If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Study: Being fat at 40 cuts years off life
Study: Being fat at 40 cuts years off life
Smoking adds to drop in life expectancy (CNN) --Two out of three Americans have an ongoing battle of the bulge, and most know all that extra weight can contribute to life-threatening ailments such as stroke, diabetes and heart disease. But just how many years will the fat take from you? A new study shows for the first time how much life expectancy is shortened for those who are overweight or obese at 40. For smokers, the statistics are even worse. "If you're overweight, you basically live three years less ... and if you're obese, you live approximately six to seven years less," says Dr. Robert Eckel with the American Heart Association. Scientists have long known that overweight people have shorter life expectancies, but few large-scale studies have been able to pinpoint how many years they lose. The study by Dutch researchers appears in Tuesday's edition of the Annals of Internal Medicine. It looks at data collected from 3,457 adults age 28 to 62 in Framingham, Massachusetts, between 1948 and 1990. So what's the difference between overweight and obese? Doctors use body mass index -- BMI -- to measure the ratio of weight to height. A person with a BMI of 25 or over is classified overweight, and a BMI of 30 or over means one is obese. For example, a 40-year-old woman who is 5 feet 5 inches tall and weighs 150 pounds is considered overweight, with a BMI of 25. She can expect three years cut from her life expectancy, according to the study. If that same woman weighed 180 pounds, her BMI would be 30, she would be considered obese and would lose seven years. Men are hit almost as hard. A 6-feet-tall man who weighs more than 184 pounds is considered overweight. If he weighed 221 pounds, he would be obese and could expect to lose six years. Smokers who have the middle-aged spread are hit with a double-whammy Obese smokers can subtract seven more years from their life expectancy. According to the study's figures, that means obese, smoking women will live 14 years less and men 13 years less than their nonsmoking, lower-weight neighbors. About two-thirds of U.S. adults are overweight or obese, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Studies have also shown that people are getting fatter, younger. So what's a person to do? "The important message from this study is, let's work on prevention. Let's work with young people to prevent that increase in body fat," Eckel said. Eckel recommends losing approximately a pound a week until you reach your ideal weight, by cutting out 500 calories a day, which is a realistic goal to set and could result in a 5 to 10 percent loss in body fat. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Study: Being fat at 40 cuts years off life
"beeswing" wrote in message
... Whenever I see a study like this, I start pondering. I lost my weight in my early 40s. My weight was high for maybe 8 or 9 years previous to this, and before that it was fairly normal. (Funny how having a kid can affect one...) Since I was overweight *at* 40, does that mean I've permanently lost 3 years of my life? In itself, it's hardly incentive to have lost weight or to keep it off. (But of course that wasn't my only consideration going in....) Very discouraging, if true. beeswing It makes me wonder too. Since most people who lose weight fail to keep it off, maybe most of the people in the study were overweight at 40 and then stayed that way. It's probably not the single things about whether or not you were overweight at 40, but your lifestyle in the years following that would continue having an affect on your life expectantcy. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Study: Being fat at 40 cuts years off life
Ignoramus16608 wrote:
What I find interesting about Framingham study is this: 1. BMI in the forties is a good predictor of remaining lifespan For a large population. An individual's lifespan cannot be determined from this. 2. Given BMI in the forties, BMI in the fifties is irrelevant as an additional predictor. Or maybe statistically significant percentages didn't change their BMI. Again, that does not mean it doesn't help an individual to do so. So, it seems, that if a 40 year old loses weight, according to the framingham study, it won't help him or her much to live longer. I find it very counterintuitive, yet, there is hard data available. Idiots jump to incorrect conclusions from insufficient data all the time. In fact, doing so can reduce your lifespan. Still, maybe a slimmed down formerly obese person won't live longer, he or she surely will live better. You think? Get some commonsense, people. BMI is bull**** on an individual level. Behavior of a large population does not determine behavior of an individual. Correlation and causation are not the same thing. And we're still waiting for info on body fat percentage as it impacts on weight. Dally |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WSJ: How to Give Your Child A Longer Life | Jean B. | General Discussion | 0 | December 9th, 2003 06:10 PM |
Now Harvard study backs up Atkins diet | Diarmid Logan | General Discussion | 84 | November 16th, 2003 11:31 PM |
Fat rejectance is the new war on women | NR | General Discussion | 3 | October 15th, 2003 07:19 AM |
Study: Even mid-life diet change can extend life | Steve Chaney, aka Papa Gunnykins ® | General Discussion | 7 | October 3rd, 2003 11:12 PM |