If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Use something like spamsubtract to block such stuff on the server so it
never gets to your PC. Nothing like this ever even gets downloaded because if I don't recognize the sender or if the subject line makes no sense to me, I nuke it. My virus software does a lot less work, too. www.spamsubtract.com Carmen wrote: || Lots of the Return-Path emails are Yahoo, but there are also some || Starmate, Flashmail, Awemail, FS1860.net, Sonnet and other ISPs || represented. They aren't "traceable". I suspect they're some sort || of || spam that didn't quite turn out right but if someone could direct me || towards a way to stop them using OE's Message Rules or by some sort || of add-on software I'd be grateful. || || Thanks and take care, || Carmen |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Use something like spamsubtract to block such stuff on the server so it
never gets to your PC. Nothing like this ever even gets downloaded because if I don't recognize the sender or if the subject line makes no sense to me, I nuke it. My virus software does a lot less work, too. www.spamsubtract.com Carmen wrote: || Lots of the Return-Path emails are Yahoo, but there are also some || Starmate, Flashmail, Awemail, FS1860.net, Sonnet and other ISPs || represented. They aren't "traceable". I suspect they're some sort || of || spam that didn't quite turn out right but if someone could direct me || towards a way to stop them using OE's Message Rules or by some sort || of add-on software I'd be grateful. || || Thanks and take care, || Carmen |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Carmen wrote:
Lots of the Return-Path emails are Yahoo, but there are also some Starmate, Flashmail, Awemail, FS1860.net, Sonnet and other ISPs represented. They aren't "traceable". I suspect they're some sort of spam that didn't quite turn out right but if someone could direct me towards a way to stop them using OE's Message Rules or by some sort of add-on software I'd be grateful. I believe they're noob-spammers, mistyping an extra return or particular characters at the beginning of a line in the header of their spamware, so the server sees it as the end of the message. The header gets parsed alone, and the headless bodies are dropped by the server. I don't know offhand how you could filter with OE, as I don't use OE. Being a linux geek, I do it with procmail. There are probably third party antispamware apps for Win that could handle filtering on other headers, and compound rules like blank to and from. I use a lot of filtering on Received headers, to block Asian spam. If I didn't know how to write filtering rules with procmail, my Newsguy email account has very advanced spamfiltering configuration via a web interface, and they allow you the option of adding your ISP email accounts to their spamfilter. You can optionally have it put filtered messages in a holding queue for 4 days to examine, instead of deleting, in case you didn't write your filter rule quite right, and then change it to delete when you're sure the rule is correct. -- jamie ) "There's a seeker born every minute." |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Carmen wrote:
Lots of the Return-Path emails are Yahoo, but there are also some Starmate, Flashmail, Awemail, FS1860.net, Sonnet and other ISPs represented. They aren't "traceable". I suspect they're some sort of spam that didn't quite turn out right but if someone could direct me towards a way to stop them using OE's Message Rules or by some sort of add-on software I'd be grateful. I believe they're noob-spammers, mistyping an extra return or particular characters at the beginning of a line in the header of their spamware, so the server sees it as the end of the message. The header gets parsed alone, and the headless bodies are dropped by the server. I don't know offhand how you could filter with OE, as I don't use OE. Being a linux geek, I do it with procmail. There are probably third party antispamware apps for Win that could handle filtering on other headers, and compound rules like blank to and from. I use a lot of filtering on Received headers, to block Asian spam. If I didn't know how to write filtering rules with procmail, my Newsguy email account has very advanced spamfiltering configuration via a web interface, and they allow you the option of adding your ISP email accounts to their spamfilter. You can optionally have it put filtered messages in a holding queue for 4 days to examine, instead of deleting, in case you didn't write your filter rule quite right, and then change it to delete when you're sure the rule is correct. -- jamie ) "There's a seeker born every minute." |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Carmen wrote:
Lots of the Return-Path emails are Yahoo, but there are also some Starmate, Flashmail, Awemail, FS1860.net, Sonnet and other ISPs represented. They aren't "traceable". I suspect they're some sort of spam that didn't quite turn out right but if someone could direct me towards a way to stop them using OE's Message Rules or by some sort of add-on software I'd be grateful. I believe they're noob-spammers, mistyping an extra return or particular characters at the beginning of a line in the header of their spamware, so the server sees it as the end of the message. The header gets parsed alone, and the headless bodies are dropped by the server. I don't know offhand how you could filter with OE, as I don't use OE. Being a linux geek, I do it with procmail. There are probably third party antispamware apps for Win that could handle filtering on other headers, and compound rules like blank to and from. I use a lot of filtering on Received headers, to block Asian spam. If I didn't know how to write filtering rules with procmail, my Newsguy email account has very advanced spamfiltering configuration via a web interface, and they allow you the option of adding your ISP email accounts to their spamfilter. You can optionally have it put filtered messages in a holding queue for 4 days to examine, instead of deleting, in case you didn't write your filter rule quite right, and then change it to delete when you're sure the rule is correct. -- jamie ) "There's a seeker born every minute." |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Hello again,
Snip of Blank Email problem details Okay, I dug around a bit, looked at some of your suggestions and found a potential solution in Google: http://tinyurl.com/5dbat I wasn't aware that one could get the option to change filter terms to a "not" later in the process. This gentleman's solution may do the trick. It was easy enough to set up, so now I guess I just wait. It leaves me wondering why OE was given to brain-damaged squirrels to develop though. Thank you guys. :-) I'm saving all the suggestions in case it doesn't work. Take care, Carmen |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Hello again,
Snip of Blank Email problem details Okay, I dug around a bit, looked at some of your suggestions and found a potential solution in Google: http://tinyurl.com/5dbat I wasn't aware that one could get the option to change filter terms to a "not" later in the process. This gentleman's solution may do the trick. It was easy enough to set up, so now I guess I just wait. It leaves me wondering why OE was given to brain-damaged squirrels to develop though. Thank you guys. :-) I'm saving all the suggestions in case it doesn't work. Take care, Carmen |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
On 5-Sep-2004, "FOB" wrote: I've gotten a few of those. I've been using K9 to filter out spam, after a bit of training it does an excellent job. It puts spam into a separate folder where you can quickly scan the headers to see if there is anything good that got misclassified. That happens very rarely and I only continue to do it because I occasionally get mail generated from my website that it might mistake as spam. It's much quicker to scan it all in a separate folder than to pick out the bad among the good. Free at www.keir.net Thank you. I've put this away in case the solution I found doesn't stop the blank emails. (Crossing fingers) Take care, Carmen |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
On 5-Sep-2004, "FOB" wrote: I've gotten a few of those. I've been using K9 to filter out spam, after a bit of training it does an excellent job. It puts spam into a separate folder where you can quickly scan the headers to see if there is anything good that got misclassified. That happens very rarely and I only continue to do it because I occasionally get mail generated from my website that it might mistake as spam. It's much quicker to scan it all in a separate folder than to pick out the bad among the good. Free at www.keir.net Thank you. I've put this away in case the solution I found doesn't stop the blank emails. (Crossing fingers) Take care, Carmen |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
On 5-Sep-2004, "FOB" wrote: I've gotten a few of those. I've been using K9 to filter out spam, after a bit of training it does an excellent job. It puts spam into a separate folder where you can quickly scan the headers to see if there is anything good that got misclassified. That happens very rarely and I only continue to do it because I occasionally get mail generated from my website that it might mistake as spam. It's much quicker to scan it all in a separate folder than to pick out the bad among the good. Free at www.keir.net Thank you. I've put this away in case the solution I found doesn't stop the blank emails. (Crossing fingers) Take care, Carmen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question from a dummy for the gurus out there | sh0rtcircuit (Deb) | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 14 | May 28th, 2004 09:07 PM |
Glycogen weight question and a status update | JJ | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 27 | April 19th, 2004 10:51 PM |
Gum Question?? | jcd | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 9 | February 6th, 2004 06:40 PM |
Can you...question about sucralose | Lexin | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 23 | November 1st, 2003 09:05 PM |
Mailwasher for the worm emails | Bob Pastorio | General Discussion | 1 | September 20th, 2003 03:53 PM |