If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Body for Life Week 6
MSN BFL is a better place to post since they will say, 'Hang in there!' or
'Very good!'. They are fluff with no substance. You seem like all the rest, jump into BFL and you bought all the advertising BS they put out. As far as results, you get what you deserve. -g "Wendy" wrote in message ... Ignoramus6463 wrote: Wendy, you are doing something wrong with your WOE or WOL, you sound very disturbed and ****ed all the time. I agree with you that I've been crabby lately. It doesn't have to do with my WOE or my exercise routine other than that I'm stuck on a project and keep blowing it off to go exercise or get on usenet. My life has many dimensions and one of them isn't going well right now. In a related note, my financial life just sucks right now. The big home improvement project I did this summer overran by about $3,000. That's not very much on in the big scheme of things, but it has been a huge blow to my daily operating budget in the slow time of my business. I've had to give up minor things (my best friend and I were going to go into Boston today to do museums and shop) and I've had to give up major things (my husband and I just can't afford to go on a cruise next April.) Reexamine your life carefully. Take back your personal time etc, drop some projects or put them on hold. Do more things you like. Don't I just wish. Maybe some food is missing from your diet that you need. No doubt. What comes to mind immediately is chocolate, ice cream, bagels with cream cheese, lasagna, pizza... I gave those things up to lose fat. I've lost fat and gained flab. So sue me if I'm not delighted. How would YOU feel if you worked out five times this week and gained 3 pounds without noticeably going off your WOE? Wendy |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Body for Life Week 6
"Wendy" wrote in message ... Ignoramus6463 wrote: Wendy, you are doing something wrong with your WOE or WOL, you sound very disturbed and ****ed all the time. I agree with you that I've been crabby lately. It doesn't have to do with my WOE or my exercise routine other than that I'm stuck on a project and keep blowing it off to go exercise or get on usenet. My life has many dimensions and one of them isn't going well right now. In a related note, my financial life just sucks right now. The big home improvement project I did this summer overran by about $3,000. That's not very much on in the big scheme of things, but it has been a huge blow to my daily operating budget in the slow time of my business. I've had to give up minor things (my best friend and I were going to go into Boston today to do museums and shop) and I've had to give up major things (my husband and I just can't afford to go on a cruise next April.) Reexamine your life carefully. Take back your personal time etc, drop some projects or put them on hold. Do more things you like. Don't I just wish. Maybe some food is missing from your diet that you need. No doubt. What comes to mind immediately is chocolate, ice cream, bagels with cream cheese, lasagna, pizza... I gave those things up to lose fat. I've lost fat and gained flab. So sue me if I'm not delighted. How would YOU feel if you worked out five times this week and gained 3 pounds without noticeably going off your WOE? Wendy I'd check my calendar and see how close to my time-of-the-month (TOM) it is. I usually gain 3 or 4 pounds in the days before my period comes no matter how "good" I am with my diet! Tonia (yeah, I'm back too) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Body for Life Week 6
Geoff wrote:
You seem like all the rest, jump into BFL and you bought all the advertising BS they put out. As far as results, you get what you deserve. I have no idea what you're talking about. What BS have I bought? And what do you mean by "jump into BFL?" I'm on my fourth formal "challenge", i.e., 12 week period where I re-examine my goals and recommit to the routine. I enjoy the periodization of my goals and the framework the challenge provides. For a year now I've been eating small portions of balanced diets low on the glycemic index. I've been doing aerobic exercises 3x a week and weightlifting for about 45 minutes a day 3x a week. Yes, I think I got what I deserve: I've lost 50 pounds. Geoff, you are so seriously ****ed off about not being able to do the math about body fat percentages that you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Exercising and eating small portions of quality foods throughout the day is NOT some BS scam. In fact, I can't think of anything that works better. Can you? Wendy |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Body for Life Week 6
I have no idea what you're talking about. What BS have I bought?
If I told you that I have a complete plan where you can lose 50 lbs. of fat and gain 10 lbs. of muscle in 3 months, you would probably want to see something to support that claim like most people. When you accept a program like that without seeing anything to support the claim, then you are accepting the marketing BS. When you accept that program and the data actually shows the opposite, then it is big time marketing BS. And what do you mean by "jump into BFL?" Doing bfl without knowing the facts of the program. Geoff, you are so seriously ****ed off about not being able to do the math about body fat percentages that you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Exercising and eating small portions of quality foods throughout the day is NOT some BS scam. Don't bust my chops because MM failed to support their bfl claims. If you don't like the message then tell eas to start printing some facts to support their claims. I have a *BIG NEWS FLASH* for you, exercising and eating small portions of quality food was not invented by eas or BP. -g "Wendy" wrote in message ... Geoff wrote: You seem like all the rest, jump into BFL and you bought all the advertising BS they put out. As far as results, you get what you deserve. I have no idea what you're talking about. What BS have I bought? And what do you mean by "jump into BFL?" I'm on my fourth formal "challenge", i.e., 12 week period where I re-examine my goals and recommit to the routine. I enjoy the periodization of my goals and the framework the challenge provides. For a year now I've been eating small portions of balanced diets low on the glycemic index. I've been doing aerobic exercises 3x a week and weightlifting for about 45 minutes a day 3x a week. Yes, I think I got what I deserve: I've lost 50 pounds. Geoff, you are so seriously ****ed off about not being able to do the math about body fat percentages that you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Exercising and eating small portions of quality foods throughout the day is NOT some BS scam. In fact, I can't think of anything that works better. Can you? Wendy |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Body for Life Week 6
Geoff wrote:
I have no idea what you're talking about. What BS have I bought? If I told you that I have a complete plan where you can lose 50 lbs. of fat and gain 10 lbs. of muscle in 3 months, you would probably want to see something to support that claim like most people. BFL doesn't claim that. It said, "if you eat less and exercise more and keep it up then you can get a better body." Yes, I bought it. But there were no specific claims of what I ought to expect. In fact, it very clearly says to form your own goals. When you accept a program like that without seeing anything to support the claim, then you are accepting the marketing BS. When you accept that program and the data actually shows the opposite, then it is big time marketing BS. Accept a program? I really don't understand what you mean by that. I am choosing to format my eating and exercising along the lines suggested in the book. At first I decided to try it for 12 weeks to see if it fit me. When it did I just kept it up... not as an accolyte believing a religion, but because the format works for me. You've seen my data. I've been tracking my weight and measurements and body fat nearly weekly for 56 weeks at www.bFLtracker.com under the profile "Dally". At first I gained muscle and lost fat. After about six months I started to lose LBM along with fat, but not quite as much LBM as fat. Overall I'm down around 6 pounds of LBM in the year and about 44 pounds of fat. But for a while there I was up 10 pounds of LBM and down 25 pounds of fat. (All numbers come from memory, I might be off and I believe I'm rounding a bit, too, since you're so picky.) But this corresponds perfectly to what we know about "newbie" gains. For a few months MOST people can gain muscle while losing fat. Then they stop being able to do that. Then they have to either being bulking (i.e., gaining fat & muscle) or cutting (i.e., losing fat & muscle.) When my newbie gains expired I started cutting. In other words, my actual results are a moving target that depend on many factors, among which are when you start measuring (I'd already been losing for a while when I started logging weekly) and what period you look at. If you look at the OVERALL LBM gains (gross, not net) then you see I truly put on muscle, even if I subsequently lost some of it (along with some other non-muscle LBM like skin and connective tissue supporting the fat and maybe some blood vessels.) And what do you mean by "jump into BFL?" Doing bfl without knowing the facts of the program. Well, I've read the book by that title (twice), seen two videos on it and get "Energy" magazine published by EAS that describes it... I've also tried it (for a YEAR now). I think I know the facts of the program. I also think that you do NOT know the facts because you keep blathering on about false claims that I've never even heard them make. Don't bust my chops because MM failed to support their bfl claims. If you don't like the message then tell eas to start printing some facts to support their claims. I have a *BIG NEWS FLASH* for you, exercising and eating small portions of quality food was not invented by eas or BP. Geoff, get over it! Each person's "claims" are individual in nature, not some corporate conspiracy. While you're busy berating people for believing that it works, I'm busy doing it and SEEING it work. And YES, I know that this wasn't invented by EAS. That's partly why I don't understand why you think it's such a load of bull****. It's basic human mechanics. Of COURSE it works. BTW, I've never bought anything from EAS. I'm actually NOT proud of that - I really appreciate all the great value-added stuff they do, including the website support, free consultants (which I've never used) and the contest itself. I buy Myoplex Lite from a discount retailer online, but only because I appreciate the taste and like using a MRP in my diet. Bicker has one everyday and some other people mentioned liking them, too. It's not because I think Myoplex is the cure for obesity! I don't get your hostility. I really, really don't. -- Wendy |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Body for Life Week 6
I don't get your hostility. I really, really don't.
LOL, hostility, never mind then, sounds like you got it all together. -g "Wendy" wrote in message ... Geoff wrote: I have no idea what you're talking about. What BS have I bought? If I told you that I have a complete plan where you can lose 50 lbs. of fat and gain 10 lbs. of muscle in 3 months, you would probably want to see something to support that claim like most people. BFL doesn't claim that. It said, "if you eat less and exercise more and keep it up then you can get a better body." Yes, I bought it. But there were no specific claims of what I ought to expect. In fact, it very clearly says to form your own goals. When you accept a program like that without seeing anything to support the claim, then you are accepting the marketing BS. When you accept that program and the data actually shows the opposite, then it is big time marketing BS. Accept a program? I really don't understand what you mean by that. I am choosing to format my eating and exercising along the lines suggested in the book. At first I decided to try it for 12 weeks to see if it fit me. When it did I just kept it up... not as an accolyte believing a religion, but because the format works for me. You've seen my data. I've been tracking my weight and measurements and body fat nearly weekly for 56 weeks at www.bFLtracker.com under the profile "Dally". At first I gained muscle and lost fat. After about six months I started to lose LBM along with fat, but not quite as much LBM as fat. Overall I'm down around 6 pounds of LBM in the year and about 44 pounds of fat. But for a while there I was up 10 pounds of LBM and down 25 pounds of fat. (All numbers come from memory, I might be off and I believe I'm rounding a bit, too, since you're so picky.) But this corresponds perfectly to what we know about "newbie" gains. For a few months MOST people can gain muscle while losing fat. Then they stop being able to do that. Then they have to either being bulking (i.e., gaining fat & muscle) or cutting (i.e., losing fat & muscle.) When my newbie gains expired I started cutting. In other words, my actual results are a moving target that depend on many factors, among which are when you start measuring (I'd already been losing for a while when I started logging weekly) and what period you look at. If you look at the OVERALL LBM gains (gross, not net) then you see I truly put on muscle, even if I subsequently lost some of it (along with some other non-muscle LBM like skin and connective tissue supporting the fat and maybe some blood vessels.) And what do you mean by "jump into BFL?" Doing bfl without knowing the facts of the program. Well, I've read the book by that title (twice), seen two videos on it and get "Energy" magazine published by EAS that describes it... I've also tried it (for a YEAR now). I think I know the facts of the program. I also think that you do NOT know the facts because you keep blathering on about false claims that I've never even heard them make. Don't bust my chops because MM failed to support their bfl claims. If you don't like the message then tell eas to start printing some facts to support their claims. I have a *BIG NEWS FLASH* for you, exercising and eating small portions of quality food was not invented by eas or BP. Geoff, get over it! Each person's "claims" are individual in nature, not some corporate conspiracy. While you're busy berating people for believing that it works, I'm busy doing it and SEEING it work. And YES, I know that this wasn't invented by EAS. That's partly why I don't understand why you think it's such a load of bull****. It's basic human mechanics. Of COURSE it works. BTW, I've never bought anything from EAS. I'm actually NOT proud of that - I really appreciate all the great value-added stuff they do, including the website support, free consultants (which I've never used) and the contest itself. I buy Myoplex Lite from a discount retailer online, but only because I appreciate the taste and like using a MRP in my diet. Bicker has one everyday and some other people mentioned liking them, too. It's not because I think Myoplex is the cure for obesity! I don't get your hostility. I really, really don't. -- Wendy |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Body for Life Week 6
Yes, I bought it. But there
were no specific claims of what I ought to expect. In fact, it very clearly says to form your own goals. No, it doesn't, it says, 'build your best better ever in just 12 weeks'. Accept a program? I really don't understand what you mean by that. Is it really that tough to understand it? If someoneone does a program then it is fair to say they have accepted it. You've seen my data. Their marketing says, build your best body ever in just 12 weeks. It doesn't sound like that happened. Well, I've read the book by that title (twice), seen two videos on it So have I. Geoff, get over it! Each person's "claims" are individual in nature Must be a hard concept to understand but when MM writes articles that say, 'I lost 30 lbs. of fat and gained 10 lbs. of muscle' but the beginning and ending stats do not show that, what is there to get over? MM messed up, I didn't write the articles nor did I run the marketing for bfl. While you're busy berating people for believing that it works, I'm busy doing it and SEEING it work. Berate is to scold or condemn at length. I am not scolding or condemning you. However, when you post a message that says, you lost LBM, that is what happened to other people also. So, why did all those people lose LBM on the program but you say you gained overall. You must be the exception. The people who say they gained lbm is anecdotal at best. Even in the discovery health challenge where each person was supervised by a doctor and had a personal trainer, and given an eating plan, they still lost lbm except for the guy who lost weight very slowly, 2 to 1 pound per week and he only gained 2 pounds of muscle over the 16 week program. The program was like bfl, 40/40/20, with alternating aerobic and anaerobic exercise and I was really surprised when their stats showed they did not gain lbm except the one guy. You remind me of a story a business professor told about a guy who invested money in mutual funds and after x number of years he said it grew to $400,000 and bragged to everyone. See how well I did? The professor pointed out that if he did his homework then he would have made $4 million in the same amount of time. I know you will say, what the hell does that mean or have to do with this discussion? Since, this seems very difficult for you to understand, I will explain it. The same principle applies, do your homework, when someone chooses bfl, it is implied that they did not do their homework because the real data does not support the results the finishers got. Most people like to see the results and data that supports the results. not some corporate conspiracy. Stop busting my chops for eas' mistakes. Talk to them if you don't like the message. -g "Wendy" wrote in message ... Geoff wrote: I have no idea what you're talking about. What BS have I bought? If I told you that I have a complete plan where you can lose 50 lbs. of fat and gain 10 lbs. of muscle in 3 months, you would probably want to see something to support that claim like most people. BFL doesn't claim that. It said, "if you eat less and exercise more and keep it up then you can get a better body." Yes, I bought it. But there were no specific claims of what I ought to expect. In fact, it very clearly says to form your own goals. When you accept a program like that without seeing anything to support the claim, then you are accepting the marketing BS. When you accept that program and the data actually shows the opposite, then it is big time marketing BS. Accept a program? I really don't understand what you mean by that. I am choosing to format my eating and exercising along the lines suggested in the book. At first I decided to try it for 12 weeks to see if it fit me. When it did I just kept it up... not as an accolyte believing a religion, but because the format works for me. You've seen my data. I've been tracking my weight and measurements and body fat nearly weekly for 56 weeks at www.bFLtracker.com under the profile "Dally". At first I gained muscle and lost fat. After about six months I started to lose LBM along with fat, but not quite as much LBM as fat. Overall I'm down around 6 pounds of LBM in the year and about 44 pounds of fat. But for a while there I was up 10 pounds of LBM and down 25 pounds of fat. (All numbers come from memory, I might be off and I believe I'm rounding a bit, too, since you're so picky.) But this corresponds perfectly to what we know about "newbie" gains. For a few months MOST people can gain muscle while losing fat. Then they stop being able to do that. Then they have to either being bulking (i.e., gaining fat & muscle) or cutting (i.e., losing fat & muscle.) When my newbie gains expired I started cutting. In other words, my actual results are a moving target that depend on many factors, among which are when you start measuring (I'd already been losing for a while when I started logging weekly) and what period you look at. If you look at the OVERALL LBM gains (gross, not net) then you see I truly put on muscle, even if I subsequently lost some of it (along with some other non-muscle LBM like skin and connective tissue supporting the fat and maybe some blood vessels.) And what do you mean by "jump into BFL?" Doing bfl without knowing the facts of the program. Well, I've read the book by that title (twice), seen two videos on it and get "Energy" magazine published by EAS that describes it... I've also tried it (for a YEAR now). I think I know the facts of the program. I also think that you do NOT know the facts because you keep blathering on about false claims that I've never even heard them make. Don't bust my chops because MM failed to support their bfl claims. If you don't like the message then tell eas to start printing some facts to support their claims. I have a *BIG NEWS FLASH* for you, exercising and eating small portions of quality food was not invented by eas or BP. Geoff, get over it! Each person's "claims" are individual in nature, not some corporate conspiracy. While you're busy berating people for believing that it works, I'm busy doing it and SEEING it work. And YES, I know that this wasn't invented by EAS. That's partly why I don't understand why you think it's such a load of bull****. It's basic human mechanics. Of COURSE it works. BTW, I've never bought anything from EAS. I'm actually NOT proud of that - I really appreciate all the great value-added stuff they do, including the website support, free consultants (which I've never used) and the contest itself. I buy Myoplex Lite from a discount retailer online, but only because I appreciate the taste and like using a MRP in my diet. Bicker has one everyday and some other people mentioned liking them, too. It's not because I think Myoplex is the cure for obesity! I don't get your hostility. I really, really don't. -- Wendy |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Body for Life Week 6
Geoff wrote:
Their marketing says, build your best body ever in just 12 weeks. It doesn't sound like that happened. It was the best change in 12 weeks that I've ever experienced. It took me a dozen years to get out of shape and I guess I didn't really expect to have my best body ever in 12 weeks. But someone else could have! Geoff, get over it! Each person's "claims" are individual in nature Must be a hard concept to understand but when MM writes articles that say, 'I lost 30 lbs. of fat and gained 10 lbs. of muscle' but the beginning and ending stats do not show that, what is there to get over? MM messed up, I didn't write the articles nor did I run the marketing for bfl. I believe that MM could have messed up. I rarely see a print article without some mistake. I don't have to think corporate conspiracy when I see one. But I also believe that the cherry-picked stats could have come from some period in the middle but not reflect the entire spectrum of experience: as when I pointed out that I had gained 10 pounds of muscle and lost 25 pounds of fat. That was true for only a moment in time: after that I started losing some of the pounds of muscle along with the fat. Now I've lost about 6 pounds of LBM and 44 pounds of fat. But if I were doing marketing I'd certainly use the shorter-period/better-result figure to crow about. You remind me of a story a business professor told about a guy who invested money in mutual funds and after x number of years he said it grew to $400,000 and bragged to everyone. See how well I did? The professor pointed out that if he did his homework then he would have made $4 million in the same amount of time. I know you will say, what the hell does that mean or have to do with this discussion? Since, this seems very difficult for you to understand, I will explain it. The same principle applies, do your homework, when someone chooses bfl, it is implied that they did not do their homework because the real data does not support the results the finishers got. Actually, your story means that there is a better way to get the results that I could use if I just knew what it was. (Alternatively, it means that hindsight is 20/20 - a useless criticism of someone's investment performance, but I don't think that's what you meant.) Let's see: I'm eating frequent small meals of balanced carb/protein low on the glycemic index with some healthy fats (in reasonable calorie levels) and I'm exercising 6x a week, 3 days cardio, 3 days weight-lifting... where's the flaw in my program? What will result in a more permanent fat loss and a better body? What alternative is better than BFL? Most people like to see the results and data that supports the results. You're falling into the trap of thinking that most people think like you do. But if you INSIST on seeing results that other people got doing Body for Life, there are countless examples. www. BFLtracker.com is filled with people's weekly logs with stats. Mine your own data and judge for yourself. But I still think you're over-thinking this. In the end, though, the correct way to determine if it works is to try it. Have you ever done a 12 week challenge where you followed the program? What were your results? BTW, I'm just back from buying a pair of size 16 jeans and a smaller belt. I got tired of cinching up my size 18 jeans. When I began BFL I was wearing a tight size 22. -- Wendy |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Body for Life Week 6
I believe that MM could have messed up. I rarely see a print article
without some mistake. I think the thread has gone as far as it can go. One correction tho, it is not one article or one person. It is every article in many different issues. I think I saw only one person where the data supported the claims. It is not a corporate conspiracy, it is sloppiness. Just like with the pictures of Randy Penberthy, they show the ending pictures of each of his challenges, then in a different article, web page, or the bfl journal book, suddenly his ending picture for challenge 3 is now the ending picture for challenge 2. So much money has been dumped into the marketing of bfl, the question is, why the sloppiness? I don't know the answer. But I also believe that the cherry-picked stats could have come from some period in the middle but not reflect the entire spectrum of experience It is not what the articles said. They said here are the stats before I started and here are the stats after I finished. that hindsight is 20/20 It was not a hindsight discussion, it was how to evaluate mutual funds at the time of purchase by looking at 15 years of data. The choices were pretty obvious. The person who bought the fund that had the lower return looked at 5 years of data. You're falling into the trap of thinking that most people think like you do. But if you INSIST on seeing results . . . I thought bfl insisted on measuring progress . . . weekly pictures, bf testing, etc. -g "Wendy" wrote in message ... Geoff wrote: Their marketing says, build your best body ever in just 12 weeks. It doesn't sound like that happened. It was the best change in 12 weeks that I've ever experienced. It took me a dozen years to get out of shape and I guess I didn't really expect to have my best body ever in 12 weeks. But someone else could have! Geoff, get over it! Each person's "claims" are individual in nature Must be a hard concept to understand but when MM writes articles that say, 'I lost 30 lbs. of fat and gained 10 lbs. of muscle' but the beginning and ending stats do not show that, what is there to get over? MM messed up, I didn't write the articles nor did I run the marketing for bfl. I believe that MM could have messed up. I rarely see a print article without some mistake. I don't have to think corporate conspiracy when I see one. But I also believe that the cherry-picked stats could have come from some period in the middle but not reflect the entire spectrum of experience: as when I pointed out that I had gained 10 pounds of muscle and lost 25 pounds of fat. That was true for only a moment in time: after that I started losing some of the pounds of muscle along with the fat. Now I've lost about 6 pounds of LBM and 44 pounds of fat. But if I were doing marketing I'd certainly use the shorter-period/better-result figure to crow about. You remind me of a story a business professor told about a guy who invested money in mutual funds and after x number of years he said it grew to $400,000 and bragged to everyone. See how well I did? The professor pointed out that if he did his homework then he would have made $4 million in the same amount of time. I know you will say, what the hell does that mean or have to do with this discussion? Since, this seems very difficult for you to understand, I will explain it. The same principle applies, do your homework, when someone chooses bfl, it is implied that they did not do their homework because the real data does not support the results the finishers got. Actually, your story means that there is a better way to get the results that I could use if I just knew what it was. (Alternatively, it means that hindsight is 20/20 - a useless criticism of someone's investment performance, but I don't think that's what you meant.) Let's see: I'm eating frequent small meals of balanced carb/protein low on the glycemic index with some healthy fats (in reasonable calorie levels) and I'm exercising 6x a week, 3 days cardio, 3 days weight-lifting... where's the flaw in my program? What will result in a more permanent fat loss and a better body? What alternative is better than BFL? Most people like to see the results and data that supports the results. You're falling into the trap of thinking that most people think like you do. But if you INSIST on seeing results that other people got doing Body for Life, there are countless examples. www. BFLtracker.com is filled with people's weekly logs with stats. Mine your own data and judge for yourself. But I still think you're over-thinking this. In the end, though, the correct way to determine if it works is to try it. Have you ever done a 12 week challenge where you followed the program? What were your results? BTW, I'm just back from buying a pair of size 16 jeans and a smaller belt. I got tired of cinching up my size 18 jeans. When I began BFL I was wearing a tight size 22. -- Wendy |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No weight loss this week. | Jarkat2002 | General Discussion | 14 | October 9th, 2003 02:55 AM |
Rope climbing -- good whole body workout | Cox SMTP east | General Discussion | 10 | October 1st, 2003 10:21 PM |
Body For Life Week 4 | Wendy | General Discussion | 8 | September 28th, 2003 04:01 AM |
took the week off... | determined | General Discussion | 10 | September 27th, 2003 03:01 PM |
? on juicing | Todd A. | General Discussion | 7 | September 26th, 2003 10:47 PM |