If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Natural high-calorie foods vs. low-calorie substitutes. What's better?
Hello,
I'm trying Weight Watchers right now, and trying to figure out the proper foods to eat, and I have the following question: What is better, higher-calorie natural foods or low-calorie substitutes. For example, eggs vs. egg substitute.. Sugar vs. Sugar substitute. Oil (olive/canola/etc.) vs PAM spray... Personally, I prefer natural foods. However, I have found that for me, using natural foods, the portions are too small to be satisfied. Using substitutes, I'd get larger portions, but are all the additives worth it? Any suggestion will be greately appreciated! Thank you! Elana |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
substitutes for fatty foods? | wilson | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 13 | April 15th, 2004 03:37 AM |
High-Glycemic foods & Colon Cancer | Diarmid Logan | General Discussion | 0 | February 5th, 2004 05:37 PM |
Low carb diets | General Discussion | 249 | January 8th, 2004 11:15 PM | |
WSJ: How to Give Your Child A Longer Life | Jean B. | General Discussion | 0 | December 9th, 2003 06:10 PM |
Sugary foods 'birth defect risk' | Diarmid Logan | General Discussion | 6 | November 26th, 2003 09:39 PM |