RAFL - Fred - Feb 4th

you know, there is nothing more dangerous or exciting than a clever man, Lee
Fred wrote in message
...
No. I don't need no "stickin womin" to think things up for me! (G)

I thought about it last week since on other weeks she has been right
on it - pacing the floor, er, computer keyboard, just waiting to take
the lead. Or maybe keep the lead. Or, perhaps, this week, lose the
lead. Bottom, top or just inbetween! (G)

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:48:08 -0600, "Miss Violette"
wrote:

that is just too good, did you have a woman think it up for you, Lee
Fred wrote in message
.. .
Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

If you say "pretty please."

Okay, coming right UP, er, down, ahem.....

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 13:54:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

YES, so Where are They??????

"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

See, cold germs can't live in this damp moisture. Feel better.

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 13:56:06 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

And to think. I was lying in bed with a pile of kleenex, moaning and
groaning, and get the whole deal after the fact, oh brother.
Still looking for the number................

"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
No. I don't need no "stickin womin" to think things up for me! (G)

I thought about it last week since on other weeks she has been right
on it - pacing the floor, er, computer keyboard, just waiting to take
the lead. Or maybe keep the lead. Or, perhaps, this week, lose the
lead. Bottom, top or just inbetween! (G)

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:48:08 -0600, "Miss Violette"
wrote:

that is just too good, did you have a woman think it up for you, Lee
Fred wrote in message
.. .
Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

excellent, Lee
Fred wrote in message
...
I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Holy Cow, you Shrank like Bluejeans in the Dryer after Thanksgiving
dinner....

You got the bottom this week babe for sure. I am hanging around 159.5 most
of this week. So I will be up another on my average most likely. I feel so
bad I don't even care.

"Fred" wrote in message
...
I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

as well as the rest of the group. G I see you once again are teasing and
playing games with us. I told ya .... PLAY NICE!

Joyce

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Welllll, it's about time you gave up the info! G Good for you, congrats on the
wonderful loss. I can imagine how thrilled you must have been with the results.
Is this now an alltime low for you?

I really do think that heavy, humid air can play havoc with scale results. I
remember going through the same thing in the summer, living with the chicago
humidity blues. sigh

Once again, congrats Fred .. and may this week be as kind and exciting!

Joyce

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 06:50:34 -0800, Fred wrote:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Great whoosh Fred. Guess you were good after all!

Brenda

"Fred" wrote in message
...
I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Weigh to go, Fred. Congratulations on getting off that gain from last
week, plus a nice additional bit.
Elaine K

Fred wrote:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:



Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............