A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Atkins and High Blood Pressure



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 22nd, 2004, 05:19 AM
Nancy 8 03
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Did she check her BP to be sure it was up. The headache was probably the
sugar/carb withdrawal headaches most people get the first 3 or 4 days.

  #22  
Old August 22nd, 2004, 12:30 PM
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tiger Lily wrote:

sounds like 120/80 is no longer an acceptable BP range

wonder if Andie will comment here
nah.... he wont
lol


I sense fear.

Why are you afraid to ask?


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867



"Bob (this one)" wrote in message
...
MU wrote:

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 08:41:14 -0500, PJx wrote:

Individuals with a systolic blood pressure of 120 to 139 mm Hg or a
diastolic blood pressure of 80 to 89 mm Hg should be considered as
pre-hypertensive and they require health-promoting lifestyle
modifications to prevent cardiovascular disease.

That's a whole lot of generalities rolled up in that advice.


Like all guidelines, huh...?

Bob

  #23  
Old August 22nd, 2004, 03:33 PM
Bob (this one)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Tiger Lily wrote:

sounds like 120/80 is no longer an acceptable BP range

wonder if Andie will comment here
nah.... he wont
lol


I sense fear.


But your sarcasm sensor is out of order.

Why are you afraid to ask?


Likewise your irony detector.

Stick with being a nutrition fraud and religious fanatic. You do them
both with an unfortunate degree of competence, but at least you're
successful there. LOL

Bob


"Bob (this one)" wrote in message
...

MU wrote:


On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 08:41:14 -0500, PJx wrote:


Individuals with a systolic blood pressure of 120 to 139 mm Hg or a
diastolic blood pressure of 80 to 89 mm Hg should be considered as
pre-hypertensive and they require health-promoting lifestyle
modifications to prevent cardiovascular disease.

That's a whole lot of generalities rolled up in that advice.

Like all guidelines, huh...?

Bob


  #24  
Old August 22nd, 2004, 05:56 PM
Tiger Lily
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob (this one)" wrote in message
...
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Tiger Lily wrote:

sounds like 120/80 is no longer an acceptable BP range

wonder if Andie will comment here
nah.... he wont
lol


I sense fear.


Mu made the original statement...... what is YOUR BP running at Andie?


But your sarcasm sensor is out of order.


isn't it though Bob!! lol


Why are you afraid to ask?


Likewise your irony detector.


tee hee...... totally!
i get 'selective responses from Andie when he thinks he can be brilliant
brilliantly stupid is what i sense from Andie


Stick with being a nutrition fraud and religious fanatic. You do them
both with an unfortunate degree of competence, but at least you're
successful there. LOL

Bob


oh no..... if that is success, i'd hate to see failure!!!



"Bob (this one)" wrote in message
...

MU wrote:


On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 08:41:14 -0500, PJx wrote:


Individuals with a systolic blood pressure of 120 to 139 mm Hg or a
diastolic blood pressure of 80 to 89 mm Hg should be considered as
pre-hypertensive and they require health-promoting lifestyle
modifications to prevent cardiovascular disease.

That's a whole lot of generalities rolled up in that advice.

Like all guidelines, huh...?

Bob




  #25  
Old August 22nd, 2004, 08:14 PM
TasTyMorsL
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I hardly think a few weeks of anything is enough time to
state a "fact" that any particular thing did or did not change someone's BP -
first I would like to see a food
diary posted of everything eaten ( including amount of
salt used ) to see if the person was truly on LC -

It took three months for my BP to fall when I stared LC
many years ago - its not like medication that will drop
it in a week - it takes time for your body to adjust to
something as drastic as a total change of eating -

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AIDS, Anthrax, Atkins....Scarlett A's Part II Steve Randy Shilts Bayt Low Carbohydrate Diets 18 July 8th, 2004 09:47 PM
Oh, brother (I roll my eyes) Eva Whitley Low Carbohydrate Diets 206 May 23rd, 2004 04:45 PM
You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof. marengo Low Carbohydrate Diets 173 April 17th, 2004 11:26 PM
Atkins Refresher - From Atkins Online Support Ropingirl Low Carbohydrate Diets 1 December 18th, 2003 08:10 PM
Was Atkins Right After All? Ken Kubos Low Carbohydrate Diets 5 November 22nd, 2003 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.