A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Walking vs. stationary bike?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 9th, 2004, 06:18 PM
dot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Walking vs. stationary bike?

I had been walking several times a week but due to my foot condition
(metatarsalgia) it is becoming extremely painful no matter how many gel pads
I put in my walking shoes and now I have developed blisters because my shoes
are now too tight. :-( Soooooooo I have ordered an exercise DVD from
Amazon.com to do indoors but I was wondering about an exercise bike. Does
any one know how a stationary bike compares to the benefits of walking?
I've always heard that walking is one of the best exercises there is.
dot


  #2  
Old February 9th, 2004, 06:35 PM
Roger Zoul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Walking vs. stationary bike?

dot wrote:
:: I had been walking several times a week but due to my foot condition
:: (metatarsalgia) it is becoming extremely painful no matter how many
:: gel pads I put in my walking shoes and now I have developed blisters
:: because my shoes are now too tight. :-( Soooooooo I have ordered
:: an exercise DVD from Amazon.com to do indoors but I was wondering
:: about an exercise bike. Does any one know how a stationary bike
:: compares to the benefits of walking? I've always heard that walking
:: is one of the best exercises there is.

I've done a lot of walking and a lot of stationary bike riding.

Both are great and both have a place. They use different muscles.

One reason i quit walking was because I hurt my foot. Then I got a good
stationary and started riding it. IMO, I can do a much more intense workout
on the bike than I can by walking because there is little impact on the bike
(aside from your butt -- but you adapt to that quickly). If the bike you
get has a tension adjustment, I suggest you not set it too high to avoid
overstressing your knees.

Once your foot get better you may want to consider doing some of both, but a
stationary will serve you very well -- especially if you get one what moving
handles so that you can get your arms into the activity. IMO, that improves
the stationary bike workout.

You might want to consider a concept 2 rower, as well. These can be very
good low impact machines. You'll need some space, though.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tegory=28 060



  #3  
Old February 9th, 2004, 10:27 PM
dot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Walking vs. stationary bike?

Thank you very much for your excellent and informative reply Roger. I do
have bad knees as well, so your advise on the tension feature is a good one.
I'll look into a bike ASAP!
Thanks again,
dot

"Roger Zoul" wrote in message
...
dot wrote:
:: I had been walking several times a week but due to my foot condition
:: (metatarsalgia) it is becoming extremely painful no matter how many
:: gel pads I put in my walking shoes and now I have developed blisters
:: because my shoes are now too tight. :-( Soooooooo I have ordered
:: an exercise DVD from Amazon.com to do indoors but I was wondering
:: about an exercise bike. Does any one know how a stationary bike
:: compares to the benefits of walking? I've always heard that walking
:: is one of the best exercises there is.

I've done a lot of walking and a lot of stationary bike riding.

Both are great and both have a place. They use different muscles.

One reason i quit walking was because I hurt my foot. Then I got a good
stationary and started riding it. IMO, I can do a much more intense workout
on the bike than I can by walking because there is little impact on the bike
(aside from your butt -- but you adapt to that quickly). If the bike you
get has a tension adjustment, I suggest you not set it too high to avoid
overstressing your knees.

Once your foot get better you may want to consider doing some of both, but a
stationary will serve you very well -- especially if you get one what moving
handles so that you can get your arms into the activity. IMO, that improves
the stationary bike workout.

You might want to consider a concept 2 rower, as well. These can be very
good low impact machines. You'll need some space, though.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tegory=28 060


  #4  
Old February 9th, 2004, 10:34 PM
Roger Zoul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Walking vs. stationary bike?

dot wrote:
:: Thank you very much for your excellent and informative reply Roger.
:: I do have bad knees as well, so your advise on the tension feature
:: is a good one. I'll look into a bike ASAP!
:: Thanks again,
:: dot


I didn't mention....I had bad knees too (weak due to too much weight)....the
biking is excellent for it.

Good luck.

::
:: "Roger Zoul" wrote in message
:: ...
:: dot wrote:
:::: I had been walking several times a week but due to my foot
:::: condition (metatarsalgia) it is becoming extremely painful no
:::: matter how many gel pads I put in my walking shoes and now I have
:::: developed blisters because my shoes are now too tight. :-(
:::: Soooooooo I have ordered an exercise DVD from Amazon.com to do
:::: indoors but I was wondering about an exercise bike. Does any one
:::: know how a stationary bike compares to the benefits of walking?
:::: I've always heard that walking is one of the best exercises there
:::: is.
::
:: I've done a lot of walking and a lot of stationary bike riding.
::
:: Both are great and both have a place. They use different muscles.
::
:: One reason i quit walking was because I hurt my foot. Then I got a
:: good stationary and started riding it. IMO, I can do a much more
:: intense workout on the bike than I can by walking because there is
:: little impact on the bike (aside from your butt -- but you adapt to
:: that quickly). If the bike you get has a tension adjustment, I
:: suggest you not set it too high to avoid overstressing your knees.
::
:: Once your foot get better you may want to consider doing some of
:: both, but a stationary will serve you very well -- especially if you
:: get one what moving handles so that you can get your arms into the
:: activity. IMO, that improves the stationary bike workout.
::
:: You might want to consider a concept 2 rower, as well. These can be
:: very good low impact machines. You'll need some space, though.
::
::
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tegory=28 060


  #5  
Old February 9th, 2004, 11:03 PM
Ken Bessler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Walking vs. stationary bike?


"Roger Zoul" wrote in message
...
dot wrote:
:: Thank you very much for your excellent and informative reply Roger.
:: I do have bad knees as well, so your advise on the tension feature
:: is a good one. I'll look into a bike ASAP!
:: Thanks again,
:: dot


I didn't mention....I had bad knees too (weak due to too much

weight)....the
biking is excellent for it.

Good luck.


A tip from the bicycle newsgroups - get a bike computer
that can measure pedal cadence (Cateye Astrale - $25).

According to the swell folks there, trying to hold a cadence
below 90 rpm can/will result in knee strain.

I own an Astrale and try to keep my cadence between
90-95 rpm. It's a bit tricky as my bike is a real bike ($600
Bianchi race bike - $35 at the good will store!!!). I'm
constantly changing gears to keep my cadence in range.

Ken
T2, Diet, Excercise & 1000mg Glucophage
300/240/175, LC'ing for 11 months
Fom 400u humalog/day to ZERO, thanks to LC WOE!



  #7  
Old February 10th, 2004, 04:34 AM
Roger Zoul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Walking vs. stationary bike?

Saffire wrote:

:: I can't go out walking, either. I use a stationary bike that also
:: has moving arms. It doesn't have a tension adjustment -- it uses
:: reverse airflow (or something like that) for resistance. I can work
:: up a sweat on it (of course, I can work up a sweat just sitting
:: down).

That's how mine works. The faster you peddle, the more resistance it
generates. The only problem I have with it is the noise.


  #8  
Old February 10th, 2004, 05:35 AM
Koenig O'Reilly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Walking vs. stationary bike?

On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 23:34:18 -0500, "Roger Zoul"
wrote:

Saffire wrote:

:: I can't go out walking, either. I use a stationary bike that also
:: has moving arms. It doesn't have a tension adjustment -- it uses
:: reverse airflow (or something like that) for resistance. I can work
:: up a sweat on it (of course, I can work up a sweat just sitting
:: down).

That's how mine works. The faster you peddle, the more resistance it
generates. The only problem I have with it is the noise.


Take the cards out of the spokes.


  #9  
Old February 10th, 2004, 05:45 AM
Leghorn Dude
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Walking vs. stationary bike?

there is little impact on the bike
(aside from your butt -- but you adapt to that quickly).





If you get a recumbent bike, there's virtually no impact on your butt.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fao beverly jayjay General Discussion 10 May 13th, 2004 02:31 PM
Ping: Laurie in Maine, walking shoe query J.J. in WA State General Discussion 25 March 25th, 2004 03:33 AM
EAT: walking to lose weight !? shinino General Discussion 10 October 24th, 2003 04:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.