholder, because I don't find it restrictive. I love the foods that I can eat on it...cereals like farina, grits, oatmeal, are my favorite thing to eat. Any vegetables or fruit. At the back of my mind is the thought of preventing heart disease, which should be a concern for most people, so lowering cholesterol is important. I eat NO cholesterol at all, since I am vegetarian. I admit Ornish would be much easier for a vegetarian, but I think that is healthier for your weight and heart. Many people look seriously into Ornish AFTER their first heart attack or bypass surgery. dkw |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Did you see the diet comparisons?
On Mar 14, 11:03 pm, Chris Braun wrote:
On 14 Mar 2007 21:14:26 -0700, "Caleb" wrote: On Mar 14, 7:19 pm, Chris Braun wrote: On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:03:58 -0500, "LFM" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... To me, the choice was clear. I want FOOD. Someone could try and make a point that fat (or protein) might be more filling, or stay with you longer, or curb appetite. All I know is there is a difference of opinion on that. Although Atkins might have better results at 10 months, I would go for the high carb Ornish diet and MORE FOOD. Not even close. dkw Forgive me here, but I've never looked into the Ornish diet. What would a typical dinner consist of? Butting in here, as I'm not the one who posted about this originally: Ornish is a virtually fat-free diet. Hence it's vegetarian. Only fat-free dairy is permitted. I think pretty much the only fats considered acceptable are those occurring naturally in fruits and veggies. I'm not sure about the low levels of fats that are generally found in bread and such. As I understand it, Ornish initially published this more as a strategy for heart health; weight loss is a side effect, in general. A close friend of mine did it for about a year due to a desire to try to lower his cholesterol without drugs, but ultimately couldn't stick with it because it's so restrictive. He did lose a fair bit of weight, though that wasn't his reason for doing it. It also lowered his cholesterol some, but not really enough. This was several years ago -- now he has gained back the weight and gone on Lipitor :-(. Chris 262/130s/130s started dieting July 2002, maintaining since June 2004 Apparently the Ornish diet is much like the Pritikin diet and that's one of the downsides mentioned about Pritikin -- that it was difficult to stick with. (I'm pretty sure that my vegetarian daughter would have little difficulty sticking with Ornish or Pritikin -- it's pretty much her choice now.) Caleb I'm recalling another reason my friend stopped doing it: In order to get enough protein, he was eating quite a lot of legumes, and he began having a lot of trouble digesting them. That kind of diet isn't easy on some people's digestive systems. Chris 262/130s/130s started dieting July 2002, maintaining since June 2004 If you eat dairy and or eggs, there is no problem at all getting lots of protein. I eat 9 egg whites a day in meringues made with Splenda and drink nonfat, lactose free milk, so I get about 60 gm. of protein per day, more than adequate. People who are vegan and abstain from dairy do have a harder time, but they usually rely on soy. I do also eat a lot of green beans and high fiber. dkw |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Did you see the diet comparisons?
On Mar 15, 9:02 am, Jo Anne wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:01:32 GMT, wrote: No, I didn't see that, but I recall watching a show about a month ago. I think it was The Zone. They talked to the guy (doctor I think) who developed it. He said one one of the keys is to buy and eat fresh vegetables every day. How unrealistic to think most people could or would do that. Just like a doctor to think that most of us mortals have the time and inclination to do that. No wonder people quit diets so quickly. What is unrealistic about eating fresh vegetables every day? I've been doing it for years. It takes no more time than frozen or canned stuff, and I find it cheaper. (I hate canned vegetables, btw.) Jo Anne Here, here. In fact, I eat out every day, sometimes twice. I go to restaurants that have salad bars and eat only that, and whoever I go with can eat other food. You can always pick up prepared packaged salads in any supermarket, too. It is simple to eat fresh salads. People probably think I'm weird, but I like canned green beans. I eat one, and sometimes two cans per day. Most people prefer frozen. Either way they are loaded with protein and fiber (based on their very low calories). dkw |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Did you see the diet comparisons?
On Mar 14, 10:14 pm, "Caleb" wrote:
On Mar 14, 7:19 pm, Chris Braun wrote: On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:03:58 -0500, "LFM" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... To me, the choice was clear. I want FOOD. Someone could try and make a point that fat (or protein) might be more filling, or stay with you longer, or curb appetite. All I know is there is a difference of opinion on that. Although Atkins might have better results at 10 months, I would go for the high carb Ornish diet and MORE FOOD. Not even close. dkw Forgive me here, but I've never looked into the Ornish diet. What would a typical dinner consist of? Butting in here, as I'm not the one who posted about this originally: Ornish is a virtually fat-free diet. Hence it's vegetarian. Only fat-free dairy is permitted. I think pretty much the only fats considered acceptable are those occurring naturally in fruits and veggies. I'm not sure about the low levels of fats that are generally found in bread and such. As I understand it, Ornish initially published this more as a strategy for heart health; weight loss is a side effect, in general. A close friend of mine did it for about a year due to a desire to try to lower his cholesterol without drugs, but ultimately couldn't stick with it because it's so restrictive. He did lose a fair bit of weight, though that wasn't his reason for doing it. It also lowered his cholesterol some, but not really enough. This was several years ago -- now he has gained back the weight and gone on Lipitor :-(. Chris 262/130s/130s started dieting July 2002, maintaining since June 2004 Apparently the Ornish diet is much like the Pritikin diet and that's one of the downsides mentioned about Pritikin -- that it was difficult to stick with. (I'm pretty sure that my vegetarian daughter would have little difficulty sticking with Ornish or Pritikin -- it's pretty much her choice now.) Caleb It would be difficult to stick with any diet that changed your food preferences. If you have to eat meat, and feel cheated without it, Ornish would be difficult. If, like me, you feel cheated without bread and cereals, and want to avoid fat, Atkins wouldn't work long for you probably. I'm afraid yo-yo and quitting diets is a part of all of them. It's why people are overweight in the first place..they have a hard time not overeating. dkw |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Did you see the diet comparisons?
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Did you see the diet comparisons?
On Mar 15, 8:59 am, "Nunya B." wrote:
"Jo Anne" wrote in message ... On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:01:32 GMT, wrote: No, I didn't see that, but I recall watching a show about a month ago. I think it was The Zone. They talked to the guy (doctor I think) who developed it. He said one one of the keys is to buy and eat fresh vegetables every day. How unrealistic to think most people could or would do that. Just like a doctor to think that most of us mortals have the time and inclination to do that. No wonder people quit diets so quickly. What is unrealistic about eating fresh vegetables every day? I've been doing it for years. It takes no more time than frozen or canned stuff, and I find it cheaper. (I hate canned vegetables, btw.) Jo Anne It depends on where you live. There are many months of the year when I have to depend on frozen because the fresh stuff is too expensive (way out of season) or half rotted before it even hits the store (again, way out of season and travelling long distance). The driving distance in rural areas for a grocery store can be prohibitive to do more than a weekly visit - and not all fresh things last a week. -- the volleyballchick Frozen works just as well. In fact, usually frozen (or canned) is better tasting than fresh for fruits and vegetables, because they wouldn't process a lot of poor tasting food. The supermarkets however seem to have a lot of tasteless, or poor quality fruits and vegetables which I end up throwing out after I've bought them, taken them home and found them to be poor quality. You would need to buy fresh lettuce though. I suppose if I couldn't get to a supermarket...I shop daily....I would eat more canned and frozen veggies, which should be just as healthy. dkw |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Did you see the diet comparisons?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Did you see the diet comparisons?
Turning the food pyramid upside down might be a good thing. EXACTLY, at least for some people. It works great for me. Doug McDonald |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Did you see the diet comparisons?
wrote:
Today on NBC, I think, they talked about the study that someone reviewed in this group a week ago. Anyway, it gave you visually a comparison of a typical dinner for the Zone, Atkins, and Ornish diets. Some lady reviewed the study saying that people lost weight on all three, but Atkins was the best after 10 months. She pointed out also that people in the study cheated...eating too much fat on the Ornish diet, etc. Still overall, all 3 diets worked. The reason of course is people were still eating fewer calories, even if they cheated. I'm rehashing this cause someone already talked about it. The thing that stood out to me though was visually, looking at the representative plates of food. You had Atkins with some chicken and something else on it....and quite a bit of plate showing. The Zone had a bit more food on it...but not much....but the Ornish plate had a LOT of food...not bottom of the plate showing there. It was stacked with great food including 2 slices of bread. I will never ever give up bread. It ain't the protein either folks cause protein and carbs have the same no. of calories. It's the fat that makes you eat less in order to stay on the diet. That's less by weight, not calories, since fat has concentrated calories. To me, the choice was clear. I want FOOD. Someone could try and make a point that fat (or protein) might be more filling, or stay with you longer, or curb appetite. All I know is there is a difference of opinion on that. Although Atkins might have better results at 10 months, I would go for the high carb Ornish diet and MORE FOOD. Not even close. dkw rant I had the displeasure of sharing a ski trip with a vegan this weekend. He's been vegan for quite some time apparently but made our group (10) dining quite uncomfortable. We stayed at a bed & breakfast. The morning meal was a spread of eggs, sausage, toast w/homemade jam, cold cereal and fruit. The hostess offered hot cereal to our vegan guest but he seemed more expecting than grateful when his special meal was served. The group decided after skiing that convenience and bad weather made the Inn our first choice for evening dining. Our vegan wasn't pleased at the idea of paying $40(flat multi-course dinner rate)for pasta but joined us anyway. Again the chef catered to him with a sauteed mushroom appetizer, a Caesar salad w/out dressing and a vegetable oil pasta dish. Our vegan complained about the food, the price and even ordered chocolate cake for dessert(huh?). The following mornings breakfast was yogurt, pancakes w/vermont syrup, bacon and fruit. The hostess again offered the hot cereal but this time our vegan protested that he needed more choices. She apologized repeatedly but had no other offerings. He ate the oatmeal but didn't hide the fact that he was upset from the rest of our group. It was uncomfortable being present during these meals. It was also surprising to me that the vegan never offered alternate food suggestion but rather waited for the host and hostess to guess what he might want. Almost like he was testing them. I have a vegetarian meal from time to time but this vegan's diet restriction, the trouble the host and hostess had to go through to please him and his reluctance to be tolerant and flexible completely turned me off. I'll stick to trying small portions of what is put in front of me and throwing away over-sized portions any day. end rant -- Cheese http://cheesensweets.com/contacts/cheese.php |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dr. Andrew B. Chung is deluded WAS: Moderate-fat Diet Is Kinder To Heart Than Low-fat Diet | Last Shot At The Mu_n | General Discussion | 0 | February 6th, 2004 03:11 PM |
Moderate-Fat Diet is Kinder to Heart than Low-Fat Diet, Study by UB Researcher Shows | Ken Kubos | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 7 | February 5th, 2004 12:17 PM |
diet: Negative behavior changes in recently dxed male senior with dr's orders to change diet | New | General Discussion | 4 | November 7th, 2003 06:48 PM |