If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Did she check her BP to be sure it was up. The headache was probably the
sugar/carb withdrawal headaches most people get the first 3 or 4 days. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Tiger Lily wrote:
sounds like 120/80 is no longer an acceptable BP range wonder if Andie will comment here nah.... he wont lol I sense fear. Why are you afraid to ask? Servant to the humblest person in the universe, Andrew -- Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist http://www.heartmdphd.com/ ** Who is the humblest person in the universe? http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 What is all this about? http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48 Is this spam? http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867 "Bob (this one)" wrote in message ... MU wrote: On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 08:41:14 -0500, PJx wrote: Individuals with a systolic blood pressure of 120 to 139 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of 80 to 89 mm Hg should be considered as pre-hypertensive and they require health-promoting lifestyle modifications to prevent cardiovascular disease. That's a whole lot of generalities rolled up in that advice. Like all guidelines, huh...? Bob |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Tiger Lily wrote: sounds like 120/80 is no longer an acceptable BP range wonder if Andie will comment here nah.... he wont lol I sense fear. But your sarcasm sensor is out of order. Why are you afraid to ask? Likewise your irony detector. Stick with being a nutrition fraud and religious fanatic. You do them both with an unfortunate degree of competence, but at least you're successful there. LOL Bob "Bob (this one)" wrote in message ... MU wrote: On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 08:41:14 -0500, PJx wrote: Individuals with a systolic blood pressure of 120 to 139 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of 80 to 89 mm Hg should be considered as pre-hypertensive and they require health-promoting lifestyle modifications to prevent cardiovascular disease. That's a whole lot of generalities rolled up in that advice. Like all guidelines, huh...? Bob |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob (this one)" wrote in message ... Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Tiger Lily wrote: sounds like 120/80 is no longer an acceptable BP range wonder if Andie will comment here nah.... he wont lol I sense fear. Mu made the original statement...... what is YOUR BP running at Andie? But your sarcasm sensor is out of order. isn't it though Bob!! lol Why are you afraid to ask? Likewise your irony detector. tee hee...... totally! i get 'selective responses from Andie when he thinks he can be brilliant brilliantly stupid is what i sense from Andie Stick with being a nutrition fraud and religious fanatic. You do them both with an unfortunate degree of competence, but at least you're successful there. LOL Bob oh no..... if that is success, i'd hate to see failure!!! "Bob (this one)" wrote in message ... MU wrote: On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 08:41:14 -0500, PJx wrote: Individuals with a systolic blood pressure of 120 to 139 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of 80 to 89 mm Hg should be considered as pre-hypertensive and they require health-promoting lifestyle modifications to prevent cardiovascular disease. That's a whole lot of generalities rolled up in that advice. Like all guidelines, huh...? Bob |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
I hardly think a few weeks of anything is enough time to
state a "fact" that any particular thing did or did not change someone's BP - first I would like to see a food diary posted of everything eaten ( including amount of salt used ) to see if the person was truly on LC - It took three months for my BP to fall when I stared LC many years ago - its not like medication that will drop it in a week - it takes time for your body to adjust to something as drastic as a total change of eating - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II | Steve Randy Shilts Bayt | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 18 | July 8th, 2004 09:47 PM |
Oh, brother (I roll my eyes) | Eva Whitley | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 206 | May 23rd, 2004 04:45 PM |
You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof. | marengo | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 173 | April 17th, 2004 11:26 PM |
Atkins Refresher - From Atkins Online Support | Ropingirl | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 1 | December 18th, 2003 08:10 PM |
Was Atkins Right After All? | Ken Kubos | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 5 | November 22nd, 2003 11:01 PM |