Low Carb Bread Recipes

I beg to differ. JC IS insulting, rarely has anything to contribute and
is more predictable in his lame and repetative, "_______ is not low
carb" posts as Old Faithful.

Asking for low carb recipes, for bread or anything else, IS a perfectly
reasonable request in a low carb ng. Clearly Ann KNOWS "bread is not low
carb", or she wouldnt be asking FOR a low carb bread recipe.
.....receiving, as usual, a comment on her "stupidity", a CANNED and
allways-present general insult that's npart of his sig, for crissakes,
intending to insult everyone/anyone, with a keystroke.

Welcome aboard, Ann---think of JC as an irritant, something like an
infestation of fleas in the carpet---impossible to get rid of and
annoying on a daily basis.

FYI, there are some pretty decent ready-made LC breads with 5 or so gms
per slice. Anyway, I hope you find a good bread machine recipe.

LassChance


Low Carb Bread Recipes

Group: alt.support.diet.low-carb Date: Tue, Aug 23, 2005, 3:15am (EDT+4)
From: (Luna)
In article .com,
"Ann" wrote:
If you have nothing to offer then why respond? Some breads have less
carbs than others. You are not only insulting, but you're ignorant as
well.
Who are you talking to? You may be ignorant, so I will let you know that
when you respond to a post in usenet, you need to quote the part of the
post you're responding to, and the attribution, otherwise no one will
know what you're talking about.
If it's JC, he didn't insult you, and he's not ignorant. One of the
things informed (not ignorant) people do when entering a newsgroup for
the first time is to read the FAQ, and search Google Groups to see if
your question has already been answered. If you'd done that research,
you would have expected JC's response.
You could post in here that figuring out how to change the oil in your
car by yourself was a piece of cake, and JC would let you know that cake
is not low-carb. It's no biggie, just his way.
--
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

LassChance~
5-16-05 202/182/162

Wow, thirteen reponses and not one answer to her question, except for
JC who, despite all of his flaws and shortcomings as a human, did
actually respond to the question, albeit obliquely.

Anyrate, actual help is here.

http://tinyurl.com/e2gax

or

http://tinyurl.com/8m7ne

Of course, JC is right. Bread, even LC bread, is not particularly LC.
Be careful with portions and carb counts, and perhaps it will work for
you. I know I can do it, but I have high carb tolerance for my ketosis.

Hollywood 264/250/218 LC Since 7/20/05, and for a while before that
(did 250 -- 205 at that time)

Ann wrote:
Anyone have any good low carb bread machine recipes?
I tried this one at:
http://www.lowcarbluxury.com/recipes...e-bread01.html
But I thought it tasted terrible. (My husband actually liked it
however.) I'm looking for more to try.

Ann

Ann wrote:

Then HE has taken stupid to a new level. And by defending "his way" as
you call it, so have you.

Sigh. I see that you failed to learn from Luna's
post. She offered some important messages:

1) This is Usenet. It has rules that you need to learn
for your posts to be effective.

2) You need to learn to quote to supply context so people
know what you're referring to. On Google groups that's
clicking the "Show options" button and using the "Reply"
button in there now their ridiculous broken visible
"Reply" button.

3) Responding to JC and complaining about JC do no good.
There is no mechanism to stop him from posting so either
you ignore him or you come across as a fool. If you
really wished to make him stop you'd gather a bunch of
his posts as evidence and go to his ISP to try to get
his account pulled not complain here feeding his desire
for responses. But that too is a losing game in the
long run because he walks the line of what is technically
allowed and if he were ever to lose his ISP account there
are limitless other ISPs he could move to. In the end
it becomes a measurement of your own maturity how you
respond to him.

Think about this for a moment. Luna attempted to teach
you and you declined to learn from her. Do you know
the difference between ignorance and stupidity?
Ignorance is curing by learning, stupidity refuses to
learn. Come on, rise to the challenge and show posterity
that you aren't stupid. Posts on UseNet are certain to
survive decades, likely to survive centuries. Do you
really want your legacy to your great-great-grandchildren
to be your posts so far?

On low"er" carb bread recipes, one approach is to use
soy flour and experiment until it works. Realistically
no one ever seems to post a recipe that actually works
when compared to regular white bread. That's the way
substitutes work; they are never the same. On the one
hand you just have to accept that substitutes will never
match the real thing. On the other hand go right ahead
and experiment on your own trying to improve. Hmmm,
time to move on to feet. On the one foot, do a bunch
of Usenet and web searches and you'll find a lot of
reports on what folks have tried and how it worked.

I'd like to take a look at those recipes but I don't open tinyurl
links. You want to post the name of the main web site their own?
Ann
Max Hollywood Harris wrote:
Wow, thirteen reponses and not one answer to her question, except for
JC who, despite all of his flaws and shortcomings as a human, did
actually respond to the question, albeit obliquely.

Anyrate, actual help is here.

http://tinyurl.com/e2gax

or

http://tinyurl.com/8m7ne

Of course, JC is right. Bread, even LC bread, is not particularly LC.
Be careful with portions and carb counts, and perhaps it will work for
you. I know I can do it, but I have high carb tolerance for my ketosis.

Hollywood 264/250/218 LC Since 7/20/05, and for a while before that
(did 250 -- 205 at that time)

Ann wrote:
Anyone have any good low carb bread machine recipes?
I tried this one at:
http://www.lowcarbluxury.com/recipes...e-bread01.html
But I thought it tasted terrible. (My husband actually liked it
however.) I'm looking for more to try.

Ann

Ann wrote:
:: I'd like to take a look at those recipes but I don't open tinyurl
:: links. You want to post the name of the main web site their own?
:: Ann

The link takes you to the results of a google search.

Geez....


:: Max Hollywood Harris wrote:
::: Wow, thirteen reponses and not one answer to her question, except
::: for JC who, despite all of his flaws and shortcomings as a human,
::: did actually respond to the question, albeit obliquely.
:::
::: Anyrate, actual help is here.
:::
::: http://tinyurl.com/e2gax
:::
::: or
:::
::: http://tinyurl.com/8m7ne
:::
::: Of course, JC is right. Bread, even LC bread, is not particularly
::: LC. Be careful with portions and carb counts, and perhaps it will
::: work for you. I know I can do it, but I have high carb tolerance
::: for my ketosis.
:::
::: Hollywood 264/250/218 LC Since 7/20/05, and for a while before that
::: (did 250 -- 205 at that time)
:::
::: Ann wrote:
:::: Anyone have any good low carb bread machine recipes?
:::: I tried this one at:
:::: http://www.lowcarbluxury.com/recipes...e-bread01.html
:::: But I thought it tasted terrible. (My husband actually liked it
:::: however.) I'm looking for more to try.
::::
:::: Ann

Doug Freyburger wrote:
Ann wrote:

Then HE has taken stupid to a new level. And by defending "his way" as
you call it, so have you.

Sigh. I see that you failed to learn from Luna's
post.

I take this back. You have a short UseNet posting history
so I just read it all. You're an anti-meat troll, just
another one in a long sequence. In other posts you have
demonstrated that you can quote context. You are coherent
when discussing your own brand of vegitarianism (lacto-ovo
if I read right). You even show a nice sense of humor in
some alternative medicine topics. Not on any meat oriented
group or discussion, though. There (ASDLC for example) you
are nasty and a troll.

Good luck finding an improved low'er' carb bread recipe.
Your posts here are unlikely to encourage anyone to help you.

In article .com,
"Ann" wrote:

As for JC, Not only ignorant and uninformed, but let's add rude, no
class, trashy and well lower than the bottom of a cesspool. Is that the
way you like to play JC?

As for Luna: "his way" you say?. Give me a break! What a couple of
jerks. If you knew how to read the newsgroup, you'd see my post
followed right after his so who else would i be responding to since we
were the only two at that point?


Actually, there were 5. You know, sometimes other people might just
manage to post something in response before you've actually finished
typing and hitting "send."

I guess to use JC's way of talk, you
too are as dumb as a brick since you couldn't figure that out.

Actually, that's his sig line, not his way of talk. A signature line
isn't "talking" to anyone, it's automatically appended to a post, not
aimed at any one particular person. Since you couldn't figure that out.


There are always a few like you in every group though.


Yes, unfortunately, I have this nasty habit of expecting people to
follow the accepted conventions of the medium in which they're
conversing, and to have some facts to back up their opinions, but I am
disappointed over and over.

--
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

In article ,
(Lass Chance_2) wrote:

I beg to differ. JC IS insulting, rarely has anything to contribute and
is more predictable in his lame and repetative, "_______ is not low
carb" posts as Old Faithful.

JC can be insulting sometimes, yes. But he wasn't in that post.

His philosophy on low-carb differs from most of the ones on here, it's
an extreme. As far as I've been able to surmise, it's "Eat nothing
which gets the majority of its calories from carbs, even if the portion
is small, even if the carbs are low, even if it fits within your carb
allowance."

The other extreme would be "Eat anything that says 'low-carb' on the
label, even if it's bread, chips, pasta, candy, cookies, etc. and eat as
much of these foods as you like."

Now, I don't agree with either of these philosophies completely, but if
I were to lean more towards one than the other, which one do you think
would get the best results, weight-loss wise?



Asking for low carb recipes, for bread or anything else, IS a perfectly
reasonable request in a low carb ng. Clearly Ann KNOWS "bread is not low
carb", or she wouldnt be asking FOR a low carb bread recipe.
....receiving, as usual, a comment on her "stupidity", a CANNED and
allways-present general insult that's npart of his sig, for crissakes,
intending to insult everyone/anyone, with a keystroke.

It's just a quote. It wasn't commenting on her stupidity at all.



Welcome aboard, Ann---think of JC as an irritant, something like an
infestation of fleas in the carpet---impossible to get rid of and
annoying on a daily basis.

FYI, there are some pretty decent ready-made LC breads with 5 or so gms
per slice. Anyway, I hope you find a good bread machine recipe.

LassChance


Low Carb Bread Recipes

Group: alt.support.diet.low-carb Date: Tue, Aug 23, 2005, 3:15am (EDT+4)
From: (Luna)
In article .com,
"Ann" wrote:
If you have nothing to offer then why respond? Some breads have less
carbs than others. You are not only insulting, but you're ignorant as
well.
Who are you talking to? You may be ignorant, so I will let you know that
when you respond to a post in usenet, you need to quote the part of the
post you're responding to, and the attribution, otherwise no one will
know what you're talking about.
If it's JC, he didn't insult you, and he's not ignorant. One of the
things informed (not ignorant) people do when entering a newsgroup for
the first time is to read the FAQ, and search Google Groups to see if
your question has already been answered. If you'd done that research,
you would have expected JC's response.
You could post in here that figuring out how to change the oil in your
car by yourself was a piece of cake, and JC would let you know that cake
is not low-carb. It's no biggie, just his way.

--
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

In article .com,
"Ann" wrote:

I just saw your photo with the flaming red hair not to mention the
tacky red dress. An entire website dedicated to photos of yourself. my
my my my.

Ah, so you don't know the difference between part of a website and the
entire website.


Now I understand. You're not only not-too-bright but you're a
narcissist as well apparently. For only a not-too-bright narcissist,
would post such ridiculous photos of herself on the internet.

Lots of people post pictures of themselves on the internet. I have an
active internet life, people I meet sometimes want to know what I look
like, and I enjoy having a record of how far I've come in my weight
loss.

The red hair was a phase. I don't like it anymore, but I'm not ashamed
of it. The dress is an interesting phenomenon. I was so excited to get
down to a size were I could shop in "normal" stores, I was so excited
that people were noticing I'd lost weight, that I decided to wear
something extreme, something I never would have worn before. It's
interesting how my perceptions of myself changed, because now that I'm
even smaller than that, I look at it like "Man, I can't believe I was
still so fat." But at the time I thought I was looking pretty hot,
lol!

I dress more conservatively now, I guess because the novelty of losing
weight has worn off, and I'm finally starting to become just comfortable
with being me.

--
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

I think you looked great with the red hair and the red dress, and you
have every reason to be proud of your weight loss. It's always
interesting to me that people who mock somebody elses pictures, are
usually people who don't post pictures of themselves, and are usually
screaming for "support."


--
Cheri


"Ann" wrote:

I just saw your photo with the flaming red hair not to mention the
tacky red dress. An entire website dedicated to photos of yourself.
my
my my my.

Luna wrote in message ...
The red hair was a phase. I don't like it anymore, but I'm not ashamed
of it. The dress is an interesting phenomenon. I was so excited to
get
down to a size were I could shop in "normal" stores, I was so excited
that people were noticing I'd lost weight, that I decided to wear
something extreme, something I never would have worn before. It's
interesting how my perceptions of myself changed, because now that I'm
even smaller than that, I look at it like "Man, I can't believe I was
still so fat." But at the time I thought I was looking pretty hot,
lol!

I dress more conservatively now, I guess because the novelty of losing
weight has worn off, and I'm finally starting to become just
comfortable
with being me.