A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

1st week update



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 29th, 2004, 01:03 AM
Chris Braun
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 1st week update

Way to go, Elly! It sounds like you're getting off to a great start!

Chris
262/143/ (145-150)
  #12  
Old July 29th, 2004, 01:03 AM
Chris Braun
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 1st week update

Way to go, Elly! It sounds like you're getting off to a great start!

Chris
262/143/ (145-150)
  #13  
Old July 29th, 2004, 12:48 PM
jmk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 1st week update

On 7/28/2004 4:17 PM, Ignoramus5882 wrote:
Elly wrote:
*
* "jmk" ha scritto nel messaggio
* ...
* That's great, even though it does not make it "balanced".
*
* Out of curiousity, what would you consider balanced? On what basis did
* you determine this? Why would this be applicable to everyone and not
* vary from individual to individual?
*
*
* --
* jmk in NC
*
* I know jmk asked Ignoramus, I just wanted to explain why my GP/nutritionist
* and I call this diet approach "balanced" - because it means that, although
* the approach is low carb, I didn't give up fruit, whole wheat pasta, black
* rice, black bread, etc. (while for many low carb approaches those a no-no).

Here's the standard definition of balanced diet.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/e...cle/002449.htm

According to this definition, it includes all foods and follows the
standard food pyramid. Surely, no one can follow it 100%, but a large
deviation from it makes the diet "unbalaned" according to that
definition. Which is to say, Ihave nothing against it.

i


I thought that you were opposed to the food pyramid, ig? Do you follow
it? I thought that you were on a pretty low carb, high fat diet, has
that changed recently?

--
jmk in NC
  #14  
Old July 29th, 2004, 02:37 PM
Elly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 1st week update


"Ignoramus5882" ha scritto nel messaggio
. ..
Here's the standard definition of balanced diet.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/e...cle/002449.htm

According to this definition, it includes all foods and follows the
standard food pyramid. Surely, no one can follow it 100%, but a large
deviation from it makes the diet "unbalaned" according to that
definition. Which is to say, Ihave nothing against it.

i


This may well work for some, but not for me. The food pyramid just isn't
working for me; I tried that, and ended up yo-yoing. That's one of the
reasons my GP/nutritionist came up with this eating plan for me.

Another thing: I don't really believe that one diet can be "balanced" for
everybody - I think what makes the diet "balanced" for a certain person has
a lot to do with the person's age, health status, life style, etc. Certainly
I can't follow the same diet as someone in his 20ies and going to the gym
every day with no hypothyroid issues; or someone is his 50ies with sedentary
lifestyle and heart issues probably wouldn't feel ok following "my" diet
regime. I just don't believe that there is a "balanced diet" for everybody.

As for me - as long as I don't give up anything or decide to give up
something but make a healthy substitution (i.e., switching from ordinary
pasta to whole wheat pasta) and eat in moderation - when I'm hungry and not
after I feel full... it seems to work. And adding exercise to this - it
works much better :-)

Elly


  #15  
Old July 29th, 2004, 02:39 PM
jmk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 1st week update

On 7/29/2004 9:31 AM, Ignoramus2121 wrote:
In article , jmk wrote:

On 7/28/2004 4:17 PM, Ignoramus5882 wrote:

Elly wrote:
*
* "jmk" ha scritto nel messaggio
* ...
* That's great, even though it does not make it "balanced".
*
* Out of curiousity, what would you consider balanced? On what basis did
* you determine this? Why would this be applicable to everyone and not
* vary from individual to individual?
*
*
* --
* jmk in NC
*
* I know jmk asked Ignoramus, I just wanted to explain why my GP/nutritionist
* and I call this diet approach "balanced" - because it means that, although
* the approach is low carb, I didn't give up fruit, whole wheat pasta, black
* rice, black bread, etc. (while for many low carb approaches those a no-no).

Here's the standard definition of balanced diet.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/e...cle/002449.htm

According to this definition, it includes all foods and follows the
standard food pyramid. Surely, no one can follow it 100%, but a large
deviation from it makes the diet "unbalaned" according to that
definition. Which is to say, Ihave nothing against it.

i


I thought that you were opposed to the food pyramid, ig? Do you follow
it? I thought that you were on a pretty low carb, high fat diet, has
that changed recently?



I am not opposed to the food pyramid, as such, I think that it is
suitable for some people and not suitable for others.


Not suitable for you but suitable for the OP, I presume based on your
asserttion above?

Yes, I eat about 50% of calories from fat, and about
25% from carbs, although it changes day to day. I still have a public
fitday journal, which I sometimes use and sometimes (most of the time)
do not.

The definition of a balanced diet that is generally accepted is linked
to the food pyramid. I don't think that getting 12% of calories from
carbs qualifies as a balanced diet according to the official and
generally accepted definition.


Neither does getting 50% of your cals from fat when the definition of
balanced that you provide states under 30% of cals for fat. Neitehr
does getting 25% of your cals from carbs when the definition of balanced
that you provide states 60% of cals from carbs. If you do not follow
this advice why are you doling it out to others?



--
jmk in NC
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WNM week 12 / SUB week 3 - Laura Laura Weightwatchers 5 June 20th, 2004 02:28 AM
WNM week 10 / SUB week 1 - Laura Laura Weightwatchers 13 June 15th, 2004 01:07 PM
Up a bit this week. Kate Dicey Weightwatchers 18 April 29th, 2004 05:33 AM
NYNY Update - Joyce Joyce Weightwatchers 38 December 27th, 2003 09:17 AM
NYNY Update - Joyce Joyce Weightwatchers 18 December 17th, 2003 03:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.