If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#231
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Doug Freese
writes Sprinters burn solid glycogen while endurance folks like myself that run for 20+ hours burn mostly fat. Endurance folks train their bodies via the long run and speed work to enhance burning fat as opposed to glycogen so you don't bonk. This is really interesting, and I never heard it put just like this before. Any clue about how far you go before you are burning mainly fat, or is that, too, individual? And (dumb question, doubtless) if endurance athletes burn fat, why do they need carbs in order not to bonk in the UK, bonk means you have lots of - er - energy...? Bear with me; I've never been in a club and I only know what Runners' World chooses to tell me. . -- Jane Lumley |
#232
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Doug Freese
writes Sprinters burn solid glycogen while endurance folks like myself that run for 20+ hours burn mostly fat. Endurance folks train their bodies via the long run and speed work to enhance burning fat as opposed to glycogen so you don't bonk. This is really interesting, and I never heard it put just like this before. Any clue about how far you go before you are burning mainly fat, or is that, too, individual? And (dumb question, doubtless) if endurance athletes burn fat, why do they need carbs in order not to bonk in the UK, bonk means you have lots of - er - energy...? Bear with me; I've never been in a club and I only know what Runners' World chooses to tell me. . -- Jane Lumley |
#233
|
|||
|
|||
On 22 Sep 2004 13:59:17 GMT, Ignoramus13667
wrote: As for honey, you could imagine that for obvious reasons, it could not be a mainstay of hunter gatherers' nutrition. i "The social value of honey is incalculable. The bee and honey are to the hunter-gatherer what a large stock and milk are to the herdsman. Even if honey has never constituted more than one-fifth of their diet, it is the substance which binds the total social life of hunter-gatherers together in different ways. It is the gift given at marriage, the pre-eminent element in ritual and a form of social communication through the process of exchange. That is also the reason why certain attempts by people and organizations under the flag to “help”, who start to buy all the honey and market it, is actually the very way to destroy the culture of these people." from http://www.ogiek.org/indepth/in-depth-hunt-gaterer.htm Dunno how you define "a mainstay", but 20% of the diet sounds significant to me. Ellis |
#234
|
|||
|
|||
On 22 Sep 2004 13:59:17 GMT, Ignoramus13667
wrote: As for honey, you could imagine that for obvious reasons, it could not be a mainstay of hunter gatherers' nutrition. i "The social value of honey is incalculable. The bee and honey are to the hunter-gatherer what a large stock and milk are to the herdsman. Even if honey has never constituted more than one-fifth of their diet, it is the substance which binds the total social life of hunter-gatherers together in different ways. It is the gift given at marriage, the pre-eminent element in ritual and a form of social communication through the process of exchange. That is also the reason why certain attempts by people and organizations under the flag to “help”, who start to buy all the honey and market it, is actually the very way to destroy the culture of these people." from http://www.ogiek.org/indepth/in-depth-hunt-gaterer.htm Dunno how you define "a mainstay", but 20% of the diet sounds significant to me. Ellis |
#235
|
|||
|
|||
Jane Lumley wrote in message ...
In article 4IV3d.12439$%42.4412@trndny08, Tony writes The body can also be trained to burn fats better by doing extremely long distance at low intensity. How long? Ultra-type length? And what intensity? People keep blathering about a fat-burning zone between 120 and 140HB, but I imagine you mean something more complex. As Doug stated elsewhere, the body is burning fat and glycogen (and protien at a very slow rate) all the time. As exercise intensity increases the glycogen/fat burning ratio goes up. For each person the scale will be different. Some think that the same amount of fat is being burned even as glycogen is called upon as the intensity goes up. I think that the energy pathway shifts at higher intensities and that the actual fat-burn rate decreases as glycogen is more utilized. For Lance Armstrong, according to his coach, the intensity to train the fat-burning system is about 110 to 120 BPM, on rides of 6 hours+. Like anything else, the more time you practice at something the more the effect. For runners, the long run (2 hours+) will do many things, including enhancing your fat burning potential for endurance exercise, and, if you eat while running, it will train your body to metabolize carbs and utilize them for fuel when exercising, which is a slightly different energy pathway than utilizing muscle glycogen. Most ultra runners do long runs of over 5 hours. What you experienced probably was the muscles getting what they wanted and needed to perform better - and that's why your speed increased. Carbs have also been shown to enhance muscle recovery after exercise. Yes, I hear this too. Never works for me. If anything my muscle ache was worse after a week in NYC in which I ran v long, but had a carby breakfast afterwards. In the same way, I don't benefit from running in Proper Shoes. I'm just odd, I guess. Sigh. And I certainly couldn't run at tempo for six hours . A carby breakfast? What do you have to compare it to? Carbs must be taken in a very pure form immediately after exercise - after 30 mins the window of insulin sensitivity for the muscles is already beginning to close. Also, you shouldn't eat fat or much protien during that window, but high GI carbs. I'm keen to hear more about your TKD programme. I'm not wedded to VERY lowcarbing, Atkins-style, but I AM keen to avoid junk carbs - sugar and white bread, including high-glycemic fruit. I sit at your feet. LoL. If you study the metabolic cycle of exercising, there is a place for some of those 'junk' carbs in your diet, albeit not the fatty ones. As said before, if taken immediately after exercise the body sucks them up and deals with them very well. There isn't as much info out there on the TKD (Targeted Ketogenic Diet). It's origins are in bodybuilding and it seems to have been born out of the CKD (cyclical ketogenic diet). Basically on TKD, you have a maintenance type of diet that you eat all the time, for pure TKDer's, that would probably be low-carb to aim for the ketogenic effect - kicking the body into fat-burning mode where it produces ketones. Then, for exercise, you add more carbs specifically around the exercise session, which can be before, during and after exercise. The type of exercise would dictate the amount of extra carbs you eat for exercise, and when. For me, this means that I always take simple carbs right after exercise to help in recovery and to keep the glycogen stores up. You have to play with the amounts. If I'm bike riding an hour or more, I take a carb sports drink, and I take simple carbs after. For running, I usually just take carbs after. For run's of over about 90 mins I take bottles of sports drink, and for runs over 3 hours I also take gels in addition to sports drink. During my normal diet, I don't aim for ketosis anymore, so I'm not really on TKD, though in some respects my diet appears TKD because it follows the exercise cycle. Normally I just eat more complex carbs instead of simple ones, as I save these for right after exercise when the body likes them best. Here's an article that outlines some of it. You can google for more. http://www.wannabebig.com/article.php?articleid=88 - Tony -- Jane Lumley |
#236
|
|||
|
|||
Jane Lumley wrote in message ...
In article 4IV3d.12439$%42.4412@trndny08, Tony writes The body can also be trained to burn fats better by doing extremely long distance at low intensity. How long? Ultra-type length? And what intensity? People keep blathering about a fat-burning zone between 120 and 140HB, but I imagine you mean something more complex. As Doug stated elsewhere, the body is burning fat and glycogen (and protien at a very slow rate) all the time. As exercise intensity increases the glycogen/fat burning ratio goes up. For each person the scale will be different. Some think that the same amount of fat is being burned even as glycogen is called upon as the intensity goes up. I think that the energy pathway shifts at higher intensities and that the actual fat-burn rate decreases as glycogen is more utilized. For Lance Armstrong, according to his coach, the intensity to train the fat-burning system is about 110 to 120 BPM, on rides of 6 hours+. Like anything else, the more time you practice at something the more the effect. For runners, the long run (2 hours+) will do many things, including enhancing your fat burning potential for endurance exercise, and, if you eat while running, it will train your body to metabolize carbs and utilize them for fuel when exercising, which is a slightly different energy pathway than utilizing muscle glycogen. Most ultra runners do long runs of over 5 hours. What you experienced probably was the muscles getting what they wanted and needed to perform better - and that's why your speed increased. Carbs have also been shown to enhance muscle recovery after exercise. Yes, I hear this too. Never works for me. If anything my muscle ache was worse after a week in NYC in which I ran v long, but had a carby breakfast afterwards. In the same way, I don't benefit from running in Proper Shoes. I'm just odd, I guess. Sigh. And I certainly couldn't run at tempo for six hours . A carby breakfast? What do you have to compare it to? Carbs must be taken in a very pure form immediately after exercise - after 30 mins the window of insulin sensitivity for the muscles is already beginning to close. Also, you shouldn't eat fat or much protien during that window, but high GI carbs. I'm keen to hear more about your TKD programme. I'm not wedded to VERY lowcarbing, Atkins-style, but I AM keen to avoid junk carbs - sugar and white bread, including high-glycemic fruit. I sit at your feet. LoL. If you study the metabolic cycle of exercising, there is a place for some of those 'junk' carbs in your diet, albeit not the fatty ones. As said before, if taken immediately after exercise the body sucks them up and deals with them very well. There isn't as much info out there on the TKD (Targeted Ketogenic Diet). It's origins are in bodybuilding and it seems to have been born out of the CKD (cyclical ketogenic diet). Basically on TKD, you have a maintenance type of diet that you eat all the time, for pure TKDer's, that would probably be low-carb to aim for the ketogenic effect - kicking the body into fat-burning mode where it produces ketones. Then, for exercise, you add more carbs specifically around the exercise session, which can be before, during and after exercise. The type of exercise would dictate the amount of extra carbs you eat for exercise, and when. For me, this means that I always take simple carbs right after exercise to help in recovery and to keep the glycogen stores up. You have to play with the amounts. If I'm bike riding an hour or more, I take a carb sports drink, and I take simple carbs after. For running, I usually just take carbs after. For run's of over about 90 mins I take bottles of sports drink, and for runs over 3 hours I also take gels in addition to sports drink. During my normal diet, I don't aim for ketosis anymore, so I'm not really on TKD, though in some respects my diet appears TKD because it follows the exercise cycle. Normally I just eat more complex carbs instead of simple ones, as I save these for right after exercise when the body likes them best. Here's an article that outlines some of it. You can google for more. http://www.wannabebig.com/article.php?articleid=88 - Tony -- Jane Lumley |
#237
|
|||
|
|||
Jane Lumley wrote in message ...
In article 4IV3d.12439$%42.4412@trndny08, Tony writes The body can also be trained to burn fats better by doing extremely long distance at low intensity. How long? Ultra-type length? And what intensity? People keep blathering about a fat-burning zone between 120 and 140HB, but I imagine you mean something more complex. As Doug stated elsewhere, the body is burning fat and glycogen (and protien at a very slow rate) all the time. As exercise intensity increases the glycogen/fat burning ratio goes up. For each person the scale will be different. Some think that the same amount of fat is being burned even as glycogen is called upon as the intensity goes up. I think that the energy pathway shifts at higher intensities and that the actual fat-burn rate decreases as glycogen is more utilized. For Lance Armstrong, according to his coach, the intensity to train the fat-burning system is about 110 to 120 BPM, on rides of 6 hours+. Like anything else, the more time you practice at something the more the effect. For runners, the long run (2 hours+) will do many things, including enhancing your fat burning potential for endurance exercise, and, if you eat while running, it will train your body to metabolize carbs and utilize them for fuel when exercising, which is a slightly different energy pathway than utilizing muscle glycogen. Most ultra runners do long runs of over 5 hours. What you experienced probably was the muscles getting what they wanted and needed to perform better - and that's why your speed increased. Carbs have also been shown to enhance muscle recovery after exercise. Yes, I hear this too. Never works for me. If anything my muscle ache was worse after a week in NYC in which I ran v long, but had a carby breakfast afterwards. In the same way, I don't benefit from running in Proper Shoes. I'm just odd, I guess. Sigh. And I certainly couldn't run at tempo for six hours . A carby breakfast? What do you have to compare it to? Carbs must be taken in a very pure form immediately after exercise - after 30 mins the window of insulin sensitivity for the muscles is already beginning to close. Also, you shouldn't eat fat or much protien during that window, but high GI carbs. I'm keen to hear more about your TKD programme. I'm not wedded to VERY lowcarbing, Atkins-style, but I AM keen to avoid junk carbs - sugar and white bread, including high-glycemic fruit. I sit at your feet. LoL. If you study the metabolic cycle of exercising, there is a place for some of those 'junk' carbs in your diet, albeit not the fatty ones. As said before, if taken immediately after exercise the body sucks them up and deals with them very well. There isn't as much info out there on the TKD (Targeted Ketogenic Diet). It's origins are in bodybuilding and it seems to have been born out of the CKD (cyclical ketogenic diet). Basically on TKD, you have a maintenance type of diet that you eat all the time, for pure TKDer's, that would probably be low-carb to aim for the ketogenic effect - kicking the body into fat-burning mode where it produces ketones. Then, for exercise, you add more carbs specifically around the exercise session, which can be before, during and after exercise. The type of exercise would dictate the amount of extra carbs you eat for exercise, and when. For me, this means that I always take simple carbs right after exercise to help in recovery and to keep the glycogen stores up. You have to play with the amounts. If I'm bike riding an hour or more, I take a carb sports drink, and I take simple carbs after. For running, I usually just take carbs after. For run's of over about 90 mins I take bottles of sports drink, and for runs over 3 hours I also take gels in addition to sports drink. During my normal diet, I don't aim for ketosis anymore, so I'm not really on TKD, though in some respects my diet appears TKD because it follows the exercise cycle. Normally I just eat more complex carbs instead of simple ones, as I save these for right after exercise when the body likes them best. Here's an article that outlines some of it. You can google for more. http://www.wannabebig.com/article.php?articleid=88 - Tony -- Jane Lumley |
#238
|
|||
|
|||
Jane Lumley wrote in message ...
In article hE%2d.597$Ec4.193@trndny04, Tony writes If you can run a marathon in less than four hours with severely restricted carbs - and feel good at the end - then it would show that you're an individual who can run sustained distances while burning fat almost exclusively as fuel. It would show nothing about what others are capable of doing; only that you're one who can. There are great differences in individual's metabolisms, perhaps related to blood type and/or other variations in body type, perhaps not; but no diet works equally well for all individuals. You know, I'm now wondering if those who can do this are also those who store fat easily and thus develop weight problems in the first place. -- Jane Lumley Interesting question. I think it has alot to do with muscle fibre types as well. Slow twitch muscles would seem to be more adapted to burning fat than faster twitch muslces. - Tony |
#239
|
|||
|
|||
Jane Lumley wrote in message ...
In article hE%2d.597$Ec4.193@trndny04, Tony writes If you can run a marathon in less than four hours with severely restricted carbs - and feel good at the end - then it would show that you're an individual who can run sustained distances while burning fat almost exclusively as fuel. It would show nothing about what others are capable of doing; only that you're one who can. There are great differences in individual's metabolisms, perhaps related to blood type and/or other variations in body type, perhaps not; but no diet works equally well for all individuals. You know, I'm now wondering if those who can do this are also those who store fat easily and thus develop weight problems in the first place. -- Jane Lumley Interesting question. I think it has alot to do with muscle fibre types as well. Slow twitch muscles would seem to be more adapted to burning fat than faster twitch muslces. - Tony |
#240
|
|||
|
|||
Ignoramus13667 wrote:
Well, if you assume that we have not morphed into something entirely different during the last million years (or even 100,000 years), then, please, note that breads, pastas, and generally grains were not available 100,000 years ago in any measurable quantity, pre-agriculture. But what about fresh fruits and vegetables, just for starters. Dot -- "So many people get stuck in the routine of life that their dreams waste away. This is about living the dream." - Cave Dog |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low carb and endurance running -- results of my experiment | Phil M. | General Discussion | 449 | September 29th, 2004 05:45 AM |
Low Carb for Endurance Sports | OverTheHill | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 31 | June 10th, 2004 07:52 PM |
Low carb diets | General Discussion | 249 | January 8th, 2004 11:15 PM | |
Low carb diets | Weightwatchers | 245 | January 8th, 2004 11:15 PM | |
Low carb diet made me feel awful | [email protected] | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 20 | December 31st, 2003 05:38 PM |