If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Article:The new trouble with fat cells
Active, powerful `glands' can spew toxic substances Spare tires more dangerous than chubby backsides DENISE GRADY SPECIAL TO THE STAR They are the building blocks of flab, the wages of cheesecake, the bloated little sacks of grease that make more of us ‹ more than we can fit into our pants. Scorned and despised, they are sucked out surgically by the billions from bulging backsides, bellies and thighs. But they are not without admirers. "Fat cells are beautiful cells to look at," said Dr. Philipp Scherer, an associate professor of cell biology and medicine at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York. "I've been working with them for 10 years and I still enjoy looking at them.'' On a recent afternoon at his laboratory, Scherer slipped a Petri dish of fat cells under a microscope and showed a visitor how strikingly they caught the light and reflected it. Magnified, the cells became a field of glittering rings. A mature fat cell, or adipocyte, contains a huge, clear droplet of fat that takes up nearly the entire cell and shoves the nucleus aside, squashing it up against the membrane so that the cell appears empty. But it's actually a shining sea of fat, stored as molecules of triglyceride. Scientists used to think body fat and the cells it was made of were pretty much inert, just an oily storage compartment. But within the past decade research has shown that fat cells act like chemical factories and that body fat is potent stuff: a highly active tissue that secretes hormones and other substances with profound and sometimes harmful effects on metabolism, weight and overall health. In recent years, biologists have begun calling fat an "endocrine organ," comparing it to glands like the thyroid and pituitary, which also release hormones straight into the bloodstream. But there is an important difference. Those glands cannot grow nearly as much as fat, which has a seemingly infinite capacity to make more of itself. Too much body fat can act like a poison, spewing out substances that contribute to diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, stroke and other illnesses, including some cancers. Researchers trying to decipher the biology of fat cells hope to find new ways to help people get rid of excess fat or, at least, prevent obesity from destroying their health. In an increasingly obese world, their efforts have taken on added importance. A lean adult has about 40 billion fat cells, an obese one at least two to three times that, and obese people have much larger fat cells than lean ones. Even worse, the body can always make more, and compared with other cells they are extremely long-lived. Though widely believed, it is not true that a person's quota of fat cells is fixed forever sometime in childhood. Adults do not create new fat cells as readily as children do, but it happens. If a person keeps overeating, the existing fat cells grow and grow, looking as if they are about to pop, but there is a size limit. When they reach that limit they do not divide, but instead send out a signal to nearby immature cells to start dividing to produce more fat cells. It has been known for decades that some kinds of obesity are worse than others. Body shape matters. People who are shaped like apples, carrying excess weight in the abdomen, are more likely to have diabetes and heart disease than are those built like pears, who deposit fat in their hips, thighs and backsides. A person's tendency to store fat in one place or the other is probably genetic, researchers say, though most people will develop a big belly as the amount of excess weight rises. Women tend to be pears, but they also redistribute fat and thicken in the middle after menopause. Ethnic groups vary. For instance, Asians are more likely than other groups to put weight in the abdomen and to suffer health problems from lesser degrees of obesity. Even a little too much abdominal fat ‹ an outsize gut on an otherwise skinny person ‹ can increase the risk of high blood pressure, diabetes and heart disease. Thin or average-looking people who actually are at risk from belly fat may be falsely reassured by having a normal reading on a common measurement of obesity, the body mass index, or BMI. The problem is that the index, based on height and weight, does not take body shape into account. "We would like to eliminate the idea that BMI is the best indicator of risk," said Dr. Osama Hamdy, director of the obesity clinic at the Joslin Diabetes Clinic, in Boston. He said waist measurement is a better predictor, with the danger zone being anything greater than 40 inches in men and 35 inches in women. Why should a big belly be more dangerous than a big backside? Many researchers think the culprit is visceral fat, meaning deposits inside the abdomen, as opposed to subcutaneous fat, under the skin. An apple-shaped person is sure to have visceral fat, as well as subcutaneous fat in the abdominal area. Anybody with a belly has visceral fat, and the more you have the worse off you are. It is not clear why visceral fat is riskier; it may be more active metabolically and spew out more toxic substances. In addition, its secretions go straight to the liver and may interfere with its functions, which include helping to regulate blood glucose and cholesterol. Some studies even suggest that the cells in visceral fat are uniquely active because they differ from other fat cells when it comes to which genes are turned on or off. A recent study published in the New England Journal Of Medicine lent support to the notion that visceral fat is more of a threat than fat under the skin. Doctors found that liposuction, which removes only subcutaneous fat, had no effect whatsoever on health, even when surgeons sucked out 20 pounds of subcutaneous abdominal fat. But a person who lost that much weight through dieting and exercise would almost certainly see significant changes in blood pressure, cholesterol and insulin resistance. Besides leaving visceral fat untouched, liposuction may fail to improve health for another reason, said the first author of the study, Dr. Samuel Klein, director of the Center for Human Nutrition at the School of Medicine at Washington University in St. Louis. He said that while liposuction removes billions of fat cells, it does not shrink the many more left behind. Obese people have huge fat cells, with 50 to 75 per cent more mass than fat cells in lean people, Klein said. Large fat cells are not a good thing to have because research has found that they are more active metabolically than small ones, and more likely to churn out harmful substances. The best way to get rid of visceral fat and shrink fat cells all at once is diet and exercise. Even a small amount of weight loss, about 7 per cent of total body weight, helps. Researchers do not fully understand why, but there is something about burning more calories than you eat, creating a state of negative energy balance, that quickly begins melting away the mass of visceral fat and slimming down bloated fat cells. Indeed, most dieters find that belly fat comes off first and that weight in the hips and thighs is much harder to lose. Unfortunately, diet and exercise have high failure rates. Even those who do manage to lose weight often regain it. Since visceral fat is harmful and many people cannot lose it on their own, researchers have been experimenting with surgical removal. Studies in animals show that blood fats and other risk factors quickly improve when the fat is taken out. In people, not all of the visceral fat can be removed safely because of where it is situated. But a portion called the "omentum" can be taken out relatively easily, according to Dr. Edward Mun, a surgeon at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. It is a pad of fat weighing 2 to 4 pounds that hangs like a curtain in the abdomen. "We estimate that it's more than one-third of the visceral fat,'' Mun said. He is doing a pilot study, performing the surgery in six obese, diabetic patients to see if it can reverse their diabetes. new york times -- Diva ****** There is no substitute for the right food |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Article:The new trouble with fat cells
One dark day on Usenet, Carol Frilegh said:
Active, powerful `glands' can spew toxic substances Spare tires more dangerous than chubby backsides DENISE GRADY SPECIAL TO THE STAR They are the building blocks of flab, the wages of cheesecake, snip Very interesting article, Carol --thanks for posting it... -- J.J. in WA * 275/231/225 (mini) (COLD to HOT for e-mail) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Article:The new trouble with fat cells
One dark day on Usenet, Carol Frilegh said:
Active, powerful `glands' can spew toxic substances Spare tires more dangerous than chubby backsides DENISE GRADY SPECIAL TO THE STAR They are the building blocks of flab, the wages of cheesecake, snip Very interesting article, Carol --thanks for posting it... -- J.J. in WA * 275/231/225 (mini) (COLD to HOT for e-mail) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Article:The new trouble with fat cells
Carol Frilegh wrote in message ...
Active, powerful `glands' can spew toxic substances what an informative article... somewhat similar to this website: http://www.sportsci.org/encyc/adipose/adipose.html "A lean adult has about 40 billion fat cells, an obese one at least two to three times that" nice to have some actual NUMBERS for a change. I don't think fat issues are linear with the number of fat cells, but since my balloon up was stopped before things got way out of hand hopefully I didn't quite react that 2x number. What that means for maintenance is an open question still. I suppose with exercise it won't matter too much. I've read somewhere that even existing fat cells, once stretched out by fat uptake, are more a problem in keeping them unfilled in maintenance. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NYT Artical on Fat Cells | RRzVRR | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 13 | July 11th, 2004 02:55 PM |
What it all does to us....... | Laurence | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 41 | April 3rd, 2004 01:55 PM |
UT Southwestern researchers find leptin turns fat-storing cells into fat-burning cells. | Ken Kubos | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 1 | February 11th, 2004 09:26 PM |
How long until we can exhale? | Ted Shoemaker | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 71 | January 23rd, 2004 07:09 PM |
Gaining Fat Cells | Joe | General Discussion | 7 | October 22nd, 2003 04:19 AM |