If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
??? Question for the ladies...
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 09:41:39 -0700, Dawn Taylor
wrote: I've always found Tom Cruise to be a vey watchable actor -- even more so as he gets older -- but he's never been fantasy material for me. Ditto Brad Pitt ... I just never got his supposed appeal. On the other hand, my tummy does flip-flops over Alan Rickman. Let me get this straight. You think Rickman.. http://freespace.virgin.net/sc.i/Claire.htm Is better looking than Cruise and/or Pitt? Like I said, you have absolutely no taste in men. Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
??? Question for the ladies...
In article ,
Harvest Mu_n wrote: On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 09:41:39 -0700, Dawn Taylor wrote: I've always found Tom Cruise to be a vey watchable actor -- even more so as he gets older -- but he's never been fantasy material for me. Ditto Brad Pitt ... I just never got his supposed appeal. On the other hand, my tummy does flip-flops over Alan Rickman. Let me get this straight. You think Rickman.. http://freespace.virgin.net/sc.i/Claire.htm Is better looking than Cruise and/or Pitt? Like I said, you have absolutely no taste in men. Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long. Eh, men are more visually stimulated than women, in general. In general, I said. Attractiveness isn't all about looks, and for most women it's less about looks than it is for most men. -- -Michelle Levin (Luna) http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick http://www.mindspring.com/~designbyluna |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
??? Question for the ladies...
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 18:11:29 GMT, Luna
wrote: Eh, men are more visually stimulated than women, in general. In general, I said. I would agree. Attractiveness isn't all about looks, and for most women it's less about looks than it is for most men. So you think Rickman is better looking than Brad Pitt too? Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
??? Question for the ladies...
Dawn Taylor wrote:
On the other hand, my tummy does flip-flops over Alan Rickman. "Harvest Mu_n" wrote: Let me get this straight. You think Rickman.. Is better looking than Cruise and/or Pitt? He's not better looking in the sense of being more classically handsome, but he's more interesting to watch than either of them. Let's face it, he made the horrible Professor Snape (from the Harry Potter books) into a very sexy man indeed when it came to the films. A man who launched 100,000 fanfics. Most of them bad. -- Lexin www.redrosepress.co.uk www.livejournal.com/~lexin LC since 9 June 2003 (300/262/182) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
??? Question for the ladies...
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:37:04 +0100, "Lexin"
wrote: Let me get this straight. You think Rickman.. Is better looking than Cruise and/or Pitt? He's not better looking in the sense of being more classically handsome, but he's more interesting to watch than either of them. More interesting than http://posterwild.com/postwld/topic_...-1820-wld.html Hell, Frankenstein was "interesting to watch: too. Is he better looking than Pitt? Let's face it, he made the horrible Professor Snape (from the Harry Potter books) into a very sexy man indeed when it came to the films. A man who launched 100,000 fanfics. Most of them bad. Rickman is a fine actor. I like him. He's no match for Pitt or Cruise when it comes to good looks unless you are looking at their reflections in a circus mirror. Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
??? Question for the ladies...
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:37:04 +0100, "Lexin"
announced in front of God and everybody: Dawn Taylor wrote: On the other hand, my tummy does flip-flops over Alan Rickman. "Harvest Mu_n" wrote: Let me get this straight. You think Rickman.. Is better looking than Cruise and/or Pitt? He's not better looking in the sense of being more classically handsome, but he's more interesting to watch than either of them. Let's face it, he made the horrible Professor Snape (from the Harry Potter books) into a very sexy man indeed when it came to the films. A man who launched 100,000 fanfics. Most of them bad. Yep. I couldn't say that he's "better looking" -- but I think he's far, far sexier. Those eyes. That voice. That talent. Double-yum. The actors that I find sexy tend to _not_ be the pretty cover boys. They're interesting, smart men with big personalities, men that I can imagine having fun with both in and out of the sack. Hell, not just actors. That's what I've always lusted after in real-life men, too. Dawn -- REVIEW: "Under the Tuscan Sun" http://www.portlandtribune.com/archview.cgi?id=20507 DAILY DOSE OF HUMDRUM: http://www.livejournal.com/users/dtaylor |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
??? Question for the ladies...
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:18:04 -0500, "Curious by nature"
wrote: ARNOLD ARNOLD ARNOLD says it all. What it says about California voters is boundless. Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
??? Question for the ladies...
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:18:04 -0500, "Curious by nature"
announced in front of God and everybody: ARNOLD ARNOLD ARNOLD says it all. "Harvest Mu_n" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:37:04 +0100, "Lexin" wrote: Let me get this straight. You think Rickman.. Is better looking than Cruise and/or Pitt? He's not better looking in the sense of being more classically handsome, but he's more interesting to watch than either of them. More interesting than http://posterwild.com/postwld/topic_...Vampire-0307-2 412-1820-wld.html To me? Hell, yes. I hated that stupid movie. Dawn -- REVIEW: "Under the Tuscan Sun" http://www.portlandtribune.com/archview.cgi?id=20507 DAILY DOSE OF HUMDRUM: http://www.livejournal.com/users/dtaylor |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
??? Question for the ladies...
ARNOLD ARNOLD ARNOLD says it all.
"Harvest Mu_n" wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:37:04 +0100, "Lexin" wrote: Let me get this straight. You think Rickman.. Is better looking than Cruise and/or Pitt? He's not better looking in the sense of being more classically handsome, but he's more interesting to watch than either of them. More interesting than http://posterwild.com/postwld/topic_...Vampire-0307-2 412-1820-wld.html Hell, Frankenstein was "interesting to watch: too. Is he better looking than Pitt? Let's face it, he made the horrible Professor Snape (from the Harry Potter books) into a very sexy man indeed when it came to the films. A man who launched 100,000 fanfics. Most of them bad. Rickman is a fine actor. I like him. He's no match for Pitt or Cruise when it comes to good looks unless you are looking at their reflections in a circus mirror. Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about Pepsi Max... | Fred | General Discussion | 4 | April 4th, 2004 09:36 AM |
One More FoodSaver Question | Saffire | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 9 | October 17th, 2003 03:30 PM |
??? Question for the ladies... | JP | General Discussion | 28 | October 10th, 2003 03:24 AM |
Question about Ketosis and response time | M Dymott | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 1 | September 29th, 2003 07:20 PM |
Exercise !Question.. again.. sorry all. | krtyrrell | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 8 | September 23rd, 2003 04:19 AM |