Where you CAN'T find Sweet-n-Low....

"Aurora" wrote in message
om...

Saccharin is one of the most disgusting, foul, nasty *ss tastes I've ever
subjected my poor body to.

Can you saccharin people please tell me WHY anyone still would use it,
when there are numerous zero-calorie alternatives available that taste way
better?


Because we don't have the same reaction you do.
I don't think it tastes foul.
It doesn't give me any problems.
I think it's fine.
bj

"bj" wrote in message ...
"Aurora" wrote in message
om...

Saccharin is one of the most disgusting, foul, nasty *ss tastes I've ever
subjected my poor body to.

Can you saccharin people please tell me WHY anyone still would use it,
when there are numerous zero-calorie alternatives available that taste way
better?


Because we don't have the same reaction you do.
I don't think it tastes foul.
It doesn't give me any problems.
I think it's fine.
bj


For me, works best when combined with other sweeteners! Actually, I
hate the Splenda taste in beverages! (Just the packet form, the others
are nice.)

Aurora,
Taste is not an absolute, it is a matter of taste
just because YOU don't like it doesn't mean others don't.



Aurora wrote:

aspartame saccharin.

sucralose saccharin

Saccharin is one of the most disgusting, foul, nasty *ss tastes I've
ever subjected my poor body to. To me it tastes kind of this chemical
flavor that does not register correctly on the taste buds... but some
confuse this enigma flavor for a "sweet" taste. In addition to the
chemical aka "sweet" taste, there is that HORRIBLE bitter / salty
aftertaste. I would rather do without sweets if saccharin were my only
choice.

My sister actually likes that pink crap BETTER than blue or even
yellow. Can you saccharin people please tell me WHY anyone still would
use it, when there are numerous zero-calorie alternatives available
that taste way better? Don't tell me you actually think saccharin
tastes better than aspartame, or *gasp* sucralose? How can this be?
The yellow packets are a god send for me. They taste almost exactly
like sugar, plus I love the color & logo .

(Pat McGroin) wrote in message . com...

I just saw a TV commercial for Sweet-n-Low, in which they show aliens
on another planet using their product. During said commercial, they
claim "Sweet-n-Low is EVERYWHERE!" I'm here to tell you it's NOT.

I think there should be a web site where people can add the name and
information nationwide about public establishments wherein you CANNOT
flavor your iced tea with a "pink one."

In Tucson Arizona there is a WONDERFUL sandwich place called Beyond
Bread. Absolutely the BEST sandwiches you've ever had. My wife LOVES
the place, and wants me to take her there all the time. I love their
sandwiches, but actually tell her, "Let's go someplace else. Remember,
honey, they don't have Sweet-n-Low there." She usually ends up winning
(those sandwiches are REALLY good) but I almost always put up a fight.

If nine people think it's worthy, I'll create the web site....

Best regards,
Pat

--
"...in addition to being foreign territory the past is, as history, a
hall of mirrors that reflect the needs of souls observing from the present"
Glen Cook

Sweet’N Low is made from sugar.
Sweet’N Low Granulated Sugar Substitute – Packets

Ingredients:
Nutritive Dextrose, 3.6%


http://www.sweetnlow.com/packets/index.html

Uh, Marshall, learn to READ, it is NOT sugar, it is saccharine

Marshall wrote:

Sweet’N Low is made from sugar.
Sweet’N Low Granulated Sugar Substitute – Packets

Ingredients:
Nutritive Dextrose, 3.6%


http://www.sweetnlow.com/packets/index.html


--
"...in addition to being foreign territory the past is, as history, a
hall of mirrors that reflect the needs of souls observing from the present"
Glen Cook

It is both.

Ted Rosenberg wrote:
Uh, Marshall, learn to READ, it is NOT sugar, it is saccharine

Marshall wrote:

Sweet’N Low is made from sugar.
Sweet’N Low Granulated Sugar Substitute – Packets

Ingredients:
Nutritive Dextrose, 3.6%


http://www.sweetnlow.com/packets/index.html



--
Wes Groleau

Even if you do learn to speak correct English,
whom are you going to speak it to?
-- Clarence Darrow

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 12:58:45 -0400, Steve
wrote:

http://www.fda.gov/ora/fiars/ora_import_ia4506.html

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:05:08 -0400, Steve
wrote:

Simm Webb wrote:

I am not sure that I speak for myself alone, but the stevia issue has been
around for at least 8 years, and no one has been able to show any value of this
stuff for a diabetic.

I wasn't suggesting it for diabetics in particular. 8 year old
nutrition might not be accurate IMHO

and yet you want us to place credence in your claim that it has been
used by indians for centuries?

http://www.fda.gov/ora/fiars/ora_import_ia4506.html


Why don't you leave the diabetics alone, and quit trying
to shove your spam at us.

One more time. I am not selling a product.

Get over yourself.


Steve
http://www.geocities.com/beforewisdom/

"The great American thought trap: It is not real unless it can be seen
on television or bought in a shopping mall"