If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health
"PeterB" wrote in message ups.com... vernon wrote: "HCN" wrote in message . .. "PeterB" wrote in message ups.com... WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health To : All participants and readers of sci.med, misc.health.alternative, uk.people.health, talk.politics.medicine .... None of those groups are blogs. (you claiming otherwise makes you look like an idiot) Claiming that the statement inferred that the News Groups are / were Blogs is outright ignorance. FYI Blogging a News Group is posting information on a News Group that one would expect and see on a personal (or paid) agenda blog. DDUUUHHHH Welcome back -- I thought you might be on vacation. You're right, it's a description of the activity, not the medium. I guess I could have used "pharmaflogging," but knowing they hate "pharmablogger" more, I'll stick with that. PeterB Pharmanure? Pharmanurring? Pharmiging? Pharmplopping? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health
"vernon" stillhere@anhere wrote in message m... "HCN" wrote in message . .. "PeterB" wrote in message ups.com... WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health To : All participants and readers of sci.med, misc.health.alternative, uk.people.health, talk.politics.medicine .... None of those groups are blogs. (you claiming otherwise makes you look like an idiot) Claiming that the statement inferred that the News Groups are / were Blogs is outright ignorance. FYI Blogging a News Group is posting information on a News Group that one would expect and see on a personal (or paid) agenda blog. DDUUUHHHH That is one of the most idiotic things I have ever read. The newsgroups are not blogs. Posting on a newsgroup on Usenet is not blogging. "Blog" is derived from the term "Web log", basically maintaining a log book of thoughts on the Internet, in other words an online diary. Usenet is not the "web", nor is it the Internet. So using the term "blogging" as a reference to posting on Usenet is outright stupidity. This has been mentioned to peteyb, but he is trying to make "all better" by defining it to what he wants. The world does not work that way. He is just making himself look like an idiot... and so are you by following along like a little sheep. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health
"HCN" wrote in message . .. "vernon" stillhere@anhere wrote in message m... "HCN" wrote in message . .. "PeterB" wrote in message ups.com... WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health To : All participants and readers of sci.med, misc.health.alternative, uk.people.health, talk.politics.medicine .... None of those groups are blogs. (you claiming otherwise makes you look like an idiot) Claiming that the statement inferred that the News Groups are / were Blogs is outright ignorance. FYI Blogging a News Group is posting information on a News Group that one would expect and see on a personal (or paid) agenda blog. DDUUUHHHH That is one of the most idiotic things I have ever read. The newsgroups are not blogs. Slow aren't you. I didn't say they were. Of course you don't know the origination of the term blog and why certain personal agenda sites are thus called blogs. DUUHHHHH Posting on a newsgroup on Usenet is not blogging. According to YOU "Blog" is derived from the term "Web log", basically maintaining a log book of thoughts on the Internet, in other words an online diary. Usenet is not the "web", nor is it the Internet. So using the term "blogging" as a reference to posting on Usenet is outright stupidity. O.K. Your definition states clearly that blogging on a dial up really isn't blogging because the person really isn't on the WEB. This has been mentioned to peteyb, but he is trying to make "all better" by defining it to what he wants. The world does not work that way. He is just making himself look like an idiot... and so are you by following along like a little sheep. Come back when you ACTUALLY know something about language ant the INTERNET. Start with finding out where Blog really came from. Find out that the term "web" is NOT an acronym. Usenet is about as close to the full meaning of "web" as it gets. Posting ideas and propaganda on the Usenet is one step deeper than simply creating a personally owned site. You are by NO MEANS an aficionado of the internet. You have your limited little teen age jargon within which you have created your own definitions. What do you call it when a person creates a web log within a news group? What do you call it when a person or persons create a log of information within a corporate web, not available to the general public? Of COURSE you know there are such webs comprised of thousands of users. Bottom line. PHARMS create there own blog network within individual and groups of News Groups. They PRETEND to be mere participants. Gee, sounds like some of the independent blogs where the owner is not truly revealed. WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health. A TRUTH |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health
"Bottom line.
PHARMS create there own blog network within individual and groups of News Groups. They PRETEND to be mere participants. Gee, sounds like some of the independent blogs where the owner is not truly revealed. WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health." We know we know, all we need now is just one example of a newsgroup posting from these evil "pharmabloggers" to make reality for what to now is only speculation. They appear to be as rare as hen's teeth, while multiple "alterblogger" posts touting one nostrum or another appears it seems daily. Or if not specific nostrums pitches for "alternative" this and that as the sure cure/treatment for something as opposed to the evil "other". |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health
"vernon" stillhere@anhere wrote in message m... "HCN" wrote in message . .. "vernon" stillhere@anhere wrote in message m... "HCN" wrote in message . .. "PeterB" wrote in message ups.com... WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health To : All participants and readers of sci.med, misc.health.alternative, uk.people.health, talk.politics.medicine .... None of those groups are blogs. (you claiming otherwise makes you look like an idiot) Claiming that the statement inferred that the News Groups are / were Blogs is outright ignorance. FYI Blogging a News Group is posting information on a News Group that one would expect and see on a personal (or paid) agenda blog. DDUUUHHHH That is one of the most idiotic things I have ever read. The newsgroups are not blogs. Slow aren't you. I didn't say they were. Of course you don't know the origination of the term blog and why certain personal agenda sites are thus called blogs. DUUHHHHH Posting on a newsgroup on Usenet is not blogging. According to YOU Actually, according to everyone but you and peatyb. "Blog" is derived from the term "Web log", basically maintaining a log book of thoughts on the Internet, in other words an online diary. Usenet is not the "web", nor is it the Internet. So using the term "blogging" as a reference to posting on Usenet is outright stupidity. O.K. Your definition states clearly that blogging on a dial up really isn't blogging because the person really isn't on the WEB. This has been mentioned to peteyb, but he is trying to make "all better" by defining it to what he wants. The world does not work that way. He is just making himself look like an idiot... and so are you by following along like a little sheep. Come back when you ACTUALLY know something about language ant the INTERNET. Start with finding out where Blog really came from. Find out that the term "web" is NOT an acronym. Usenet is about as close to the full meaning of "web" as it gets. Posting ideas and propaganda on the Usenet is one step deeper than simply creating a personally owned site. You are by NO MEANS an aficionado of the internet. You have your limited little teen age jargon within which you have created your own definitions. What do you call it when a person creates a web log within a news group? What do you call it when a person or persons create a log of information within a corporate web, not available to the general public? Of COURSE you know there are such webs comprised of thousands of users. Bottom line. PHARMS create there own blog network within individual and groups of News Groups. They PRETEND to be mere participants. Gee, sounds like some of the independent blogs where the owner is not truly revealed. WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health. A TRUTH What color is the sky on your planet? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health
wrote in message u.edu... "Bottom line. PHARMS create there own blog network within individual and groups of News Groups. They PRETEND to be mere participants. Gee, sounds like some of the independent blogs where the owner is not truly revealed. WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health." We know we know, all we need now is just one example of a newsgroup posting from these evil "pharmabloggers" to make reality for what to now is only speculation. The pharmers are pure, uneducated sales persons. Real researchers and lab people know the advantages of both, which includes when prescription (dangerous) solutions are not required and OTC or supplements work better with less side effects. There is not a singe person classed as "pharmblogger" who adds any information or credibility to the often real advantages of pharmaceuticals where needed. REAL ADVANTAGES. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health
"HCN" wrote in message ... "vernon" stillhere@anhere wrote in message m... "HCN" wrote in message . .. "vernon" stillhere@anhere wrote in message m... "HCN" wrote in message . .. "PeterB" wrote in message ups.com... WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health To : All participants and readers of sci.med, misc.health.alternative, uk.people.health, talk.politics.medicine .... None of those groups are blogs. (you claiming otherwise makes you look like an idiot) Claiming that the statement inferred that the News Groups are / were Blogs is outright ignorance. FYI Blogging a News Group is posting information on a News Group that one would expect and see on a personal (or paid) agenda blog. DDUUUHHHH That is one of the most idiotic things I have ever read. The newsgroups are not blogs. Slow aren't you. I didn't say they were. Of course you don't know the origination of the term blog and why certain personal agenda sites are thus called blogs. DUUHHHHH Posting on a newsgroup on Usenet is not blogging. According to YOU Actually, according to everyone but you and peatyb. "Blog" is derived from the term "Web log", basically maintaining a log book of thoughts on the Internet, in other words an online diary. Usenet is not the "web", nor is it the Internet. So using the term "blogging" as a reference to posting on Usenet is outright stupidity. O.K. Your definition states clearly that blogging on a dial up really isn't blogging because the person really isn't on the WEB. This has been mentioned to peteyb, but he is trying to make "all better" by defining it to what he wants. The world does not work that way. He is just making himself look like an idiot... and so are you by following along like a little sheep. Come back when you ACTUALLY know something about language ant the INTERNET. Start with finding out where Blog really came from. Find out that the term "web" is NOT an acronym. Usenet is about as close to the full meaning of "web" as it gets. Posting ideas and propaganda on the Usenet is one step deeper than simply creating a personally owned site. You are by NO MEANS an aficionado of the internet. You have your limited little teen age jargon within which you have created your own definitions. What do you call it when a person creates a web log within a news group? What do you call it when a person or persons create a log of information within a corporate web, not available to the general public? Of COURSE you know there are such webs comprised of thousands of users. Bottom line. PHARMS create there own blog network within individual and groups of News Groups. They PRETEND to be mere participants. Gee, sounds like some of the independent blogs where the owner is not truly revealed. WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health. A TRUTH What color is the sky on your planet? It's not acoustic ceiling in an isolated room. You see, I actually have worked with and still do work with many pharm agencies. I know the difference between reality and the advertising arm. I know the training given to the sales people. Just the other day (last week) I was introduced to a woman who made a great deal of money in pharm sales working with Doctors. It got to the point that she learned some more truths. She now works in the office at a Chiropractor, and selling outside, earning about half and feels much better about herself. She didn't burn her bridges behind her and constantly gets calls. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health
We know we know, all we need now is just one example of a newsgroup
posting from these evil "pharmabloggers" to make reality for what to now is only speculation. The pharmers are pure, uneducated sales persons. Real researchers and lab people know the advantages of both, which includes when prescription (dangerous) solutions are not required and OTC or supplements work better with less side effects. "There is not a singe person classed as "pharmblogger" who adds any information or credibility to the often real advantages of pharmaceuticals where needed. REAL ADVANTAGES." We know we know, we still seek one example of a newsgroup post where industry is sending posters in the way the original author suggested to make further discussion aside from gossip and speculation possible. .. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health
wrote in message u.edu... We know we know, all we need now is just one example of a newsgroup posting from these evil "pharmabloggers" to make reality for what to now is only speculation. The pharmers are pure, uneducated sales persons. Real researchers and lab people know the advantages of both, which includes when prescription (dangerous) solutions are not required and OTC or supplements work better with less side effects. "There is not a singe person classed as "pharmblogger" who adds any information or credibility to the often real advantages of pharmaceuticals where needed. REAL ADVANTAGES." We know we know, we still seek one example of a newsgroup post where industry is sending posters in the way the original author suggested to make further discussion aside from gossip and speculation possible. . If you can't see them by reading, you are hopeless. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
WARNING: Industry Is Blogging these NewsGroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health
We know we know, we still seek one example of a newsgroup post where
industry is sending posters in the way the original author suggested to make further discussion aside from gossip and speculation possible. . "If you can't see them by reading, you are hopeless." We know we know, now we need someone with the "special magic glasses" to point we the blind to one example in the real world so we can discuss it. I "see" some "alternative" supporters being challendged on the science of their claims, are those the "pharmabloggers"? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WARNING: Industry is Blogging These Newsgroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health | PeterB | General Discussion | 102 | November 29th, 2006 04:19 PM |
TC, once again, public announces his idiocy. | Mr. Natural-Health | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 0 | April 8th, 2006 08:35 PM |
my fitday public journal | Aquarijen | General Discussion | 1 | August 10th, 2004 04:21 PM |