Is Your Trainer Asking You These Questions?

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:11:02 -0800, "Daven Thrice"
wrote:

I see I have my own troll now.

Don't flatter yourself. It is an automated attempt to flood
news.admin.net-abuse.email, conducted by an entity known as Hipcrime.

You did notice that you were posting into news.admin.net-abuse.email
when you replied, right?

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a university somewhere in Idaho
"When you can't do something completely impractical and intrinsically
useless *yourself*, you go get the Kibologists to do it for you." --J. Furr

MU wrote:
|| On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:09:11 -0500, Roger Zoul wrote:
||
||| Merely asking questions should not be the sign of a good trainer....
||
|| It's the first sign, it should happen before you dole out $$$.

Yeah. It's a technique to make someone who really has no credibility seem
credible. After they've got your $$$, those questions go in the gargage
can.

"MU" wrote in message
.. .
If not, and if he/she is not getting a recent medical history, dump them.
Mine are more extensive than this, the training interview last at least
one
hour and can often involve spouses, family members, input from physicians,
etc.

snip

Not that I would want a personal trainer, but I would prefer a personal
trainer who was not a control freak.

"MU" wrote in message
.. .
If not, and if he/she is not getting a recent medical history, dump them.
Mine are more extensive than this, the training interview last at least
one
hour and can often involve spouses, family members, input from physicians,
etc.

snip

Not that I would want a personal trainer, but I would prefer a personal
trainer who was not a control freak.

"Daven Thrice" wrote in message
news:lVjud.1082$ve.813@fed1read06...
I see I have my own troll now. A nazi-sympathizer, no less!

You have a spammer robot attacking news.admin.net-abuse.email
Do not reply to the posts cross posted to that group

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:22:51 -0500, Roger Zoul wrote:

MU wrote:
|| On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:09:11 -0500, Roger Zoul wrote:
||
||| Merely asking questions should not be the sign of a good trainer....
||
|| It's the first sign, it should happen before you dole out $$$.

Yeah. It's a technique to make someone who really has no credibility seem
credible. After they've got your $$$, those questions go in the gargage
can.

Not sure what you mean but here is how I do it. Much like when you go to
the Dr, you have a patient sheet that accompanies you into the visit room.
Before he does anyhing, he usually reviews it. It goes where you go. Same
with training. Clipboard, workout, client sheet. Returned at end of
session.

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:22:51 -0500, Roger Zoul wrote:

MU wrote:
|| On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:09:11 -0500, Roger Zoul wrote:
||
||| Merely asking questions should not be the sign of a good trainer....
||
|| It's the first sign, it should happen before you dole out $$$.

Yeah. It's a technique to make someone who really has no credibility seem
credible. After they've got your $$$, those questions go in the gargage
can.

Not sure what you mean but here is how I do it. Much like when you go to
the Dr, you have a patient sheet that accompanies you into the visit room.
Before he does anyhing, he usually reviews it. It goes where you go. Same
with training. Clipboard, workout, client sheet. Returned at end of
session.

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:31:44 -0600, the Moderator wrote:

"MU" wrote in message
.. .
If not, and if he/she is not getting a recent medical history, dump them.
Mine are more extensive than this, the training interview last at least
one
hour and can often involve spouses, family members, input from physicians,
etc.

snip

Not that I would want a personal trainer, but I would prefer a personal
trainer who was not a control freak.

Then you would get what is out there. Semi-literate cheerleaders for the
most part.

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:31:44 -0600, the Moderator wrote:

"MU" wrote in message
.. .
If not, and if he/she is not getting a recent medical history, dump them.
Mine are more extensive than this, the training interview last at least
one
hour and can often involve spouses, family members, input from physicians,
etc.

snip

Not that I would want a personal trainer, but I would prefer a personal
trainer who was not a control freak.

Then you would get what is out there. Semi-literate cheerleaders for the
most part.

an editor at Random House, one Bob
Loomis, got in contact with him and promised him cooperation from
the CIA with the book. This explains how Posner got access to KGB
turncoat Yuri Nosenko, who was put on a CIA retainer in the late
seventies. At the time of Posner-mania, Alan Houston wrote Mr.

Loomis, who also edited the Posner book. In a reply dated
10/27/93, Loomis revealed much about himself:
I have no doubt that you really believe what you are saying, but
I must tell you that your letter is one of the best indications
I've seen yet as to why the American public has been misled by
ridiculous conspiracy theories.

You have proved nothing insofar as I can see, except for the fact
that you simply can't see the truth of the situation. My feeling
is that it is you and others like you who have perverted the
historical record and, in an inexcusable way, pardoned the
murderer.

Readers of Probe know that Loomis is not a new pal of the CIA. In
our Watergate issue (Vol. 3#2), we wrote about the long,
controversial career of journalist James Phelan, a strong
supporter of the Warren Commission and harsh critic of Jim
Garrison and his "wacky conspiracy theories." Phelan always
strongly denied he was compromised in any way. Even when
confronted with documents showing connections to government
agencies (like the FBI) he still denied it. When Phelan did his
book on Howard Hughes-which completely whitewashed the ties of
the eccentric billionaire to the CIA-that "instant" book was a
top secret p