RAFL - Fred - Feb 4th

WOW! Good job, now I want the same :-)
--
Nathalie from Belgium
134.1/101.4/minigoal 99.9 Goal 68 Kg
295.6/223.5/minigoal 220.3/Goal 150 pounds
RAFL 105.3/101.4/96 Kg
232/223.5/212 lbs
"Fred" wrote in message
...
I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

hey hey - no upward trend in the Fred household then! hurrah

though you're still a terrible tease I see...........
(don't deny it - you're guilty as charged!)
*grin*

--
krys

UK 157/132/126
Started March 1st 2001
GOAL August 16th 2001
....definitely making progress...

"Fred" wrote in message
...
I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Congrats on the BIG loss Fred!!

COnnie

--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/205/155
RAFL 210.5/205/198.5


Fred wrote:
I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:


Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Oh well, you Know how he Is...

"Joyce" wrote in message
...
as well as the rest of the group. G I see you once again are teasing
and
playing games with us. I told ya .... PLAY NICE!

Joyce

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Well. well! Enjoy the bottom Fred. As it is with men, they don't get to
assume that position often! hehe!
Congratulations.
Sorry to anyone I offend with my colorful imagination!!!
Bird
need to lose 45#
"Fred" wrote in message
...
Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Well, I only held out till this morning. She was sick (oh, yeah, is
she sick (g)) and I felt sorry for her. (G)

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:02:22 -0800, "Brenda Hammond"
wrote:

Ooooh, you're bad! Or maybe you're good..... I guess we'll find out!

Brenda

"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

No, that's Skinny Cow - bought five packages (g) yesterday for the new
freezer - it also has a big appetite. But I like your analogy.

I more than made up for it again, today. Junk candy in the afternoon
when the candy lady came to work. Must have been a pound of mixed
crap. That probably explains that last up 2.2 since this candy truck
comes every other thurs and I overindulge...

Feel better.

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:08:06 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

Holy Cow, you Shrank like Bluejeans in the Dryer after Thanksgiving
dinner....

You got the bottom this week babe for sure. I am hanging around 159.5 most
of this week. So I will be up another on my average most likely. I feel so
bad I don't even care.

"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Thanks. I have to look but I think there was one better WI a long
while back (G)

I already ate too much but it would be nice if the scale decided to
ignore it (G)

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 09:24:52 -0600, Joyce wrote:

Welllll, it's about time you gave up the info! G Good for you, congrats on the
wonderful loss. I can imagine how thrilled you must have been with the results.
Is this now an alltime low for you?

I really do think that heavy, humid air can play havoc with scale results. I
remember going through the same thing in the summer, living with the chicago
humidity blues. sigh

Once again, congrats Fred .. and may this week be as kind and exciting!

Joyce

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 06:50:34 -0800, Fred wrote:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Well, see, I knew I was doing good but was not trying for anything
exceptional. As you wrote above in another thread - who knows. I
really did not expect a big loss. More like a pound down. I do think
it is relative to last week's gain which was probably too much and
inflated by some unknown factor.

On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:36:40 -0800, "Brenda Hammond"
wrote:

Great whoosh Fred. Guess you were good after all!

Brenda

"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Thanks. I'm glad it is gone and had company. And gives me room for
this week's already anticipated gain!

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:22:53 GMT, Elaine Kirkham
wrote:

Weigh to go, Fred. Congratulations on getting off that gain from last
week, plus a nice additional bit.
Elaine K

Fred wrote:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last
week's results so this one may make sense but then again. But without
further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the
envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked)
Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which
seemed too high and so that anomaly explains this bigger loss. I
think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated by water
or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week
and over-celebrated last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar
results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164.0 (Lifetime July 2003)
Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred
wrote:



Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............