Foods to Avoid?

Jumpin' Jack Flash wrote:
|| "carla" wrote in message
|| ...
||| Jumpin' Jack Flash wrote:
|||| "FOB" wrote in message
|||| m...
||||| In m,
||||| Jumpin' Jack Flash stated
|||||| Listen, dick. Why do you think I'm here?
|||||
||||| To insult people? And call them names?
||||
|||| Good to see you aren't reading the back-posts.
||||
||| Jack, you've gotten some helpful responses. You've also gotten
||| some that
||| you consider less than helpful. This is just my opinion, of
||| course, but you don't add anything to the discourse by reacting to
||| the latter with
||| invective. Thank the folks who helped, ignore the others. I
||| suggest this
||| for two reasons. First, it helps keep up the signal-to-noise ratio
||| in the group. But second, and perhaps more importantly for you, if
||| those helpful
||| folks start to associate your name with insult-filled posts,
||| they'll stop reading your questions and you'll stop getting helpful
||| answers. Yes, we
||| have some cranky veterans around here. I just don't think much is
||| accomplished by flying off the handle at them.
||
|| Carla, I know you're right about this. But it just bugs me how some
|| people feel the need to waste their time talking bs to me for asking
|| a
|| very simple question. I mean, why would these people want to
|| discourage a new person from doing this? Yes, it is also a waste of
|| my time to reply to them. But it's also my thread, and I should
|| really not have to read stuff like this. Helpful advice is great, I
|| appreciate it a lot. But negative, discouraging feedback makes me
|| just want to say "screw it". Anyway, I'm gonna try and not feed
|| these
|| trolls. Thanks.

Slight correction: It's not your thread...it's PD...when you post, anyone
can reply as they see fit. You, OTOH, have complete freedom to ignore or
not. You choose not to. Also, they are not trolls.

You're too stupid to know what an attack is.

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Jumpin' Jack Flash" wrote in message
m...
(The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote in message
...
Jumpin' Jack Flash wrote:

(The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
Daniel Hoffmeister wrote:
The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
Jumpin' Jack Flash wrote:

Excuse me, pal, but this group is called "alt.diet.low-carb",

no, it isn't.

That must be the group for the Adkins diet ;-)

It's beyond me how someone can come on this group with some very
basic,
didn't-do-my-homework questions -- which we all know a number of
people
have been patient enough to answer in a nice way for other new
posters in
the past -- and then cop an attitude when he doesn't get the
answers he
wants to hear.

it doesn't surprise me at all. most people are ignorant and lazy.

I'll guarantee you that I'm much more intelligent than you, bitch.

is that why you have to resort to name-calling?

Nope, I just don't react well to being attacked by a bunch of
strangers for no real reason.

You're too stupid to know what an attack is.

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW


"Jumpin' Jack Flash" wrote in message
m...
(The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote in message
...
Jumpin' Jack Flash wrote:

(The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
Daniel Hoffmeister wrote:
The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
Jumpin' Jack Flash wrote:

Excuse me, pal, but this group is called "alt.diet.low-carb",

no, it isn't.

That must be the group for the Adkins diet ;-)

It's beyond me how someone can come on this group with some very
basic,
didn't-do-my-homework questions -- which we all know a number of
people
have been patient enough to answer in a nice way for other new
posters in
the past -- and then cop an attitude when he doesn't get the
answers he
wants to hear.

it doesn't surprise me at all. most people are ignorant and lazy.

I'll guarantee you that I'm much more intelligent than you, bitch.

is that why you have to resort to name-calling?

Nope, I just don't react well to being attacked by a bunch of
strangers for no real reason.