Why dieters are so stupid

On Mon, 24 May 2004 23:27:52 GMT, "MMET572" ,
wrote:

But just like his dip**** friends, he'll claim in a month that I
started it all.



"Daedalus" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 20 May 2004 14:30:11 GMT, "MMET572" ,
wrote:


"Daedalus" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 18 May 2004 01:30:21 GMT, "MMET572" ,
wrote:


"Lady Veteran" wrote in message
.. .
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:36:38 GMT, cowardfinder

wrote:

On Mon, 17 May 2004 02:10:30 GMT, Lady Veteran
, wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 16 May 2004 13:02:50 -0300, "Heather d'Entremont"
wrote:

Do you even think before you type? I wasn't whining or
complaining. I was stating facts. And I was disputing the myth
that fat people are healthy. Talk about trolls. You are a fine
example of one. You didn't notice my signature did you? Or my
follow up message. Idiots shouldn't be allowed keyboards.

Complaining about your back hurting isn't whining?
You dogs have to
suffer because you can't walk them as they should be walked?......

She didn't complain or whine. Illiterate brainwashed jackasses like
you are just unfamiliar with context.

Now be the obedient coward you are and add me to your killfile for
the 1,000th time

Jade

ps - Bobbi, you are rude and stupid. Very rude, very stupid.

Hey vermin. You are the one chasing me. Why is that? Are you so
obsessed with me that you can't leave me alone? Are you stalking me?
If you are, I have been stalked by better fools than you.


I'm puzzled by this jade's mania with attacking you LV.

You're addressing the quintessential nutcase and you wanna talk mania?
LOL!

But if you must know, she's so obnoxious and daft that kicking her in
the head everyday is kind of enjoyable. I'm sure, as with Chaney, I'll
get bored with it and move on eventually.


Did you, by chance. happen to **** in her cornflakes, even
unintentionally?


Net abusing, obsessive egomaniacs like her tend to try and **** on
everyone. Luckily she's too stupid to accomplish much.


LOL


DFooK

I'm puzzled by your apparent desire to get involved.

Jade




I'm puzzled by your surprise.

I'm puzzled, not surprised.


Oh, my mistake. I have trouble discerning between puzzlement, surprise, and
boneheadedness when it comes to your type.

You appear to have trouble discerning a lot of things.



You tiresomely and ceaselessly attack Ms.
Sanchez without apparent objective correlative for your actions,

You don't see a correlative? You need a good optometrist. Or perhaps
you just need to remove the shades of blind loyalty that you seem to
be wearing.


How about making it easy for me. Show me where she went looking for your
abuse.

You don't seem to know your friend very well. I'm sure it's all
available to you in Google. Do your own work if it matters that much
to you. Since I don't really give a **** about what you think, I'm
not compelled to go surfing to prove a moot point.

Show me where she targetted someone who DIDN'T first troll through
her fat-acceptance group.

It happens regularly, but again that's all in google. I doubt you'd be
able to see it even if it was shown to you.

Then you can start whining.

Hey look, another tard who has to make things up to have any leverage
in an argument.

Please post proof of any whining on my part. You brought the subject
up, asshat, not me.




None the less, the couple of minutes a day I spend smacking her around
pale in comparison to the time she spends insulting everyone she
encounters for nearly four years. You seem to be confused about what
is really tiresome and ceaseless here. You also seem to have a little
problem with hypocrisy.


Hypocrisy? You seem to think there should be a licence for people to go
where they are not welcome, post off topic,

Yep. In an unmoderated group, people can post whatever the hell they
want. One must develop the self control to ignore what they don't want
to see. (Are you gonna take the bait, simpleton?)

torment and abuse people, and
get away with it.

Torment and Abuse? LOL! Your exaggeration skills get better and
better.

If what people say on usenet torments and abuses others, you should
really tell her to stop calling innocent posters ****wits every time
they post.

Yet when called on it you act sooooo upset.


Here's a free clue for you, sparky. Projecting nonexistant emotions on
people is a mindnumbingly trite usenet tactic. It only shows you suck
at debating anything with anyone. So far it's been your only blade. I
can now see why you chose the friends you did.




then you
act shocked that someone would remind you that you're acting like a a sad
little obsessive dip****.


I happen to think there's someone else that you should be reminding of
that, hypocrite. Someone with a real problem. That's what friends are
for, after all.


If she has a problem, as you say, what are YOU doing to ameliorate it,
darling?

First of all, I'm not a ****ing usenet therapist. Second of all, I
and contless others have tried to actually communicate with the woman
(Hint: Google again) civilly. She doesn't want any part of it. You
seem to be her friend, maybe she'll listen to you.


As far as I've seen these dreary little playlets always start with you, or
one of the other fart catching herd, provoking or trolling or abusing.

See above, She initiated the flaming, I gave up trying to debate her,
then I got bored with her interrupting all the actual debates I and
others were having screaming "****wit!". Now it's headkicking time and
I'm quite enjoying it. She seems to rely on pity parties from you and
Chaney to step in and protect her. *shrug* Bring it. The more the
merrier.

If
she bugs you so much why not leave her alone? But we all know why that won't
happen, right?

She has me firmly killfiled. The poor little lamb doesn't even see my
posts, save when I want her to a couple of times a week. (Do I need to
remind you of Google again?)

I might leave her a lone for a while, since I've got you now *begging*
me to. See how stupid that exaggeration **** looks?

And while we're at it...

I'm puzzled by your apparent desire to get involved.

This is what you call shock? Quite a talent for exaggeration you have
there.

I guess I'll be seeing you around.



I suppose so. If you can find a few minutes away from your LV Agenda.

Exaggeration to the very end. I noticed you snipped the bit where I
pointed it out in the last post. Is this really your only trick, or do
you just have a severe problem with truth, numbnuts?

Jade



DFooK

In article ers.com,
MMET572 wrote:
I happen to think there's someone else that you should be reminding of
that, hypocrite. Someone with a real problem. That's what friends are
for, after all.


If she has a problem, as you say, what are YOU doing to teach her to relax
by cramming things up her ass darling?

As far as I've seen these dreary little playlets always start with you,
ignoring my posts about sticking common ordinairy dinner implements
up my ass.
One of the other fart catching herd, also known as the tards ie chaney
Lady Boarella are the last of a dieing breed of people that really really
enjoy sticking lawn care implements up our asses, provoking or trolling of
us is not going to give you the satisfaction that I get from a paint brush.
If I bugs you so much why not cram something up my ass? But we all know
why that won't happen, right? It's my dingleberry problem. Well that's just
rascist.

I guess I'll be seeing you around.

I suppose so. If you can't find a few minutes away to entertain my sphincter.
DFooK

Jesus Christ Dfaggot go back to posting as a women it beats this sick ass ****
you're always posting about.

-Jeem, Pink power walker when I gonna get my lesson? Never boypussy.

Archive-name: stevechaney-faq
Posting-Frequency: whenever
Last-modified: 2003/11/04
Version: 2.1


alt.bonehead.steve-chaney FAQ

Table of Contents

1. Who is Steve Chaney?
2. Why is he hated by almost everyone?
3. Is Chaney a loser?
4. Is Chaney obese?
5. How long has be been making an ass of himself on usenet?
6. Does he really have a girlfriend?
7. What other names does he go by?
8. What qualifies Steve as a net loon?
9. Was Chaney thrown out of school?
10. Did Chaney threaten his ex-girlfriend?
11. Is Chaney insane?
12. Is Chaney a welcher?
13. Is Chaney a stalker?
14. What does Chaney think of Shakespeare?
15. What does Shakespeare think of Chaney?
16. Does Chaney have a learning disability?
17. Why does Steve Chaney have his own newsgroup?
18. Is Steve Chaney insanely jealous of Brad Pitt?
19. Where can i learn more about Steve Chaney?
20. Where can i learn more about Chaney's girlfriend?
21. What is my final advice for Steve Chaney?
22. What will happen to Chaney if he does not take my advice?
23. What Does Steve Chaneys friends say about him?
24. What has Steve Chaney been flipping out about lately?
25. Recent threats, rants and a view into the mind of psychosis

****

1. Who is Steve Chaney?

Steve Chaney is the official loser of soc.singles. When he isn't shoving
his foot in his mouth on soc.singles he squanders his time playing Quake,
farting around on IRC, watching Highlander, drooling over Japanese
cartoons and creating web pages devoted to these extremely productive
activities among which are such diverse elements as:

http://www.clandenial.org
http://www.self-acceptance.org

The real Steve Chaney is revealed through his posts at:
http://www.pat_acceptance.org
Bring a vomit bag.

2. Why is he hated by almost everyone?

He is that most annoying of creatures: The total failure who thinks he
knows it all. Everywhere he goes he can be seen offering worthless advice
on subjects he knows nothing about. He thinks he is terribly clever.
Combine this mediocre intellect with a total lack of any wit or charm and
you have a potent combination that led him to be dubbed the Natural Born
Troll.

He is particulary hated on soc.singles:

Steve's participation in soc.singles is characterized by four things:
(1) he professes to hate all snigglers [regular participants in
soc.singles], yet he is always seeking to prove that he is the equal
of a sniggler; (2) he attempts, endlessly, to advise others who are
obviously more intelligent, successful, and happier than he about how
to become an unhappy failure just like him; (3) he argues with
everything any sniggler tells him, but mysteriously months later the
advice he received is the advice he is now giving. He claims, however,
that it's his own; and (4) documentation. Steve claims to be the king
of documenting claims. However, his feeble attempts at documenting his
claims either prove nothing or prove the opposite of what he's
arguing.
---- From: (Mike)
Message-ID:

Important revision (1999/2/10):
Originally I believed that Chaney was not hated for his politics.
However Daniel Mocsny ) has argued convincingly that
within the culture of soc.singles social conservatives are anathema
especially if they are anti-abortion.
So my fiscal conservatism or tree's opposition to high taxes or Dawn's
pro-gun stance not inspiring the same degree of opprobrium as Chaney does
not mean that conservatism is acceptable there.
On soc.singles it is indeed possible to be politically incorrect.

3. Is Chaney a loser?

Yes.
He is a fat slob.
He is in denial about being a fat slob.
His girlfriend is a fat slob.
His previous long-distance girlfriend was a fat slob.
He lived with his mommy til he was 25 years old.
Like many losers he hates and envies those doing better than he is.
He whines constantly.
He blames social forces for his own failures and inadequacies.
His idea of dating advice is to brag about how you eat Ramen Noodles but
plan to learn to cook for your wife (whine, grovel, whine)
He is almost universally despised everywhere he posts.
He enjoys many loser hobbies including listening to Rush Limbaugh and Dr.
Laura, babbling on IRC, playing Quake, watching and obsessing over
shallow
TV shows, and producing garish, clumsily constructed web pages about the
above loser topics. (see question 1.)

4. Is Chaney obese?

Yes. He claims he weighs 230 pounds and is 5 foot 11 inches tall.

Tokeman wrote:
I challenge you to post your current weight and body fat percentage.

230lbs; I haven't got a bodyfat percentage figure yet.
---- (Steve Chaney)
Message-ID:

He had managed to lose about 10 pounds in six months as of 3/98. At this
rate he might attain a healthy weight in about two and a half years.
However his recent reticence about posting his current weight might be an
indication that he has failed to make any progress since the last update.
I would also note that the original claim in this FAQ that he was
morbidly obese may have been in error. Steve's BMI is over 30 but it is
not 40. Recently Crash Street Kidd helpfully pointed out that a BMI of 40
is the threshold of morbid obesity. Of course he never said a peep about
it before but better late than never.
Any further data on the medical definition of morbid obesity would be
helpful.

However:

Tokeman wrote:
Jim Dutton wrote:
Said the 5'6" 330 lb lump of lard.

Jeem, what is your source of those numbers?
I am revising the alt.bonehead.steve-chaney FAQ and I am trying to
resolve
this mystery once and for all.

I've been suspicious about that all along. My suspicions were
heightened when the letter from his ex girlfriend (Toni?) was included
in the bonehead faq - wherein she states "He weighs close to 300
lbs..."
---- Leanne R Campbell
- Message-ID:

It is possible that Steve has been lying about this all along.
However Jeem admits his figure is a guess so it should also be taken with
a grain of cheesy poof flavoring:

Tokeman wrote:
Jim Dutton wrote:
Said the 5'6" 330 lb lump of lard.

Jeem, what is your source of those numbers?

Off the top of my head. I figure we might as well all be making crap up.
Trish is a crack whore. Chaney is an expert on dating. I have seen him
and one of his low self esteem victims pictures tho. The numbers are not
far off
Pictures don't lie.

---- (Jim Dutton)
- Message-ID:

My apologies to Steve for saying he was MORBIDLY obese for the past year
based on an erroneous definition.
In future I shall not take John Fereira's ) word on
anything.

Incidentally - how's the diet going chubs?

5. How long has be been making an ass of himself on usenet?

Since the summer of 1992 -- at least that's when I first noticed him
waddling
into talk.abortion.
---- (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Message-ID:

6. Does he really have a girlfriend?

Unknown. He claims to. He says she is 180 pounds and 5 foot 5 inches tall
ie obese.

7. What other names does he go by?

Gunhed. Tunastankboy. Airplane Boy. PropellerBoy. The Hamster. Anime.
Lordfeff. SharonFan. Richie Ryan. Gund00d. fatcrack. Eric Cartman.
Readingdisabilityboy. Pat *******. Mailbomber. Pelican Gullet. Welchboy.
Anal plug. Stebo Spnako. ****head.

8. What qualifies Steve as a net loon?

He is mentioned in the net.legends FAQ as a noted talk.abortion wacko.
His qualifications are also bound to be on display in any thread where he
is at work.

9. Was Chaney thrown out of school?

It is widely claimed that he flunked out of college. This may be
usenet legend only. Hopefully someday Steve will clear this whole
thing up.
---- From: (Mike)
Message-ID:

Chaney wrote:
I, on the other hand, have been asked to explain the claim that I was
thrown out of college. Seeing as I never was, what can I say? Jim,
mind
you, will never provide any documentation showing I was ever thrown out
of
college, because it never happened.

Hmmm Your ex -fiancee who glows now that she's married to what she
refers
to as "a real man" states you were unable to maintain a "c" average and
were
thrown out of school.
---- (Jim Dutton)
Message-ID:

10. Did Chaney threaten his ex-girlfriend?

Absolutely without a doubt, first hand knowledge, yes.
---- Ben Tersian
Message-ID:

We have her firsthand testimony as well:

Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 19:21:16 -0600 (MDT)
From: What happens if I press THIS button?
To: Talk-List
Subject: This is the side of Tawnya that GunHed won't tell anyone.
(snip)
There was a lot that caused me to no longer want to be with Steve. Some
of it was the fact that he was too .. rigid. To me, he had no sense of
humour and he took all my questions to be personal attacks. Yes, I
admit that I was a bitch to him for the last year. That's because I did
not want to be with him. Since April of '94, I told him that I wanted
out of the relationship. But he wouldn't let me go. He refused to let
me leave him even though he knew I wasn't happy with him. So, I started
arguments at any opportunity I could. I made his life a living hell
trying to get him to let me go, but he wouldn't.
(snip)
It was almost fateful the night that Steve and I got into a monstrous
argument. It was a stupid argument over which wordprocessor was better:
WordPerfect 6.0 for DOS or MS-Word6.0. For nearly 2 hours, we argued.
Finally, Steve cut the "TALK" session that we were holding at 6:58pm,
MST, on Thursday, March 9th. Since I had a class at 7, I simply logged
out and went to class. I came back at 10pm, MST, and there was a very
nasty letter in my box saying that I "****ed up" and he was leaving me
because "he was tired of my bull**** and how I was treating him like
****". It was then that I realized that I was finally free of him. I
didn't leave him, he left me.
(snip)
Monday morning when I went back online, I found out that Steve had
started spreading that I cheated on him. I tell you this. I did not
cheat on him. It was not until the 10th of March, the day AFTER Steve
left me, that I finally agreed to go out with John. AFTER he had left
me.

Then, he swore to me that if I did not leave John then he would come
after me with a shotgun. Now that seems a little farfetched as he won't
come to New Mexico, where I have always lived and he also swore that if
I came to California, then he would have a shotgun ready for me and/or
have me arrested.

But for what? I never once said that I would go see him, and I don't
think that he owns all of California. He has threatened to do too many
things to me, anything from Netdeath to reality death. And this hasn't
been just because I left him, but because I wasn't lett him control me
any longer.

When he came here in January of '94, it was a happy time. Until I saw
that he lived for control. I went on IRC one night just to check my
mail and to say Hi to anyone I knew, I was kicked off by a dork who had
taken over #talk. But because I didn't go into catatonics, Steve went
crazy.

He stomped around my room with fists clenched and there was a wild look
in his eyes. Now I'm 6' and weigh approximately 200 (give or take 5
lbs) lbs and I know how to defend myself. However, I was afraid of what
Steve was going to do as he slammed his fist against the wall (which
caused it to boom out loudly) and I knew that if he were to strike me, I
wouldn't be in a good position to do anything against him considering
he's 6'0 and weighs nearly 300lbs. Basically, I was not safe with him,
or so I felt.

Probably by now, all of you are bored stiff. I admit that this is not
what you designed this talk-list for. But please, realize this. I did
NOT cheat on Steve. He dumped me and there was someone here who was
willing to go out with me. John is here, with me, in the same area as I
am. He's not pushing marriage on me. Steve was going to make me either
have his children or raise them, whereas I didn't want either. Also,
John shares my love for animals, whereas Steve would rather seem them as
roadkill.
(snip)
I leave the judgement up to God's hands, as we humans are too flawed to
judge ourselves. Only the Purest may decide.

Toni A. Anaya

11. Is Chaney insane?

Yes.

12. Is Chaney a welcher?

Chaney offered to meet any sniggler on at the sniggler's locale and on
his terms to engage in a "pickup" contest. When his offer was
accepted, he revoked it.
---- From: (Mike)
Message-ID:

13. Is Chaney a stalker?

I'd say so, seeing as he's been promising for the past five years to
confront
me at my workplace -- Rice University -- for my alleged racism (and,
whether
he admits it or not, for nothing more than being pro-choice and a parent
_and_
grandparent). Funny thing is, even now that he's making tons of alleged
money, he _still_ can't figure out how to get from Los Angeles to Houston
to
do his confronting.
(Patrick L. Humphrey)
Message-ID:

He is a netstalker. He mercilessly hounded Trish Roberts and accused
her of being a crackhead.
---- From: (Mike)
Message-ID:

14. What does Chaney think of Shakespeare?

Generally, the LOWLIEST of Japanese cartoons have a deeper plot and more
creativity, than the very BEST of William Shakespeare's plays.
---- (Steve Chaney)

and time has not diminished his idiocy:

Liliolanus wrote:
Steve Chaney ) :
Question:
I do however wonder why most Americans could give a rat's ass about
such a presumed prestigious fellow as Shakespeare, who but for the
help of a few fans who rediscovered and redistributed his work, would
have never amounted to anything. Shakespeare is big **** with the
literary academia, and with students trying to get through the
bull**** english lit classes

Yo Steve - this opinion about Shakespeare? You know how much I
respect this opinion about Shakespeare? I respect it like I respect

the common cry of curs, whose breath I hate
as reek o' th' rotten fens, whose loves I prize
As the dead carcasses of unburied men
That do corrupt my air: I banish you.

- From: (Lydia van der Weyden)
Message-ID:
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000
References:



15. What does Shakespeare think of Chaney?

"Think him a great way fool, solely a coward"
-- All's Well That Ends Well, I,1
"A whoreson beetle-headed, flap-ear'd knave!"
-- "Taming of the Shrew", IV,1

15b. What would ol' Will say to him if he were on the internet?

"Hang, cur! hang, you whoreson, insolent noisemaker!"
-- The Temptest, I,1
"A pox o' your throat, you bawling, blasphemous, incharitable dog!"
-- same

---- contributed by (The_Doge of St. Louis)
Message-ID: thedoge-0111970153330001@ppp-207-193-20-
62.stlsmo.swbell.net

16. Does Chaney have a learning disability?

Unsure, he was placed in a special school as a child for a learning
disability.
---- Ben Tersian
Message-ID:

Most of your difficulties here stem from your own misunderstandings and
poor reading and comprehension skills. The classic example was when you
claimed to have seen Seth's plate at a gathering, at a time when he was
3,000 miles away. The plate in question actually belonged to someone
named Keith (and was so marked), but you were so convinced that Seth was
there to torment you that you imagined his presence, as verified by his
---- (Michael K. Lerch)
Message-ID:

17. Why does Steve Chaney have his own newsgroup?

Because he's a bonehead of course!

18. Is Steve Chaney insanely jealous of Brad Pitt?

Sure looks that way:

"Fortunately I know enough women who don't like him, that Brad Pitt
doesn't bother me. There's too many Brad Pitt's to get jealous of
them all."

"I don't like very much of this sick and twisted, narrow-minded,
MTV-poisoned, Brad Pitt and Claudia Schiffer, you're-a-nice-guy-but,
women can be victims but men have to suck it all up and yet we call
this equality society."

"The same is true of good looking guys. Look at Brad Pitt (ick)."

"But I do have to admit, I personally have seen the "I have to be in
love first..." and then Brad Pitt's picture comes on the tube and it's
all "I'd love to be with him!" (and you know what that means)."

"I have to love him before I bed him - OOH there's Brad Pitt I'd love
to take him home!".

"Tut tut tut. What evidence do you have that Brad Pitt *IS* smart?"

"Brad Pitt is the worst actor to have ever existed. Jerry's kids
could do better than he can!"

"I love Brad Pitt's role as an insane asylum inmate in '12 Monkeys.'
It was so fitting."

"Rarely does any other country's women give a whit about David
Hasselhoff or Brad Pitt."

"For many women, conversational skills basically constitute how much
you know about sports and Brad Pitt, or how many jokes you can tell."

"They watch soap operas and think Brad Pitt is the be all and end all
of mankind - of course there is that rebellious "Long Live Tom Cruise"
splinter group."

"They may be desperate for a Brad Pitt Man, mind you, but they're
desperate."
---- (Steve Chaney)

19. Where can i learn more about steve chaney?

http://www.pat-acceptance.org

20. Where can i learn more about chaney's girlfriend?

http://www.fatchicksinpartyhats.com

but seriously you can judge for yourself whether or not stebe is a
desperate loser by perusing the followink actual photographs of his
female equivalent in her natural habitat:

http://www.ejeem.com/p.jpg
http://www.ejeem.com/i.jpg
http://www.ejeem.com/g.jpg

21. Whats this stuff about Chaney being a pedophile?

Chaney often makes pedophile comments about his antagonists children.
On 5 occasions he has failed to accept offers to repeat said comments
to the face of parents of these children. He appears proud of his extensive
history of being a snivelling coward.

22. What is my final advice for Steve Chaney?

Commit suicide.
Ditch the boybra.

23. What will happen to Chaney if he does not take my advice?

Listen up Steve, this is your life:
Here's what will happen to you. You will get older and each year you will
get fatter. Your inactivity and reclusiveness will make you more and more
repulsive. If you're LUCKY this obese sow you're porking will deteriorate
at the same rate and have just as few options as you do. You will have
sex about once every two weeks, then once a month, then every other
month. You will fall into a rut at a job paying a little more than the
average income. You will spend endless hours watching TV and playing
video games. Time will slip away. And then one day you will be
contemplating your life. And you will feel a terrible emptiness as you
look back at the horrible void that was your existence. You'll shiver not
knowing why. And then the grim reaper will reach out and erase you from
the world and they'll bury you and no one will remember and no one will
care because in your 42 years you never, ever, no not ever, not even
once, did anything bold or interesting or original.
The End.

24. Why Steve Chaneys supporters say he's insane:

What Steve Chaneys most adament supporter says about him:
In article ,
Subject: Speaking of columbine
Date: Thu Aug 15 11:47:02 CDT 2002
Kthulah wrote:
The answer as to the whys would be:
Because he was already sick, and people (some who even stated that he
was sick) pushed him and pushed him until he snapped.
I don't push crazy people.
There's a reason I don't talk to certain people here. There's a reason
that if I do talk to certain other people here, it's very light or very
constructive. Whatever may go on in your little world, I've seen people
go over the edge.

25. What has Steve Chaney been exhibiting his insaness about lately:

Mr. Chaney is mentioned twice in part 4 of the net legends
faq:

http://www.killfile.org/~tskirvin/fa.../legends4.html

Mr. Chaney also has his own faq, a copy of which can be
found at:

http://www.pat-acceptance.org/steve_FAQ.html

Recently, Mr. Chaney bragged about hiring a private
investigator to track down an ex girlfriend (from nine years
earlier) whom he claimed defamed him nine years ago. His
rationale for tracking her down was to be able to sue her in
case she ever defamed him again. Of course, this girlfriend
hadn't uttered a peep in Mr. Chaney's direction in the
preceding nine years. When she found out and questioned him
about throwing threats to her about the internet he responded by
threatening to post a sexually explicit video of her he had obtained when
they where dating. A video he promised and swoar he had disposed of.
He then crowed about how tough he was by threatening to post naked pictures
of women he knew.

To see Mr. Chaney's explanation of
these events, see:

http://www.pat-acceptance.org/kookrant.html

http://www.pat-acceptance.org/kookrant2.html

Mr. Chaney's net-kook credentials were recently acknowledged
in alt.usnet.kooks, wherein Mr. Chaney was voted kook of the
month for July 2003.

Message ID:

Some of Mr. Chaney's other notable achievements include
initiating child molestation remarks in the newsgroup
soc.singles, running a self-acceptance/fat-acceptance
website (http://www.self-acceptance.to) while insulting the
size and weight of posters with whom he has disagreed,
posting over 10,000 forgeries of other posters to usenet,
and having a movie of his life story made and published on
the internet.

That movie can be viewed he

http://www.pat-acceptance.org/pat.html

26. Recent threats, rants and view into the mind of psychosis:

If I catch you busting into a mass and vilifying a church, the last thing
you'll hear in your entire life, will be the ratatatatat of an automatic.
- --Steve Chaney to Mark Ira Kaufman
Message-ID:

Young Mr. Chaney, the man who has told me that he wants to murder me and
sodomize women in my family, has said, repeatedly, that advocates for
choice had vandalized churches.
- --Mark Ira Kaufman
Message-ID:

she probably has to have her picture taken by satellite because no normal
camera can fit all that whale blubber into one picture.
- --Steve Chaney
Message-ID:

Excessively fat women look ugly. It is impractical to try and have sex when
she's 100lbs overweight and the weight is all fat - but most women ain't
that big.
- --Steve Chaney
Message-ID:

You of course do know what a lot of Asian women prefer, right? Besides,
after ****ing a cute asian chick, experience tells me it isn't all that
except that she looks good on your arm. In bed it ain't much at all. If the
lights go out, any guy whose hormones are more fixed on performance than
looks, is going to go to sleep right there and then.
- --Steve Chaney
Message-ID:

Clarice and Allisson were well beyond a BMI of 25 in their pictures where
they were called cows.
- --Steve Chaney
Message-ID:

If Dutton knocked on Steve's door and Steve shot him in the face, I would
really not care.
- --Crash Street Kidd about Steve Chaney
Message-ID:


If you have any questions about this ragingly insane
netkook, post them to soc.singles, and someone will
certainly be glad to answer them for you.

LV



Original Author jackie 'anakin' tokeman

lies are stebe's only avenue to access his ultimate ambition .. which
is prety much just to perceive himself as a glowing hero.
- cb

"Daedalus" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 24 May 2004 23:27:52 GMT, "MMET572" ,
wrote:

But just like his dip**** friends, he'll claim in a month that I
started it all.



"Daedalus" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 20 May 2004 14:30:11 GMT, "MMET572" ,
wrote:


"Daedalus" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 18 May 2004 01:30:21 GMT, "MMET572" ,
wrote:


"Lady Veteran" wrote in message
.. .
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:36:38 GMT, cowardfinder

wrote:

On Mon, 17 May 2004 02:10:30 GMT, Lady Veteran
, wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 16 May 2004 13:02:50 -0300, "Heather d'Entremont"
wrote:

Do you even think before you type? I wasn't whining or
complaining. I was stating facts. And I was disputing the myth
that fat people are healthy. Talk about trolls. You are a fine
example of one. You didn't notice my signature did you? Or my
follow up message. Idiots shouldn't be allowed keyboards.

Complaining about your back hurting isn't whining?
You dogs have to
suffer because you can't walk them as they should be
walked?......

She didn't complain or whine. Illiterate brainwashed jackasses
like
you are just unfamiliar with context.

Now be the obedient coward you are and add me to your killfile
for
the 1,000th time

Jade

ps - Bobbi, you are rude and stupid. Very rude, very stupid.

Hey vermin. You are the one chasing me. Why is that? Are you so
obsessed with me that you can't leave me alone? Are you stalking
me?
If you are, I have been stalked by better fools than you.


I'm puzzled by this jade's mania with attacking you LV.

You're addressing the quintessential nutcase and you wanna talk
mania?
LOL!

But if you must know, she's so obnoxious and daft that kicking her
in
the head everyday is kind of enjoyable. I'm sure, as with Chaney,
I'll
get bored with it and move on eventually.


Did you, by chance. happen to **** in her cornflakes, even
unintentionally?


Net abusing, obsessive egomaniacs like her tend to try and **** on
everyone. Luckily she's too stupid to accomplish much.


LOL


DFooK

I'm puzzled by your apparent desire to get involved.

Jade




I'm puzzled by your surprise.

I'm puzzled, not surprised.


Oh, my mistake. I have trouble discerning between puzzlement, surprise,
and
boneheadedness when it comes to your type.

You appear to have trouble discerning a lot of things.


I know it whwn I see it, and I know someone with too much time on their
hands when I see one. If this is your idea of recreation I really pity you.





You tiresomely and ceaselessly attack Ms.
Sanchez without apparent objective correlative for your actions,

You don't see a correlative? You need a good optometrist. Or perhaps
you just need to remove the shades of blind loyalty that you seem to
be wearing.


How about making it easy for me. Show me where she went looking for your
abuse.

You don't seem to know your friend very well. I'm sure it's all
available to you in Google. Do your own work if it matters that much
to you. Since I don't really give a **** about what you think, I'm
not compelled to go surfing to prove a moot point.

IOW: You can't come up with a compelling example of an exchange that DIDN'T
originate with you baiting, trolling or flaming or otherwise provoking LV.

Colour me not surprised.

Your modus vivendi seems marginally more palatable than others in teh
thundering herd of Dutton fart catchers, but barely. At least you come out
full tilt looking for a fight, I'll grant you that. But why this daintiness
and hypocrisy when you get one?

People who attempt to beard a lion in its den should not act surprised when
the lion reacts.






Show me where she targetted someone who DIDN'T first troll through
her fat-acceptance group.

It happens regularly, but again that's all in google. I doubt you'd be
able to see it even if it was shown to you.

Show it to me - I dare you. Or, to be even fairer - show me where she
attacked you first.




Then you can start whining.

Hey look, another tard who has to make things up to have any leverage
in an argument.


IOW - you can't debate the question, so attack the questioner. Here's
something that may aide you in formulating more acceptable and useful
arguments.

HTH

http://www.fallacyfiles.org/adhomine.html




Please post proof of any whining on my part. You brought the subject
up, asshat, not me.


Ibid.




None the less, the couple of minutes a day I spend smacking her around
pale in comparison to the time she spends insulting everyone she
encounters for nearly four years. You seem to be confused about what
is really tiresome and ceaseless here. You also seem to have a little
problem with hypocrisy.


Hypocrisy? You seem to think there should be a licence for people to go
where they are not welcome, post off topic,

Yep. In an unmoderated group, people can post whatever the hell they
want. One must develop the self control to ignore what they don't want
to see. (Are you gonna take the bait, simpleton?)

torment and abuse people, and
get away with it.

Torment and Abuse? LOL! Your exaggeration skills get better and
better.

If what people say on usenet torments and abuses others, you should
really tell her to stop calling innocent posters ****wits every time
they post.


Your definitions amuse. Do you actually hold that what you did was
"Innocent"?



Yet when called on it you act sooooo upset.


Here's a free clue for you, sparky. Projecting nonexistant emotions on
people is a mindnumbingly trite usenet tactic. It only shows you suck
at debating anything with anyone. So far it's been your only blade. I
can now see why you chose the friends you did.


I've never claimed anyone as a "friend" - your words, not mine. Projection
and ad hominem seem to be all you are offering. I invite you to try debating
the facts. Until such time as you equip yourself with teh proper skills,
I'll wait.








then you
act shocked that someone would remind you that you're acting like a a
sad
little obsessive dip****.


I happen to think there's someone else that you should be reminding of
that, hypocrite. Someone with a real problem. That's what friends are
for, after all.


If she has a problem, as you say, what are YOU doing to ameliorate it,
darling?

First of all, I'm not a ****ing usenet therapist. Second of all, I
and contless others have tried to actually communicate with the woman
(Hint: Google again) civilly. She doesn't want any part of it. You
seem to be her friend, maybe she'll listen to you.


You claim your offerings were in any way civil? LOL



As far as I've seen these dreary little playlets always start with you,
or
one of the other fart catching herd, provoking or trolling or abusing.

See above, She initiated the flaming, I gave up trying to debate her,
then I got bored with her interrupting all the actual debates I and
others were having screaming "****wit!". Now it's headkicking time and
I'm quite enjoying it. She seems to rely on pity parties from you and
Chaney to step in and protect her. *shrug* Bring it. The more the
merrier.

If
she bugs you so much why not leave her alone? But we all know why that
won't
happen, right?

She has me firmly killfiled. The poor little lamb doesn't even see my
posts, save when I want her to a couple of times a week. (Do I need to
remind you of Google again?)

I might leave her a lone for a while, since I've got you now *begging*
me to. See how stupid that exaggeration **** looks?

And while we're at it...

I'm puzzled by your apparent desire to get involved.

This is what you call shock? Quite a talent for exaggeration you have
there.

I guess I'll be seeing you around.



I suppose so. If you can find a few minutes away from your LV Agenda.

Exaggeration to the very end. I noticed you snipped the bit where I
pointed it out in the last post. Is this really your only trick, or do
you just have a severe problem with truth, numbnuts?

Jade



DFooK



DFooK

(Steve Chaney, NR's Tormentor ®)
wrote:

In , Outanabout
wrote:

On Thu, 20 May 2004 18:16:56 GMT, Lady Veteran ,
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 20 May 2004 14:52:41 GMT, "MMET572"
wrote:


"Steve Chaney, NR's Tormentor ?
wrote in message ...
In s.com,
"MMET572" wrote:


"Lady Veteran" wrote in message
.. .
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:36:38 GMT, cowardfinder
wrote:

On Mon, 17 May 2004 02:10:30 GMT, Lady Veteran
, wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 16 May 2004 13:02:50 -0300, "Heather d'Entremont"
wrote:

Do you even think before you type? I wasn't whining or
complaining. I was stating facts. And I was disputing the
myth that fat people are healthy. Talk about trolls. You are
a fine example of one. You didn't notice my signature did
you? Or my follow up message. Idiots shouldn't be allowed
keyboards.

Complaining about your back hurting isn't whining?
You dogs have to
suffer because you can't walk them as they should be
walked?......

She didn't complain or whine. Illiterate brainwashed jackasses
like you are just unfamiliar with context.

Now be the obedient coward you are and add me to your killfile
for the 1,000th time

Jade

ps - Bobbi, you are rude and stupid. Very rude, very stupid.

Hey vermin. You are the one chasing me. Why is that? Are you so
obsessed with me that you can't leave me alone? Are you
stalking me? If you are, I have been stalked by better fools
than you.


I'm puzzled by this jade's mania with attacking you LV.

Did you, by chance. happen to **** in her cornflakes, even
unintentionally?

Sure sounds like it....




How did all this start?


DFooK

I jumped in her **** just like I jump into every other idiot that
comes into SSFA and ridicules fat people. She has been asked and then
told that her weight loss drivel is of no interest to SSFA, because
there are a multitude of diet groups out there. She has been an ass
every sense. She thinks that attacking me personally is going to get
me to leave her alone. If she bothers me or mine she will find out
that my "mental illness" is the least of her problems. If she really
thought I was crazy she wouldn't be bothering me because a psycho
does't care how many people they maim. She is a sociopath who thinks
I am a psychopath.
I think the is **** incarnate.

LV


You always have such interesting versions of real events, grunt. I
never know if it's intentional lying or if your limited mental
function causes delusions.

Two to one says you're the liar.
And she can back her claim up by doing a deja on you.


-- Steve

Steve stands behind LV just like he stood behind that psycho stalker
jeannette.

miguel